Editor’s Note: I will repeat again: if he does not consider himself the Pope, why do so many voices insist that we have to? It is nothing but coercing us into the Globalist agenda?
Cionci, in his Italian editorial today, points out another glaring admission hidden in this: namely, that by saying if he resigned, he would be a bishop emeritus, he is saying that Benedict XVI has not resigned, or at least, is not acting like one who has resigned. This concedes the entire argument, whether the renunciation is effectively of the loss of the papacy, because if the Anti-Pope admits that it was not done properly, then everyone has to admit it was not done properly. And if it was not done properly, its doubtful. And just as a doubtful pope is not a pope, a doubtfully resigned pope is still the pope!
So if you want to call us BIPers or Benevacantists, or sedevacantists, heretics or schismatics, well you can scream names at us all the way down to your Hell, but we have just won the argument! Because you cannot argue with the person you claim is the pope.