by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
The Masonic Lodges have prepared for more than a century to enslave and decimate mankind. And we are seeing their plan unfold with the Scamdemic and Great Reset.
But Pope Benedict XVI, by Christ’s inspiration in the summer of 2012, has fashioned for the Catholic Church a Restart Button to begin the Great Catholic Reset of the world.
With this Button, the Church has the tool to begin the restoration of Christendom, since the very act of pressing it means the reaffirmation of every truth of the Faith.
And this button is his seemingly valid, but utterly canonically invalid resignation, which by fooling the Freemasons inside and outside the Church has caused them to reveal their plans and expose themselves to the Faithful, while giving the Faithful the necessary spiritual challenge to train them to become warriors for the restoration of Christendom.
The pressing of this Button will start the Great Catholic Reset, because, to find itÂ and press it, you have to return to the truth,
- That the Latin tongue, one of the Three Languages which Christ Spoke, according to the Fathers of the Church, is superior to all modern languages.
- That the word of Christ to Peter, “Whatsoever you bind” refers to all Church Teaching, Liturgy and Canon Law.
- That words have meaning, and that Nominalism is the thought of Hell.
- That Christ remain in intimate union with His true Vicar and will not suffer the Apostolic See to be stained with heresy, apostasy or Globalism.
- That God’s plans endure forever and can never be overthrown.
Those who accept, and break from excusing themselves from, ALL of these 5 points, regardless of anything the Cardinals or Bishops might claim, are those who have discovered and are discovering this Button for the Great Catholic Reset.
And that Reset will begin by proclaiming the Truth that Benedict XVI is the pope and insisting on a Second Synod of Sutri to depose Bergoglio the pretender, antipope and false prophet of Globalism, and utterly condemn all his falsehoods, lies, blasphemies, heresies and errors!
With Benedict XVI restored, then the Church will be empowered with clarity to reject Globalism, Vatican II, the Aggiornamento and all which has come forth from Modernism and Neo-Modernism.
And each of us has a part in this. The more Catholic we call back to the truth of what Benedict XVI did, the more we advance the hour of the GREAT CATHOLIC RESET!
Now is the time therefore, to give Battle!
FromRome.Info, for its part, will work to prepare here at Rome the first Session of the International Inquest into the Corruption at the Vatican, which will conclude with a formal call for the convening of the Second Synod of Sutri. We believe that the book by Attorney Acosta is sufficient pleading for such a case. — We invite canonists and legal experts from around the world to assist FromRome.Info in organizing such an Inquest. Contact us by leaving a comment below, with your full contact information of your office or studio.
If you would like to contribute to the expenses for holding this inquest, you can do so by using the Zelle App and sending your contribution to firstname.lastname@example.org.Â Please mark your contribution as “Cross Azure Legal Fund”. Thank you.
Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
March 6, 2021: The Italian Daily, il Libero Quotidiano has published anÂ article by Andrea Cionci provocatively entitled, “Un libro rimette Ratzinger sul soglio” (A Book has put Ratzinger back on the Throne). — Above is the image of the actual article. — Below follows the Italian and ENGLISH translation.
The article features the juridial study of Attorney Estefania Acosta Ochoa, an legal expert from Colombia, South America, which was published by Amazon Books in English, Portuguese and Spanish last week, and which is causing a global sensation among the sacred hierarchy. FromRome.Info featured the book in two previous articles. (here & here)
It represents an important work necessary for the International Inquest into Corruption at the Vatican, which was issued 366 days before the publication of Acosta’s Book. The Inquest calls for an extraordinary Synod to hear the facts, depose the antipope Bergoglio, and restore Pope Benedict XVI to the Apostolic Throne.
The article by Andrea Cionci, in the Libro, this morning here in Italy, marks the first time, according to my knowledge, that a major Italian newspaper dares to express that Benedict XVI is still the pope according to the juridical facts and laws.
As such, it is a decisve shot across the bow of the ecclesiastical establishment which in the eyes of a large portion of the faithful world wide has UTTERLY discredited themselves, and the institution of the priesthood, over their malicious insistence to simply ignore the facts and laws, while proclaiming Bergoglio undoubtedly the pope.
ITALIAN ORIGINAL –Â Reprinted with permission
Il primo testo giuridico: Benedetto XVI invalidÃ² le dimissioni.
Il papa Ã¨ lui.
âIl papa Ã¨ solo lui, non Francescoâ: la ricostruzione dello stratagemma
by Andrea Cionci
Eâ appena uscito il primo testo giuridico che conferma: il papa Ã¨ uno solo, Benedetto XVI, in quanto la Declaratio di dimissioni Ã¨ stata da lui costruita in modo giuridicamente invalido.
Lâavvocatessa colombiana Estefania Acosta, autrice di âBenedict XVI: pope emeritus?â spiega come la Declaratio sia stata preparata con cura da Ratzinger in modo che, sulle prime, non si notasse che non si stava affatto dimettendo. Gli errori di latino avrebbero poi attirato lâattenzione anche sul meccanismo giuridico auto-invalidante.
Non essendo giuristi dobbiamo rimanere ai dati di cronaca oggettivi, come gli ambigui comportamenti di Benedetto stigmatizzati dal card. Pell: egli veste ancora di bianco (giustificandosi col dire che ânon ha piÃ¹ talari nere nellâarmadioâ), risiede in Vaticano, mantiene il nome, la benedizione apostolica e, da otto anni, ripete – sibillino – che âil papa Ã¨ uno soloâ, senza mai specificare quale.
Ci hanno provato a farglielo dire, nel 2019, quando Vatican News titolÃ²: âPer Benedetto il papa Ã¨ uno, Francescoâ, citando (un giorno prima) unâintervista di Massimo Franco sul Corriere. Ma il virgolettato era di Franco, non di Benedetto. Una svista?
La Acosta, nelle sue 300 pagine, analizza anche altre questioni, come le dichiarazioni del cardinale Danneels, primate del Belgio e membro della âMafia di San Galloâ che, nellâautobiografia andata a ruba e mai smentita dal Vaticano, dichiarava che la stessa lobby di cardinali modernisti mirava a far dimettere Ratzinger avendo come campione Bergoglio. Roba da scomunica automatica, secondo la costituzione Universi Dominici Gregis promanata da Wojtyla nel â96.
Ma per la Acosta, dirimente Ã¨ solo la Declaratio: Â«Attenzione, le dimissioni non sono invalide perchÃ© Benedetto Ã¨ stato “forzato”: egli ha agito consapevolmente, sapeva che non si stava dimettendo dallâESSERE il Papa (cedendo il munus petrino), ma semplicemente dichiarava di rinunciare al FARE il papa (il ministerium), a svolgerne – solo alcune – azioni pratiche. CiÃ² invalida le sue dimissioni, poichÃ© munus e ministerium, per il papa, sono INDIVISIBILI, come conferma (pur in difesa di Bergoglio)Â il canonista Mons. Sciacca. Si spiega cosÃ¬ lâultima battuta di Ratzinger al Corriere: âOtto anni fa ho compiuto la mia scelta in piena consapevolezza e ho la coscienza a postoâ. Il mainstream non ha capitoÂ».
Altro fatto strano: perchÃ© nelle versioni della Declaratio dal latino in italiano e altre lingue il Vaticano ha tradotto il munus sempre come ministerium? PerchÃ© essi sono indivisibili, o per celare la âtrappolaâ di Benedetto? A âguadagnarciâ, in entrambi i casi, Ã¨ il Benedetto-stratega.
Ancora piÃ¹ strano come la gravissima questione venga evitata in modo surreale non solo dai vescovi, ma anche dai media laici. Eppure, lâhanno giÃ denunciata giornalisti, teologi, latinisti.Â Ora câÃ¨ finalmente un testo giuridico: si apra il dibattito.
Indifferenze, attacchi personali e accuse di complottismo, in reazione, avvalorerebbero la tesi per cui Benedetto, nel 2013, isolato e impotente, seguÃ¬ tale strategia per lasciare che la âdeep Churchâ, al servizio del mondialismo, si svelasse. âAmbiguo per non mentireâ, avrebbe cosÃ¬ mantenuto quanto da lui scritto nella Declaratio, anche se essa Ã¨ giuridicamente invalida. Del resto, sotto attacco dallâinterno, cosa avrebbe potuto fare per difendere la Chiesa? Solo usare la Logica e il Diritto canonico,Â attendendo che i vescovi, âvedendo davveroâ la Declaratio, uno ad uno, dicano semplicemente la veritÃ : che lâunico papa Ã¨ Benedetto. Il resto verrebbe da sÃ©.
ENGLISH AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION
The first legal text: Benedict XVI invalidated the resignation. The pope is him.
“The pope is only him, not Francis”: the reconstruction of the stratagem
The first legal text confirming: the pope is only one, Benedict XVI, has just come out, as the Declaratio of resignation was constructed by him in a legally invalid way.
Colombian lawyer Estefania Acosta, author of “Benedict XVI: pope emeritus?” explains how the Declaratio was carefully prepared by Ratzinger so that, at first, it was not noticed that he was not resigning at all. The Latin errors would then also draw attention to the self-invalidating legal mechanism.
Not being jurists, we have to stick to objective facts, such as the ambiguous behavior of Benedict stigmatized by Card. Pell: he still wears white (justifying himself by saying that “he has no more black cassocks in his closet”), he resides in the Vatican, he keeps his name, the apostolic blessing and, for eight years, he repeats – sibylline – that “the pope is only one”, without ever specifying which one.
They tried to get him to say it, in 2019, when Vatican News titled, “For Benedict the pope is one, Francis,” quoting (a day earlier) an interview by Massimo Franco in the Corriere. But the quotation mark was Franco’s, not Benedict’s. An oversight?
Acosta, in its 300 pages, also analyzes other issues, such as the statements made by Cardinal Danneels, primate of Belgium and member of the “Mafia of St. Gallen”, who, in his autobiography, never denied by the Vatican, stated that the same lobby of modernist cardinals aimed to make Ratzinger resign, having Bergoglio as a champion. Stuff from automatic excommunication, according to the constitution Universi Dominici Gregis emanated by Wojtyla in ’96.
But for Acosta, what is decisive is only the Declaratio: “Attention, the resignation is not invalid because Benedict was “forced”: he acted consciously, he knew that he was not resigning from BEING the Pope (ceding the Petrine munus), but was simply declaring that he was renouncing to DO the Pope (the ministerium), to carry out – only some – practical actions. This invalidates his resignation, since munus and ministerium, for the pope, are INDIVISIBLE, as confirmed (though in Bergoglio’s defense) by canonist Monsignor Sciacca. This explains Ratzinger’s last remark to Corriere: “Eight years ago I made my choice in full awareness and I have a clear conscience. The mainstream has not understood”.
Another strange fact: why in the versions of the Declaratio from Latin into Italian and other languages did the Vatican always translate munus as ministerium? Because they are indivisible, or to conceal Benedict’s “trap”? To “gain”, in both cases, is the Benedict-strategist.
Even stranger is how the very serious issue is surreally avoided not only by the bishops, but also by the lay media. Yet, journalists, theologians, Latinists have already denounced it. Now there is finally a juridical text: open the debate.
Indifference, personal attacks and accusations of conspiracy, in reaction, would corroborate the thesis that Benedict, in 2013, isolated and powerless, followed such a strategy to let the “deep Church”, at the service of globalism, unveil itself. “Ambiguous in order not to lie,” he would thus have maintained what he wrote in the Declaratio, even though it is legally invalid. Moreover, under attack from within, what could he have done to defend the Church? Only use Logic and Canon Law, waiting for the bishops, “really seeing” the Declaratio, one by one, to simply tell the truth: that the only pope is Benedict. The rest would come by itself.