Benedict XVI replies to Andrea Cionci’s request for an interview

by the Editor of Katejon, Brazil


A few hours ago we posted the happy news of Pope Benedict XVI’s response to Italian journalist and writer Andrea Cionci: Part 42 of his Investigation. Based on what the journalist called the “Ratzinger Code”, the form of encrypted communication adopted by the Pope since the banishment from the Petrine See, a new confirmation comes to us, in an authorized manner through the Prefect of the Papal Household, Msgr. Georg Gänswein, that not only has Benedict not ceased to be the only Pope of the Church, but that he is in fact in private custody, which is to say: suffering a coup d’état.

In Cionci’s words, “if Pope Benedict were really the abdicated pope, and Francis the true pontiff, in the face of the writer’s ‘heinous slanderous outrages,’ a true ex-pope, or pope emeritus, would have to: either not respond, or deny himself, or openly admonish us not to continue with our articles,” or give a merely protocol response, without any additional detail; which he did not do, on the contrary.

FromRome’s Alexis Bugnolo points out in a commentary on this news that the fact that Benedict is unable to meet the journalist in question (a request previously granted to other “Bergoglian” journalists, and continuing to receive people), even if only to say that Cionci is wrong in his Investigation, and to stop conjecturing that he is the Pope, is a major indication that he is truly in an impeded see. Also noting that the date of the reply (10/27), has correspondence with “the first day that Pope Damasus reigned as Pope after defeating his rival, Antipope Ursinus, in a 3-day battle, which he eventually won on October 26, 366 AD. The battle took place in the Basilica of Saint Mary Major, here in Rome. So, as could not be otherwise, another coded message to reassure us, as Bugnolo concludes, of his victory over the usurper.

But it is possible that there are still three other details that tell us something about this plot, because as Bugnolo points out in another article, quoting Sherlock Holmes: “I have long held the axiom that the little things are infinitely the most important.”

Thus, the first, still in relation to the date, shows us a reply given exactly 8 days after the sender’s request (10/19). In it, the mention of an impossibility. Which somehow refers to the 8 years of impossibility of “piloting” Peter’s boat through two of his four papal ministries, that of government and that of preaching; and this after another 8 years of integral pontificate.

The second, the fact that Msgr. Gänswein twice used the term “Pope emeritus”, even after the recent confirmation by the Vatican that the term has no canonical-legal support.

Thirdly, although we are not familiar with the nuances of the Italian language, the form used by the Prefect in his first mention of Benedict, “Benedict XVI, Pope emeritus,” curiously enough the title of Estefanía Acosta’s book, Benedict XVI: Pope “Emeritus”? Another lapsus linguae?

Some years ago, when he was still in full exercise of his functions, the Brazilian priest Father Marcelo Tenório (Campo Grande-MS) was with Benedict XVI in the Vatican. From Brazil, he brought with him a picture painted for the occasion. In it, Don Bosco’s dream, but with Benedict XVI as the pilot of the Captain Ship. Upon receiving the picture, the priest and some others present observed the Pope spend some moments in great introspection while contemplating the painting in front of him; until he heard from the Brazilian: “You are the Pope of Don Bosco’s dream”. Without taking his eyes off the image, he answers: “Yes, this is me.”

Not by chance, we still find today the tireless “messages in a bottle” launched from the Mediterranean to all the oceans by the captain of the weather-beaten Barque of Peter. But who will come to her rescue?

Fr. O’Connor: Biblical Signs of the End of the World


“Biblical Signs of the End of the World”, a talk by Fr. John O’Connor at St. Peter’s Catholic Church- Chicago, Illinois on October 6, 1979.

In Loving Memory of Father John F. O’Connor, O.P. (July 18, 1929 —December 14, 2006)

Fr. John F. O’Connor, O.P. was an American Catholic priest, who belonged to the Order of Preachers, also known as the Dominicans. He was notable for opposing and foreseeing the future pedophile crisis in the Post Vatican II Church and fought openly against the Freemasonic plots against the Catholic Church. He was severely persecuted for his bravery right up to his death.

On Ash Wednesday, February 28, 1990, O’Connor wrote: “When I made my vow of obedience 40 years ago, it was first and foremost to Jesus Christ, His Mother and St. Dominic and in obedience to them only death will silence my witnessing to the Truth.”


I published this voice track because of the eminent reputation of the speaking, Father O’Connor. But when at last I had the time to listen to the entire video, I found that the version posted here was made by a Sedevacantists who introduced heretical doctrines and false accusations into the video, in images.

Sedes are a very dishonest lot. They were founded by a pedo and so they hate Pope Benedict XVI most of all, who expelled from the priesthood more than 500 of their kind.

At about 22:00 there is an image of Fathers Karl Rhaner and Joseph Ratzinger, with the claim that both were declared under suspicion for heresy. That is false.  Suspicion for heresy is not something the Holy Office declared.

After that there is a claim that the new sacraments are invalid. That is also false.

So, as there are other probably egregious lies and falsehoods in the images, ignore the images, which certainly would not have had the approval of Fr. O’Connor.

Archbishop Gänswein confirms that Benedict XVI is a prisoner in the Vatican

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In a stunning turn of events, Andrea Cionci has obtained from the personal secretary of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI the confirmation that he is a prisoner in the Vatican and is not free to do as he pleases.

The confirmation came in Archbishop Gänswein’s response to Cionci’s request for a private audience with the Holy Father to interview him on the events of February 2013 and the Holy Father’s cryptic way of speaking during the last 8 years.

You can see a photo of the letter here, along side of which are the two different coat of arms of Archbishop Ganswein, those he currently uses, and those he used to use, when Benedict XVI was in power at the Vatican.

First, I will give an English translation of the text, then I will comment.

Vatican City
October 27, 2021

To the most Illustrious Doctor Cionci,

I will respond to your respectful letter of October 19 last, in regard to your request for a “private audience” with Benedict XVI, Papa emerito, to assure you that He did not omit to give your proposed request an attentive consideration.

In this regard, it is my duty to inform you in the name of the Holy Father emeritus that, despite ever good intention, it is not at all possible to favorably grant your desire.

Please accept my best regards,


+George Ganswein

The letter is typed. Most notably, it is typed on stationary with the coat of arms which the Archbishop used during the Pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI, which the Archbishop abandoned in 2017.

Now, it is obvious, since the Holy Father has given many interviews in the last 8 years and has spend 100s of hours speaking with his official biographer, than it is indeed possible for him to speak with journalists. If he is not free to speak with those he wishes, however, then Cionci is correct, that the Pope is a prisoner in the Vatican, the See is impeded, and the cryptic way of speaking used by Pope Benedict XVI is to get these messages out, which would otherwise be censored.

Here the Holy Father had an excellent and appropriate opportunity to meet with Cionci and debunk his entire thesis, if the Holy Father thought it was wrong. But he did not.

On the other hand, if Cionci is 100% or nearly 100% correct, the Holy Father does not need to meet with him to affirm that. He only has to decline the request, making sure Ganswein uses stationary which indicates He is still the reigning pontiff.

And that is just the point.

But if you did not get the hint, note that the letter is dated October 27, which is the first day Pope Damasus reigned as Pope after defeating his rival the Antipope Ursinus in a 3 day battle, which he won on Oct. 26, 366 A. D.. The Battle took place at the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore, here at Rome.

Or in other words, “Be at peace, my son, for the Lord has promised me the victory in this battle, and I am soon to have it!”

What it is like inside the Australian Plandemic Concentration Camps?

Remember, once these camps are built, there are just too many ways for psycho-politicians to create reasons to fill them up, so that they can get kick-backs from subcontractors for their maintenance. And anyone who might question such corruption, “Is a no Vaxx denier!”

GERMANY: The Federal Republic unmaskes itself as the Fourth Reich

 Here is just one of thousands of examples of the viciousness being unleashed by the German police on the citizens and residents of the Federal Republic who do not observe the Scamdemic Restrictions:

An Investigation of what really happened at Rome on Oct. 9

Summary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The Protest on October 9, 2021, which was called to overthrow the government, but ended up attacking a Union HQ, was organized by the controlled opposition who worked hand in hand and step in step with Lamorgese, Minister of the Interior, to blacken the name of the no-Vaxx and those opposing the DeathVaxx Passport. Thought there ares many like these who have become famous for achieving nothing, Italians need to turn their attention away from “heroes” of this kind and concentrate on actions which will truly put an end to the Dictatorship.