Editor’s Note: This show will be viewable after 8 A. M. May 9th, 2025, New York Time. that is in just 30 minutes from publication.
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
This fund was started by Ordo Militaris Catholicus, an international relief organization founded by Br. Bugnolo and AJ Baalman. Click the image for more information.
+ + +
Brother, thank you for all that you do to protect Holy Mother Church.
watch father Z, asking for a new dubia…
Hehe.
Many thanks for revealing all this troubling & worrisome information.
My “gut feeling” since the ‘Habemus Papam’ announcement in the evening of Thursday May 8th was that this so-called ‘election’ happened remarkably quickly……after just the 4th round of voting, therefore, it was most probably a ‘rigged’ election by the globalists/freemasons/CIA together with various sexually-deviant cardinals.
‘Rigged’ papal elections have been ‘the norm’, tragically, over the past seven decades, I think only JPI and Benedict XVI were “properly” elected and, as we know, the sinister St Gallen Mafia tried their damndest to get Bergoglio onto the papal throne in 2005……
Here within the Catholic Bishops Conference of England & Wales it seems to be “business-as-usual” with widespread acceptance of Leo XIV, from the Cdl-Abp of Westminster, diocesan bishops, parish priests, TLM priests and various organisations including the noteable ‘Latin Mass Society’.
Here is Cardinal Nichols in a press conference earlier today, doing his very best to convince us all that ‘everything went smoothly’:-
https://www.cbcew.org.uk/cardinal-nichols-pope-leo-xiv-is-a-man-with-the-right-combination-of-talents-to-lead-the-catholic-church/
Hmmm……to quote a very well-known phrase:
“HOUSTON……WE HAVE A PROBLEM!!”
Joseph Shaw, chairman/mouthpiece of the Latin Mass Society in England DEFENDS THE satanic Talmud (on Twitter/X) and
@LMSChairman and bullies “Catholic Unscripted” to delete their interview which Fr James Mawdsley who has done great research in exposing the lies of the J$wish Hollywood Holocausianty victimhood cult.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaQQuA-E0UI
·
18 Aug 2024
You can go to hell imitating the vices of the saints. The Council of Trent ordered an investigation into the Talmud which concluded that it should be permitted to be printed in the Papal States. St Louis had been misled about its nature and contents.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Dr Taylor Marshall
@TaylorRMarshall
King Saint Louis IX of Francis had all known copies of the TALMUD burned. 24 wagonloads of Talmudic manuscripts were burned by royal order of the Catholic King in AD 1242. Pope Boniface VIII canonized King Louis IX as a Catholic Saint in AD 1297.”
In the practice of morals we should follow the canonized saints, not the non-canonized popes. Saint don’t have vices, to say they do is a blasphemy.
Have just watched your programme. When I realised that Francis was not the pope pre 30/01/23, I stopped receiving Holy Communion. Now I believe that a heretic and antipope has been elected to the See of St. Peter, I cannot accept Holy Communion in a church where Leo XIV is prayed for in the canon of the Mass. I believe that we are back in the same situation, nay worse, than before. Our Lady of Good Success implored us to pray that God will send us a good and holy pope, so back to the prayer mill we must return, and may God once again hear our prayers.
I respect Catholics who are reacting as you do. But I do not think the cases are the same. First, Pope Francis was elected while Benedict XVI still lived and did not abdicate. So those who named Francis and knew this were naming Francis as a sign of rejection. But in the present Case no one is naming Leo as a sign of rejection of anyone else. And most clergy do not even know Prevost’s stance on Fiducia supplicans. But some do, and say it subtly, like the parish here at Rome where none of the clergy at mass even said, “We have a new pope”, or even made a point of it, and the celebrant obviously had a sour voice when he said, “in union with our pope Leo”.
what a shame Father Z, what s the problem with you, you re last article… the dubia is gone now…don t agree with him….why this change… it s a good start really………..
He is a convert from Methodism.
Here is explained why the West has reached the bottom today:
THE NAMELESS WAR
by Captain Achibald.H.Maule Ramsay
https://archive.org/details/the-nameless-war-1952
A must read
I refer to a very detailed presentation by
Giuseppe Nardi, Catholic Magazine for Church and Culture,
Journalists and victims reject accusations against Leo XIV
The accusations flavoured with “abuse” prove to be unfounded
14 May 2025
https://katholisches.info/2025/05/14/journalisten-und-opfer-weisen-anschuldigungen-gegen-leo-xiv-zurueck/
How does that go together?
This article you quote is disinformation, because it does not regard the cases upon which basis Prevost is accused both in Peru and the United States of America. — If it did, it would be worth a listen. Since it does not, it is obviously admitting by it’s silence, that the basis of the accusations are true. — And though I can only read the article through a google translation, it is clear that the article is trying to tell the reader how to think and what to not investigate, which is a bizzare form of journalism. — What I find also surprising is that the Left-Wing, Marxist Corriere della Sera is trying to squelch the real story of abuse cover up.
As for it’s attempt to dismiss the accusations by SNAP, in the USA, that is most shameful, because in the U.S.A. we have a long experience with reports on abuse and SNAP, while not friendly to the Church, is not know for inaccuracy in its reports, nor could it, since to make a false claim in such matters is prosecutable for both libel and slander.
As for the implications in this article that InfoVatican is a biased news source and published falsehood, I find that a very facile excuse to look into the matter, since Info Vaticana has been publishing highly accurate reports for many years on many scandals in the Pontificate of Pope Francis, for which they had to defend themselves in court at least once already and won against lawyers from the Vatican. I doubt therefore that they would even risk another return to court by publishing a total lie. But perhaps that is why Nardi does not even dare name the source (Info Vatican) that he attempts to denigrate.
The article therefore is poorly written and obviously dishonest.
As for the author of the article, Giuseppe Nardi, he has been a journalist for 59 years and has the thinnest biography I have ever seen at Wikipedia
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Nardi_(giornalista)
Dear brother Alexis,
Thank you very much for this further view. I have been on your website for many years because I feel your commitment, your great dedication and your sharp judgement, your courage. I myself am a priest, but have not been in ministry for 5 years due to a serious illness with cancer. I am also very saddened by what this conclave reveals: Is this the state of our Church!
As far as Bergoglio is concerned, I have not been able to name him in the High Prayer. I am aware of your canonical argument regarding Benedict’s resignation. But Benedict confesses that he has examined himself before God and has come to the conviction that he can no longer exercise the Petrinus Munus. Does a resignation from the ministry necessarily have to be misinterpreted? Surely it is not due to a single canonical term! Can’t the whole text express the true intention? I also understand the so-called extended papacy that still does what it can: “suffer and pray – and not return to private life!” – I am also a German!
I am with you in all your endeavours and thank you very much! I too am praying for you – right now – before the Child Jesus together with St Francis, St Padre Pio, St Annibale di Francia and the Servant of God Luisa Piccarreta.
Grateful
Father Wilhelm
Father thank you for your support. If Pope Benedict XVI has renounced using the German Translation of his Declaratio, as published on the Vatican website and announced it effective immediately or repeated it on Feb. 28, his renunication would have been valid. But the argument turns on the precision of Latin terminology, which I think Pope Benedict XVI understood were distinct terms, without realizing however, that munus refers not only to the grace of office but to the office itself, whereas he seems to have though it did not. And I think in this, he fell into the simple error of thinking Latin terms refer to German concepts.