Editor’s Note: It is a very ominous thing, against which I warned last week, about Prevost being a classical Modernist, who believes that the Catholic Faith is merely an expression of one’s interior religious sentiment, that in the above article, which quotes a priest in Peru who worked closely with Prevost, that his agenda on priestly formation will be to dump “the theology from above” (code word for Divine Revelation) and teach seminarians about “a God with us”. Which god is not yet clear, but it appears that it either refers to the new age idea of “the god within”, where one presumes he is always in God’s favor no matter what sins he commits, or to something further below the belt. — This might explain why Prevost protected pedophile priests, because he actually believes that they are being true priests when they are raping children. I kid you not.
The main news of the above article, however, is that Prevost wanted to take the regnal name, Francis II, but opted for one which would win over conservatives and traditionalists: an admission that he is a fox in sheep’s clothing, like all the predatory pedophile and pedophile clergy.
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
This fund was started by Ordo Militaris Catholicus, an international relief organization founded by Br. Bugnolo and AJ Baalman. Click the image for more information.
+ + +
Someone was talking about ‘bother Leo’ who was a friend of Francis
This is, indeed, ominous. It is difficult to comprehend how, on the one hand, Pope JP II can be praised for being a wise legislator, yet he was also a known protector of pedophiles. How does this work? Also, the New Age was ushered in by him in that event at Assisi. It doesn’t lead to real conversion, but maybe that was the genuine thought behind it?
Because when we say that John Paul II was a wise legislator we are praising him for doing something right, in accepting the advice of canonists to put certain things in the law regarding the elections. But when in the show today with AJ I criticized him for the 1996 papal law saying that bribery did not make an election invalid, I faulted him for allowing that thing in the law. One can be smart and prudent in one field, and immoral in one’s personal behavior, just like great artists or sculptors are sometimes Saints and somtimes sinners.