CDC: 99% of Covid deaths not caused by the “Virus”

Editor’s Note: In March of 2020 we were told that Covid had a 60+% death rate. FromRome.Info, analyzing the first statistics available said it would be rather like 0.5% or 0.05%.  Recent reports claimed that it was 0.03%.

But that figure has to be lowered even still, according to this new report from the CDC which says that 99% of all new covid deaths are not primarily caused by the “Virus”. — Here we are getting closer to the ultimate admission, that the Virus is mythical and never existed.

So that means that Covid, if it is a real disease, whatever its cause, is only 0.0003% deadly, or only 3 persons in every 10 thousand who get it will die from it primarily.

The Globalists are now running in a panic, because if you search the web for the above story, you can find as of today 5+ news sites with the same original title, “99% of Covid deaths” not caused primarily by the Virus, ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN CHANGED in the last 24 hours to read “1% of Covid deaths” caused primarily by the Virus. A change which I, as an anthropologist, believe was made to induce the masses NOT to read the article.

In sum, THE PLANDEMIC WAS A TOTAL HOAX. The CDC has just statistically admitted what FromRome.Info has said since mid March 2020. For if something is only 1% the cause of something else, since statistical accuracy is always doubtful, that 1% can be presumed to not exist.  Here we have a statistical piece of evidence which confirms the hundreds of bio-labs round the world, all of which have declared that they have NO SAMPLE of the SarsCov2 virus.

PLANDEMIC COUNTER-INSURGENCY: How employees at US Hospital got new DeathMask requirement cancelled in 4 day battle

EDITOR’S NOTE:  The Counter-Reset has begun. Read this amazing true story of how the employees of one of the largest Hospital chains in the USA got the new DeathMask requirement, declared by the management on August 24, 2023, cancelled after a 4 day united fight. This shows the way forward. The Counter-Reset has begun! Take the war to the enemies camp!

UKRAINE: Zelensky makes 180° turn, says Elections are possible in Spring

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

This change does not surprise, coming just days after President Zelensky admitted that the Western Powers would not be sending as much military aide in 2024 as in 2023.  The Ukrainian summer offensive has shown the world that the two powers, Russia and Ukraine are locked in a World War I style conflict, wherein acquisition of the enemy’s territory can literally costs thousands of lives per square kilometer. Both sides have lost well over 200,000 in killed and wounded in general estimation, and if they continue the stalemate, they could easily begin burning manpower up at the rate of 10s of thousands per week.

As I have observed many times, the plan of this war was hatched long ago, perhaps as early as 1995, when Putin attended his first WEF meeting in Switzerland, before his rise to power. The insistence by western powers that Ukraine disarm after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the broken promises to admit Ukraine to the EU, set the stage. The extremely measured grants of old equipment in the last 18 months, shows too that western powers wanted the war to continue but not be won by Ukraine.

At stake is one of the richest deposits of iron and coal in the entire EurAsian land mass: the Donbas. And the Rothschilds are anxious that clear title to the mines be had so that their exploitation can restart (after armed conflict began there by Russia in 2014).

The Russian Federation has a capacity to levy troops 5-7 times that of Ukraine. In addition, 14 million Ukrainians have fled the country, with polls showing that they are not likely to return, ever.

An election in the Spring will give Zelensky a way out of his unwinnable position, since his political support would most likely implode if he talked compromise with Putin. However, an election might put into power a former member of the Azov Regiment, which is wildly popular among the Ukrainian People, despite the Russian Myth that they are Nazi’s — totally unfounded.

Zelensky is emphasizing in the current news item that the men in arms also have a right to vote. This might indicate that he knows that he needs their vote to remain in office.

Zelensky ran for office years ago on the promise to keep the peace with the Russian Federation. By any objective review, he has failed utterly in that promise, even though he has shown a zeal to defend his own country from unjust aggression which rivals any European head of state since World War II. Nevertheless, this next election will be a referendum on his administration and leadership.

His near persecution of Ukrainian natives who are religiously attached to the Russian Orthodox liturgy is not going to make any campaign easy for him. Ukraine is Ukraine, but she is also culturally very close to Russia, due to her history. The secularists and Jews of Ukraine do not seem to want to make peace, even going so far as to pass laws during the Zelensky goverment which are gravely offensive to the Christian traditions of Ukraine. But the Christians of Ukraine are still Ukrainian Christians and they are much more desirous to protect their historical and religious traditions, than they are of becoming a tool in the hand of the secularist agenda, whether that emanates from Brussels or Tel Aviv.

I will not be surprised, therefore, if Zelensky is easily defeated in the next election by a candidate who offers a different direction of national interest. This war has ignited Ukrainian Nationalism in a way that no other even in their long history has, and Ukrainians want a Christian as their president. They are now woke to the realization that their nation will never be free if their leadership has any ties to foreign powers. And they are not the Ukraine which elected Zelensky, a TV personality. They have been hardened in a fierce and existential threat and in all the horrors of war.

The sad reality is, that if Ukraine makes any peace deal with the Russian Federation, which cedes territory; there will be another war, some years hence — because Russia will be much stronger with the Donbas — and then Ukraine’s fate will be that of Czechoslovakia’s, after the seizure of the Sudetenland by the Nazi regime: total annexation.

Pope Francis shows his Jesuit colors in praising “Great Russia”, which protected Jesuit Renegades

Editor’s Note: Another historic gaff; another flabby denial and retraction. The Catholics in Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland and the Baltic States are outraged, that Pope Francis has praised an Empire which from its existence has persecuted the Catholic Faith. — But as I often remark, you cannot excise the love of Russia from the heart of anyone who admires Marxism, even if he be a Jesuit.

The Franciscan Pope, Clement XVI, in his brief Dominus ac Redemptor of July 21, 1773 A. D. suppressed the Society of Jesus permanently. The renegades then fled to Russia and chose the Russian Orthodox Schismatic Emperor to be their protector. Pope Pius VII, on account of his alliance with the Tsar against Napoleon, approved the Jesuits in Russia in 1801 and fully restored them in 1814.

I, like many others, believe that was a tragic mistake, for obvious reasons.

Even a Bill Gates Funded group finds the masses agree with FromRome.Info

Editor’s Note: Bill Gates with all his billions of bribes to journalists and institutions world wide has failed to convince a third of the population that his DeathVaxx is safe and effective against the mythical virus. He has also failed to convince them that Ivermectin is dangerous. — A group funded by him can not even design a method of polling to hide the fact. Which means, that the real percentage is much higher. — A hat tip to all those doctors, nurses, and critical thinkers who opposed the Scamdemic and the DeathVaxx. — I thank God that with my many friends and informants and supporters (FOR WITHOUT YOU IT WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE), I can count myself and my readers as among the number of these true heroic defenders of humanity!

These statistics make it virtually impossible to yell, “Pandemic!” again with any effect. The Globalists will have to resort to mass murder on an industrial scale to terrorize us with such a narrative again. This consideration is both reassuring, and foreboding. — Therefore, let us pray to the Living God, that He strike confusion in the camp of the enemies of His creation, so that they turn on one another, as St. John Bosco foresaw, long ago; lest such a horrible event take place.

Pope Francis’ talk to Jesuits in Portugal, and why Catholics should rebuke him

Commentary and Call to Action by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

When the Roman Pontiff speaks as a private theologian he is not protected by the charism of infallibility. There have been celebrated cases of this in recent history, such as Ratzinger’s books written while he was Pope, where he said that God is not only charitas and amor, but also eros, which is a blasphemy since eros is lust.

Then there was John Paul II who said that he doubted there was anyone in Hell.

Pope Francis during his anti-papacy said enough things to scandalize Catholics until the end of time, but it is the things he says now in his Papacy, that we have a grave moral duty to respond to. That is, when he is in error, to rebuke him or denounce him.

The duty to rebuke Peter to his face when he is in error, is of Apostolic Tradition, as it began with St. Paul the Apostle, Doctor of the Gentiles, who after his conversion by the intervention of Jesus Christ Himself, on the Road to Damascus, is held by all the Fathers never to have sinned, even though he was not present at Pentecost.

The objectionable statements by Pope Francis took place in his private meeting with the Jesuits of Portugal. It is obvious that he was speaking freely and with little consideration for theological precision. Like always, he was pushing his narrative of progress.

But nevertheless any error which leaps out from the lips of the man who is the Pope ought to be corrected. And the Faithful have a duty to remonstrate with him.

For the complete conversation, see the article above. I presume here the English translation is correct; but it may be manipulated by Spadaro. So let’s be cautious.

So without more ado, I cite one of the passages which is clearly erroneous and leads the listener most likely to contradict de Fide truths, without which one cannot be saved. There are many more, but I do not want to wax Jesuit by citing them all here.

First a question by a Jesuit, then the response by Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis):

Pope Francis, I would like to ask you a question as a religious brother.[4] I am Francisco. Last year I spent a sabbatical year in the United States. There was one thing that made a great impression on me there, and at times made me suffer. I saw many, even bishops, criticizing your leadership of the Church. And many even accuse the Jesuits, who are usually a kind of critical resource of the pope, of not being so now. They would even like the Jesuits to criticize you explicitly. Do you miss the criticism that the Jesuits used to make of the pope, the Magisterium, the Vatican? 

You have seen that in the United States the situation is not easy: there is a very strong reactionary attitude. It is organized and shapes the way people belong, even emotionally. I would like to remind those people that indietrismo (being backward-looking) is useless and we need to understand that there is an appropriate evolution in the understanding of matters of faith and morals as long as we follow the three criteria that Vincent of Lérins already indicated in the fifth century: doctrine evolves ut annis consolidetur, dilatetur tempore, sublimetur aetate. In other words, doctrine also progresses, expands and consolidates with time and becomes firmer, but is always progressing. Change develops from the roots upward, growing in accord with these three criteria.

Let us get to specifics. Today it is a sin to possess atomic bombs; the death penalty is a sin. You cannot employ it, but it was not so before. As for slavery, some pontiffs before me tolerated it, but things are different today. So you change, you change, but with the criteria just mentioned. I like to use the “upward” image, that is, ut annis consolidetur, dilatetur tempore, sublimetur aetate. Always on this path, starting from the root with sap that flows up and up, and that is why change is necessary.

You have been to the United States and you say you have felt a climate of closure. Yes, this climate can be experienced in some situations. And there you can lose the true tradition and turn to ideologies for support. In other words, ideology replaces faith, membership of a sector of the Church replaces membership of the Church.

Bergoglio is fond of misquoting St. Vincent of Lerins, whose chief criterion for progress in doctrine is “according to the same doctrine, the same meaning, and the same judgment”, a passage Bergoglio never cites, as far as I know. There is a discussion on his habitual manipulation of the text, here, which for the sake of argument could be because he was taught an erroneous view of St. Vincent’s doctrine, and is in invinceable ignorance at present of the matter.

So let me address the errors in order.

“It is a sin to possess atomic bombs”

Every statement should be understood according to the meaning of its terms. And each word can have different senses, especially when heard by persons of different levels of education.

“Sin”, in common parlance is an act which was morally deficient or faulty. But in the Bible a “sin” is the obstruction put between you and God, in some passages at least.  So sin can be considered (1) as the deviation from the right moral order, whether that order be known by revelation from God or man’s own ability to discern by the use of reason a moral deviation; or it can be considered (2) as the act which contains this deviation; or as (3) the fault which arises from the act which is perpetrated, or as (4) the liabilty for punishment which is merited by the full or partial consent to that act.

Pope Francis does not define his terms. But the common man knows of “sin” only in the first sense.

Then again, “possess” can mean to have legal title, or de facto control over a thing, directly or through its physical location on his physical property or by legal claim, title, etc.. Thus you can possess a thing in one sense because it is in your hand, in your pocket, in your car, in your garage, or listed among your legal possessions in a juridical act, such as a last will and testament. But just because it is possessed in any one of these senses, does not mean that it is possessed in any one or all of the others. Otherwise, when a zealous merchant put an apple in your hand, you would have to buy it, even if you did not want it; or when a kind aunt asked you to take some candy to your niece and gave it to you for that purpose, that you could eat it on the way to your niece’s home.

But most people understand possession in the sense of belong to you as your property with right to dispose of it.

An atomic bomb is a nuclear weapon, that is, one in which a reaction of nuclear fission or fusion causes a massive exothermal explosion, when triggered.

With the terms defined, let us examine the error in the statement.

In the common sense, the statement is erroneous, as can be seen by the fact, that if in a war, in which one side had no nuclear weapons, and another which had them, the armed forces of the side without them — with no intention ever to use them — came upon a warehouse with the atomic weapons of the other side, and captured them, then it would be no sin for the unarmed side to capture and take possession of them. — For if it is a sin to possess them with intent to use them, then it must not be a sin to take possession of them from such an owner. This is a police action. And thus the statement is false and erroneous, and even self contradictory, because if it is a sin to own them, then there would be no way of ridding oneself of that sin but by destroying them on one’s own initiative. — Perhaps in a ideological world — which Pope Francis exhorts us to reject — there could be no crime because ever criminal would rectify his behavior without police intervention. But that world is not our world.

So there has to be cases in which possession of atomic bombs is not a sin. Indeed, there are cases when it is a virtue, that is, when it is used to deter the use of them by others who have them, for in that case possession is had to prevent the use of the legal title to them in war by another.

Is this error, in the above statement, a denial of a revealed doctrine?

This is an important question, because only in such a case would such an affirmation be a heresy. For each and every denial of revealed doctrine is formally a heresy, according to St. Thomas Aquinas, transmitting the perennial magisterium of the Church on this topic.

Answer: No, simply because in Scripture and Tradition there is no affirmation that possessing atomic bombs is of God’s will for man, simply because there were no atomic bombs in the ancient world, so the topic does not even come into consideration. So we have to have recourse to moral principles and revealed truths about God’s will for man and creation.

Could the statement of Jorge Mario Bergoglio be understood in a Catholic sense? Yes, if “sin” is taken in the Biblical sense of something which is an obstacle between man and God.

In this sense, one says that possessing pornography is a sin, meaning to say, possession with intent to use it. If it were illegal to posses, it would not be a sin for the police to take it from you or keep it for evidence, for example.

In this sense, one can say in a very wide sense, that it is a sin for mankind to possess atomic bombs, because no good can come from it. But no good can come from renouncing atomic bombs, so long as the entire human race has not renounced using them. Again, yes atomic bombs are contrary to God’s will and plan for man in the natural world, because He put us here to build it up not to destroy it.

But just because I personally can imagine a sense in which the statement could be understood soundly, does not mean that the statement should be excused or ignored. As stated it is so badly stated as to induce error directly and immediately. And that is immoral. For a pope, it is gravely immoral since everything he says could harm every human person on the planet now and until the end of time.

Now to the next phrase …

“The death penalty is a sin. You cannot employ it, but it was not so before.”

Here we must have recourse to the same distinctions regarding the meanings of the word “sin”.

But in this case, we can see that there is a logical error in the statement, in addition to other errors. Because “capital punishment” is a non-concrete term, that is, it refers to a category of punishment not to a thing, thus it is not a thing nor a moral act. So it cannot be a “sin” in any sense I mentioned above, since for a proper logical statement the thing in the subject of the sentence must be logically withing the grasp of the term in the predicate of the sentence.

Moreover, God commanded capital punishment for many offenses in the Old Testament. Therefore it cannot be of itself a “sin” in any sense as mentioned above.

God also authorized Saints and sinners to impose capital punishment, according to the infallible teaching of St. Paul, “To Caesar God has given the sword to punish evildoers”. And I am sorry, but I will remind all Jesuits, that St. Paul’s authority trumps even than of a Jesuit Roman Pontiff, since it pertains to the Deposit of the Faith which the Roman Pontiff must guard and protect and serve, not alter.

In what sense could the phrase not be an error? Not in any obvious sense, in my opinion. Perhaps one could have wanted to say, that “The indiscreet, indiscriminate and hasty recourse to capital punishment for most crimes would be a sin of injustice, because correction can well amend and make reparation for such crimes.” — This I think would be the Jesuit counter-argument, at least. But it neglects that the reaffirmation of the eternal unchanging moral law of God in certain cases does require that the perpetrator be put to death, even IF he is sorry and completely penitent for his crime. Thus it is an objectively good thing, in all times and places, to put certain kinds of horrible criminals to death, by public execution, even. Pope Sixtus V put 5000 brigands to death. And I know of no Catholic writer before the Council who faulted him for it. Nay, he was universally praised for making the highways of the Papal States safe for travelers.

If one denied that capital punishment of itself is justly imposed by proper authorities for proper crimes, then one would have to say that the Death of Christ itself was entirely and in every sense unjust, and that therefore His Sacrifice of no avail before the Altar of His Father.

While the capital punishment of no criminal rises to such a pure state as the Crucifixion of Christ, it is important to note that no Catholic Author has ever impugned the sentence of capital punishment issued by Pontius Pilate against Christ Jesus, the Living God, on the grounds that “capital punishment is a sin to employ”, simply speaking.

Thus we have two grave errors when understood commonly and without specification.

Therefore, all Catholics have the duty to remonstrate with Pope Francis by some means, directly or indirectly, as they may be able to do, to obtain from him a correction for his words which will cause scandal to soul, if not the total corruption of their personal grasp of the moral law or Church teaching.

Is this second error a heresy. I think it is such a bad error as to definitely impugn Pope Francis as a possible heretic. But because of the syntactical error of calling “capital punishment” a “sin” when it is not a moral act, means that it is a phrase of ignorant propaganda, which is morally scandalous, rather than formally a heresy.


Since such a scandal is a moral fault which Catholic should publicly distance themselves from, I do believe that we all have the duty in our own way, in conversation, correspondence, to friends and superiors to bring to their attention these errors and scandals. While we should not correct a superior in public without light reason, the weighty reasons, mentioned by St. Thomas, of defending the Faith and protecting little ones from being led astray, authorize such action in this case. — I would suggest you bring the matter to the attention of those Cardinals and Bishops who may welcome your petitions. Canon 212 gives you the right to speak out on this matter.

As regards my comments on the Papacy of Pope Francis in the last six months, I will only briefly comment that what Pope Francis has said in this interview, on this topic and on other topics such as sodomy, is so scandalous, that he is hastening the day of his own terrible personal judgement before the Throne of God, for Whom religion is not a game of politics, as it is for Jorge Bergoglio. Yes, he has avoided heresy; but no, he has given grave scandal, because it is obvious that he does not have much good will to avoid it.

This article is an example of how a Catholic approaches a public scandal perpetrated by the Roman Pontiff. Compare it to how Sedevacantists might respond, in coming days, to this same news.

How the CIA Controls the minds of nearly everyone in the Catholic Church, right now

And the role Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre played in it.

Background information on CIA goals for world domination:

Br. Bugnolo’s September Appeal

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

If you would like to help me in any way, you can do so either via these PayPal donation buttons, with a debit/credit card. You do not have to have a PayPal account. — Or you can use a bankwire, as per below, which is a NEW method available to my readers, who come from all over the world.

As a Franciscan Brother, I live on divine providence, that is, I beg what I have, since I have nothing of my own, as the Rule of St. Francis of Assisi obliges. — This is to follow Jesus, unto the Kingdom of Heaven. But before, God willing, I arrive, I have to pay the bills.

I AM GLAD that most of my readers are preparing to resist the next Plandemic and therefore have gone off-grid or abandoned digital money. But that means those of you who are risking it still, are the only ones left to help me keep going. It is a certain, sort of strange relationship with the reality of our times, that only those who beg, like myself, as a Franciscan Brother, have the freedom to criticise the Globalist Agenda inside and outside the Church. But that means that I still rely on my readers.

There will be a new crowd of awakened readers during the upcoming Plandemic, and FromRome.Info will try as long as possible to inform them, against all the waves of censorship which will take place. So for those of you who want to fight this electronic war for free speech about and opposing the Great Reset, I count on you.

Thus, I understand that most of you cannot be of help. But if it were not for a small number of benefactors last month, I would have been under water, as they say, that is behind about 90%. SO EVERY ONE OF YOU WHO DOES HELP, means all that more to me. Of the 458 subscribers, about 10 pledge $7 to $20 a month, and the rest comes from 3-4 large donors, who are keeping me afloat. — Thus anyway you can help is VERY appreciated.

So that your donation can help me in the way you want to help me (because I know that not all of my readers are Catholics) … here are the different ways to helping …

To Support FromRome.Info

To support the costs of the place where I reside (Hermitage):

Or if you would just like to help me with personal expenses, like for food, utilitis and travel:

Or if you would like to help me in an Apostolate I am organizing here in Europe:

Bank Wires

To help me and my works, you can now send a bank wire to any of the below accounts to help me in my efforts.

DISCLOSURE: Unlike PayPal, if you use a BankWire to one of the accounts below, ALL YOUR PERSONAL information is WITHHELD, that is Br. Bugnolo will not receive your address, email, bank account information or phone number. Only the name on the account from which the bank wire emanates will be disclosed.

However, do to this, Br. Bugnolo will not be able to issue a refund if requested, because he will have no way of verifying from which bank account the money came.

For all bank wires, You must indicate one of the REASONs as follows, when you send your bank wire, so that the receiving account, Ordo Miltiaris Inc., can assign the funds to one of the US tax deductible causes:

HERMITAGE — For donations dedicated to supporting the place where Br. Bugnolo resides (Rent, Utilities)

BUGNOLO — For donations to enable Brother Bugnolo pay his personal expenses of food, travel, phone bills etc.

Depending on where you are, you can send a bank wire in different currencies, to Wise Bank, at any one of the following accounts, held by Ordo Militaris Inc., a US corporation for humanitarian assistance. No part of these funds will be used by this corporation, all will be transferred to the purpose you request in the REASON you state as per above.

When sending US Dollars:

From the United Kingdom, in Pounds Sterling:

From Australia, in Australian Dollars:

From CANADA & all other nations, in EUROS:

Please note, that when sending monies within the EU or the SEPA system, use the BIC code shown below. BUT, when sending monies in Euros from CANADA or from outside the EU or SEPA systems, use the same code as the BIC, but enter it as the SWIFT CODE.

In advance I offer my gratitude and prayers to all who read this article, regardless of whether they can or cannot help me this month.

If you cannot afford to make a donation, please do me the favor of praying for me and making FromRome known to your friends and family. That way I can grow my readership. Thank you!

CREDITS: A photo of Br. Bugnolo, standing in front of the poster of St. Bonaventure of Bagnoregio, which a shopkeeper in that town gave to Br. Bugnolo as a gift on the Saint’s feastday. Please pray for her.

HAWAI’I: Maui Areal Video, in memoriam of the victims

The music is a morning dirge for the dead. — One thing that the MSM news and the subsequent speculation frenzy has forgotten, is that many of the victims were Catholics. We should pray for their souls. This is what happens when you vote for the Left; you vote yourself into the Fire Vortex of Hell. God permitted this, because the clergy no longer preach hell fire to remind us.

A Fact to share with those who ridiculed you for not getting the DeathJabb

Editor’s Note: Generally speaking, it’s not charitable to rub in it, when you are right and your opponent was wrong. But in the case where it may lead them to repentance, save lives, and teach them true humility, it’s a solemn duty. — Sharing this fact, is one of those. —  This is for all the Vampires who pushed the DeathVaxx and attacked FromRome.Info for posting the truth. For the search engines and Aleteia and Father Matthew Schneider, and all the others who if they don’t repent will surely burn in Hell for hating the truth and acting with reckless disregard for the health of everyone.

LEGAL NOTE: If your health was harmed after you took a DeathVaxx, on the advice of Father Matthew Schneider, Legionnaire of Christ, you may have grounds for a civil liability suit against him and his Congregation, on the grounds of practicing medicine without a license and spreading medical disinformation, as well as undue psychological influence. Seek the advice of competent legal experts for more information. And if you file suit, let me know!

Here is the full thread, from above, for those who do not want to log on to Twitter (click image):

UK: 98% of NHS workers are refusing to take the Winter Flu Jab

Editor’s Note: As I said in my editorial of August 18th, where I was the first, this month, to warn about the coming Plandemic, the Globalists gravely misunderstand human mass psychology if they think they can fool everyone a second time. To this extent too, Dr. Martin is correct, the playbook, now being unmasked, won’t work a second time. — But I defer to Dr. Rashid Buttar, who warned us days before his strange death in May, 2023, that they still have ways to inducing mass deaths. After a short 30 minute visit to the city the other day, I returned home with a spinning head, a thing I never experienced in my life; so I am convinced that the 5G attack is underway. It remains to be seen, however, if this next trick in their box functions.