Finnish Intel Officer explains how Russia works

Editor’s Note: At 29 minutes into this video, the Intelligence Officer agrees with AJ Baalman and myself, that the selection of John Paul II and his effort to back Solidarity might have been a very well organized CIA operation.

+ + +

+ + + + + + +

The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present

bonav-I-banner This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!

+ + +

Subscribe to FromRome.Info!

Loading

6 thoughts on “Finnish Intel Officer explains how Russia works”

  1. Thank you. This merits a very close listening. Looking at Russia in terms of layers is useful. Did the USA truly lose the Vietnam war, though? Or did it allow itself to be defeated as Yuri Bezmanov sort of suggests, by efforts to subvert American culture in the USA? MacArthur and Patton, if i comprehend well, were prevented ftom defeating the enemy. Curious that a university lecturer presents indoors with a cap and sweatshirt.

  2. Please note Willing Kay’s comment on this video on YouTube:

    “I am Chinese with Western education, and China is like this now and (has been) for the last 2000 years. You can take this PPT and just replace Russia with China, but Chinese paranoia of invasion and insecurity is only 100 years old… (China) have always been very confident about itself as the only super power in East Asia, the insecurity only happened about the Taipin rebellions, which is considered to be the start of modern Chinese history and the start of the century of shame.”

    Matthew Zheng comments:
    “If one wants to understand the Chinese and how they think about the world internally and externally , study the century of shame and then the Mao years. Those two phases of absolute disaster and humiliation is what is what the Chinese (are) always thinking about and want to avoid.”

Comments are closed.