Marks of the Beast: Solidarity in Dissent

By Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I have previously written an extensive description of how the horrible sin of pride is the hallmark of wicked men in the Church since the time of Vatican II, in my article on The Downfall of Luciferian Pride.

Today, I want to focus on one of the outstanding characteristics of the unfaithful who are members of the Church of the Antichrist, though they may not realize it or admit it. I want to do this because it is very easy to fall into the camp of Lucifer without realizing it, because, as I said in the previous article, the vice and sins of pride, being the most evil, are the hardest to discern and recognize, because they are full of the deprivation of the being that should be in an act of virtue. And that makes them spiritually invisible, except to the very humble who desire to glory solely in the Divine Majesty of God.

Ann Barnhardt’s Righteous Indignation

I am continually impressed by the righteous indignation of many devout Catholics on social media. Righteous indignation is the sense of disgust and anger which rises in the heart of someone who loves God and puts God first, and this kind of indignation is expressed solely because the rights of God are being transgressed.

As you may know, in recent years, months and weeks certain clergy, religious and laymen, who insist Bergoglio is the pope, because they refuse to doubt for a moment that Cardinals and Bishops are infallible, have begun to fault Our Lord Jesus Christ, in His promises to Peter, the teaching of Vatican I on Papal Authority and Infallibility, and the credulity of the Saints in regard to the Roman Pontiff’s authority and magisterium.

A recent example is the declaration of the Hermits of Westray, Scotland. Who know well what the arguments for Benedict still being the pope are, but refuse to harken to them, because they prefer to deny the indefectibility of the Catholic Church or the infallibility of the Roman Pontiff which they cannot reconcile with their more cherished “belief” that Bergoglio is the Pope.

One of the more shocking and sustained attacks came recently from Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, in his blog post entitled, How Francis may be vindicating the “inopportunists” of the First Vatican Council, published by Lifesite News, run by the Campaign for Life Coalition, a political organization out of Toronto, Canada, whose editor is a Mr. John-Henry Westen, co-founder of Lifesite and of the Voice of the Family Coalition, one of the leading “Bergoglio is certainly the pope” politicians-journalists.

Ann Barnhardt rightly unloaded a cartload of righteous indignation on Dr. Kwasniewski’s attempt to undermine the infallible teaching of Vatican I, in her recent post, entitled, Hey! Here’s a wacky idea. Instead of assuming that God is incompetent and Vatican I and the declaration of the infallible dogma of Papal Infallibility was all a big mistake…

I will quote the key passage, which I want to focus on, as a preamble to a discussion of the Marks of the Beast.  Ann Barnhardt, addressing the problem many Catholics are having, from Cardinal Burke down to the last man in the pew, to understand how a man like Bergoglio could be the pope, says decisively:

Maybe if people would attack this controversy from the base assumption that GOD ALMIGHTY is THE PERFECT ONE as manifested in His Spotless and Indefectible Bride the Church, in His Angels, and in His Saints, and that THEY THEMSELVES are deeply fallible and so very capable of error, INSTEAD OF THE EXACT OPPOSITE,  there might be a bit more clarity of thought round about.

(Bold Face in the original)

What Ann Barnhardt is addressing is PRIDE. And a particularly diabolic kind of pride, which holds that the unholy fallible trinity of “I, me, and myself,” knows better than the Holy Infallible Trinity of God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

No use talking about modern errors, if you embrace them without so much as a wink of the eye

What is so ironic about her observation is that it is valid against a good number of popular writers and speakers and YouTube personalities, who either ascribe to or have been leading members of the so-called “Traditional Movement” in the Catholic Church since the time of the Second Vatican Council. A group which has made it a point and raison d’entre to fault the errors of modernity.

These errors consist in Modernism, Neo-Modernism, Relativism, Individualism, Secularism, Humanism, Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Liberalism, Progressivism, Hedonism…  Have I left any out? Probably.

However, when it comes to the controversy of how a man like Bergoglio can be thought to be the Vicar of Christ and act more heretical than any lay leader of one of the main line Protestant “churches”, then their opposition to certain modern errors is cast to the wind and instead some of these errors are readily embraced.

First of which is Modernism, which holds that that which validates religious belief is interior religious sentiments, not objective revelation. For the Modernist, Papal Infallibility is not a gift from God, but the habit of mind of believers to take whatever a Pope says or does and regard it as a religious doctrine. For that reason, there is nothing wrong in criticizing Catholics throughout history who had this sentiment.

Second of which is Neo-Modernism, which holds that there is no unchanging eternal truth revealed by God, but that religious truth consists in conformity of the mind to modern life. Neo-Modernists think that the Church is dead unless She is in the process of continual aggiornamento, that clergy are not properly formed unless they are undertaking continuous formation, etc. etc. For them no event can be condemned by religious doctrine because events themselves are the goal posts of truth and the sacred. They worship history, but not as something that once was, but which is always changing. Hence, papal infallibility must also now be reconsidered and redefined in light of Bergoglio’s way of acting.

The Third of which is Relativism, which holds that there are no absolute moral truths implicit in human nature or in an eternal unchanging law. Truth is found in the right relation of things and actions in the here and now. And right, here, means what is suitable to me. Relativism in turn gives birth or opens the door to Hedonism and Individualism, the definitions of which are well known. Hence, what papal infallibility should mean today is not limited to what it meant before. And what I think it should mean is more important than what any Saint, Doctor of the Church, or previous Pope said it meant, because what is most important is that I have a pleasant experience of Catholicism.

Bergoglio is certainly the Pope, because …

Many Catholics unwittingly have adopted the errors which I just mentioned in a very imprudent attempt to rationally explain why they hold the position that Bergoglio is certainly the pope.

None actually confront the historical facts, which are as follows:

  1. Pope Benedict, as the man who is the pope, renounced the ministerium in his declaration of Feb. 11, 2013.
  2. Canon 332 §2 says a Roman Pontiff renounces when he renounces the munus.
  3. Canon 17 says that Canon 332 § must be read in accord with the Code of Canon Law’s usage of terms, canonical tradition, and the mind of its legislator, Pope John Paul II.
  4. Benedict behavior after Feb. 28, 2013, shows that he retains the papal dignity in all respects.
  5. The idea that Benedict’s renunciation of ministerium means a renunciation of the papacy comes from a tweet by Giovanna Chirri, an ANSA reporter, minutes following the Consistory of Feb. 11, 2013.
  6. No meeting of canonists was called to examine the act of the Renunciation to determine if it was valid or not.
  7. The Vatican has never officially claimed that the renunciation was valid.
  8. The Cardinals have never claimed that they did anything to verify that the See was Vacant before meeting in the Conclave of 2013 to elect Jorge Mario Bergoglio.
  9. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is a public manifest and pertinacious heretic, idolater and fomenter of schisms, who by divine right cannot be a member of the Catholic Church, let alone hold any office in Her.
  10. The Church has NEVER taught that the Cardinals or Bishops or even all the clergy are infallible in matters of canonical interpretations or knowledge of historical facts.

Instead, these “Bergoglio is certainly the pope” Catholics take another route.  They hold that the solidarity of opinion of the vast majority, who say Bergoglio is the pope, is more authoritative than:

  1. God who is infallible by nature.
  2. Christ Jesus who created the office of Saint Peter and promised it infallibility.
  3. Christ Jesus’ Prayer for the person of the Pope that his faith may NEVER fail.
  4. The First Vatican Council in its decree, Pastor Aeternus.
  5. The Code of Canon Law of 1983 promulgated by the Vicar of Jesus Christ, Pope John Paul II.
  6. The words of Pope Benedict himself during and after the Renunciation of Feb. 11, 2013.

Solidarity in Dissent, is a Mark of the Diabolic

The essence of pride, the vice, is dissent. This is because pride as the worst of all vices is directed more principally against the truth and against knowing the truth, than all other vices.  Pride is a spiritual vice and since the intellect is the most spiritual of all the powers of the soul, pride takes root first of all in it.

We can see this in Scripture, where, from the name of Saint Michael, who according to Saint John the Apostle, in his Book of the Apocalypse, was the first Holy Angel to act out of holy indignation and take up arms to fight against Lucifer and his angels, that the sin of Lucifer was pride.  For Saint Michael’s name means, Who is like unto God? A name, which, according to the Fathers of the Church, he merited for repelling the evil suggestions of Lucifer who suborned and seduced a third of the Angels of God with a sin of pride.  Lucifer then was probably saying something like, Worship me, because I am like unto God!

But this is also the sin of all prideful men.  When you by any act of mind or will or body or soul do something which presupposes any affirmation that you have the merit, right, worthiness, power, protection, etc.. that only God has by Nature, then you are committing a sin of pride. This is so, because you are acting as if you were like unto God in such a way as to fail to distinguish that you are much more unlike God than like Him, and that you fail in being like Him in 3 principle characteristics:  You are not omniscent, You are not omnipotent, You are not infallible.

Omniscent means all knowing. Omnipotent means able to do all things by your own power or ability. Infallible means able not to err.  I could add impeccable, which means unable to sin, but since a proud man is already entirely oblivious to his ability to sin, I will omit that here.

It follows, then, that since Lucifer seduced the Angels of God by pride, and that those who fell with him and were cast out of Heaven by the Divine Power and Saint Michael and his Angels, that one of the marks of the diabolic community is their solidarity in pride. And that means solidarity in the misuse of their intellects in dissenting from the truth.

Dissent, which merely means disagreement, can be good or evil. But when it disagrees with objective reality or revealed truth or even a truth which we know is true on account of other truths, natural or revealed, then it is evil, a mortal sin. This is the dissent of which I speak in this article.

Our Lord points this out for our observation, when He calls Lucifer a liar and a murderer from the beginningBecause a liar attacks a truth because he disagrees with it. And a murders kills a living thing, because he disagrees that it should be allowed to live.

Solidarity in Dissent is, therefore, the Mark of the Beast

Solidarity in dissent, therefore, must be the chief mark of the Beast, that is, the chief distinguishing characteristic of all the members of the Church of the Anti-Christ, the Mystical Body of Satan.

Saint John the Apostle indicates this symbolically in his Apocalypse, when he says that in the days of the Antichrist no one will be able to buy or sell anything without having the mark of the beast inscribed upon their right hand.  According to the Fathers of the Church this is a symbolic expression, chiefly, for the conspiracy of the wicked in acting on principle out of falsehood. The biblical number, often translated as 666 is actually in the Greek text written very similar to sss, three Snake like symbols which were used in Asia Minor, in the time of Saint John, as the symbol for the number 6, which in the bible indicates the fullness of imperfection.  And since pride is the fullness of all vice, and vice is the moral habitual failing which leads to imperfection and wickedness, 666 is a pre-eminent symbol for pride and dissent.

Whether the number 666 means more than this, is another consideration. I am here giving a mystagogic reading of the text, that is, a reading which applies to the moral or spiritual life and how we should or should not be living our lives today.

But the “Bergoglio is certainly the Pope” people are doing just this. They are acting out of a spirit of solidarity in dissent from the 10 truths which I listed above.  They ignore all arguments, refuse all reflections and reasons, even conversations, which would lead them to confront the fact of what they are doing. They have willfully blinded themselves to the truth and they show absolutely no worry whatsoever of what might or will befall them for denying and dissenting from truth. They do this because they do not want to separate themselves from the massa (damnata)* who define themselves as dissenters from these truths. They do not want to disagree with the Cardinals and Bishops who reject these truths or close their eyes to them. They are literally willing to risk their eternal salvation on the basis of this solidarity in dissent.

And it is true dissent, because they do not even attempt to give reasons for what they are doing. They only lash out with insults or vicious punishments, calumnies etc..

These catholics are profoundly confused. The unanimous or near unanimous opinion of men might be truth in the political order, but it is not the criterion of truth in matters of canon law. That many of these Catholics are very political people might indeed explain why they cannot understand that in the Church democracy or politics means nothing. Truth means everything.

Indeed, it is the teaching of Christ, Scripture, the Apostles, the Fathers of the Church, the Doctors of the Church, the Saints and the Magisterium throughout the ages, that to deny even one truth is a mortal sin meriting eternal damnation. But a godless politician will never accept or understand this.

This is why solidarity in dissent is the preeminent spiritual mark of the beast. If you have this mark, then you are a member of the Church of the Anti-Christ, no matter what religion you practice, what mass you attend, what Cardinal you follow, or what you otherwise might think of yourself, as holy or impious.

Solidarity in dissent can last a long time. It is what destroyed and is destroying the Protestant Churches, who agreed in the Reformation to deny certain Catholic truths, and in that tradition, from which they refuse to break, they ran into the necessity of denying other truths. — This follows the spiritual law of moral degradation, namely, that if you deny one moral truth with unbending firmness and fidelity, then you will be forced to sacrifice your adhesion to other moral truths, until you become utterly depraved and ultimately are driven insane. This is why among men, insanity is a hallmark of the diabolic. — And this is why Protestant Churches, or any group which practices solidarity in dissent, such as those who deny the 10 truths above, cannot be saved: they are doomed by that solidarity to fall into continually worse and more diverse errors and vices.

So I warn all: solidarity in dissent is a mark of the Beast and so long as you are marked with that mark, you belong to that Beast.


* “Massa damanata” is a Latin phrase used by Saint Augustine of Hippo to name the collectivity of all the damned souls. Massa in Latin means mass, damnata, means damned.


With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

9 thoughts on “Marks of the Beast: Solidarity in Dissent”

  1. É verdade já estamos sendo marcados espiritualmente, ou temos a marca do sinal da cruz de Jesus ou a marca da besta. Antes que chegue a marca material há possibilidade de voltar atrás, depois não mais. Tudo se resume em querer ser como Deus, como foi explicado.Já estamos sendo provados a quase sete anos, antes de chegar a apostasia e idolatria total há sempre um período de preparação com o endurecimento dos corações, negação da Verdade Divina, profanações, e sacrilégios.

  2. Dear brother,
    Please forgive me if I’m not seeing things clearly, but as far as I can tell, Kwasniewski isn’t denying papal infallibility or the idefectibility of the Church, or Vatican I in general. Rather, he’s pointing out that, due to the timing of the Vatican I’s declaration, there is a modern tendency to assume that practically everything the pope says is infallible (which is false), and that this has led to the assumption among some that simply because Bergoglio says heretical things (while not infallibly “defining” them), he must therefore not be the pope.
    Now, of course your argument is that Benedict didn’t truly resign, therefore Bergoglio is not the pope, and that Bergoglio’s scandalous behavior makes manifest that he is not the pope. I agree that Kwasniewski doesn’t accept this argument (at least publicly), but that would be because he doesn’t accept the canonical argument for Benedict’s non-resignation, NOT because he in any way or degree denies papal infallibility.

    1. The idea that the timing or doctrine of Vatican I is the cause of error is not only ludicrous but blasphemous. What is the Church going to do, put the Gospel under a bushel basket because it might come to pass that in the future someone, somewhere might misinterprete the true doctrine and fall into an error of human respect. Think about it. No, the imprudent doctor knows what he is doing and why he is doing it. He is just fooling himself. Nay rather, it is those of us who accept that doctrine exactly as it is stated who are thereby enabled to NOT idolize the pope and recognize that Bergoglio cannot be the man who has such an office. Bishop Gracida saw that from the beginning because of not in spite of his faith in the dogmatic teaching of Vatican I.

  3. Thank you for your response. Just to be clear, I didn’t think that Kwansnewski implied “that the timing or doctrine of Vatican I [was] the cause of error”, but rather that modern man’s misunderstanding and misapplication of papal infallibility has caused many to vastly over-emphasize the everyday communications of the pope as if these were somehow “infallible”.

    Now, I understand your canonical arguments for Bergoglio’s not being pope, and that makes sense. And I completely agree that his actions have proven him to be un-Catholic. But if we were to make that the grounds for declaring him to not be the pope (rather than the canonical argument), what then are we to think of things like Paul VI’s destruction of the Mass, or John Paul II’s meeting as Assisi, which were also very un-Catholic things to do?

    1. There is a vast difference, TJ. Because heresy attacks truth which is more principally near the good, that bad rubrics which attack right practice, which regards exterior comportment.

  4. Br Bugnolo, I find the timing of this explication a God-send and answer to prayer for me. Your straight forward summations and descriptions of Modernism, Neo-modernism, and Relativism have been something I have wrestled to find. As a believer in and supporter of the 10 BiP-truths that you outline, I have been labeled a dissenter, troll, and trouble-maker even when I have explained that I do not dissent for the sake of dissent but rather for the sake of Truth.

    After reading this post, I have more peace of mind and heart than I have had in a long time. Thank you for your distillations and explication.

    Also, your list of five places of authority reminds me of what I call my “First Things” list that I will withdraw to when swirls of chaos become overwhelming. This is my list:
    1. There is a God and I am not He.
    2. God is revealed in Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition because He said so.
    3. Jesus is the God-man Who left us His one, holy, catholic, and Apostolic Church bc He said so.
    4. His Church is visible with a visible head, the Vicar of Christ, because Jesus said so.
    5. Where Peter is, there is Jesus’ Church because Jesus said so and He shows us so in the Fathers and in His saints.

    Herein lies a quandary for me that I hope you will weigh in on, if you have the time.

    By the grace of God, I realize that I have been fooled and betrayed much of my life into believing anti-church teachings thinking that they are Jesus’ teachings. To be aware of this betrayal is a good thing. This is my puzzlement: I trust in Jesus and His Church. At the same time, Jesus uses fallible men (who often of late have proven to NOT be trustworthy themselves) in order to lead us into all Truth. I myself am limited in understanding the technicalities of discipline, doctrine, dogma, magisterium, and the theology, philosophy, ecclesiology, history, etc. of any number of heretical ‘isms’; I have a general idea about these subjects and that is sufficient for me. By grace and grace alone I have the gift of Faith as well as the grace of holy fear that I can lose that gift.

    To put it simply, I trust Jesus, but I do not trust men and knowing that Jesus uses men as instruments to bring us to Truth it seems to me to be a dangerous, Protestant position where I decide what is true and what isn’t true like those dissenters you describe in this post. Also, because Recognize and Resisters seem to me to be practical Sedevacantists, I do not want to take their route. At the same time, having to depend on my gut seems like deciding for myself what is and isn’t Truth and that strikes me as a Protestant position and I want to be Catholic.

    All the while I keep in my mind, “Where else where I go? You alone have the words of eternal life.”
    Geographically, I live in a Novus Ordo, Neo-Modernist desert. How and where might I find a Catholic middle ground?

    1. Dear Islam is Islam,

      Every adult Catholic who is intellectually capable of study, should ground his faith in the reading of sound Catholic sources, such as the Bible (English speakers, only the Douay Rheims, the others are junk), the Fathers of the Church (Only translations done by Catholics before the Council, as Fr Mitchelli SJ says the modern translations are intentionally falsified to hide Catholic truth), especially Augustine, Athanasius, Chrysostom, Gregory the Great, the Doctors of the Church (take your pick, same criterion for translations) and Church History (In English I recommend Father Hughes, History of the Councils, History of the Church in 3 vols, History of the English Reformation 2 vols), the Catechism of the Council of Trent, Anything by Saint Thomas (same criterion for translations). Dont forget the saints who teach about virtues, Saint Francis of Assisi (see side bar), Saint Theresa of Avila (everyone has to read the Interior Castle and Autobiography), Saint Francis de Sales (On the Love of God), the homiles of the Saints. — And when I mean Saints, I mean the ones from before Vatican I, because generally speaking they were more educated and their writings are clearer and to the point. — Do not take living men as your guides to the truth. Only Canonized Saints and the Documents of the Church, prior to Vatican II, because these are clear and free from error). But most of all, consecrate yourself to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and to the Immaculate Heart and do everything you do for love of them, and repent of every sin and habit of sin. For until you do the latter, you are like a plug not plugged into its socket.

  5. Thank you, thank you, thank you for your solid instructions; this is indeed a good year! I will offer my day for the repose of souls in your generational lines. I remain resting in Their Hearts more profoundly than I have in a long time.

Comments are closed.