15 thoughts on “Cassandra S. Dunn, RN: Covid Swab is coated with toxic Ethylene Oxide”

  1. I have a question. Have anyone tested the surgical masks coming from China, to know if they are coated with eo or other harmful chemicals? Before anyone judges me, I work at a hospital, and it’s mandatory. I try to isolate as much as posible, so I can lower the mask, though. Thanks

    1. Here in Italy, under the microscope, they were found all to contain parasitic microscopic worms, which can be seen to move in high lighting conditions. Worms which seem able to climb on to tissue or nasal hairs and travel up the nasal passages to the brain.

    2. Very good question; the answer, sadly, may be yes. Look at this report by John Rappaport – (and look at his work daily!)


      the danger is:
      ” On April 2, 2021, Health Canada issued an advisory, warning people not to “use face masks labelled to contain graphene or biomass graphene.” ”

      Good luck to you – I feel terrible about those who are forced to wear these nasty things for a full work day; so far, I have only needed to do so for 15-20 min once or twice a week for food shopping. I have used US made (I think) 3M household dusk masks.

      1. Cassandra, most of what you have to say about Ethylene Oxide is based on ignorance. As a nurse you must have flunked Microbiology because EO and radiation are one of the safest ways of sterilizing sensitive materials.

        In the case you aren’t aware, swabs, syringes, needles, admin sets and even IV solution bags are sterilized with EtO.

        So horror of horrors, no more injections, IV’s, transfusions for you or your mindless minions.

        FYI :the products are sealed in their final packaging, exposed to EtO in a humid chamber for a defined period, and then the EtO is vacuumed off.

        Products certainly can’t be dipped in EtO because it’s a gas 🤔

        Packages are checked for residual EtO before release for sale.

        EtO is toxic, especially to microbes, and to humans if inhaled. All EtO is removed from products.

        You never mentioned any of this in your little sensation seeking drama!

        So next time you need any medical intervention, please DON’T use any :

        Syringes, Needles, IV bags, Admin Sets, Transfusions, scalpel blades etc.

        I can’t believe you are a Forensic investigator, let alone an RN.
        I used to respect RN’s until I heard you.

        Do some homework before spreading this malicious propaganda.

    3. Wearing face masks coated in graphene can cause serious lung problems, warns Health Canada
      Wearing face masks could cause catastrophic lung problems, especially if they are the kind coated with graphene. This is despite the fact that advocates of masks and mask mandates believe that wearing them is essential to preventing the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) from spreading.

      The latest evidence proving the dangers of wearing face masks comes from Health Canada, the country’s national public health agency. It warned Canadians to not use face masks that contain graphene because people could inhale graphene particles.

      Graphene is a nanomaterial that supposedly has antiviral and antibacterial properties. Manufacturers have been coating face masks with graphene and selling them as miracle cures for COVID-19.

      According to the proponents of graphene-coated face masks, there are three main ways these masks supposedly damage viruses and harmful cells.

      First, microscopic graphene particles have sharp edges that allegedly mechanically damage viruses and cells as they pass through them. Second, graphene is negatively charged with electrons. These electrons supposedly electrostatically trap and inactivate viruses. Third, graphene allegedly damages cells by impairing their metabolism.

      Research shows graphene can cause significant lung injuries
      Research clearly shows that graphene is dangerous, and if inhaled it could lead to disastrous respiratory conditions.

      One study found that binding human cells to graphene damaged the cells. An animal experiment from 2016 found that mice with graphene in their lungs experienced localized lung tissue damage, inflammation and the eventual formation of granulomas. These formed because their bodies attempted to fend off the graphene by walling it off. The researchers also found persistent lung injury similar to what happens when humans inhale asbestos. (Related: BOMBSHELL: Disposable blue face masks found to contain toxic, asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs.)

      Another study from March 2020 developed biological models that simulated the impact of high concentrations of aerosolized graphene on industrial workers. Their study found that long-term industrial exposure to graphene induced inflammation and weakened the protective barriers of the lungs.

      These three studies show the health impacts of breathing in microscopic graphene in large doses, which is what will inevitably happen due to the requirements of many local, state and national governments around the world for masks to be worn at all times.

      Health Canada’s own preliminary assessment of the research has identified that inhaled graphene particles have the potential to cause early lung toxicity. This potential health risk was enough for the agency to warn people against using face masks labeled to contain either graphene or biomass graphene – graphene made from biomass waste.

      The agency has asked mask manufacturers to assess the potential health risks of their graphene-coated masks. Health Canada is focusing on two specific manufacturers of face masks with graphene and is in the process of determining the safety and effectiveness of their products. It said in its statement:

      “Until the Department completes a thorough scientific assessment and has established the safety and effectiveness of graphene-containing face masks, it is taking the precautionary approach of removing them from the market while continuing to gather and assess information. Health Canada has directed all known distributors, importers and manufacturers to stop selling and to recall the affected products.”

      While the federal agency has no power over the decisions of Canadian provinces, it has written to their provincial health departments advising them to cease the distribution and use of masks containing graphene.

      In a separate statement, Health Canada told CTV News that the health risks associated with masks with graphene or biomass graphene are unacceptable.

      “Unless the manufacturers of these masks can provide substantial evidence to support the safe and effective use of graphene-coated masks, Health Canada considers the risk of these medical devices to be unacceptable.”

      Learn the latest information regarding the use of face masks in Canada, the United States and the rest of the world at Pandemic.news.

    4. Don’t you worry one bit about anyone ever judging you. You do what you do and you hold your head high as you walk knowing that you do what you think is the right thing, that goes for everything in life. If your good on the inside with every move you make then the rest of the judgemental individuals mean nothing at all. I support you in the mask stance and whatever else you stand with or against.

  2. Good evening
    I always refused to take this test but I did not know why… maybe just my gut…
    Thanks for sharing this info
    Take care

  3. Johns Hopkins University confirms: You can be vaccinated with a PCR test, even without knowing
    Sun 5:02 pm +00:00, 11 Apr 2021
    posted by Weaver
    In January 2019, the WHO defined the growing number of vaccination critics as one of the top ten threats to global health, and since the unprecedented Corona vaccination fiasco, the number of vaccination refusers has truly multiplied.
    Meanwhile, resistance is forming even within the orthodox medical establishment. But the masterminds of the WHO continue to insist on an unrealistic vaccination coverage rate of at least 70 percent.
    In this article, Jan Walter describes, with extensive source citations, which techniques are possible to still vaccinate the population, when people are becoming increasingly critical of vaccinations. This is only fueled by the continuing pressure for mass “vaccination” against a non-lethal disease for 99.8% of people, with a new type of “vaccine” that is actually gene therapy by means of mRNA. It seems like science fiction and is chilling, but the metohodes and techniques are available. There question is how far do we let it get?

    Vaccinations increasingly scrutinized and the chilling alternative
    In January 2019, WHO [1] defined the growing number of vaccine critics as one of the ten greatest threats to global health, and since the unprecedented corona vaccination fiasco [2], the number of vaccine refusers has really multiplied. Meanwhile, resistance is emerging even within the conventional medical community. But the masterminds at WHO continue to insist on an unrealistic vaccination rate of at least 70 percent.

    Now several experts and former mainstream journalists like John O’Sullivan are warning that the massive PCR testing campaign could be a WHO vaccination program in disguise. (see Principia Scientific) [3] O’Sullivan is referring to a new technology developed at Johns Hopkins University that is supposed to make it possible to carry out covert vaccinations through a PCR test. (See Johns Hopkins Universitiy) [4]

    Inspired by a parasitic worm that digs its sharp teeth into the intestines of its host, Johns Hopkins researchers have developed tiny, star-shaped micro-devices that attach to the intestinal mucosa and can deliver drugs into the body.

    These tiny devices, known as “Theragrippers,” are made of metal and a thin film that changes shape. They are covered with heat-sensitive kerosene wax and each no larger than a dust particle. (See Figure 1)

    When the kerosene coating on the Theragripper reaches body temperature, the devices close autonomously and clamp onto the wall of the colon. Because of the sealing action, the tiny, six-pointed devices burrow into the mucosa and attach to the colon, where they are held and gradually release their drug load to the body. Eventually, the Theragripper lose their grip on the tissue and are removed from the colon through normal gastrointestinal muscle function.

    Note: According to Johns Hopkins University, Theragrippers are actually administered with a cotton swab. (see Figure 2)

    Figure 2: Theragrippers on a cotton swab

    The Johns Hopkins University research team published positive results from an animal study as a cover article in Science Advances on October 28, 2020 [5], confirming that the new technology works flawlessly:

    Here we report that GI parasite-inspired active mechanochemical therapeutic grabs, or theragrippers, can survive 24 hours in the gastrointestinal tract of live animals by autonomously adhering to mucosal tissue. We also observe a remarkable six-fold increase in elimination half-life when using ripper-mediated delivery of the model analgesic ketorolac tromethamine. These results provide excellent evidence that shape-shifting and self-locking microdevices improve the effectiveness of long-term drug delivery.

    Fig.3: Shape-shifting Theragripper as self-locking drug delivery devices

    Coincidentally, the PCR test in China is now also performed anally because the reliability of the results is said to be better and of course this practice is immediately supported in the Western mainstream media. (See Business Insider) [6]

    Note: If you can’t imagine the government administering toxins to you against your will and without your consent, think of all the horrific experiments on humans that were admitted afterwards and which, according to Wikipedia, [7] have continued well into modern times. In 2007, the CDC [8] even admitted that between 1955 and 1963, 10-30 million citizens were infected with the carcinogen SV40 via polio vaccination.

    The Vaccination that is Not a Vaccination, but Gene Therapy
    In a revealing video conference [9] with Dr. Judy Mikovits, Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. David Martin, it is explained that the mRNA vaccine, by the legal definition, is not a vaccine at all. It is falsely called a vaccine to hide the fact that the purported vaccine is, in fact, a gene therapy. Experienced physician and epidemiologist, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, stated in a censored interview with Rubikon, “Actually, this ‘promising’ vaccine should be PROHIBITED for the vast majority of people because it is genetic engineering!” Mary Holland, Vice President and Chief Advocate of the Children’s Health Defense Organization, warns, “New vaccine technologies will likely lead to new types of vaccine harms. Since there has never been an approved mRNA vaccine, we really don’t know what such damage will look like. Because vaccines have been developed so quickly and clinical trials are so short, the long-term damage is completely unknown.”

    What is particularly chilling is that the vast majority do not even know what the mRNA vaccine is doing in their bodies. They simply allow themselves to be blindly vaccinated, and this despite the fact that more and more independent and even orthodox medical experts are warning against it. (See doctors from around the world warn against mRNA vaccination) [10] In this context, it should not be forgotten that the American company modeRNA Therapeutics was founded in 2010 not as a vaccine manufacturer, but as a GenTech company. The example of the many Monsanto scandals makes it crystal clear that genetic engineering does not serve to protect species, but rather to gain power. The hidden agenda is to genetically modify species in order to patent or own them. Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once said, “Whoever controls the seed controls the world.” (See Press Portal) [11]

    What’s next? Are they going to patent our bodies after they genetically engineer us with the mRNA vaccine?
    Dr. Carrie Madej, [12] a specialist in internal medicine with over 19 years of experience, states that the COVID-19 vaccine could actually be a Trojan horse to patent humans because it alters our DNA. According to an Article published in the British science journal Phys.org in January 2020 [13], it is confirmed that modified RNA has a direct impact on our DNA. The following passage is particularly alarming: “Several research groups are now working together to investigate what effect this may have on the DNA molecule. We already know that R-loop regions are associated with DNA sequences that contain active genes, and that this can lead to chromosome breaks and the loss of genetic information.” Also alarming is the fact that leading vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer are warning their subjects not to reproduce after vaccination (see Pfizer, p. 132) [14 PDF] By doing so, the pharmaceutical company is confirming that the mRNA vaccine can have negative effects on human reproduction and is being vaccinated in spite of it!

    Conclusion: Anyone who knows a little history knows that genetic experimentation and human experimentation are nothing new. Although modern eugenics has its origins in the 19th century, the ideas, measures and justifications of state and social interventions and influences on reproduction have been known since ancient times. They can already be found in Plato’s “Politeia,” which, however, is limited to state selection and education. In the Renaissance, corresponding lines of thought can be found in the social utopian writings “Utopia” by Thomas Morus, “Nova Atlantis” by Francis Bacon and “La città del Sole” by Tommaso Campanella. But because common sense instinctively resists such interventions, the establishment has always endeavored to disguise its true intentions with misleading labels. The Nazis, for example, disguised eugenics as “hereditary health science” or “hereditary care” to make it attractive to the masses, and today the same sick agenda is sold to us with a new “vaccine” to save us from a supposed “pandemic”.

  4. Not everyone has been able to avoid these tests. I worry because my daughter had to take them twice. How can we know if there’s been damage? What should we look for? This is all so disturbing.

  5. I wonder what drugs might be administered that are effective at such low doses as to be able to be contained in these tiny things.

    And although I’m no researcher, it seems strange to me that I haven’t read anything about adverse effects after the PCR ‘test’ except temporary nose bleeding.

  6. Is it more harmful to a person who has had to have it several time compared to a one time swap?

    1. As with all toxic chemicals, the greater the exposure, the greater the danger.

  7. Just because a linkedin profile does not include professional credentials does not mean that the person is not a professional or credentialed. Do your research better. But since you gravely attacked her reputation, please provide proof she is not a RN otherwise, your ability to comment here will be suspened for calumny. Otherwise withdraw your accusation.

Comments are closed.