Editor’s Note: FromRome will not feature this entire series, but for the record, it publishes here the first installment of this highly controversial investigation into the true identity of Brigitte Macron. — While I disagree in principle about speculations regarding a woman’s identity, because I was raised to be a gentleman, this investigation is timely for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the importance of understanding how much power the press has to misinform the public. — Another important point in Candace Owens’ presentation is that she points out that the Elephant in the Room, the big lie, is the one thing that the guilty will never allow to be discussed. This is true, so true about Pope Francis too: no journalist of repute will talk about his uncanonical election in 2013, or his prosecutability quo warranto for heresy, schism, apostasy and idolatry. Bishops who speak of this are censored by the “opposition press” (Bishop Gracida), suspended and/or excommunicated (Archbishop Vigano) or put under house arrest (Archbishop Lenga); and priests who dare to do so, all over the world, are immediately excommunicated and expelled from the priesthood.
While what she says is certainly likely if not true, knowing that she is a grifter and hearing her excessively combative tone makes it difficult to listen to her. It is rather repulsive.
If you have grown up in the USA and know of those who are descendants of slaves, then you are familiar with their way of speaking. I don’t find it repulsive, thus, and indeed it’s engaging, though I am skeptical about her manner of argumentation which seems to be material based, that is, designed to move your personal judgement to a point where it will accept the facts she presents. I am told she is going to attempt to demonstrate that Mrs. Macron is the natural father of Mr. Macron, and then had a transitional surgery in order to marry him. It’s lurid and as I said elsewhere I do not think a recent Catholic convert would have their mind in such a gutter. — However, as a student of forensic investigation, I see that there is a lot of opportunity to hone one’s own critical thinking, sitting listening to her presentation as if you were a juror in a jury.