USA: Diocese of Lexington praises Hermit who reveals she mutilated herself

Editor’s Note: Since it is a blasphemy to the living God to deny one’s own femininity by mutilating one’s self, it is also a most grave sacrilege and work of the demonic to consecrate the body by vows thus mutilated. The Diocese of Lexington must repudiate this witch or it will be in de facto schism from the Catholic Church.

Cardinal Burke: “The Rebellion against God … has reached an unimaginable level”

Editor’s Note: This was a great Commencement speech. But I would remind the Cardinal that to affirm in public repeatedly for 8 years that “there is no canonical solution” to a man who claims the papacy falsely, is also to be part of the rebellion against God. — I refuted the Cardinal’s position here, on the juridical grounds of his claim. — As far as I know, he has known of this argument for 6 months and has not publicly refuted it. But I am not at all certain he has seen the refutation in detail.

NETHERLANDS to get Zionist, pro-Sodomite, anti-Immigration Government

Editor’s Note: Geert Wilders has taken his mask off. What he means by protecting the Netherlands from Islamic immigration, means that he will protect Netherlands as the pro-Bilerberg Cultural Marxist force in Europe.

Since the 16th century the Netherlands has promoted the attack on Christendom and the moral degredations found in the Talmud, with its concepts of usury, free sex and multiple economic forms of exploitation, from perpetual race slavery to drug and arms running. Wilders represent no fundamental change from that downward course.

Vatican Conference on Phenomena, lumps Our Lady’s apparitions with UFO sightings

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction française

It is more obvious than ever, that Pope Francis’ intent is the utter ideologically destruction of the Catholic Religion and all that is sacred in it. This is just another news story which adds to the guilt of all Catholics who could do something to remove him from office, but do nothing.

Those who read FromRome.Info know well that the UFO narrative is 100% a U. S. Military psyop to explain away their secret technology programs and undermine the faith of Christians in the Creator, who according to Scripture, created all things for His honor and glory, though the salvation of men. Thus, there is no possibility whatsoever of life outside of Earth or intelligent corporeal life other than human beings.

Catholics also know that authentic apparitions represent God’s intervention into history and are an essential part of the Catholic religion, with those recorded in Scripture as part of public revelation for our edification and the direction of all in all times and places and future generations, and those not recorded in scripture after the death of the Apostles, which are do not add anything more upon our Holy Catholic Faith but which are for the instruction and direction of Catholics individually or collectively, according to times and places, ages and generations.

A true intervention of God obliges those who receive it gravely, such that they would be considered apostates in the sight of God if they denied what they saw. But this pertains only to supernatural interventions (such as those which are visible or audible, or intelligible, whether in exteriorly (in the sensible world) or interiorly (in the soul) to the person. Devout Catholics often have imaginary visions in their minds or visions in dreams which represent nothing from God but are merely nature’s way of overflowing the mind with things most beloved by it. These represent no divine intervention and impose no obligation, and should not be heeded with any concern. Discerning between true divine interventions by God, the Saints or Angels from false ones, takes great training in mystical theology and human psychology and sometimes also in medicine. And the more grave and serious and important the Divine Message, the more God will confirm that it is truly from Him with miracles and signs which cannot be reasonably denied by anyone.

Thus, the psychopaths and sociopaths such as those who govern the Vatican right now are wholly unqualified to make any determination or rule in such matter. And Catholics should pay them no heed, other than to lump ridicule back upon them.

Pentecost Sunday: The 25th is God’s Favorite Number

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

As I mentioned in my last article regarding the dates of Christ’s Conception, Birth, Death and Ascension, Our Lady’s most ancient feast Day is the 15th of August, and it must also be the one She favors the most, because Our Lord Ascended to Heaven on May 15, 33 A. D., the same day of the month.

But God also has a favorite day, and it is the 25th of the Month.

Because since Christ returned to the Father’s House on May 15th, on His Ascension, that means that God the Holy Spirit, Who descended 10 days later, came down to Earth for the first time, to dwell with men, openly, on May 25th, 33 A. D..

But Christ our Lord was conceived by the Holy Ghost on March 25th, 2 B. C., and born on Dec. 25, 2 B. C..

So the 25th, as a number of a day, connects not only the coming into the world of God the Son but also the coming into this world of God the Holy Spirit. And since it is God the Father Who gives us His Son and His Holy Spirit, the 25th is also God the Father’s favorite day to bless those who remain faithful to Him, as He promised of old to do.

This year Pentecost falls on May 19th, but it will fall on the 25th in the years 2066, 2075 and 2088 A. D..

Perhaps the Holy Ghost also chose the 25th for another reason. Because, as we see from the Book of the Apocalypse, there are 24 elders who throw down their crowns in Heaven, to worship God, with the 12 Prophets and Patriarchs of the Old Testament, there were numbered the 12 faithful Apostles of the New Testament gathered around the Blessed Virgin on Pentecost Day. Or again, all gathered around the Lamb of God in Heaven. And both enumerations makes 25.

Eric Sammons says he won’t call for Pope Francis to be deposed until there is a way to do it

Editor’s Note: If you have increasing doubts about the sincerity of Catholic media owners such as Eric Sammons, you might be justified, since in this long article where he explains why he did not sign the recent statement calling for Pope Francis to resign or be deposed, he actually closes by saying, that until a proper way is known how to do it, Catholics should not call for it. Even though the way to do it has been extensively discussed and explained for several years at and other Catholic websites which spoke about the first provincial council of Sutri in 1046 A. D..

At Crisis Magazine’s website, they list an address where you can contact Eric Sammons:

Maybe one of my readers would get a response. I know I would not.

You might share with him the following links.

How to depose a Pope

A real Petition to depose the Pope

How 3 Popes were deposed in 1046 A. D., with approval of St. Peter Damian, Doctor of the Church, Pope Saint Gregory VII, who was present, and Bl. Pope Victor III.


Pope Francis denies he allowed “Gay Blessings”

Editor’s Note: When the evidence in court would convince even the most sleepy and tolerant judges and jurors of your guilt, there is nothing left than to claim that the evidence means something else. So if there is anyone in the Catholic World left, who thinks that Pope Francis did not knowingly and pertinaciously affirm that sodomite couples could be blessed, he has only to listen to this interview by Pope Francis. — The facts, however, prove this, since all the translations other than the English say “union” not “couple”, though it means the same thing, since if you bless two persons involved in a common sin together, howsoever you twist or use language, you are blessing both the couple and the union and the two persons all at once. The real intention cannot abstract from one or more of these aspects.


USA: CDC admits killing 1.2 Million during Covid Scam

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The MSM, ever intent on lying and covering up the facts, sometimes in desperation admits the truth, in passing. Such is the case the other day in this report regarding the remarks made by Harrison Butker, a well known American Football player, at the commencement (graduation) celebration of a Catholic Benedictine College.

In the course of attempting to throw mud at Butker, the CBS article admits that 1.2 million died from Covid-19. But since it has now been scientifically and forensically demonstrated by many experts that there does not exist any pathogen known as SarsCov2, and that the protocols pushed by the Center for Disease Control were not only all wrong, but all lethal and death inducing, it can be reasonably inferred from this admission, that the CDC killed every one of these patients or at least falsely labeled their deaths by such means under the rubric of Covid-19.

This is important, because there has been a debate about just how many have been killed during the Scamdemic. And thus, this admission that 1.2 million died leads inexorably to the conclusion that a lot more died than that.


This is because in the U.S.A., only those who died from other causes than the DeathVaxx were labeled as such. When they died from the DeathVaxx, it was excused away as a sudden death or other complication.

While Butker’s mind is still totally under the delusion that Covid-19 was a real thing and that people like the founder of Opus Dei were saints — even though he denied Christ’s teaching that the evangelical counsels are for the inspiration and formation of all Christians — he did a very able job in disrupting if not destroying the accepted modernist and marxist control narratives of our age.

Meanwhile, the National Football League, which is controlled by Sabbatean Jews (nearly all the owners of the individual teams are godless Jews), has pulled the woman’s version of the official NFL Jersey for Butker from their online store, to protest not only what Butker said as a Catholic, but to prevent fans from showing their support and agreement with what he said. His jersey was their top selling item. And this last shows that the NFL’s owners are more concerned with narrative control and anti-catholic bigotry, than even with profits. Something which is both vile and astounding, at the same time.

For the full text of Butker’s speech ….

Vatican Document on Apparitions violates Apostolic authority of Local Bishops

Editor’s Note: It is obvious, as I have written six months ago, that a Pope who signs a heretical document has impeded the Apostolic See and therefore loses all moral authority to issue any other documents or make any decisions. Rather, all Catholics are gravely obliged to oppose him and seek his removal form office. FromRome.Info has been the only Catholic journal to call for this and remain consistent, publishing a petition to this effect more than 6 months ago.

Thus, I consider the new document’s attempted power grab from Bishops completely without any legal effect, as anyone who intentionally blasphemes the Name of God by associating it with the approval of sodomy has lost all moral authority in the Church, even before he be juridically condemned.

For the Catholic Church from time immemorial has regarded each local Catholic bishop has having the infallible charism to determine the veracity and authenticity of supernatural phenomenon in his diocese. Any since this is from Apostolic Tradition, included in the mandate of every bishop, according to the intention of the Apostles, to oversee and rule each diocese, it follows that not even the Pope can overturn it or withdraw it.

This is not the first attack on Apostolic Tradition by Pope Francis. As soon as his antipapacy began, when he claimed to be pope while Pope Benedict XVI still lived, having never abdicated, he attacked the Apostolic Tradition on Capital Punishment. Then, the Apostolic Tradition on excluding impenitent public sinners from the Sacraments of the living: Baptism, Eucharist, Confirmation and Matrimony. Then he attacked the Apostolic Tradition of regarding Our Lady as living Saint; Christ as being Divine; Scripture as being inerrant and accurate; and Blessings as being God’s approval reserved only for the penitent and virtuous and faithful.

So his apostasy is not merely a claim by writers who disagree with him. It is a program for his entire “pontificate”

But, now, due to the lack of action of nearly the entire Catholic media sphere, to call for this in any effective way, I think it is no exaggeration to say, that every other news outlet, saving OMC Radio TV, and allies which have always joined FromRome.Info in the above initiative, is clearly not only NOT part of the opposition to the diabolic globalist takeover of the Church, nor only part of the those grifting on the issues to appear in opposition, but have either lost their faith completely, or are in the very grips of Satan’s power, since they are totally inert and ineffective to help Holy Mother Church and remove the cause of the crisis.

May God reprove these false shepherds and false leaders. And may Catholics everywhere wake up and begin to reprove their erring superiors. — And may YouTubers like Taylor Marshall stop calling these fake opposition grifters “leaders” in the Church – an attribution which is not only false but presupposes a heretical notion of hierarchy.

And if anyone thinks this new “document” about apparitions has any good intentions behind it, read this, wherein, just days before the Vatican cast doubt, by that document, on all those apparitions of Our Lady calling for repentance and prayer,  it is claimed to be “injurious” to accuse the satanic serial rapist Father Rupnick of being a practitioner of “false mysticism”.

Though I am not endorsing the first article above, in its entirety, I think the lead title of it is correct. For when a mind turns entirely away from God and makes evil its good and lies its truth, it must by all means create a litany of excuses or a rule of conscience against listening to God’s Voice again, by whatsoever means it may come. And this is the very essence of a spirit of apostasy.  Yes, Pope Francis is the False Prophet, and all who collaborate with him in this evil are workers of iniquity. The Catholic World must rise up against them!

Every province in the Church can convene a provincial council and condemn him. If the  Bishops of the Roman Province issue any statement approving of his heresies and attack on Apostolic Tradition, then they to must be held co-responsible in his crimes and can be condemned by any provincial councils world wide.

The longer Cardinals and Bishops neglect their pauline duty to rebuke Pope Francis to his face in Council and to discern and declare at the juridical level, his errors as heresy and apostasy, the more they will seal the decree of their own eternal damnation, which God has issued from eternity against all false shepherds.

Faithful Catholics know they must pray AND act. Our prayers should be for the repentance and conversion of these men in their godless ways of inaction and error. Our action should include requests that they call provincial councils to rebuke and condemn Pope Francis.  Every one of us has this duty, and this duty is NOT fulfilled by reading FromRome.Info and then doing nothing.

I have done only a very little to actually work for these ends. But I fear that unless I say so, others who might agree with me, may come to think that they will not be condemned for having nothing nothing more.

No, we all stand liable for this apostasy by our lack of doing more. Those with the means, talents and reputations to do more, most of all.

GOOGLE introduces 3D Mapping tool to train Drone Warriors

Editor’s Note: This new facile interface to Google map data adds an entirely new video like experience to using maps, which some persons find difficult to comprehend because of their symbolic two dimensional format. However, this new technology, in that it gives an areal view of terrain, seems to have no other utile function than to be of use to those piloting drones, because in every day life, no one ever sees where he lives from the air. Does Google really think that all our cars will be flying by 2030? — Rather, as has been seen in the recent unjust genocidal wars against Ukraine, Armenia and Gaza, drone warfare is the next worst thing coming round the corner of history. And Google Inc. is prepared to meet the challenge (sarcasm).

Tactics of Manipulation used by Modernists against Catholics

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo


I do not claim to be an expert. I am sure that there are many Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, Deacons, Religious and Laymen who have better knowledge of such things than myself. But in my nearly 30 years of personal experience in Ecclesiastical institutions or as a religious/hermit, I have noticed some patterns of deception and manipulation, which I believe in conscience I am obliged to name, explicate, so that Catholic Faithful at Rome and around the world might take guard against them.

“Manipulation”, in the dark sense of the word, is a way of misleading, maneuvering, deforming, altering, etc., the mind, actions or even words or reactions of another, to serve one’s own goals.  When the victim is a faithful Catholic and the perpetrator is a modernist, you have a very evil and wicked malice at work.  Yet, to those who know anything of the history of the Church during the last 100 years or more, the Modernists have honed to perfection many methods of manipulating Catholics to serve their own abominable conspiracy to overthrow the true Church of Christ, from within, using the very institutions and offices of the Church, established by Christ and by ecclesiastical tradition, against Her.

Having studied Cultural Anthropology at the University of Florida, I was trained in the methods of participant observation, which is a way of learning about a subculture’s mores, rules, ethics, behaviors, by sharing or keeping company with them.  I never consciously used this method, but now, after many years of fighting against Modernists, I will take a moment to step back and analyze and categorize some of the methods of manipulation I have seen or learned first hand against faithful clergy, religious and laity.

 The Church, being the perfect society founded by the Incarnate Word of God, enjoys an order of society which enables Her to achieve the end which God have Her, the honor and glory of God through the worship of God and the salvation of Souls.  This being the case, the Modernists, who believe in no God, but only in the god of personal sentiments, thus have an upward battle if they are to use the very things of the Church to overthrow the Church from within.

Alas, however, since many modernists have been members of the clergy, and this throughout the last 180 years or so, they have had the ability to use all the forms of clerical and moral corruption, known beforehand, to their end.  They have also had the assistance of the general moral degradation which has been promoted by the Free Masons in the West (and not only in the West), which has led many a Catholic to be disposed to be easily deceived about what constitutes Christian virtue and ecclesiological justice and honesty.

In former ages, we read of the heroic and saintly Bishops who did not hesitate to threaten unfaithful Catholics, Kings, Dukes, Princes, Mayors, Scholars, even the Pope, with excommunication if they did not stop from their pubic sins or injustices.  There are cases, where immoral bishops, were taken outside of the town walls and hung from a tree by the Catholic faithful, to rid the local church of their vile depravities.  There are cases where laymen shot corrupt priests dead for the crimes they perpetrated against children or families.

In the modern age, with all our institutions of civil and ecclesiastical justice, we are apt to look down upon the Catholics of former ages, who understood that in some cases, waiting for lengthy procedures would only endanger the public good the more. They understood that after some point, the depravity of a man could be such that he merited no longer the customary due process accorded to the merely suspected of a crime. They also understood that obedience to an evil command did not absolve from the sin of collaboration or participation in the evil commanded.  Former ages enjoyed a sense of personal honor and manliness that is rarely admired and even more rarely tolerated in modern times.  Indeed, corrupt and evil men have all kinds of words to lambast such honorable men.

The decline of morals in the West did not begin with the Age of the Enlightenment, yet, Rationalists of that age started a trend which has been greatly exploited by Modernists (even though Modernists are sentimentalists not rationalists): that trend is the use of deprecatory language to subvert the sentiments of Catholics away from admiration of virtue, especially away from admiration of heroic virtue.

You can see that effect palpably in the common and vulgar opinions some men, even clergymen, have of the Saints of old.  The most striking example I know of personally, is the comment made by a priest, now deceased, who remarked to me one day, after he read a very short life of Saint Francis of Assisi, that if anyone did such penances today, he should certainly be locked up in a mental asylum. To which I replied, with not a little shock, “Do you mean that just today, or is Saint Francis any less suspect for having done them long ago”. He replied that he was no less suspect, and added, “I have great difficulty understanding why such a man was ever made a saint”.  (This priest, by the way, died of being too overweight by about 200 pounds.)

 Ah, what has happened to that age of chivalry and honesty, where even a sloucher or glutton admitted that the diligent and abstemious man was virtuous? Is modern man so ignorant, as to not understand, that it is one thing to be virtuous, another to admire virtue; and that if you are not at least the first kind of man, that you can at least save your honor by being the second?

God forbid, however — as the Modernists think and consider the matter — that there even exist in the Church the second kind of man, the man who actually admires the heroic virtue of the Saints of old!

And here we have the first tactic in the tool box of manipulations, used by Modernists:

1. Denigrate what is best, and make it the enemy of all the rest.

You see, if the Modernists are to prevail in the Church, they must put into practice some of the general tactics of the fallen angels, because the Church, being principally a spiritual society, Her strength lies principally in spiritual things.  Now there is nothing more principally spiritual in a believer than his virtue, and the prince of all virtue is the virtue to the heroic degree.  Consequently, to shut out all possibility of this most spiritual enemy of Modernism, the first and prime spiritual goal is to ostracize and exile heroic virtue.  And this is done chiefly by denigration.

Denigration of what is best is the first tactic to employ, because when the best is no longer seen as the best, the soul and the society no longer strives to reach the proper goal by the only methods which can attain that goal. Giving up the only tools to arrive at that goal, one guarantees in the very first instance, that the Catholic side of the battle will not and will never win; and that the battle will continue interminably, without victory for the Catholic party.

This denigration has gone on for many generations now: Rationalists did this by debunking the lives of the Saints, debunking the authenticity and authority and veracity of Scripture; by debunking the normalcy and authority of Tradition; by debunking the sanity of heroic virtue, by recourse to modern false sciences of psychology and psychiatry as the “true” authorities on human behavior.  This could not be done without despising and denigrating Scholastic Theology and Philosophy.

The result of such a campaign of denigration, is a Catechism of Denigration, induction to which is common place in Catholic Seminaries today, throughout the whole world; and especially so in the Pontifical Universities at Rome, where the majority of professors believe education means debunking every historical, theological, moral, ethical, religious, liturgical ideal which a seminarian might bring with him to Rome.

Simultaneous, to this work of denigration, is the work of substitution.  After railing against the ideals which the Church has from Christ, the Apostles or from the Holy Spirit in the Saints, it is necessary but easy to suggest and laud the ideals and criteria which prevail in modern times, and this, in the name of being “acceptable”, “up to date”, “normal”, “middle of the road”, etc.. Thus to virtue, we have sound & healthy psychology; to faith in scripture, the critical historical method of rationalistic interpretation; to Christian charity, social justice work; to preaching, neutralizing rhetorics; to worship of God, worship of self or of man; to Tradition, the modernist reading of Vatican II (holding that it is obligatory and dogmatic just like, nay, better than Vatican I) etc..

2. Identify and root out the “non-compliant”, “intransigent”, “rigorists”, those who take the Faith “too seriously”.

The work of denigration provides the best context for the second method or tool of manipulation: identifying those who have such virtue as to resist or oppose the denigration of the best. Social cohesion and the insistence that one not be divisive, not jeopardize approval of superiors who hold the keys to the formation process, are powerful emotional threats used to cajole acquiescence to the program of denigration.  If this fails, then one moves easily to accusing the resistant of being “rigorists”, “ideologues”, “intransigent”, simply because they resist the process of denigration.  Few, in such an emotionally charged atmosphere as the Seminary or Pontifical University where denigration has replaced formation and information, have the spiritual balance to notice that it is precisely in this personal attack of those who resist, that there becomes manifest the actual ideals of the denigrators; ideals which are contrary or opposite of those which Catholics should hold. Many, beholden to a “follow the group”, “don’t rock the boat” ethic, easily succumb to such an attack; those who don’t, thus, are then easily isolated and separated from the group, when the attacks move from opposing ideals of the Faith, to denigrating those who show loyalty to them.  With all the filters Modernists now have in society and in ecclesiastical institutions today, it will be few vocations who show such fortitude and resistance; it is thus easy then to divide them from the group and from others in the group who would give moral support.

This separation is a necessary part of the re-education program of the Modernists.  Insistence on attending certain Pontifical Universities is a sure sign that re-education is the goal.  It is not that re-education is the necessity, but a seminarian or religious has to be very knowledgeable and virtuous beforehand, to survive without being scathed.  Such a man is a rare breed today, though.

One effective tool in this work of weeding out the virtuous, is the system of falsification of formation and formators.  In seminaries the Modernists most capable of appearing Catholics and most knowledgeable in how to flip a Catholic to a Modernist, or at least to a complaint do-nothing, are placed in the roles of Confessors, Spiritual Directors, and Vocation Directors, Rectors, or other formators.  This is important so that not only the gate-keepers but the counselors of the victims conscience are compromised, so that if he seeks help and guidance, he is guaranteed to get  advice that will do him in; either by advising compliance, silence, or excesses which will guarantee expulsion or exclusion, or serving as pretexts for such.  Indeed, a common tactic, is to propose friendship and sympathy for the victim, with the condition that he compromise in something, which will only prologue his ordeal and wear down his resistance.

These two tactics, Denigration and Identification/Segregation regard individuals. Now, let us consider the cases of groups.

3. Disfavor initiatives aimed at promoting the Faith in a non-compromised manner

In regard to groups, Modernists employ distinct but similar tactics.  In the age following the diffusion of the errors of voluntarism and totalitarianism, many a person has come to accept in principle that obedience to a superior is never wrong, even when a superior commands to be done that which is wrong !  A whole host of excuses is given, but to the group which is poorly formed in the Faith and enmeshed in the errors of the present age, the power of the accusation of disobedience to a superior’s commands or disfavor in regard to superior’s wishes is never to be discounted. How many holy initiatives, works of the Holy Spirit’s suggestions, have come to naught since Vatican II simply because someone whispered, “The Bishop won’t like that”, or “the current Pope does not favor that”, etc..!

Mind you, the Catholic Faith aims to please God alone; when a superior’s wishes diverge from what God has revealed to be pleasing to Himself, either in Scripture, or throughout the course of the ages in the Saints’ and their works, then the faithful should have the common sense to ignore his wishes, no? You’d think so; but, alas, this sense of integrity is rare today.  Only when Catholics by long years of good works come to understand the profound connection between them and the  Faith which comes from Christ, do they have any interior conviction to question such an evil suggestion as, “the Bishop won’t like that” holy proposal.

The errors of voluntarism and totalitarianism have become so widespread, that many Catholics no longer hold their pastors or Bishops’ to be their shepherds, they now consider them to be their “heads” and “hearts” proper! Content with the satisfaction of their daily lives and common pleasures, and rarely prepared by modern culture to have a sense of personal dignity which is founded in loyalty to Christ first and foremost, few initiatives, even holy initiatives, of Catholics, whether laymen or clergy or religious, withstand a concerted or long process of Modernist manipulation tactics.  The fortitude is simply lacking; the clarity of judgement too poor; the heroic virtue, not something they have every prayed the Lord to give them.

4. Accuse of Disobedience, especially after unreasonable or unlawful requests

Accusations of disobedience are a grave matter, since the Code of Canon Law especially identifies these as a grounds for imposing censures or penalties.  Most Catholics, when accused, do not have the clarity of mind or knowledge of the faith to distinguish a just command which should be obeyed, from an unjust or unreasonable one which should not or could be ignored.  The mere stigma of not doing what a superior has commanded, is so strong in modern times (despite the false exaltation of liberty) that nearly no group escapes from such an accusation.  What results is disintegration, internal divisions, which render the group non-effective in its holy proposals, or so divided, as to dissolve; in any event, the mere accusation when leveled is sufficient to guarantee that a group be exterminated from the life of the Church, if the Bishop should so wish, or even, to obtain complete acquiescence to the Modernist agenda in the Church as the penance necessary to remove the stigma.  This is why a reasonable or just request, refused, need not be the basis of the accusation.

Now let me adjoin some commentary on the so-called negotiations which have been required of Catholic groups since the Council, which have “dared” to resist the Modernist reformulation of the Faith.

5. Require negotiations for reconciliation

I have always wondered just why some groups are required “to be reconciled” so as to obtain favor or approval from superiors, where it is rather the superiors who have been known for years, decades, even their entirely priestly lives, for deviations from the Faith or right ecclesiastic practices.

The reason may be, that the opportunities to be had from negotiating the reconciliation of such groups provides a powerful social-psychological force for demanding and obtaining compliance.  Social-psychology is the study of how groups behave and interact in such wise as to influence the behavior of individuals and individuals of groups. The mere announcement of an offer of reconciliation makes the imposition of the requirement of negotiations all the more noteworthy, the object of much emotion and speculations.  The hope that persecution and justice will be granted, is combined with the natural desire of the victim to exit the suffering imposed so unjustly.  It is a powerful magnetic force, therefore, to propose to the abused a negotiation with the abuser to stop the abuse.  It also sets up the context where any discussion of the injustice or abuse appears not to be useful to obtain the needed reconciliation.

For this reason, I ask, just why is it that some groups, and not all groups or all Catholics, are required to accept by written signature the legitimacy, authority, or doctrines of the Second Vatican Council?  If the Fathers of the Council had the liberty to choose to sign or not to sign, and if the  Council did not in any anathema or canon obliged its acceptance or the acceptance of any of its pastoral proposals, why is it then that such written acceptance is required?

I believe the reason is, that such a written document, can serve very ably in coercing and guaranteeing compliance, and in shutting off the ways of escaping from further abuse, when the malice or perfidy of one party might later become evident.  After all, that is the reason for every peace treaty between disputants, is it not, to guarantee compliance of the weaker party?

Thus, if the Modernists simply falsely accuse their opponents of refusing Vatican II, being schismatics, or in danger of schism, as has frequently and recently been done by some Bishops, it becomes very easy to propose reconciliation as a condition for being pardoned of the false charges.

In truth, Catholics need not compromise, reconcile or negotiate with Modernists; they need only to refuse false obedience and false acceptance when and wherever it is offered. Rather, it is Catholics who should preach and demand repentance of the Modernists, their resignations and their removal from office, howsoever high it be.


Just hours after the publication of this Article, Pope Francis directed AB Parolin, his Secretary of State, to publish a Rescript in which he claims the right, in Art. 5, thereof, to depose any bishop for any reason after a fraternal dialogue.

Cf. http:// / content / salastampa / it / bollettino / pubblico / 2014 / 11 / 05 / 0821 / 01739.html

To use the link, simply remove the spaces before and after the / symbols.

SLOVAKIA: Attempted assassination of Prime Minister Robert Fico

Editor’s note: As we learned during the Scamdemic, the Globalists insist on having leaders they want, and when they do not get them, they assassinate the ones they do not want. Fico has been PM for nearly 10 years, and heads the Marxist ruling party, which is of course, pro-Soviet Union.

Robert Fico, who has always been a Communist / Marxist, was born in Slovakia on the Feast of Our Lady of Sorrows, in 1964. He is not to be confused with Roberto Fico, the Italian Parliamentarian.

His attacker, Juraj Cintula is a writer, activist and “anti-violence” activist. He is 71 years old and seems to have used a short-barreled fire arm. He is a rabid pro-Russian militant, who apparently was tasked to infiltrate the peace movement in Slovakia and push more radical reactions in that nation.

News and Commentary on the Catholic Church