6 thoughts on “European Court of Human Rights gives nod to mass forced Vaccinations”

  1. Is SOCIAL SOLIDARITY the new Schutzstaffel?!
    Ironic that the Judges of the European Court for Human Rights ruled 16-1 in favour of supporting a Novel Value called SOCIAL SOLIDARITY, a value so novel that many people in the world have never even heard of it, let alone understand what it means and that in supporting SOCIAL SOLIDARITY the Judges have turned their backs on the solid humanitarian values of respecting and protecting Individual Human Rights and Freedoms and they’ve done this against a background where there is a near future threat of mandatory covid untested experimental genetic therapy “vaccines”.
    The European Court for Human Rights should simply close up shop! The Judges have lost the plot and done Humankind and especially the children of Europe a gross disservice by setting this atrocious legal precedent! So the question is…..is this the Law of Intended or Unintended Consequences?!

    ‘….an important aspect to underline in this judgment is the fact that the Court also justifies the vaccination obligation by what it calls the search, the preservation of solidarity, this objective of social solidarity between people with regard to health. This is a notion, a somewhat new value, which is put forward by the Court and which I think could be used more often in the future, because this notion of solidarity can justify many infringements on individual rights and freedoms.’


    ‘European countries can legally require childhood vaccinations, the European Court of Human Rights ruled on Thursday. The decision covers preschool vaccinations for children, but it could also have an impact on the EU’s battle to control the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Compulsory vaccines can be seen as “necessary in a democratic society,” the Strasbourg-based court said in its ruling, which came on a 16-1 vote.’


    Well, Well, Well!
    ‘NGOs and judges at the ECHR, 2009 – 2019″. This study revealed that some of the judges sitting at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) are former officials or collaborators of NGOs from the “Soros galaxy” that are very active before this Court. The seven NGOs identified in the report were the Open Society Foundations (OSF), the Helsinki Committees, the International Commission of Jurists, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Interights and the A.I.R.E. Centre.’





    ‘The report of the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ) on “NGOs and the Judges of the ECHR” reveals serious dysfunctions within the European Court of Human Rights. Over the last 10 years, 22 of the 100 permanent judges at the Court have come from or worked closely with seven NGOs active at the Court. 18 of these judges have also sat in cases involving the NGO to which they were linked. Among these 7 NGOs, the network of the Open Society stands out for the number of judges linked to it (12) and for the fact that it funds the six other organisations mentioned in this report.

    This situation is serious, as it calls into question the independence of the Court and the impartiality of its judges; it is contrary to the rules which the ECHR itself imposes on States in this area. It is all the more problematic because the Court’s power is exceptional.

    It is therefore necessary to remedy it.

    We ask you, Mr President, in accordance with Rule 71 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, to put this matter on the Assembly’s agenda so that an investigation can be carried out and solutions to these malfunctions recommended to the Committee of Ministers.’

  2. ‘….in reading the annual financial reports of the Council of Europe, the ECLJ discovered that George Soros’ Open Society and Bill Gates’ Microsoft are the two largest private donors to the organization. These two organizations respectively gave the Council of Europe nearly €1,400,000 between 2004 and 2013 and nearly €690,000 between 2006 and 2014. The Open Society also supports Council of Europe initiatives, including the European Roma Institute for Arts and Culture. Since 2015, there is no longer any trace of such direct funding. However, the Council of Europe has established a special fund to receive such voluntary extra-budgetary contributions. These payments raise questions, as it is surprising for an intergovernmental political organization to be so permeable to private funding. A member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe referred this matter to the Committee of Ministers to ask that all documents relating to such financing be made public.’

  3. Has the spirit of the Irish Constitution been turned on its head/twisted by the new novel SOCIAL SOLIDARITY virus?!

    It seems that if one has the antibodies for Covid-19 from a prior corona virus infection and/or has received the covid gene therapy “vaccines” that the public health guidance will still advise one to social distance, wear the masks and to quarantine where necessary.

    The High Court ruling of Mr. Justice Brian O’Moore denied the requested release of a Health Care Worker from Quarantine who apparently had previously contracted covid-19 and who had already received the first dose of a covid gene therapy “vaccine” and who had tested negative twice since returning to Ireland from South Africa.

    Senior Counsel for the State – Michael Cush argued that the woman had chosen to travel to South Africa for medical assistance and that those in Ireland who choose not to travel had the right to life and bodily integrity, the right not to be exposed to any infection from which they might die or which might cause them significant illness.

    Obviously this Health Care Worker, a Frontline worker in Ireland was unable to access in Ireland the necessary health care/medical assistance that she required and so she had to travel a very long and tiresome journey to her home country to find and receive the necessary medical assistance and on return to Ireland was imprisoned in a Quarantine Camp, went through the stress of filing a High Court request to be released to her home in Dublin and had her request denied.
    Could one seriously say that the Irish State cares a damn about Health Care Workers?!

    What is very puzzling is that the Irish State is worried about a new strain, a new variant of corona virus from South Africa circulating well outside of the corona virus season in the Southern Hemisphere!! How can that be possible?!

    And why are the public health officials, politicians and mainstream media failing to ask what really caused all the illnesses and deaths attributed to covid-19 that occurred outside of the normal February to end of April corona virus season in the Northern Hemisphere?!


    Related articles



  4. Pfizer-BioNTech experimental covid gene therapy “vaccine” for children and underdeveloped countries?!

    ‘One of the developments is a potential vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds, which, if approved, could potentially be ready some time around the first term of the next academic year.

    ‘Mr Reid said the company hopes to submit data to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as soon as possible for approval. It would involve two doses, as for adults.

    Work is also under way on a trialling a vaccine for children aged 6 months to 11 years old.

    If “safety and immunogenicity is confirmed, and pending authorisation or approval from regulators, we hope the vaccine could be available to these younger children between the ages of 11 and 6 months by early 2022.”….’

    Mr Reid said that Pfizer now has an agreement to supply 40 million doses of vaccine to 92 underdeveloped countries on a not-for-profit basis.

    It is being distributed through the Covax scheme, which aims to ensure vaccines are shared fairly among all nations, rich and poor.’


  5. Outright Discrimination and Abuse of the Vulnerable dressed up as Positive Discrimination, Social Justice, Equality, Social Solidarity…..?!
    Untested experimental covid gene therapies being pushed first on the elderly, the infirm, minority and ethnic peoples, poor nations and innocent young children and babies.

    ‘….“The urgency we see in rich nations to vaccinate their populations, aiming for all adults by the summer, is simply not reflected globally. Instead, we have Covax aiming for perhaps 27% by the end of the year if we possibly can manage it – that is simply not good enough,” said Max Lawson, head of inequality policy at Oxfam and the chair of the People’s Vaccine Alliance, which is calling Covid-19 vaccine developers to openly share their technology and intellectual property to boost production.‘

    ‘People’s Vaccine Alliance, a coalition of organisations including Amnesty International, Oxfam, and UNAIDS’


    Perhaps the People’s Vaccine Alliance should be renamed the Pushers Vaccine Alliance?!

    Thank God the poorer nations are being largely spared from being experimented upon with these untested experimental covid gene therapies that to date have resulted in the reporting of hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions, miscarriages and thousands of deaths and where the long term negative impacts such as the extent of ADE and levels of Sterility are as yet an unknown.

    “Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the Earth”.

  6. Some Good News!
    Why such a long deadline to 2024 to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the current system of selection and election of the Court’s judges?

    European Court of Human Rights ECHR: No New Soros-Judge for Belgium

    ‘This defeat of the Open Society comes at a time when the ambassadors of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe have just adopted an official text admitting the veracity of the ECLJ’s report on NGOs and judges of the ECHR, and announcing its decision to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the current system of selection and election of the Court’s judges by the end of 2024. This is also an important follow-up to the Report.

    Over the past year, the ambassadors representing the 47 member states of the Council of Europe have received three embarrassing written questions from members of parliament on “the systemic problem of conflicts of interest between NGOs and judges of the Court” (here) and on “Restoring the integrity of the European Court of Human Rights” (here).

    The Council of Europe governments had been seized following the publication of the ECLJ’s report on NGOs and the judges of the ECHR, which revealed that at least 22 of the last 100 ECHR judges are former employees of seven NGOs, and that they have judged on numerous occasions cases supported by their own NGOs, in a blatant situation of conflict of interest. Among these NGOs, George Soros’s Open Society stands out because twelve of its employees have become judges in Strasbourg, and because it funds the other six NGOs in question, sometimes to a very large extent. The massive presence of judges from the same NGO network shows the hold of large foundations and private NGOs on the European human rights protection system and calls into question its impartiality.

    The revelations in this report are extremely serious; they circulated around the world but have also been met with silence from the ECHR and with the refusal of the European Commission and some governments to respond to them in substance, to the point of denying the evidence. The most important support for the report came from Mr Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister (see here the reactions to the report).

    It was feared that the 47 ambassadors, who together constitute the supreme body of the Council of Europe on which the European Court depends, would also bury the issue, claiming an inability to find a common answer. Surprisingly, this was not the case: they submitted a reply, six months after (read here the reply).’

    ‘..the ambassadors of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe have just adopted an official text admitting the veracity of the ECLJ’s report on NGOs and judges of the ECHR, and announcing its decision to re-evaluate the effectiveness of the current system of selection and election of the Court’s judges by the end of 2024.’


Comments are closed.