Editor’s Note: This Vatican Decree confirming Bishop Olsen was obviously invalid from the get go. I said as much in my editorial of June 1, 2023, arguing on the basic principles of Canon Law and facts. It is not a surprise, therefore, to me, that the former Apostolic Nuncio would agree, though the other opinion was sustained by popular and degree-carrying canon lawyers.
3 thoughts on “Archbishop Viganò agrees with Br. Bugnolo: Vatican Decree against TX Carmel null and void”
Comments are closed.
High time for ++Vigano to desist from long-winded verbatim writings on the minutiae of the transgressions of flaming sodomite apostate heretics like Olson and actually DO something. If Olson is as despotic (yet surely a pathetic hollow man in reality) as described, he must be countered by being replaced with a faithful bishop consecrated by ++Vigano for the purpose of rallying the faithful behind a true shepherd. Is this not what St Athanasius did?
Dialogue concedes all initiative to an enemy that lacks validity and can surely be overcome by being ignored and outflanked.
That this does not happen can, as usual, be attributed to false notions of obedience.
I myself do not understand the Archbishop. He should insist on a council, a synod, etc.. The only thing is that you cannot appeal to a future council against a pope, as that has been condemned. And before Jan. 30 he had perfect canonical grounds to move one. Now I think he is just waiting for Bergoglio to drop.
“. . . popular and degree-carrying canon lawyers”
= chorus of Bergoglian yes-men Pharisees.