Editor’s Note: The opening of the office of the World Jewish Congress just outside the Vatican, in October of 2023, is a very disturbing development, considering the criminal associations of this organization, as exposed in this video documentary. — While the claimed associations in this video should not be considered true without further proof, they are sufficiently of such a nature that all Catholics should pay attention. — This is an exposé of international Zionist criminal organizations and their fronts and affiliates. Note: that the Zionist Organization, AIPAC now totally controls the U.S. Congress and hence the entire U. S. government.
Monthly Archives: January 2025
Michael Haynes: An update about Pope Francis’ Health
Pope Benedict XVI’s Declaratio: A ‘Munus’ which keeps on giving
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Traduction française — Traduzione italiana
Nearly 12 years ago, Pope Benedict XVI read aloud in the Clementine Hall, before the Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, assembled for the approbation of 3 groups of Saints, his now famous “Declaratio”, an administrative act which announced that he was to renounce the “ministry … which he received through the hands of the Cardinals …” as of Feb. 28, of that year. The document, rife with errors in Latin and juridical concepts, was immediately recognized by even the most main stream publications as the BBC (see Feb. 28, 2013 report here) to risk splitting the Church in two and making the man to be elected in the upcoming Conclave an anti-pope.
His conscious, free decision to renounce the ministerium rather than the munus of the Roman Pontiff was the cause and origin of the controversy, which is mocked by those-still-in-denial after 12 years, as “Benevacantism”, a term coined by Steve Skojec, founder of 1 Peter 5.
But ironically, Pope Benedict XVI’s Great Error — unlike Pope Celestine V’s “Great Refusal” — is a gift, that is, a munus, which keeps on giving, because whatsoever was his intention, and whatsoever is the opinion of any observer, Pope Benedict XVI’s action began a great divorce in the Church, between the juridical order and the church of appearances.
For from the moment that he neglected or failed to actually renounce the Petrine Munus (as he had apparently announced he would do) on Feb. 28, 2013, the Apostolic See has been in a state equivalent to an impeded see, with the entire Roman Curia and Courts deprived of all legal right to act and issue any decisions or judgements, and Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who came out of the illegal and uncanonical Conclave of 2013, as Pope Francis, of all right to govern the Church. This is because, the entire Roman Curia operates licitly and validly only inasmuch as they assist the Roman Pontiff in the exercise of his Petrine Ministry. When he refuses to do this, they cease to have any legitimacy.
This has made all of Pope Francis’ acts, statements, documents, letters etc. and treaties since March 13, 2013, until the death of Pope Benedict XVI on Dec. 31, 2022, null and void, without effect.
But that is not only their only effect.
For because so many unfaithful and cowardly men, followed by so many uninformed and lazy Catholics, have recognized Pope Francis as a legitimate pope throughout this time, they have accepted his illicit alterations of the Code of Canon Law and reorganization of the Roman Curia, such that, now, even after the death of Pope Benedict XVI, every act of the Roman Curia and every judgement of the Apostolic Signatura and Roman Rota, as well as every penal process, in tribunal or by administrative decree, throughout the whole Church, which is based on those changes, is legally null in void, that is irritus, because it has not cited the correct and authentic canons of the Church, or has emanated from justices which hold no canonical mandate issued by a Roman Pontiff holding the Petrine Munus, or is issued by an office of the Roman Curia which has never legally existed, being created by Pope Francis during his antipapacy.
This gift of Pope Benedict XVI keeps on giving, also, because of the faithful and courageous action of the Roman Catholics at Rome, who resorting to their Apostolic Right to elect the Roman Pontiff, granted them by Saint Peter the Apostle themselves, elected Pope Francis the Roman Pontiff to satisfy canon 331 and to reestablish the basics of juridical order in the Church, while yet omitting to inform him of his election,* so that he would not reissue by valid decree those documents which he issued invalidly without legal right as antipope.
Now, the next Conclave can give the Church a valid Successor of Saint Peter, who can begin the Great Catholic Reset. The Great Reset which Pope Benedict XVI, unwittingly or consciously, prepared with his Declaratio of Feb. 11, 2013.
Archbishop Fulton Sheen once remarked, that the day would come when the laity would save the Church, and that day came two years ago, on January 30, 2023, at the Assembly held to elect Pope Benedict XVI’s successor, just as Pope Benedict XVI — may he rest in peace — indicated in his Declaratio, an election “by those who were competent” to act.
** An election by Apostolic Right, since the Apostle laid down no written law concerning it, operates under the terms of Natural Law, where if one already claims to hold an office, his acceptance of any election to it is tacitly assumed de facto and de jure. So there is no need that the one elected explicitly and verbally indicate his acceptance of that election, his acceptance is automatic by reason of his habitual prior claim to the office.
Edgar Beltrán: Canonists have dismissed the Benevacantist Theory
Critique by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Here a writer at “The Pillar” confuses the word “dismissed” with “refuted”. “To dismiss” something, is to reject it with or without consideration. But “to refute” something is to show by reasons that the argument it presents is fallacious in some manner sufficient enough to show that its principal conclusions are false.
“The Pillar” has a long history, as documented here at FromRome.Info, of publishing false, misleading, or inaccurate statements.
They were even sued for one of them.
But to tell your readers that the Renunciation of Pope Benedict XVI is an abdication by such round about propagandistic statements, and no reasons, is the duty of a “Ministry of Truth” ala 1984, and not a Pillar of anything in the Church.
In my experience, however, only those who are intellectual cowards dismiss arguments they do not agree with. Men of truth, rather, study the sources of truth and compare them with the reasons of the arguments they oppose, to find flaws, if any; and if they do, the refute them, and if they do not they recognize that it was they who were wrong and not their opponents. — Alas this attitude is very rare among online publishers and Social Media personalities.
Ironically, “The Pillar” is so amazed at Edgar’s type of journalism that they did a fundraiser last year to pay his way to live in Rome and report for them; their fundraising letter claimed Edgar is the kind of journalist Catholics need to have at Rome. Gasp!
I do not know why, because, propaganda can be written from any location.
The truth is that no one with a degree in Canon Law has EVER refuted the claim that Pope Benedict XVI’s Declaratio is not an abdication, because it is so patent that the claim is true, you would have to jettison all reason and your entire reputation, not to mention twist the meaning of every Canon in the Code of Canon Law. Indeed, the very fact that every priest who states the claim in public is being excommunicated on the spot without even being given due process or brought before a tribunal of experts in the law, shows that the claim can only be dismissed by those with malice of aforethought: it cannot be refuted by right reason.
Italian Government proposes Bill to leave W.H.O.
Editor’s Note: Here at FromRome.Info we have long memories and do not forget, that Matteo Salvini, during the Scamdemic was not only NOT opposed to the lock-down measures, but was MORE extreme than even many of the Left wing party members then in the government. So I think we can ask, whether leaving the W. H. O. is actually going to have any effect that will save lives, since someone, who wanted to maximize deaths and the terror campaign, is in favor of leaving it.
Trump’s own move to leave the W. H. O. is wildly popular in the U. S. A., but then again, he is the one who pushed the development and distribution of the DeathVaxx.
What seems to really be going on, is the Globalists are at play to regain control after having exposed themselves and lost some of that control during the last attempt at mass murder. So they are giving each nation a leader whom the people trust, but always someone compromised, to get them to consent to being led into another “catch and kill” pen.
SWEDEN: Iraqi Christian murdered by Islamic Supremacists as he live streamed
Editor’s Note: This Iraqi Christian was hunted by Muslims and persecuted by the Swedish government, both left and right ones. That he could be murdered in his own apartment by 5 gunmen in a country where privacy rights are expansive and gun rights very restricted, shows that he was correct in everything he said. It also shows that as much as governments of the right may fake being such, they are still in favor of Islam’s conquest of Europe. — His name was Salwan Momika, and he deserves to be remembered for exposing Islam for what it is. — There is no death penalty in Sweden, which means, basically, that Muslims can murder Christians there with total impunity, except for the fact that they might get a 5 star hotel room for free for life (prison cell) or deported back to their Islamic countries (where they will be hailed as heroes).
ITALY: Bishop of Palestrina “excommunicates” Don Santonocito for saying “Bergoglio is not the Pope”
Canonical commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Don Natale Santonocito, a priest of the suburbican diocese of Palestrina, was excommunicated yesterday by Msgr. Mauro Parmeggiani (yes, the same name as the cheese*), the Bishop of Palestrina-Tivoli, who declared an excommunication in virtue of canon 1364 for “heretical and schismatic” teachings.
The official Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Italy newspaper, L’Avvenire, says in the article above, that the priest was given an opportunity of legal defense with a lawyer assigned to him, ex officio. — In previous public statements, Don Santonocito said he would not oppose the extra-juridical process (a canonical process undertaken by a superior without the presence of a tribunal) because he did not recognize the appointment of Msgr. Parmeggiani as valid, it having been made by Pope Francis and not Pope Benedict XVI.
Father Santonocito holds that the Apostolic See is vacant after the death of Benedict and that Pope Francis by reason of his manifest heresy is ipso facto excommunicated and thus not the pope.
The excommunication was declared not imposed, since the announcement of the Diocesan Chancery cites canon 1364’s provision for latae sententiae excommunication.
This excommunication is null and void, in my opinion, for its error in ascribing Don Santonocito’s views to a crime punishable under canon 1364 for “heresy” or “schism”, since holding that a papal renunciation was invalid, when it was invalid, and hence that a conclave was invalid when it was invalid, are neither heretical nor schismatic acts, punishable by the Code of Canon Law. Don Santonocito has made clear in his many videos that he refuses communion with those he holds to be in manifest heresy (Pope Francis etc.) and thus cannot be held to be either a heretic or schismatic by intention. And without the intention to violate Canon 1364, a person cannot be punished.
The notice in the above news article tries to make it appear that Don Santonocito was sufficiently and duly notified of his errors and given a chance to retract them, but it is clear that Bishop Parmeggiani proceeded with a very shallow and incorrect view of the precise position of Don Santonocito.
Bishop Parmeggiani cannot, in my view, be excused of gravely violating the rights an good name of Don Natale Santonocito, because he has already received dozens if not hundreds of petitions to convoke a Provincial Council to hear the charges that Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not hold a valid claim to the Apostolic Throne. This makes Bishop Parmeggiani legally presumed to be in a state of bad will, precisely because he should have referred the case of Don Natale Santonocito to the Provincial Council, since what Don Natale is saying directly pertains to the charges in the Sutri Initiative. Bad will must also be presumed because the charges of heresy and schism to not apply to Don Natale Santonocito’s publicly affirmed positions.
By proceeding against Don Santonocito himself, and without bringing the matter before his diocesan tribunal, where the judges are supposed to be both learned in ecclesiastical jurisprudence and impartial, the Bishop has furthermore shown prejudice of aforethought against Don Santonocito.
In fact, I do not believe jurists trained in ecclesiastical right would have held Don Natale’s statements configurable under the delicts of heresy or schism, since all the classical sources of ecclesiastical right, expressly say such disagreements of opinion about papal elections and abdications are not such delicts.
Finally, the malice of Msgr. Parmeggiani is made most evident by the terms of his penal decree against Don Natale, which forbids him “to receive the Sacraments”. That blanket statement means that poor Don Natale, even if penitent, cannot go to confession again for the rest of his life. How is this in any way pastoral? Nay, it is clear that his bishop has an ideological-political motivation contrary to the entire Catholic Faith. — Even Heretics and Schismatics are allowed to receive the Sacrament of Penance, as this is the required means for them to be received back into the Church.
In short, Don Natale’s Bishop has shut the door in his face and nailed it shut. And for what?
Msgr. Mauro Parmeggiani is the first Bishop in the Roman Province to take public action which shows that he is an adherent to the heresies, blasphemies and apostasies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio. There are 14 other such Bishops in the province who have also been petitioned.
Supporters of the Sutri Initiative or of Don Santonocito can now appeal to the other 14 bishops and demand an immediate convocation of the Provincial Council to address the grave crimes committed against Don Santonocito and his serious allegations against Pope Francis. This is the true Catholic and juridical approach, it is also the true Synodal approach the Church has always used in the past in such grave matters pertaining to the Apostolic See, impeded by dubious claims of pretenders to the Throne of Saint Peter.
Don Santonocito’s own errors lie in thinking that just because he can discern manifest heresy in another person or superior, that that person is not a member of the Church nor holds an office. But this contradicts canon 194 §2, which says the loss of office for those who abandon the Catholic Faith does not take effect without the decree of the same competent authority which declared the heretical depravity. And this is precisely the reason for the necessity of the Sutri Initiative.
Needless to say, Catholics everywhere should be disappointed that superiors in the Church are acting in this manner. There seems to be a deep and habitual incapacity of so many of the clergy to confront the reality of their own actions and to follow the rules of their own Church. There also seems to be a total lack of fraternal interventions by fellow Clergy and Bishops to prevent mutual violations of ecclesiastical right. — Let us pray for our Bishops and our Priests, and let us do whatever we can to encourage them to be more respectful of one another for the sake of the weak who will be harmed by the scandals, like this, which erupt weekly.
______________
* The famous Italian cheese from Parma, Parmigiano, is the Italian standard for grating cheese over pasta, or eating cheese with green melons and cantaloupes. It’s name refers to the City from which it comes, that is the cheese of Parma, just as the surname of the Bishop means, those men from Parma. Parma is one of the principle cities of the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, in Northern Italy. It’s more famous sister city is Bologna: and yes, that is where bologna, the cold-cut, originates.
U.K.: Bishop Richard Williamson dies
Editor’s Note: Reconciled to the Apostolic See on January 24, 2009, under Pope Benedict XVI, who lifted the surreptitious excommunication levied by his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, Bishop Richard Nelson Williamson died in the embrace of the Church. He was a reader of FromRome.Info during the pandemic, since he cited its reports about the danger of the DeathVaxxes. Though he went on to consecrate several bishops, Pope Benedict XVI never penalized him for it, before his own death on Dec. 31, 2022. May he rest in peace.
Born into a wealthy family in the United Kingdom, but of an American mother, during the Battle of Britain, on March 8, 1940, A. D., he eventually attended Clare College, Cambridge, where he earned a degree in English Literature. He converted to the Catholic Faith in 1971 and within a few months joined the Society of Saint Pius X. He was illicitly ordained a priest, at Econe, Switzerland, in 1976.
In 1988, on June 30, Msgr. Williamson was one of the four men illicitly consecrated a Bishop by the late Archbishop Marcel LeFebvre, the founder of the Society of Saint Pius X, whereupon Pope John Paul II excommunicated him.
After Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication, he was hounded by Vatican officials and civil officials in Argentina and Germany for his statements controverting the well-accepted historical propaganda that 6 million Jews were put to death in concentration camps by the Nazi Regime, an assertion which is now widely accepted as false in countries where it is not a political crime to deny it. He was subsequently expelled from the Society of Saint Pius X in 2012, for not accepting their disciplinary measures against him for his statements.
Msgr. Williamson died of a cerebral stroke, on January 29th. He suffered a cerebral hemorrhage on the 16th anniversary of his reconciliation to the Church and was taken immediately to hospital where he passed quietly.
Williamson was a man who spent his life swimming in the direction of the truth against the currents of his age. He was not a man to keep from speaking it, out of human respect or fear of the press. He had, thus, an ocean of virtue beyond most of his contemporaries.
The True History of the Downfall and Trial of the Knights Templar
Vatican Press Office admits Opus Dei Cardinal Sanctioned, without due process
Editor’s Note: The admission is implied in the Vatican News’ own report, which cites the Cardinal as saying he was placed under a penal sentence without ever having any knowledge of being prosecuted. The tacit admission by Vatican News is tantamount to a declaration that the penal sentences are utterly contrary to the Cardinal’s rights in Canon Law and all notions of jurisprudence.
Generally speaking, an appeal to the Roman Rota for lack of due process would result in an immediate suspension of sentence, except that in this case, if the Cardinal’s case was brought to the Apostolic Signatura or Pope Francis himself, there would be no possibility of an appeal to the Roman Rota. Nevertheless, it appears that the Cardinal was sentenced while Pope Benedict XVI was still alive, and hence the penalty is utterly void and without any effect.
If you are a friend of the Cardinal, you should urge him immediately to appeal to the Provincial Council of the Roman Province demanding that the case regarding Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s claim to hold the pontifical authority from March 13, 2013 to January 30, 2023, be heard without further delay.
Trumpian “Catholics”: We need a Trump-like man as the next Pope!
Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
When a Catholic says that a political leader is the “Light of the World”, you know you are face-to-face with an adept of the spirit of the Antichrist.
I am reminded of the loonies who in 2008 said that Barrack Obama was “the Messiah”, a most blasphemous thing to say.
The U.S.A. is currently under a massive psy-op, where given the appearances of a little back-tracking and patriotic supremacy, many Catholics are falling under the spell of a carefully orchestrated fake salvation.
Let us remember that the titles, “light of the world” or “the Light of the World” are proper only to Christians and Christ respectively; and that Trump is a member of a church of positive thinking, which is not even Christian. So when he says, “God” the meaning is not even certain.
But to confuse some political details with salvation is just as absurd.
Has Christ been proclaimed “King of the United States”, has Trump converted to the Catholic Faith, has the Masonic Lodge been abolished, have their two political parties been banned? Some such things might be cause for rejoicing.
But in any case, one should never ascribe titles which are theologically based on decisions of God to certain persons or to Christ, to a political leader who is doing something entirely different.
Nor is it sane to say that Donald Trump is an example of the kind of pope the Church needs to restore Her from years of Modernist attacks, as Mundabor, who is given to excesses as much as some people are given to drinking more than one cup of coffee, says, here:
And when you click on the side bar of FromRome.Info, then you will understand why I say this. Because the U. S. government policy since 1953 has been to undermine the Catholic Church and make the American example accepted as the true salvation of the world. This being the case, an informed Catholic can rightly wonder if Mundabor and Sheryl Collmer are of a sane mind, or whether they have accepted consciously that objective and error, since what they are proposing, that Trump be a model for a pope, is totally Americanist in the worse sense of that term.
Trump is not a virgin. He is not a Catholic. I am not sure he is even baptized. He is twice divorced. He allowed his second election to be stolen. He pushed the DeathVaxxing of the U.S.A.. He allowed 200+ cities burn under Marxist mob attacks. He is pro-Abortion, though not under ever circumstance. He is pro-LGBTQ+.
If you say that this man is the kind of man we need to restore the Church, then I would say you are a blasphemer.
Now, my critics might lash out and say that I am faulting the comparison of Trump vs. the next Pope on the personal characteristics of the man, when the above authors are talking about his public policies. But, if my critics dare to respond thus, they can save their breath in enunciating that, because, I ask, do you really want a godless, heathen of a man on the Apostolic Throne who does good things? Don’t we need a holy man? Is not holiness the only certifying factor that a pope’s pontificate will do good for the Church?
And in this, is shown the real error of the above authors: they are claiming that politics is a more sure sign of Catholicism than sanctifying grace and communion with the Holy Spirit.
So please, think before you repeat this HYPE. As it is godless and demonic.
Trump thinks he has jurisdiction over Geography
Historical Note by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
A Catholic, if he be true to who he be, has a long memory and while not a traditionalist, in the sense condemned by the First Vatican Council — namely, who holds that all truth comes from the past through human tradition — nevertheless remembers history. And so, this week we Catholics the world over get the last laugh. Because Donald Trump, a protestant at best, if he be a christian — I say this not out of disrespect, but because the “church” he has gone to for decades, “of positive thinking” is not a Christian church — is attempting to assert the political influence of the United States by “renaming” the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America”. But Catholics remember who discovered the New World, and he was a Roman Catholic. And Catholics remember after whom the New World was named, and he was also a Roman Catholic. And, thus what Donald Trump is attempting to do in renaming the Gulf to the south of the shores of the continental United States, to assert the dominance of that nation over its borders, is really just adding another Catholic name to the map, just as the United States by its very name cannot extricate itself from the name of a Catholic explorer and the historical fact that Catholics discovered the New World, bringing the light of Christ’s Salvation to a people who had lived in darkness for eons and a bounty of opportunity to the Christian peoples and their civilization to an entire hemisphere of the Earth.
As far as the name “Gulf of Mexico” goes, it appears to have been used by non-Catholics instead of the names which Catholic explorers gave to the Gulf as, “Gulf of Saint Mary” and “Gulf of the Holy Spirit”, with “Mexico” being preferred to “New Spain”, even though “Mexico” comes from the Spanish name for Mexico City, which little-by-little was used for the entire Vice Royalty of New Spain. (See a map of 1708, with this name on it, here)
What Trump seems to misunderstand, is that “America” is not the name of his country, and “Gulf of America” is thus confusing, since there are many gulfs all along the shores of North and South America. He seems he should call it the “Gulf of the United States”, and maybe that will dawn on him after he hears a host of complaints from Geographical Associations and Institutions as well as publishers of Maps and Atlases.
ROME: Italian Press pushes Fake Narrative of Papal Critic, Demos
Editor’s Note: For nearly two years, the Italian Press has pushed a very sophisticated narrative whereby some anonymous Cardinal is openly criticizing Pope Francis and his pontificate through a series of multilingual pamphlets and that Pope Francis is enraged at the level of gossip they contain. However, when you read the article (click image above for Italian original, click HERE for English) you see that this pamphleteer, who writes under the name Demos, is someone totally out of touch with the real problems at the Vatican which are gross immorality, heresy and apostasy. But for Demos, the problem is bad administration and bad public reception of reforms. Hah!
VATICAN: Pope Francis’ stomach grumbling is a “torture”
Editor’s Note: The moment was a brief one, on January 25th, last, when Pope Francis refused to read the entire talk that he prepared, saying, “With my stomach, which is grumbling, it would be a torture.” A statement which appears to indicate an acute case of gastritis or stomach ulcer.
ROME: Prepare for your Jubilee Pilgrimage, without the Mass
Exclusive Report by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
If you are planning a trip to Rome for the Jubilee Year of 2025, prepare to expect not to be able to have Mass celebrated by the priest who is leading your pilgrimage.
Shocking as it may seem, but Pope Francis had ordered all the major Churches to establish pharasaical rules whereby any Mass by anyone, even a Bishop, during the Holy Year, can be cancelled or refused for any reason at any time.
And the rules are truly pharasaical.
I will explain what happened to a pilgrim priest yesterday in the Eternal City and let you judge for yourselves.
The priest visited the website of the Church in question and saw that the only requirement to celebrate mass was to fill out a simple form and submit it.
He arrived at the Church in time for the Mass he requested to say.
The laymen on duty asked if the priest had filled out the form. Then they said that these requests were only granted by the Rector, but that the Rector was not on duty. The vice-rector was also not on duty. Finally, the laymen realized how embarrassing the situation was to them, and they said the priest could say the Mass after the Church closed to the public, at 12:30 P. M.
The priest returned before that time to have some time to view the Church. Members of his pilgrimage where then told that he could not say the mass. The reason given was that the Rector who previously was claimed not to have seen the request, was now claimed to have seen and replied, and that the priest had to reply 3 or more days before he came to the Church. But this rule is no where on the website.
The members of the pilgrimage asked to speak with the Rector. They were told he was not on site. They asked to speak with the vice-Rector. They were told he was not there. They asked to speak to someone in charge. They were told there was no on available. They asked if the priest could reply to the email, which contained a questionaire, in person on paper. They were told that the email had to be replied to electronically. The poor priest did not think to bring his device with him.
The mass was to be a votive mass in honor of the Patron Saint of the Basilica. The day the priest chose was his birthday. He had come 10,000 miles to say this Mass.
The door was metaphorically speaking shut right in his face, with excuses that nothing could be done, because the Rector had just “entertained 3 cardinals and 15 bishops and 60 priests the day before, on Sunday, and had to take a day off.”
However, what these pilgrims were told does not make sense. Because if the Rector had not the time to see the request, how did he have time to reply to it? And if he had time to reply to it, why was he not reachable, even electronically on Mondays? And if permission was granted for 12:30 as the staff affirmed before numerous witnesses, how is it that it was withdrawn if the Rector and vice-Rector were unreachable?
Upon inquiry the pilgrims were told that masses by pilgrim priests are allowed at 9 AM, 12:30 P.M. and 5 P.M. But when they asked if any where scheduled today, they were told, “No”. And when they asked why their Mass could not be allowed at 12:30 PM, the staff say that the Church closes and the staff goes on lunch-break, so that they cannot remain and have mass!
On top of this, the website of the Church says, that “any priest who wishes to say mass at the Church, can concelebrate at the Masses regularly scheduled, and he need not show his celebret”!
Translated into layman’s terms: Anyone, Catholic or not, Christian or not, who claims to be a priest, can come to the Church before the Masses on Sunday or weekdays, present himself as a priest, whether he be so or not, and concelebrate with the Rector and his associates! — A policy entirely contrary to all Catholic Teaching and all Canon Law, not to mention the discipline of the Diocese of Rome which is announced for hearing Confessions on their official Jubilee Website, here.
So why the open door to fake priests, but a door slammed in the face of Catholic pilgrim priests?
The end result is this: what this priest suffered is exactly what I reported was going to happen in regard to the Ban on Masses at another Basilica, that of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem. It appears if Pope Francis has intentionally banned the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass by Catholic pilgrims during the Holy Year.
The Mayor of Rome seems to be in agreement, because the City of Rome is plastered with posters promoting the Jubilee Year, which show a Female couple, one white, one black, which seems to imply that lesbians, transgendered couples are the targeted group for tourism for the Catholic Jubilee Year, and that the City of Rome expects them, not mass going pilgrims. — On the Web, there are several variations of this poster showing different groups, but on the ground at Rome, I saw repeatedly and only this version:
Finally, FromRome.Info is the only Catholic news source which is reporting on this ban on masses. So please share this report for the sake of your brothers and sisters in Christ everywhere, lest they suffer the same religious persecution that Pope Francis seems to have organized this year at Rome as a sort of sadistic psychological game of abuse.
UPDATE: A member of the pilgrimage told me, after this report was first published, that the Priest did receive an email from the vice-Rector, who gave permission for a mass at 12:30 P.M. She had sent this email just a little more than an hour before the priest arrived in person. Pilgrims do not have cellphones which work in Italy, only near WiFi points in hotels and restaurants. The email from the vice-Rector contained no form to fill out. — More proof that multiple layers of mendacity were being employed to say, “yes” and signify, “No!”.
France & Germany to oppose US Annexation of Greenland
USA: Trump freezes all foreign aid, except to Israel & Egypt
Editor’s Note: If you want to know if President Donald Trump can defend himself against the accusation of being a radical Zionist, out for “Make Israel Great Again”, just read this news story.
Persecutor of Latin Catholics says Religious Persecution must stop!
Musk’s Brother meets Italian PM, Meloni, at Rome
Trump orders release of all JFK, RFK and MLK documents immediately
Editor’s Note: The assassinations of U. S. sitting president, John F. Kennedy, his brother, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, and religious leader Martin Luther King, have cast a long cloud of doubt and suspicion in the minds and hearts of U. S. Citizens about the cover ups committed by the U. S. Federal Government though 60 years of differing administrations. This complete document release is the fulfillment of one of the most honest and upright promises made by any U. S. elected President.
The Vatican should follow suit on this example of transparency by releasing all the documents it has regarding the suspicious death of Pope John Paul I, the disappearance of Emanuela Orlandi, and the pedophile ring run by one of the Vatican policemen during the reign of John Paul II, in addition to all the documents relating to Pope Benedict XVI’s “Renunciation”, including the original copy held in his hands the day he read it aloud.