25 thoughts on “United Kingdom to crown the first Divorced royal: as Charles III ascends to the throne”

  1. Diana’s husband was an adulterist from the start.
    Camilla Parker Bowles was an adulterist as well: she did not respect the marriage of her lover.

    Charles’ mother ordered them to divorce.

    Diana was murdered, alongside Dodi al Fayed and the driver of the car. She announced in a handwritten note that this would happen. Her 2 sons were robbed from their loving mother because she was dangerous for fallen ones in her surroundings.

  2. Was Queen Elizabeth “vaccinated”? Royals and especially women live even long lives that even reach 120 in Europe.

    1. Her Majesty was not vaccinated, she was 96. Bill gates is not vaxxed, King Charles is not Vaxxed, Fauci not vaxxed, they are not vaccinating their own, they are given the placebo if they must receive something for PR.

  3. Charles was an adulterist from the start of the marriage between him and Diana.
    Camilla Parker Bowles: same thing: she did not respect the marriage between Diana and her lover,
    Elizabeth ordered the divorce between Charles and Diana.

    Diana was murdered, alongside Dodi al Fayed and the driver.
    She announced that murder in a handwritten note.

  4. To King Charles III and his Queen consort:

    Proverbs 30
    20 This is the way of an adulteress:
    she eats, and wipes her mouth,
    and says, “I have done no wrong.”

    21 Under three things the earth trembles;
    under four, it cannot bear up:
    22 a slave when he becomes king,
    and a fool when glutted with food;
    23 an unloved woman when she is married,
    and a maidservant when she succeeds her mistress.

    God tended to punish countries ruled by idolatrous and adulterous Kings.
    I think the UK’s chastisement was in part postponed because of the moral rectitude of the late Queen.

    But now that King Charles III and Queen consort Camilla reign, the wrath will fall and England will slide into anarchy.
    I wonder if the country can hold together until Prince William and Princess Katherine bring some decent family values to the throne?

      1. After King David had Uriah the Hittite killed, he wasn’t an adulterer, either.

        Princess Diana wrote that she would be killed, as she was an embarrassment to “the Firm”.
        How convenient that she died in a a”accident” before her wedding to Dodi el Fayed.

      2. Once an adulterer, always an adulterer, unless you repent of your sins and go to confession, and get your natural marriage Sacramentally witnessed in the Church for an ordered matrimonial union

      3. Well in the moral order, you are an adulterer if you have violated the marriage of another. But if the other is dead, then while you remain a sinner, if you have not repented, you are not legally in violation (even if the transgression continues) because that other marriage no longer exists, as marriage comes to an end in death.

      4. Camilla is, presently, an adulterer, as her husband still lives. Charles is a willing participant in this.

      5. Oh, I did not know that. Before the Council, when the Church was sane, we never regarded the marriages of Protestants who believed divorce was allowable, to be valid sacramental matrimonies…. and I see the wisdom in that…

      6. Trudi,

        As per your many comments which I have not published on this thread: you seem to be trying to make me appear to be the most evil person in the world, simply because I did not post some inappropriate or off topic comment by you on this thread. I do not know what to make of your intentions. I think you need to calm down. You even admit to not being the person who made the donation you claimed to make. So what can I say? Nothing more, than that against such an accusation, I need no defense, because it is absurd on the face of it.

      1. That makes it better?
        Or did you mean that like King Solomon, Henry VIII began as a virtuous monarch, –but lost his way later in his reign , under the idolatrous influence of his porcupines? :-0

    1. But he was not dvorced before ascending the throne, only after, hence he claimed to have the Divine power to be both head of the State & Church. Plus in those days, they would’ve called it an Annulment (Church jurisdictional term), divorce was known as a secular jurisdictional term – not accepted by the Church.

  5. A Freemason, Globalist, Elitist, spoiled Sociopathic mess returning the fourth branch of the Govt. of England to its HISTORICAL Predatory past in one fell swoop.

  6. It will be interesting to observe how the Catholic Church in England & Wales ‘deals’ with Charles III in the near future. This weekend, Requiem Masses are being offered everywhere for the late Queen Elizabeth which is to be expected. But, moving forward, one has to bear in mind that our Bishops’ Conference is very much wedded to the heretical ‘Bergoglian Church’…….

    1. Charles is a globalist intent on miltarizing the climate norms. That means global military patrol units on the streets to enforce lockdowns. Further I think Francis is his global Archbishop of Canterbury. So the Francis is saying nothing. Mind you he already gave a blue marble globe to George his grandson. The queen said. ‘He will know to appreciate it when he gets older’.

  7. Elizabeth accended to her throne through her father’s divorce and now her son accended to his throne divorced. This does not bode well for families.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.