by Andrea Cionci
(Click the Image above for the original Italian with links)
We have already spoken in depth about the so-called “Plan B” of Pope Benedict XVI HERE. The hypothesis is that – never denied by anyone and always more plausible – of a renunciation written ON PURPOSE legally invalid to give way to his modernist adversaries to take power in an illegal way, reveal themselves to the Catholic world scandalizing it – perhaps even to the point of abolishing the ancient Mass – and then be annulled by a breath, in a kind of “eschatological combustion”.
But the matter seems to be even more refined than we had understood: in essence, Ratzinger reserved the choice to consecrate his successor, once elected.
But let’s go in order. If Benedict never abdicated, in fact, in 2013 the See was not vacant and the conclave that elected Bergoglio was not valid: therefore Francis is antipope as confirmed yesterday by Prof. Sànchez HERE .
No wonder, then, that Benedict chose that date – he admits – with an inner connection between Our Lady of Lourdes, his birthday and the first Monday of Carnival HERE.
So, not only would “Pope Francis” never have existed, but also all his appointments, acts, teachings etc. would be wastepaper.
However, a reader on the blog Stilum Curiae of Marco Tosatti, made a logical objection (the only one, so far) saying: “But how could Ratzinger know that, after the trap he set, would be elected certainly Card. Bergoglio, or another modernist? What if a traditionalist had been elected?”.
An excellent observation, which gives us a way to understand how perfectly devised Benedict XVI’s plan could have been.
As it emerged in the press, by 2013 Ratzinger was so pressed and deprived of power that IOR president Ettore Gotti Tedeschi was torpedoed by Card. Bertone without his knowledge: Benedict learned about it from TV. (Do you realize?).
So the Holy Father could be almost reasonably certain that, once he resigned, a modernist linked to the Mafia of St. Gallen would be elected, 99% Card. Bergoglio (as attested by Card. Danneels’ autobiography HERE ). However, in conclaves you never know: surprises can always pop up.
But PAPA BENEDICT had foreseen it all.
In fact, even if, by a very strange eventuality, a cardinal faithful to Tradition had been elected, there are two considerations to make:
1) The newly-elected, while unaware in good faith of the legal problems preceding, at the first objections to the Declaratio of renunciation, had he been, let’s not say a holy man, but at least a good Catholic, would have gone to Benedict to submit the matter to him asking him to REPAIR his renunciation IMMEDIATELY and/or CONFIRM THEIR ELECTION. The newly elected good cardinal would certainly not have shown himself to be attached to power, perhaps snubbing the invalid renunciation as a mere “clerical legalism”. Any proper person cares that his office is legitimate and beyond challenge. So, already this would have been a test case to test the honesty – at the minimum – of a possible successor.
2) In this case, if the newly elected pope in pectore had first come to ask for a “sanatio” from Pope Ratzinger, he himself would have repaired his invalid Declaratio: either with a new document, or with unequivocal declarations, explaining that he had made a mistake due to an oversight, but actually wanted to abdicate (and not just “resign” from practical functions, as he has said until today). He would thus have declared to the world, “Don’t worry: THE PAPA IS ONE AND IT IS ONLY PIO XIII” (to say any papal name). Probably, in that case, Ratzinger would have also abandoned the white robe, the Vatican and all the other prerogatives that today, instead, he continues to enjoy as the factual holder of the munus petrino, that is, the title of pope conferred directly by God. (This is why he created the fake title – according to all the major canonists – of “pope emeritus”: an excuse to remain pope in all respects, in case of modernist election, gulling his opponents). Ratzinger could also have formally ceded the Petrine munus to the successor approved by him, with an ad hoc act. He could also do so today, perhaps, if Bergoglio asked him to, but this would be tantamount to admitting that Francis has been an anti-pope up to now and would render null and void, in one breath, all his activity of the last eight years. One would have to start all over again for the “new Pope Francis.”
The subtle invalidity of the renunciation lent itself very well, therefore, to escape the immediate advent of the modernists and let them cook for years in the broth of their invalidity: a time bomb.
However, a reader on the blog Stilum Curiae of Marco Tosatti, made a logical objection (the only one, so far) saying: “But how could Ratzinger know that, after the trap he set, would be elected certainly Card. Bergoglio, or another modernist? What if a traditionalist had been elected?”.
Excellent observation, which gives us a way to understand how perfectly devised Benedict XVI’s plan could have been.
As it emerged in the press, by 2013 Ratzinger was so pressed and deprived of power that IOR president Ettore Gotti Tedeschi was torpedoed by Card. Bertone without his knowledge: Benedict learned about it from TV. (Do you realize?).
So the Holy Father could be almost reasonably certain that, once he resigned, a modernist linked to the Mafia of St. Gallen would be elected, 99% Card. Bergoglio (as attested by Card. Danneels’ autobiography HERE ). However, in conclaves you never know: surprises can always pop up.
But Pope BENEDICT foresaw it all.
In fact, even if, by a very strange eventuality, a cardinal faithful to Tradition had been elected, there are two considerations to make:
1) The newly elected, while unaware in good faith of the legal problems preceding, at the first objections to the Declaratio of renunciation, had he been, let us not say a holy man, but at least a good Catholic, would have gone to Benedict to s
The subtle invalidity of the renunciation lent itself very well, therefore, to escape the immediate advent of the modernists and let them cook for years in the broth of their invalidity: a time bomb.
However, in the event of the election of a non-modernist cardinal, the invalid Declaratio could have been remedied immediately after the conclave. That is why Ratzinger said BEFORE THE CONCLAVE that he would swear allegiance to his successor: YES, BUT WHICH?
He would have sworn obedience only to a good cardinal approved by him, the one of Tradition who, newly elected pope, even if in an invalid conclave, would have been the first to dispel any doubt about his own legitimacy. Thus he would have been rewarded.
Pope Ratzinger, on the other hand, has NEVER sworn obedience directly to Francis and this is demonstrated by the fact that in the book “Last Conversations” of 2016, Benedict XVI replied to the journalist Seewald: “When he took leave of the Curia, how could he then swear absolute obedience to his future successor?
Benedict XVI’s answer : “The pope is the pope, no matter who he is.”
Ratzinger, therefore, with his subtly invalid renunciation, and with the useless title of “pope emeritus”, in essence reserved the right to choose his legitimate successor after the conclave.
And Benedict, until today, HAS NOT BENEDICTED ANYONE, least of all Bergoglio. He has not healed anything of his renunciation and in fact – for eight years – he has been repeating that “there is only one pope” without explaining which one he is.
We don’t say this: the matter has been resoundingly confirmed, unintentionally or crypto-intentionally, by none other than his particular secretary Monsignor Gaenswein, when he answered HERE to the priest Don Enrico Bernasconi who is faithful to Ratzinger: “Pope Benedict himself has declared several times that there is only one pope and it is CLEAR that it is Francis. Other interpretations are instrumental.”
“It’s clear?” Ah.
So explicitly he NEVER SAID that.
Brilliant! Thank you dr. Cionci: step by step you are helping us to solve that riddle.
More and more we find evidence that Benedict XVI is probably the smartest pope ever. He tried to outsmart Satan’s minions… maybe he eventually succedes with the Holy Ghost’s special assistance.
Benedict was born a few years before my Dad( 1930)—Hope there’s a chance left—if not, it’s what Jesus said to the late Segatasya of Rwanda ( See book “The Boy Who Saw Jesus” [ he died a martyr there { and all those people probably went crazy because they slipped some ‘zombie gunk’ into their vaccines back then}]) ” that if a man calls out to me[Jesus] from under a bridge I will hear him”—-I’ll never return to a Deep Church Novus Ordo Mass ( Novus is written on back of the dollar bill too)—If those sorry loser-“Regressives” want to turn their back on the Light, then they got to answer to Jesus for it—Segatasya warned the people not to eat the antichrist’s food ( is this the vaccine wafers they will use in Communion[see Minnesota scientist working on vaccine wafers[no more needle jabs])—and if they flip that 5G switch on, I hope the miracle of 1938 happens again( it was not an aurora borealis–but an angel’s fiery sword [it crackled like flame according to an astrophysicist who studied it back then]) because this interfered with radio and land lines(?)-and it would certainly interfere with satellites and 5G(!)—Thanks Brother Bugnolo—when I get some $$ I’d like to purchase Your wonderful book on St Francis—I certainly appreciate your hard work and blogs here—it makes me feel part of a group and that I am not alone–Thank You Brother 😊✝️
This is excellent !
Retaining the munus , and knowing his renunciation was invalid, Benedict , did the same as a check mate.
1) He was almost certain Bergoglio would be elected as antipope , because he knew the majority of the cardinals , including those who tried to elect Bergoglio in 2005.
During his ministerium the darkness increased , and he was so lonely….
2) As Andrea Cionci says in the article , in the almost impossible possibility of a “humble Anti Pope elected “, he could made the “new antipope “ as a real Pope , because he WAS the Pope and and could change Unversiti Dominici Gregis of JPII, and then renounce validly.
3) Then 2) was the only way to give a “good” Pope to the faithful.
But it was almost impossible .
He must had thought the possibility of being dead before Bergoglio ( now , I am not so sure )
Now , I wonder , why didn’t Bergoglio make Benedict disappear , after some time… ?
He knows perfectly that Benedict is increasingly accepted as the real Pope . He must be increasingly anger (Friday false document is a clear demonstration) , and blind.
I think he knows something else that prevents him for doing such thing ( easy to do ), he fear something else.
Is it possible that Benedict has already named a new Pope after his death ?
He IS THE POPE , so he could abrogate JPII election procedure , and name in pectore a new Pope after his death in a secret document.
I cannot imagine now , other possibility , something else, something above us.
Meanwhile Bergoglio is burning himself….
Hello Luis,
I agree with you when you say:
“He (Benedikt) IS THE POPE , so he could abrogate JPII election procedure , and name in pectore a new Pope after his death in a secret document.”
Because, as we know, there is from St. John Don Bosco, among others, the vision of the ship of the Church with the Pope who is hit and falls and rises again (in this is seen the assassination attempt of 13.5.1981 on John Paul II) and falls hit again (this is a later Pope) and dies. And Don Bosco said that the election of the following pope will arrive simultaneously with the news of the pope’s death.
This is only possible if the new pope is already predetermined.
Traduction française :
https://www.homelie.biz/2021/07/la-grande-manoeuvre-de-benoit-xvi-a-ete-concue-pour-duper-un-successeur-inique.html
Can we not get back to basics in understanding that this evil comes directly as a result of numerous Popes refusing to comply with Our Lady’s request of over 100 years to consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart in order to avoid communist persecution.
Most of these Apostates were appointed by PJPII & PBXVI who should have been inspired by the Holy Ghost not to do so. Since the adoption of VII which went way beyond its public aspirations – a pastoral council without binding, to an ecumenical council with binding, it now appears that the Holy Ghost lost a lot of interest in those supposedly heading the Church. By not complying immediately we have been thrown to the lions by selfish men who run the CC like a game of chess; by their downright disobedience to Heaven we now have the greatest Apostasy the Church has ever experienced & a NWO godless Great Reset fully supported by the Antipope (still awaiting that council to depose him) & his apostate prelates & clergy who urgently require every Catholic to comply with the poisonous jab to ensure the drastic depopulation of the world according to the unelected elites who rule the world economy.
If prelates like Cardinals Burke, Mueller, Sarah, Eijk etc. don’t unite to denounce JB as an Antipope along with his appointees as heretics, then we can be assured that they too are implicated, one way or another, in this Great Reset. Certain canon lawyers & journalists are also implicated for not condemning our leadership much earlier (Dubia) & supporting their own colleagues public Petition, Correctio Filialis which many of us also signed in support.
In order to get back our unity & obtain the necessary graces from God which are vital to ending this huge Disobedience to Him & His Mother we must collectively end the bickering & demand the consecration of Russia by valid Cardinals dismissing those appointed by JB. The Gates of Hell may not have yet technically prevailed but in reality they have. Our obligation is to shut the door after capturing Satan & his evil warriors & the work of doing so must be accomplished very quickly.
Agreed Ana, the failure to consecrate has led to these woes, but so too has the suppression psearheaded by John 23rd and Paul VI (the Unsaints) of the Third Secret, the part Socci proved exists. The part of the Third Secret consisting of the words of Our Lady, and which we know from eyewtiness testimony contains the following chilling prophecy which we are now seeing fulfilled. The letter that John XXIII read in 1959 and decreed and scrawled on the envelope containing this Third secret, “This is not for my time.” A subterfuge. A half-truth. A lie. This letter conflicted with his dearly desired council that he had already decided to call,and specifically addressed one very touchy subject for all modernists, from John XXIII (the Unsaint) all the way and most especially to Bergoglio, antipope.
The apostasy in the Church at the highest levels.
Cardinal Ciappi, who was there at John XXIII’s reading of the Third Secret, has testified that this is precisely what it said. Our Lady predicted “the apostasy in the Church” at the highest levels.
To purport to decree the abrogation of, that is to try to stamp out and bury the Mass of the Ages, as Antipope Bergoglio and his minion DiNoia among others are trying to do, is the gravest apostasy and betrayal of the One True Faith and of the one true Pope, Pope Benedict.
Holy Mother Church is on Her Via Dolorosa to Calvary, if she is not there yet, and only Pope Benedict remains to stand by Her Cross. The katechon. That is why Pope Benedict said he remains within the enclosure of St Peter, to suffer and pray by the Cross. He is surrounded now only by the Caiaphas’s and Annas’s of the temple–the Vatican prelates who fill the halls of the secretariats–and by Pilate (J. A. “What Is Truth” DiNoia?), the Roman soldiers who prod and poke both him and Holy Mother Church, and last of all Judas in the person of Antipope Francis himself.
And of course SAP* Francis’s master, the lord of darkness, is also there….
*satanic antipope.