Efficacy of the Prayer of the High Priest, Jesus Christ, Report: Week 4 of Pope Francis’ Pontificate

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo


The juridically valid election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, to be Roman Pontiff, was held on Monday, January 30, 2023, at about 12:30 PM, 4 weeks ago.

The proof of its validity in the sight of God is that the one elected is now the beneficial receiver of Christ’s High Priestly Prayer for Peter: “I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail”, as evidenced by the PUBLIC FACT that Pope Francis has not uttered 1 blasphemy or heresy in the last 4 weeks.

This week, I want to comment on the mass delirium into which the leaders of the traditionalist movement world wide have thrown themselves, willing as they obviously do, to live in the false narrative that will lead astray all those who heed them into schism from the Apostolic See and eternal perdition.


Our Lord said, if you have faith, you will be able to say to the mountain, move, and it will be moved. The Mountain is now in motion and those who want to see, can see it.

But these say, “If you blindly trust in me, I will lead you into the depth of Hell and you will praise me as your savior. However, you must listen to me and ignore all right reason, common sense, and documentary facts, not to mention all Canon Law. Yes, I was wrong for 10 years about who is the pope. Yes, I did not even want a valid pope after the death of Pope Benedict XVI. But no, I am totally competent and trustworthy to give you advice about everything from rubrics on the Latin Mass, to documents from the Vatican, as well as your eternal salvation.”

Would that Catholics have more trust in Jesus Christ. Perhaps many think He is a myth and that the claims of His power are just that, old superstitions. But He is the One Who has the words of eternal life. And when we risk ourselves in believing in His Words, only then do we hook our wagon to the train which is headed to Heaven.

Contrariwise, if we are willing to risk our eternal salvation, mental sanity, and perception of reality on the mere word of those who have been proven to be totally incompetent commentators on the biggest issues in the Church for 10 years, what else do we merit by the damnation that we so glibly risk to embrace?

While I have in many emails cited canons 59 ff. to these careless fools, they still persist in judging the truth of the matter on the basis of these blind and godless social media influencers. NONE OF THEM HAS EVEN DARED OPEN THE CODE OF CANON LAW. So I will share that canon with all here:

Can. 59 §1. A rescript is an administrative act issued in writing by competent executive authority; of its very nature, a rescript grants a privilege, dispensation, or other favor at someone’s request.

§2. The prescripts established for rescripts are valid also for the oral granting of a permission or favors unless it is otherwise evident.

Can. 60 Any rescript can be requested by all those who are not expressly prohibited from doing so.

Can. 61 Unless it is otherwise evident, a rescript can be requested for another even without the person’s assent and has force before the person’s acceptance, without prejudice to contrary clauses.

Can. 62 A rescript in which no executor is given has effect at the moment the letter is given; other rescripts, at the moment of execution.

Can. 63 §1. Subreption, or concealment of the truth, prevents the validity of a rescript if in the request those things were not expressed which according to law, style, and canonical practice must be expressed for validity, unless it is a rescript of favor which is given motu proprio.

§2. Obreption, or a statement of falsehood, also prevents the validity of a rescript if not even one proposed motivating reason is true.

§3. The motivating reason in rescripts for which there is no executor must be true at the time when the rescript is given; in others, at the time of execution.

I assume all can read, so there is no need for me to say, that a rescript by its its very nature is granted by a superior, to someone asking for a favor. Thus, there is NO SUCH THING as a rescript published by a Cardinal who goes to the pope seeking the punishment of others. It violates both the nature of what a rescript is and the order of authority in the Church.

Yet no social media influence speaking on this topic has dared confront Canon Law. They all keep telling Catholics that Pope Francis has turned against the TLM once again. It is a complete lie. By not issuing a rescript, Pope Francis is indicating that as Pope, he does NOT approve of this attempt by Cardinal Roche to squash the Old Rites.

But what we can see, is that, now that Pope Francis is validly elected, the Roman Curia is treating him as they treated Pope Benedict XVI. These clerics are the true enemies of Christ.

I will report on this on a weekly basis, to glorify the Lord Jesus and His wondrous care for His Flock through the grace of the petrine munus, so that those who see and believe might praise God, and those who disbelieve and say that they see, might be confounded in eternity.



CREDITS: The featured image is taken from the Icon of Christ, the High Priest, available on line here.

With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

14 thoughts on “Efficacy of the Prayer of the High Priest, Jesus Christ, Report: Week 4 of Pope Francis’ Pontificate”

  1. Peace of mind comes from reading this article of yours, Br. Alexis. Thank you for your clarity.

  2. Here is an excerpt taken from the traditional Papal Oath upon the coronation of a pope:

    I swear to God Almighty and the Savior Jesus Christ that I will keep whatever has been revealed through Christ and His Successors and whatever the first councils and my predecessors have defined and declared. I will keep without sacrifice to itself the discipline and the rite of the Church.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    When Jorje Mario Bergoglio pronounced his ACCEPTO upon his election by the College of Cardinals to be the Successor to St. Peter, did he have the proper INTENTION to faithfully fulfill his pontifical duties & responsibilities to defend The Deposit of Faith & to promote the Propagation of the Catholic religion? His subsequent actions patently manifest that he did not, but rather to destroy the Catholic Church &, in short, introduce a new religion established upon the ruins of the same Church. Consequently, his defect of intention is an obstacle which renders his papal election compromised. By referring to him as the lawful pope, you are enabling this him to carry on.

    1. Popes do not take oaths upon coronation. Oaths presuppose superiors, and he has no superior on earth. This oath is an internet myth.

  3. Mistic Visions of Jacinta Marto of Fatima (1920)

    “I don’t know how it was, but I saw the Holy Father in a very big house, kneeling by a table, with his head buried in his hands, and he was weeping. Outside the house, there were many people. Some of them were throwing stones, others were cursing him and using bad language. Poor Holy Father, we must pray very much for him.”

    Jacinta saw “highways and roads and fields of people, who are crying with hunger and have nothing to eat.” Jacinta Saw “the Holy Father in a church praying before the Immaculate Heart of Mary” and “many people praying with him.”

    Forseeing the sufferance of the holy Father Jacinta kept saying “coitadinho do Santo Padre” («Poor Holy Father»)

    Memories of sister Lucia

    The Vicar of Jesus Lord remains ever and forever with Jesus till the Holy Cross. “Peter,
    feed my sheep”.

    Let us pray for the holy Father Pope Francis.

  4. ”«Le protagoniste principal d’un synode est l’Esprit Saint. Si l’Esprit Saint n’est pas là, il ne peut y avoir de synode.»

    «Une Eglise qui ne célèbre pas l’eucharistie n’est pas une Eglise. Mais une Eglise qui se cache dans la sacristie n’est pas non plus une Eglise. »

    About the first point. It seems that Card. Cantslamessa is illustrate the true sense of a synod
    «Ogni novità e ogni cambiamento si trova davanti a un bivio; può imboccare due strade opposte: o quella del mondo, o quella di Dio: o la via della morte o la via della vita.»

Comments are closed.