In the above video, Br. Bugnolo, the editor of FromRome.info explains in simple terms how accepting the election of Cardinal Prevost as Leo XIV would lead to the total destruction of the Church and the moral corruption of every Catholic family on Earth. He also explains how those who say Catholics must accept him are contradicting the entire teaching of Jesus Christ, Who taught that the very measure of true love of Him is to keep all the Commandments. — A “church” which wants to junk the 2nd or 6th commandment is not only not Catholic and not Christian, it’s not even Jewish. It’s satanic. We cannot allow this man to be our pope without denying Jesus Christ totally and completely!
Video mentioned in the above video: Why the Election of Cardinal Prevost as Leo XIV is invalidated by Pope Paul IV (Versione Italiana)
Therefore Catholics have the right and duty to refuse this man as their superior; and thankfully both Pope Paul IV, in n. 6, of his bull of Feb. 15, 1559, “Cum ex apostolatus officio”, say we have this right, and Canon Law says he does not have a right to this office over us.
Br. Bugnolo, who lives at Rome explains in this video the fight which lies before us. He invites Catholics to come to Rome and collaborate with him to organize the Faithful in the City (3 Million) to exercise their ancient right to elect their own Bishop. And if you cannot come, to help him with the expenses to conduct a massive publicity campaign.
How To Help Financially
You can make a donation to this Holy Work to defend the Church, via Paypal, Zelle Pay, or Bank Wire:
Via PayPal
Via Zelle, add the message: SAVEROME
Via a BankWire, add the message: SAVEROME
When sending U.S. Dollars
When Sending U.K. Pound Sterling:
When Sending Euros:
When Sending Australian Dollars:
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
This fund was started by Ordo Militaris Catholicus, an international relief organization founded by Br. Bugnolo and AJ Baalman. Click the image for more information.
+ + +
Were you even alive back then to verify your claims, or is it a claim you made decades later? If the latter you are not credible. If they former, show the evidence. I have looked into the claim, and found only allegations. As for the CIA, if you know what they are, and it seems you do not, then you would realize I am not a member of the CIA and no one in my family ever worked for them.
I understand you are upset, because you are a Sedevacantist who probably cites Paul IV too, but only to justify your separation from the rest of the Church, where I cite the same Bull to save the whole Church and that irks you. It should irk you and I hope you realize that you are not following the right path. After all who created the Sede movement. Look him up. He is a twice convicted pedophile.
HG is a moron. Even Dr. Taylor Marshall says, that this new anti-pope is his pope. Facepalms is the new normal..
I’m not a catholic, and I can easily see thru all this gaslighting bs.
Thanks Lone Ranger,you are a man of truth.
I reject Cardinal Prevost as Pope.
#NO-GASLIGHTING
I grew up pre V2. If these sins of homosexual behavior were rampant before V2, It certainly wasn’t exposed by the Church or the media. It was taboo to even talk about it. Chastity and Celibacy were taught by Catholic schools as the way to avoid Mortal Sin.. and going to Hell forever if you died without the Sacrament of Confession
Brother, I have made a donation today to support activities related to the election. May God Bless you and protect you.
don munitella showed a photo of cardinal prevost with the masonic cross like pope francis amazing ,,,may 10,this video,
Can you post the link?
radio domina nostra ,,,r,f, prevost non e papa. is the way to see the photo,,,
I can’t find it. Can you post the link?
Dear Brother, I have enjoyed your video and agree with your views, I interpret them rather to be cautious about Prevost. I recall while reading a biography on Pius IX, the famous Pio Nono, how he was seen at the time of his election as the hope of reformists and liberals. Pope Pius IX, who started as a reformer, quickly turned 180 degrees and became the foremost pontiff of the 19th century to condemn liberalism in all its forms. Looking at his example, we should ask ourselves whether Robert Prevost is more a sheep in wolves’ clothing than the other way around. I stay cautious and I will observe the ways and words of this man before writing him off.
Adrian you are suffering from Hopium. AJ and I will address this in our Monday show over at OMC Radio TV.
Brother, I think you meant to say “Thou Shalt Not Take the name of the Lord in vain”
Ugh, yeah. But the meaning is the same.
Ave Maria Brother,
Thank you for your video! I absolutely agree with you! I am changing to the SSPX. The only place I can get a Traditional Mass. I am from The United States, Kalamazoo, Michigan. I will pray in the way in which I can be of help to you. Keeping you in Prayer.
Peace,
In Christ~
Catherine Christine
Br. Bugnolo, I funded your almost impossible task. I always believed in miracles, not because I read about them but because I’ve seen them with my own eyes. Looking at it another way, I see two anti-popes, one after the other, obviously telling us the Church is no longer counting on the Holy Spirit to help them in their decisions. One Saint said this will be the last pope. I haven’t heard of anybody debunking this allegation or prophecy. I’m 58, and I’m pretty sure my generation will live through the tribulation and experience the 2nd coming of the Lord. A good pope or a bad pope won’t change that. God Bless.
Thank you for your support Nelson!
Sedevacantism is an error which leaves in the air everything, never defining what they mean by the false church or false hierarchy, such that they deny the indefectibility of the Church and end up saying that they alone are the Church.
The Catholic position, however, recognizes that not everyone is responsible or guilty for the decisions of the Few, and when there is a valid election, Christ will either assist a willing Pope or bishop or visit him with opposition or punishments, like we saw now with Bergoglio.
The Sedevacantist position really takes Christ out of the picture. Because since the Roman Church can never all from the Faith, when there is an invalid election Christ will stir up the faithful to have a true election.
Thus quoting the Great Schism which regarded a French anti pope opposing a Roman true pope, really is not the same thing, because sedes claim there is no pope, and no sedes have ever come to Rome to see that there is a true pope elected, since the spirit which motivates them is self righteousness and division and not holiness and communion.
Sedes commenting on this site to promote their religion.
Meanwhile all false converts spreading the “pope leo” agenda all over the platforms.
There is a great correlation, are they all paid in the same day of May???
Very insightful comment. Thank you.
Huge thanks, Brother Alexis, for this heartfelt, insightful & profoundly ROMAN CATHOLIC video which I shall share and, indeed, which has already been shared to my FB page by a friend in Christ!
I will do what I can to financially support you in your forthcoming strategy though my finances are very limited.
My thoughts keep returning to the same expressions: “Don’t believe what the Catholic media and especially the evil MSM are telling us”……and “Don’t believe the propaganda, lies & falsehoods from our so-called ‘catholic hierarchy’……
The 2020 Scamdemic, the “resignation” of Benedict XVI & “election” of Francis in 2013, [the so-called “terrorist attack” of 9/11], the entirety of Vatican II, [the “assasination” of JFK in 1962]……all of these Church and secular events were proved to be totally fake so why on earth should we believe anything we are told now by our so-called hierarchy???
Meanwhile every Catholic apostolate that I normally read seems to be ‘flying the total acceptance flag’ for Leo XIV – even Rorate Caeli who were robustly critical of Bergoglio from 2013 have succumbed to the prevailing ‘mood’:-
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com
Saints Nereus, Achilleus, Domitilla & Pancras, pray for us.
And [in my home diocese of Brentwood, UK] St John Houghton, pray for us.
Here a new article worth reading
https://gizadeathstar.com/2025/05/archbishop-vigano-sues-the-vatican-bank/
Yes, I reported on that several days along.
Dear Brother, Bugnolo, thanks for all that you do, are doing, and have done. Please know that your brave efforts are greatly appreciated. Without a doubt you have dealt with much suffering in defending God’s Church and its teachings. Praying for you and your ministry daily. Brother May I please ask a couple questions? You are very knowledgeable and educated on Church teachingI I was Blessed to have a Saintly mom, and I try my best to learn and study the teachings of the Church, so please have patience with me if I don’t understand everything. I have read the Church teachings on Papal Infallibility, and I have read that it means that it means when the Pope is speaking Ex-Cathedra, that he is infallible. I have also read that there have only been two times when The Pope has spoken Ex-Cathedra. The Definition of The Dogma of The Immaculate Conception, and also The Dogma Of The Assumption Of Mary. Also ( please correct me if I am wrong,) Question 1.) Can you please tell me, when the Pope is speaking directly on Faith and Morals, is part of the Doctrine of Papal infallibility say that if the Pope is speaking directly on Faith and morals, will he always have to say the right thing? Is that part of the doctrine of Papal infallibility if it is, how can Pope’s Like Pope Francis, and The New Pope Leo do and say These Heretical things? IQuestion 2.) I see where you are saying that this new Pope is an Anti Pope because he supported The Evil Fiducia Supplicans. May I please ask does that mean that the seat of Peter is vacant, or who is the Pope now if this Pope is an Anti Pope? Can the seat be Vacant? Does Church Teaching say that we will always have an actual Pope? I am sorry to take up your time, but I want to understand these things better to defend my faith. I am trying to read different Catechism’s like The Council of Trent, and others. Thanks so much Brother for your time and all that you do! You are a very brave hero! Praying for you, your staff, family and ministry daily, love you brother, God Bless.
Q.1 Papal infallibility only regards the promulgation of documents which regard Faith and Morals, by the Pope, which impose the obligatoin of accepting them upon the whole Catholic World. P. I. does not regard the everyday speech of the pope or any other kind of document, such as a novel, history book, he might chose to write while pope.
Q. 2 He is not an antipope since there is no true pope at this time. He is an invalidly elected cardinal, pretending to be the pope. The Church has never taught that a sede vacante only lasts so long. A sede vacante lasts until the the first juridically valid election of a Roman Pontiff occurs.
Thank you so
Much
Brother Bugnolo, thanks again for helping me. And I am learning. May I please ask another question. And I am sorry if I don’t understand all of these things. Because I do believe and agree that these are the end times and that Free Masonry and evil has creeped in our Church Hierarchy and has been there for many years . Thanks for answering my questions. I am asking this next one because my son said after reading and watching you that you are very knowledgeable on Church teaching. But your answer to my second question starts with he is not an Anti Pope. But one of your articles and videos on here starts with CARDINAL PREVOST IS AN ANTI-POPE, HIS ELECTION IS INVALIDATED BY PAUL IV. I am praying and trying to be prepared for whatever they have coming. Is he an Anti Pope? Thank you again for your time.
Words can be used in a broad sense or a specific technical sense. When I say he is an antipope, I mean he is not the true pope. But when I said he is not an antipope, because there is no rival pope, I was using the same term in the specific technical sense.
Thank you so much Brother Bugnolo
Brother Bugnolo
Mark Docherty posted this yesterday:
https://nonvenipacem.org/2025/05/15/guidance-for-catholics-under-a-pope-suspected-of-heresy/#comment-20564
Mark is an Accountant, if I remember correctly, and accountants look at facts all their lives. I am glad he is on board with Cum ex apostolatus officio. Wonder where he got that idea?