Here is a critique of this demonic person. This critique is NOT for children. Warning Explicit content.
Follow ups, to this video by same author:
Theo-Porn Cardinal of Dicastery for Doctrine of Faith Vatican Statement declares Piccarreta free from “any doctrinal errors”
Editor’s Note: To depict Jesus Christ in a sexual relationship with a woman is UTTER BLASPHEMY. To have to explain this to someone, means that they have no conception whatsoever of the dignity of the Eternal God. — The claims of the final of these priests in these videos is making a totally false statement: since he is claiming that what the first priest read from her official writings is not immoral.
Having examined her authentic writings in Italian, I can confirm that Piccarreta was in grave error, in confounding the Divine Will with God’s will for me. The first is God, the second is what God wants for you to do in creation. The first therefore you can adore and obey as It is your Last End and Eternal Beatitude; but the second you can only obey, but not adore, since it is merely a sign-post in time to lead you Home. Luisa promotes the idolatry of the second by refusing to distinguish ontologically between these two. — This failure to distinguish was understood immediately by Satan, as a blind and blinding spot in and over her conscience, and he thus succeeded in deceiving her into imagining herself in an intimate sexual-physical relationship with Christ, in a manner which is contrary to all chastity and virginity of the Eternal God-Man.
This woman is no Saint, no example of virtue. To propose her as such could only come from people like the second priest who imagines that Kissy-Tucho author of 3 porno novels about Jesus could possibly be able to discern theological or moral error in a book.
I thank Ann Barnhardt for bringing the danger, of the recent Vatican approval, to wider attention.
Hello Br.Bugnolo and AJ,
I read your good article about Luisa piccarreta. I had doubts as any normal person would until a couple of YouTubers I follow ‘Daniel o Connor’ and mark McLean recognize her as ‘divine’. You probably won’t know them but I do know fr mawdsley and I think he’s a great priest. My question is actually about medjugorije and associating with people that have a terrible take on obvious things like Luis piccarreta as I couldn’t believe Daniel o Connor and mark MacLean and Robert Nugent embracing them.
So they were explaining away problems with Luisa piccarreta while they all embrace medjugorije
Whereas fr mawdsley is on the ball with everything but thinks medjugorije is demonic.
Now I was there and I even seen a demonic possession and people sharing their stories with me and some even shared miraclous pictures and and miraclous conversions. I didn’t believe medjugorije but I forced to see the reality as I was there for 6-7 weeks and I experienced a lot !
This is me in this video in medjugorije last April as I was interviewed there
https://youtu.be/P-Mi9IIAoKM?si=QP2MmylLHsqecgPC
Is accounting with these YouTubers harmful?
They are even embracing this fr.michel rodrigue which another seemingly obvious phony.
https://youtu.be/Kb7L6SzRI5U?si=5pjbR47O_vXiikY2
This is Ann Vučić explaining the finger incident
This is fr.leon Pereira responding to all objections to medjugorije
https://youtu.be/R_-Use-ZNns?si=oj2dYzeYjZS8Q5AX
It does seem there’s no one online ( apart from yourselves) that tell the truth.
Can you recommend more reliable sources. I’m very disappointed at these people I follow that support Luisa piccarreta to say the least…
Anyway sorry in advance at this long-winded article but I’d love to know you’re thoughts.
Thank you and God Bless you both 🙏
Spiros
The sad reality is that most talkers on YouTube are not proficient in the topic they speak about. So you have to use a lot of discernment. I just know what I know because I knew devotees to the Divine Will movement and engaged them in conversation, respectfully. As for the alleged apparitions in Croatia, I think the first were authentic but all the rest faked or demonic.
A few years ago I also watched some videos made by Daniel O’Connor and Mark Mallett (not MClean) where they promoted the devotion to the Divine Will. Then Bro Bugnolo very perceptively noticed a masonic symbol on an image of the frontpage of Mark Mallett’s website and wrote an article on fromrome.info discrediting Mark Mallett’s escape into the Pope Benedict XVI controversy. I later found a picture of him and his wife, with his wife hiding her hand inside his jacket as if doing the masonic hidden signal. He is most probably a freemason.
https://www.fromrome.info/2022/09/17/market-mallets-ridiculous-escapade-into-the-controversy-over-benedict-xvis-papacy/
https://images.app.goo.gl/CcnASGSnMqM2Wx5x6
I read lots of her writing online,none of the shocking stuff was included,so many of her devotees would be unaware of its existence. The videos Fr Madesley made are horrendous ,how have they managed to keep that secret,how could they possibly think that would pass for holiness.
I have to admit that having talked to her devotees not a single one of them, even those who claimed to have read her authentic writings, admitted these things. Most of the Italians are women, and I would hate to speculate why they found them inspiring if they knew of them.
Respectfully, I gain a lot of insight and help from watching your videos so far but you are wrong about this. I have personal metaphysical proof that this devotion is true and coming from a place of truth. I have gained a great deal from listening Daniel O’Connor and Fr Iannuzzi in particular , whose podcast on the Divine Will you can follow on radiomaria.us, Youtube.. If I may say, you are probably in need of a devotion like this to help expand your viewership.. praying in the Divine Will in the Name of Everyone is a formula that transtemporally helps you influence everyone. Sometimes simple things elude the great minds and intellects though. It is a mystery why some people get things and others dont. I dont have your intellectual gifts and breadth of knowledge, but i know that this is true. I dont think that it is true. I know it is. God can do whatever He wants. Respectfully, Fr Iannuzzi has the grace of state of the authority to teach in the Church and is probably under some attack because this is a great revelation and a gift such as this has not been available to the saints through history and Fr Iannuzzi is its main key exponent. Luisa was the first one to get that gift besides the Virgin Mary. Even St Joseph didnt have it.. Also, the suggestion that this is pornography is simply not true. Would you say that about the Canticle of canticles? Same kind of thing, you are just not understanding it for some reason. I will pray for you because you need my mercy, my insight and understanding to help you and help the Church. I am a contemplative and pray a lot.
Dear Marie-Claire,
I thank you for commenting. But I assure you that the notions you express are beyond all propriety in theology: like claiming that Louisa had graces that Saint Joseph did not, or that Luisa had a revelation kept from all the saints, or that prayers have transtemporal effects. I do not want to be harsh with you, but I think your comment proves everything the English priest has warned us about
Traduction française :
LE VATICAN FAIT LA PROMOTION DE LA THÉOPORNOGRAPHE FÉMININE LUISA PICCARETTA POUR SA CANONISATION
https://www.homelie.biz/2025/02/le-vatican-fait-la-promotion-de-la-theopornographe-feminine-luisa-piccaretta-pour-sa-canonisation.html