Vatican begins to Counterfeit Papal Documents at Vatican.va to deny that Benedict XVI is the Pope

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Rome, Nov. 15, 2022 A. D.. — The criminal conspiracy at the Vatican, by which the legitimate successor of St. Peter was thrust from power and a false globalist was installed as anti-pope has now descended to the ultimate mendacity, the public alteration of Vatican documents, to hide the legal fact that Pope Benedict XVI is and has always remained the one true successor of St. Peter of our day.

Andrea Cionci published the first of these, last night, when he revealed that the Italian version of the papal law on Papal Elections, Universi Dominic Gregis, where in n. 77 it explicitly cites Canon 332 §2, has a hyptertext link which does not function.  The link should send the reader to the online Vatican version of the Code of Canon Law of 1983, but it goes to a non-existent page!

 

What is the fear, here, that someone might read the Latin text of that Canon, and discover that the man who is the pope has to renounce his petrine munus to abdicate? Like Benedict did NOT?

The document contains no other significant hypertext links. This error then, is the code-equivalent of giving the middle-finger, in my opinion, as one who has maintained and operated and  written HTML code for websites for nearly 25 years.

Then, after publicly publishing the existence of this error, another Twitter user has pointed out an eve more grievous error: in the English edition of that same n. 77, the citation is NOT linked, but cites Canon 333 §2, instead of Canon 332 §2!

Two errors for the same citation, each to misdirect the reader? Is it that possible that the Vatican webmasters are so sloppy?

(UPDATE 1:20 PM: It has just been brought to my attention that, the error in the Italian is found also in the French version!)

The unity of purpose in disparate errors manifests the unity of intention behind them. Here they both hide Canon 332 §2.

One can reasonably and forensically conclude, therefore, that the Vatican knows AND NOW ADMITS that Benedict XVI did not abdicate on Feb. 11, 2013, because he never fulfilled the terms of the canon they want to hide.

But, by this report I do not want to deny that there is an internal division at the Vatican, since the Secretary of State regularly regards Pope Benedict XVI the the Supreme Pontiff:

———-

CREDITS: Featured image is of the Basilica of St. Peter, seen from the Via Conciliazione. All rights reserved © 2022 FromRome.Info.


10 thoughts on “Vatican begins to Counterfeit Papal Documents at Vatican.va to deny that Benedict XVI is the Pope”

  1. Simply amazing. These corrupt people lie, cheat, steal, and cause schism just like the NWO globalists. If they do not confess their multitude of mortal sins before they die, they will spend eternity in Hell. Papal schism is no laughing matter. Nor is apostasy from the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

  2. Is there anybody within the Vatican who is not a puppet of the enemy?
    The devil’s usual strategy is, once again, manifest here:
    Deception, leading to
    Division, leading to
    Distraction, leading to
    Discouragement/Disillusionment.

    “The Father of Lies” must know his time is short as these nefarious tactics combine Pride/Lust for his intended ‘victory’, with Anger/Envy that he will be defeated…….!!

    Apocalypse/Revelation, chapter 18 [?]

      1. Thankyou. But as he has been imprisoned within an ‘impeded see’ since early 2013 I had temporarily forgotten his location!

        I often recall the homily Pope Benedict XVI gave after his election in April 2005 and, in particular:- “Pray for me, that I may not flee for fear of the wolves…”

  3. Dear Brother Bugnolo,

    You are correct on all points, but the deception is much worse than the mistyped reference to and a dead hyperlink to Canon 332 § 2.

    In Number 77 of Universi Dominici Gregis, the law clearly states that “even if” the Roman Pontiff were to “resign,” the “dispositions” required in the previous sections of Universi Dominici Gregis must be followed precisely or the election is invalid.

    The key pre-condition in UDG for a valid papal election (EVEN IF there has been a canon 332.2 resignation) is the “death of ” and the celebration of the “funeral rites” of the deceased Pope (UDG, 49). Since Benedict XVI was obviously not dead in March 2013, the election of Bergoglio is “null and void” according to UDG, 76.

    Keep up the good work. And see http://www.antipope.cc for the full analysis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.