Contra ‘Fiducia supplicans’

Here you will find a list of essays and editorials written by Br. Alexis Bugnolo against Fiducia supplicans and its pernicious errors

For our complete coverage of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ Controversy, click the ‘Fiducia supplicans’ tab at the end of any article.

Join the Committee Against Apostasy

This page will be updated as more essays are published

With Globalist Censorship growing daily, No one will ever know about the above article, if you do not share it.

4 thoughts on “Contra ‘Fiducia supplicans’”

  1. Dear Brother Alexis After the pseudo election of last year you stated that ‘ Pope Francis ‘ would not pronounce heresies any more. Given that Bergoglio Is pulling out all the stops to bring the Catholic Church. I read about your request of help to reopen the Hermitage. In my opinion you should Say you were wrong and Bergoglio Is not the Pope and then apologize to Don Minutella e Dr. Cionci. God bless you

    1. Emilio, I never said that Pope Francis would not pronounce heresies any more. I said, that now that he was juridically elected, we could trust in the prayer of the High Priest Jesus Christ for him. But Christ promised only to pray for “Simon” whom “satan wants to sift”. He never promised that the Roman Pontiff as a man would not spout or promote heresy, only that in his official capacity he would not impose it as an obligation on the faithful. This is what Christ achieved in the last year by the extraordinary event, never happened in the last 1000 years, that so many Bishops from all parts of the world, opposed Pope Francis’ Fiducia supplicans and called for him in private to remove his signature or cancel the document. They achieved extracting from him the removal of any legal obligation for anyone to accept the teaching contained in that document and even obtained from him a written document for all Bishops in Africa to reject it. Several Bishops conferences repudiated it without any legal consequences.

      Jesus prayed for Pope Benedict XVI too, but that did not prevent him from writing an invalid renunciation or that so many around him would betray him.

      As for Don Minutella, I have nothing to apologize to him for, because I have never said a word about him, other than that his personal crusade to defend the truth that Pope Benedict XVI was the pope until death has shown no real fruit, after the death of the Pope, since he rejected immediately all efforts to elect his successor, just like Cionci has done. Both of them have thus made themselves seem to be incoherent, because every good Catholic knows, that after the death of a pope, there should be the election of another pope as soon as possible. Like Leo VIII, an antipope can become a true pope. Back then tacit acceptance was juridically sufficient. But canon 332, section 1, now requires that he be elected in a legitimate way. It does not say in a legal or canonical way, because the word legitimate includes also the wider genus of any valid juridical manner and thus allows for an election by Apostolic Right, which is how Pope Francis was elected on January 30, 2023, when no other candidates came forward — a thing for which Cionci and Minutella are chiefly responsible, because knowing full well of the election, time and place they did absolutely nothing to encourage the Faithful to attend or any potential candidates to be considered. From that day to this one I have lost all confidence and trust in these two men, since they have acted in an absolutely reckless manner concerning the salvation of the Church and all Humanity.

      That Pope Francis is a great and public sinner and trying to destroy the Church is no one’s fault but his own. And trying to make it the fault of anyone else is really shameful.

      Those Catholics who wanted to restore the juridical order in the Church by having a juridically validly elected pope and those who want to see a man unworthy of his claim to the papacy removed from office in a juridically valid manner, are true Catholics. On the other hand, neither Cionci nor Minutella want him removed from office.

      So if you neither wanted a juridically validly elected pope, nor that a man like Bergoglio be removed from office, I do ot think that you have any cause to demand apologies.

      I would, however counsel you not to follow individuals who reject the Apostolic Tradition of the Roman Church to elect her own Bishop. As those who do such things cannot be saved.

      As for myself, what can one Franciscan without a penny to his name and no ecclesiastical status or fame do to save the Church from following a false pope? The only thing I could, namely, suggest when there were no candidates for election on Jan. 30, 2023, that at least the Assembly elect the man whom everyone thought was the pope, but was not, so that the Faithful be reunited again to our Lord juridically, and thus return actually to communion with the One Church He founded. All including myself recognized that this was a stop-gap measure, but it was the only thing that could have been done at that moment that would be beneficial in radice. Subsequent events have shown that no one who said B16 was the pope until death have moved an inch to see that he have a good man as a successor, and Christ Himself has confirmed the election by the above-said, miraculous once-in-a-millenium ecclesiastical grace.

      Perhaps you should thank Him more rather than dedicating a poison pen to attempting to demonically gaslight the Faithful about the facts of the case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.