Stop blaming Holy Mother Church, and start blaming yourself! o Bergoglians!

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I do not know which is the worse sin: that of the Bergoglians who are destroying the Church, the Faithful and Christendom, or that of those who insist Bergoglio is the Pope but denounce all his actions as Pope.

We are not in a situation in which the anti-Bergoglian party has no basis on which it could openly reject him: his claim to the papacy is materially, formally, canonically and factually false. His heresies are daily. His betrayals of the Faithful exceed the measure of all Heresiarchs and Enemies of Christ!

So what really motivates them, then, to hate someone so much but insist without questioning that he is Christ’s Vicar? Is it a sort of madness? Is this the spirit of the Antichrist, in another incarnation? Is it simply hatred of paternal authority by those who have big daddy issues? Or is it the rhetoric of a false opposition controlled by the Fourth Reich’s agents: to divide and conquer while providing no solution, no refuge and no way of flight?

Chief among them is Archbishop Carlo Viganò, who just the other day Blasphemed Holy Mother Church, by claiming that Bergoglio is the Pope and he and the Church are leading the Faithful into apostasy!

Can you not even see the depth of depravity in blaming Holy Mother Church for the sins of those who have broken entirely from Christ?

But, I already hear the voices:  “It is unfair to blame the opponents of Bergoglio who condemn his every uncatholic action!”  “You cannot fault them for what he is doing to the Church!”

But since we are all called to humility and penance, perhaps it is time for these anti-Bergoglians who hate Benedict more than they hate Bergoglio — a fact proven by their 8 year refusal to support Benedict’s right to the Papacy despite all authorities, facts, laws, arguments, reasonings, which show this — to look in the mirror and take an account of their own horrendous, mortal, grave, and quasi infinite culpability in the destruction of the Church?

So here goes a partial list of the sins of the Anti-Bergoglian “But without a doubt the Pope” party :

  1. You have rejected Jesus Christ, who said to Peter, not to the Cardinals, “What soever you bind upon earth, shall be bound in Heaven”, in reference to Canon 332 §2, which declares that a Pope must renounce his munus, not his ministerium, to abdicate.
  2. You have rejected the Vicar of Christ, who said, “I have not abdicated”, without union with whom Pope Boniface VIII declared it IMPOSSIBLE to be saved.
  3. You have rejected reason itself, which says that prima facie, “munus” must mean something other than “ministerium”. otherwise there would be no reason for its existence in the Latin language after 2750 years.
  4. You have enabled Bergoglio to deceive the entire Church in all of his wicked deeds, because you present yourself as the opposition, but you still insist he is the Pope.  What is the clueless Catholic to conclude, but that his claim to the papacy is certain and undoubted, when you, the most vociferous of his critics bash, censor or ignore with Journalistic silence and blacklists, executed on a nearly daily basis those who say otherwise?
  5. You have refused to say he has lost the papacy for his manifold, manifest and pertinacious heresies.
  6. Therefore, you are complicit in Bergoglio’s betrayal of 30 Million Catholics in China, to death and persecution, to rape, medical experimentation, lobotomization, kidnapping, torture etc., BECAUSE you claim he has legitimately the title of the Pope to do it.
  7. Therefore, you are complicit in Bergoglio’s GOULISH guilt in advocating that 1.2 billion Catholics take the death vaxx, nearly ALL OF WHOM WILL DIE.

And so, you must fact the hellish reality of the utter possession of your souls by the Father of Lies and confess that you are guilty of the murder of 1.2 Billion of your fellow Catholics and the damnation of perhaps as many souls for the sin of suicide and loss of faith, not to mention, for dying separated from the true Pope, Benedict XVI.

What can an objective observer comparing YOUR sin to that of all other Christians throughout all history?

You are without a doubt deceived by the spirit of the Antichrist and are most likely already possessed by Satan Himself, for you have abandoned all Light, to follow the Cardinals in their sin of saying that munus = ministerium. For a word, you have bought an eternal hell with punishments which will far exceed that of Judas Iscariot.

So the next time anyone asks, “What does it matter whom I recognize as the Pope?” read him the above article.

With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

20 thoughts on “Stop blaming Holy Mother Church, and start blaming yourself! o Bergoglians!”

  1. “Chief among them is Archbishop Carlo Viganò, who just the other day Blasphemed Holy Mother Church, by claiming that Bergoglio is the Pope and he and the Church are leading the Faithful into apostasy!”

    Would you kindly cite the text or video in which you claim the Archbishop committed this scandalous action? TY

  2. Yet again you spell out and heavily underline clear, incontrovertible facts. Yet the diabolical disorientation persistsin the perverse will of those who will not see. I’m constantly amazed at my fellow Catholics’ inability to identify and cling to Truth with their very being. As with the scamdemic, many appear to consider and accept superior factual evidence, but are then distracted by far weaker claims and then shrug their shoulders as they continue with the diabolical status quo. Immaculate Mary, hora pro nobis!

  3. This goes far, far back to Montini and even earlier, Roncalli—Roncalli changed the episcopal rites of ordination ( so whom is valid today?[Benedict had valid ordination])—Monitini(Paul VI), according to Cardinal Mindzentzy, abandoned +betrayed thousands of priests and Christians to the Communists—the Orthodox, Traditonal Catholic faces total extinction ( except for the Progressive [regressive] Masonic Catholic Christian[ or really Mason because these want to restore the so “oldest religion “{ and they will get their way when the URI replaces the UN eventually}])—Was Roncalli legit ( or did he lose the papacy due to heresy/apostasy [its said he took a jibe at the children of Fatima even { and he did not reveal the 3rd secret of Fatima as he was called upon to do so at that time/”it would become more clear in the 1960s”\}])? Was Montini a legit Pope? And then down the line….Archbishop Vigano was ordained in the Vatican’s new episcopal rite of ordination ( so if he invalidates this and says he is layman, then he would not recognize Bergoglio as Pope[and Bergoglio was ordained in the new rite of ordination {unlike Benedict}])—Perhaps Benedict has become the “silent witness” of the crucifixion of the Church—-But this URI( United Religions Initiative) is dangerous ( as it will label Traditional Catholics as Fundamentalist-extremists who can’t get along with their New World Religion)

    1. Pius XII modification of the ordination rites did not touch the signification of the Sacrament, and thus neither its validity.

    2. Gorbachev’s Green Cross International, his “Earth Charter” and his new list of sins will become the new 10 commandments and the sermon on the mount—-because, as Ted Turner( founder of CNN) was quoted as saying ” Christians are not eco-friendly “

      1. Benedict should consecrate Russia ( with the Bishops of the world) while there is still time

      2. The communists have been planning this takeover for a long time now—and they are using a false pandemic—and even environmental causes ( Gorbachev’s Green Cross [green cross because we are crucifying the earth[the Pachamama coin depicts the “Earth soul”]International)—they are not omnipotent—but the Blessed Mother has left the fate of the world in our hands–we must ACT ( Benedict consecrate Russia)and She will do the rest

      3. Benedict can do this (consecrate Russia) in union with the Bishops of the world by Skype ( put this wearisome “big tech” to use)

  4. When presented with the black-and-white facts, those who I’ve addressed and who still choose to savage the papacy and then justify their positions with the quip, “We’ve had bad popes before” are being physically brought up short by my reply.

    (As an aside, rather than refer to them as the “Anti-Bergoglian ‘But without a doubt the Pope’ party, I call them the “Bash Bergoglio since ‘we’ve had bad popes before'” useful idiots.)

    Of late when they quip their inevitable “bad popes before” fall-back justification I remind them that we’ve had anti-popes before, too. Then I add, “We have never before had a Pope ‘Emeritus’.”

    I finish by saying, “By our Baptisms we have the right and duty to request an official examination of the evidence. Would you like to join me in making these requests?”

    Having informed all of our diocesan priests and the Bergoglian bishop of the evidence (as well as Cardinal Burke when he was passing nearby in Oct 2019), it seems my only recourse now is to use my handmade signs, do a “stand out” on the public sidewalk outside the chancery, and hand out flyers with suggestions for a transparent examination.

    While PPBXVI is still alive, one or all of Andrea Cionci’s suggestions toward just such a transparent investigation would be most helpful toward resolution. In his reply to Steve O’Reilly, Cionci’s recent observation that the Declaratio with all of its syntactical and grammatical errors exists as an historical Church document was most comforting to me.

    Thank you, God, for Br Bugnolo, Andrea Cionci, Bp Emeritus Gracida, Abp Emeritus Lenga, and all the priests who publicly pronounce Benedict XVI in the Holy Mass. And of course, thank you for Pope Benedict who did not flee for fear of the wolves.

  5. Viganó plays at being the opposition. But who is he really opposed to?
    Because behind his criticisms – where in fact he just talks more of what you see on the internet every day – he simply reaffirms and reaffirms that Bergoglio is pope and that Benedict XVI is emeritus.
    It even began a series of criticisms of Vatican II – always accompanied by criticisms of Benedict XVI.
    So who is Viganó really fighting?
    In Brazil, we call this type of attitude “paid opposition”, when the ruler knows that he will be opposed, so he counts on the help of “official opponents” who criticize – but without ever going to the bottom of the truth. And so they distract the population by making them look where they really want to look – not what they should see.
    In a “magical” way Viganó has enlisted followers here who defend him fiercely and even want him to be pope…
    As you well know, no one can get so many fanatical fans on the internet in such a short time. So I ask: who is behind Viganó? Who is making all this media around his name, recruiting promoters for him in Brazil and in the world?
    Whichever group is one thing, it is clear: he has benefited Bergoglio from this irritating mania for always calling the Argentine pope and never questioning either his election or his heretical acts profoundly.

  6. Just watched your ‘A Message in a Bottle’. Touché! The Latin distinctions had not escaped me, however I hadn’t realized it was JPII who made the crucial alteration to the formula–could it be they cooked this up between themselves? That sly old fox!

  7. Excuse my uninformed understanding of Vatican II, but did I really read somewhere that Satan was crowned at the Vatican? Does that mean he manifested as a body? Or does that mean possession? Maybe that question is out of bounds? I do know that you cannot serve two masters if that is what he is to some people. He is definitely not an equal to God, because God is the creator of all.
    Another question that I would like to know concerning Angels; Are they only male? Do they look reptillian? Maybe that is a question too far, (because who would know) but who are the Seraphim and Cherubim? Sometimes they can appear human as they did to Abraham and Sarah, and also at Sodom and Gomorrah. It is also said that we should be careful in how we greet strangers because they may be Angels.
    What about the building at the Vatican that is shaped and looks like a snakes head? I have seen a couple of photos showing this.
    Maybe my questions reflect my spiritual immaturity and knowledge. This world is a very strange place. I do trust the Catholic Church to get things right. Humanities future is at stake, and we cannot have the wrong Pope.

    1. Satan was not crowned at the Vatican. He does not have a body, and therefore cannot wear a crown. Angels are neither male or female, but if we have to classify them, we do so as males since there is nothing passive in them, they are pure action. They appear always a men of light or in human male form. The Seraphim and Cherubim are two Choirs of Angels who are of the 2 most exalted ranks, dedicated to the Divine Worship and to the Love of God. There is no building at the Vatican shaped like snake eyes, it is a urban myth derived from a cut and past of two sites of the same picture of the ridiculously ugly modern art in the Paul VI Audience Hall at the Vatican. — I answered your questions because I realize you are newbie on Catholic topics, and because a lot of readers who are in the same category, have them too.

    2. Brother Bugnolo
      I did not mean to cause offence, and I do not understand where the photos originated from. It just seems very odd that of all the animals that Satan could use for a body it was a serpent.

      1. I am not offended. A serpent lies in wait and is cold not hot. In these ways he symbolizes a fallen Angel who has lost immortality and dedicated himself to deceit.

  8. Not only is this article true, but it is the most essentially true thing.

    Traditional orthodox Roman Catholics are doing the heavy lifting for the Modernists when they insist a Pope can create a new position and retire. It all began at the beginning – by accepting their initial base premise, that the Ministerium and Munus are equal … and even if not equal … “what difference at this point does it make?”. And then these mistaken orthodox Catholics (I hate using the word “Trad”) insist with every fiber of their remaining spiritual reservoir that the resulting acts of evil from the antipope (they call him “Pope but a bad one”) are entirely normal and expected and oh so sad, thus rendering Divine Protections irrelevant, also rendering respect for the Office and person who occupies a thing of the past.

    The current field of battle has both Modernists and traditional Catholics doing their part to destroy Tradition together.

    The Modernist followers are happy to follow Modernist doctrines. They destroy Magisterial Tradition st the doctrinal level.

    The traditional orthodox Roman Catholics complete the destructive path by attacking the Office itself as no longer divinely protected, powerful or special in any meaningful way. The Pope is (can forever be) an evil clown deserving our scorn; to be ignored when we choose.

    The Papal Office is the Rock upon which Christ built His Church and we just rolled over and accepted this deformation without justification, explanation, reference to Tradition. Who needs to abdicate, under such conditions? Retire to the fold with whichever other “Pope” is residing there. Just a shrug of the shoulders – meh! A perfect descriptive for our day: “who cares?”.

    Well, God cares because the Church by Divine Law MUST be in accord with His will. We CANNOT remake it and redefine it. It is impossible., because She is the truest of all things. There is a price to pay when we innovate, and God will not be mocked. He is coming in power to restore what rightfully belongs to him, by His death on the Cross, resurrection, ascension into heaven. He is Lord of All by right. We are servants, not masters; sons not gods.

  9. I hear Francis wants to accommodate Protestants receiving Eucharist at Novus Ordo Mass now( but I remember hearing about inter-faith communion and con -celebration as a kid during Novus Ordo Mass[ so this is nothing new])——I think when Matthew Fox’s( former Dominican priest) “Techno Cosmic Mass” ( really dance,lights, and music [ no vicarious sacrifice]) comes into acceptance ( this certainly will make the URI happy and Freemasonry [after all—they want to re-establish the “old religion “])—-Then, and only then will people see the progression/regression of Sacrifice (Tridentine Mass), Supper(Novus Ordo Mass), and Dance Party ( Techno Cosmic Mass[ this is actually happening now{ and I think of priests and altar boys+ girls dancing in Church plus the Techno light shows in Church for the youth now])and then people might regret their error for attending a Novus Ordo supper like I did

Comments are closed.