Editor’s Note: Pope Francis did NOT die in his sleep, nor did he die suddenly. He died during a two hour long medical crisis, in which he was for a time partly able to speak. He did not go to confession nor repent of all the crimes, errors, heresies, blasphemies, scandals and betrayals he perpetrated during his life. He did not even say, “Sorry”.
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
This fund was started by Ordo Militaris Catholicus, an international relief organization founded by Br. Bugnolo and AJ Baalman. Click the image for more information.
+ + +
The media is saying he had a stroke. Then died after a time. It would be interesting to know exactly what time he met JD Vance and how much time later he had the stroke. He acted strangly when JD V tried to communicate with him…barely raising his right hand with a semi sign of the cross you has to belooking for to notice. This would have been Pope F1s last official act, would it not,? Surely Theres a hidden meaning there somewhere since there is really no such things as ” accidents “.
Pope Francis certainly seems to have died on queue. He was installed by Hilary Clinton under Obama, and he dies the day after meeting the VP of the USA, who belongs to an administration which does not want him or his policies.
Archbishop Carlo Viganò tells us that Bergoglio did not believe in hell.
https://x.com/CarloMVigano/status/1914273114587824193
Has there been any mention of sacramentum exeuntium?
No, there is no mention that he asked for the Sacrament of the Sick in his final hour. But most modernists think its to be received at the beginning of illness, and yes he has received that several times in the past years.
The One Who has trampled upon death is out and about, and taking a victory run this His Holy Week.
“I Am Who Am and My counsel is not with the impious” (from the 1st Ant., Matins, RB – Fourth Day in the Octave of Easter). Authentic participation in the Resurrection of Our Lord is exhibited by the renewal of the mind in its greater and more perfect conformity with the Divine Truth, as seen and understood by common sense and by reason illumined with the #CatholicFaith – as obstinacy in error is at the foundation of slavery to the devil in sin, the Book of Deuteronomy teaches us. I have publicly taken exception in accepting the so-called ‘resignation’ by Pope Benedict XVI (and, therefore, rejecting the validity of the so-called ‘conclave’ which installed Bergogrelio as “Pontifex Francis’) – announced by the ‘liberal-Modernist’ Vatican and the “New World abNormal” – for the incontrovertible evidence of canonical anomaly in the very terms of ‘resignation’ provided in the script is at the service of the Truth. And when those same inimical disOrders within and without the sacred precincts of the #CatholicChurch announced the ‘death’ of Pope Benedict XVI they had made up ‘resigned’, I refused it as well as the nose, chin, and ear of the cadaver presented were not Benedict’s and the announced ‘death’ does not align with the prophecies of Ven. Anne Emmerich and of Pope St. Pius X which make the earlier analyses by Fr. Kramer and the late Fr. Gruner of the original Fatima Crusade reasonable that Benedict XVI will have to make the necessary reparation and satisfaction then of revealing* in full the Third Secret as it is, having been instrumentalized by the Masonic ‘Cardinal’ Sodano, then ‘disoriented” Vatican Secretary of the State, in twisting it (everytime repeating “according to Cardinal Sodano…”) so that an important demand by the Queen of Heaven will surely be met still according to the standards of divine justice. *How shall it be made known (along with the necessary decrees against the “New disOrder” and its foundation – the “New disOrder of ‘Mass'” in vulgarities and by a ‘presider’ ‘#priesthood’ according to the idea of Luther), as my confreres asked in our KL meeting two years ago, the calculations are determined already in the divine designs yet to unfold.
On the last point above, the idiotic heretical and schismatic ‘patriarch’ of #Hindang, Leyte of the school of Sedevacantism – Ariel Alonto (under “Y.A.”..wa) – called this priest “lunatic” in reply to his stupid rabid KL dog of subversion (the priest for him is merely an administrator of the Sacraments and blessings) who, commenting on his ‘patriarch’s’ repost on the Vatican in “sede vacante”, referred to this lone “one,” AGAINST THE WORLD, holding P.BXVI as the living (and with the distortion “reigning”) occupant of the Chair in Rome still. Well, these infernal butt-heads belong to a “New Catholic abNormal” but to the extreme opposite swing (as Logic shows us) of the ‘liberal-Modernist’ sect – a pretended ‘traditional’ Catholic ‘order’ but which foundation bangs against the solid truth laid down by the unanimous teaching of the Church Fathers (“de fide”) and enshrined in the Roman Catechism : that the Church can not be deprived of her visible head FOR A LONG TIME. In the end, therefore, they can not speak solidly, squarely, with the Lone Truth; they can not help it but speak in unison with their fellow ‘liberal’ aliens on the same planet they inhabit on its other ‘trad’ end: their sanity is inseparable with what the “New abNormal” mind holds – really, as by the critical thread of subtlety in principles; their pretended renewed mind could see only what their sensibilities – same for the “Novus Ordites” and the SSPX-‘Conservative’ ‘TLM’-‘beauty and solemnity”-goers – could capture and exhibit for their ridicule. The deluded Sedevacantist ‘patriarch’ has now, given the death of the unabashedly impious fav of the organized revolutionaries and their ‘rainbow’-colored children (the Pachapapa), taken up the call of the muddled PhD holder in the US as with the other self-styled popular ‘trad’ laymen in the West for ‘unity of TLM clans’, even proposing “ecumenism in ‘Tradition'” – that is, Tradition and #TraditionalLatinMass without square grounding on the Truth: SAME Vatican II/”New One World Religion” terms of ‘unity’ – off with the underlying rigours of the Radiant Absolutist Truth. Such is but a logical conclusion (by way of objectivity) of that illogical arch-idiot of Sedevacantism in Hindang who lives there, when he is around, proposing to the TLM-goers in his chapel bishops and priests of the principle ‘Recognize and Resist’ which he also publicly deprecates about. That is the pathetic kind of lunacy ever known in history : the ‘liberal-Modernist” subscription to both fundamental opposite principles unto their delusional synthesis/reconciliation. ” Fr. John
Father John, when it was announced that Pope Benedict XVI died, I went to the Vatican immediately and began a series of reports. In one of them, I took my cellphone turned on the video recording and visited the casket of Pope Benedict XVI on display at the center of Saint Peter’s Basilica. I saw the body and can assure it it corresponded to all the photos I have seen of the man. I got very close. So I am humanly speaking certain that doubts as to whether it was him or not, are not based on facts, but only speculation.
I searched online for “return to the square” and any of various words including and derived from mason and freemason.
Google’s AI generated result appeared at the top of the list, beginning as follows:
‘AI Overview
In Freemasonry, “return to the square” is a phrase related to restoring moral rectitude or rectifying a mistake.’
and ending as follows:
‘”Returning to the square” signifies a commitment to regaining moral uprightness and aligning oneself with the principles of Freemasonry.’
For copyright reasons, I only copied these first and last sentences – there is much more.
The AI Overview provides this source link, which is insightful, but not definitive:
https://www.quora.com/What-does-it-mean-when-a-Mason-says-on-the-square#:~:text=The%20phrase%20is%20a%20reference%20to%20the,as%20a%20trial%20or%20form%20of%20hazing.
I doubt that most Catholics would understand the significance of Bergoglio’s last reported words to his nurse.
I suspect that few Freemasons would not understand the significance.
First, we should never take what AI says as authoritative. As it is only a program to guess what to say. But it is true that his final words are masonic, because “on the square, on the level” are the ancient greetings and expressions to signify to others that one is a freemason.