This is Trump’s Address to the Nation from 10 PM, EDLST, June 22, 2025. He admits that he has been working with Netanyahu from the start, and threatens more bombing if Iran does not capitulate. It’s clear from this speach, that Trump is committed to a full war. — He ends his speech by saying, “God. God we love you,”
His argument that it was just to bomb Iran due to previous acts of terrorism is a non-sequitur, because if you justify a war on that basis, a lot of nations could justify wars against many other nations, and all hell would break loose. Hey, the CIA’s operations since its founding would be sufficient for most nations, then, to go to war with the U.S.A.. — There is nothing Christian or rational about Trump’s motivations, therefore.
Next, video, here below, is the report about the news.
Editor’s Note: The best commentary, is again from Janta Ka Reporter, who said an hour before, that it is now obvious to all that the leadership of the U.S.A. is entirely under the control of the Zionist government of Israel.
Iran has promised military retaliation against any nation which joined Israel in this illegal war. So U.S. citizens and military personnel must now consider themselves targets. While Iran does not have a missile capable of hitting U.S. territories, the U.S. has many military bases in the Mid-East and Europe which are vulnerable.
I strongly urge all U.S. Citizens to leave the Mid-East, and to be on alert for attacks by civilians in Europe and from sleeper cells round the world.
A.J. and I advised Catholics in the U.S.A., not to vote for Donald Trump; those who did are now morally responsible for what has happened. I urge you, if you have voted for Trump, to go to confession.
Since Iran is a close ally of Russia, it is now certain that the world is on the cusp of a World War III.
Here is the U.S. Propaganda to justify the illegal immoral act of bombing a nation at peace with the U.S.A.:
Editor’s Note: This intervention was given at the Annual Meeting of Foreign Ministers of the Nations which belong to the Organization of Islamic States. It is rare that in any news outlet in the West, that Christians can get such an inside look at how the Islamic world is reacting to international events. Since understanding how the Islamic world will react to the attack by Israel on Iran is crucial in the present and future security of all nations, I think that we can only benefit by having this occasion to familiarize ourselves with that they are saying at this meeting.
Editor’s Note: The war is going badly for Israel, and journalists are even admitting it, though they continue to be told to push the Zionist narrative. Rifat Jawaid, from India, a former BBC news editor, exposes the discrepancies, in this very fact-based and cutting report.
The front page of VaticanNews.Va for June 21, 2025, at 4 AM Rome time. — 1 screen shot is worth a thousand words. Nor will I expatiate again about the observation made by one of the readers of FromRome.info, that a “lion” (Latin: “leo”) is a male predator.
Five years ago, I wrote to a Cardinal about the invalidity of the election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio, in the Conclave of 2013, and he wrote me back, claiming that as Catholics we must presume the election was valid and that Pope Francis had received the papal office from Christ. I responded to the Cardinal, here, in this open letter, “Dialogue with a Cardinal who refused to dialogue“, published on January 23, 2020, a copy of which I mailed directly to him.
Since the issue is timely, I will reformulate his question for present circumstances, and give my reply:
Must a Catholic presume Pope Leo XIV is a validly elected pope,
who actually holds the papal office?
No, because:
Firstly, because, that a man is the pope is not a presumption of fact, but the conclusion of law.
For example, he is not the pope, whom the Cardinals say is the pope, rather, he is the pope who was validly elected by the Cardinals according to the norm of the Papal Law of John Paul II, Universi Dominici Gregis.
To say the first, that is, that “he whom the Cardinals say is the pope, is the pope”, confuses the means whereby we know a canonical fact with the cause of the legitimacy of a canonical fact. They are two different things. — Yes, we know under normal circumstances who was elected by the Cardinals, from the Cardinals themselves. That is the normal channel for knowing the canonical fact of the election. But the canonical fact of the election is not the canonical validity of the election. The canonical fact is the witness that the event took place. Period. — But the legitimacy of the election is much more important. Just as the truth of any claim is more important than the fact the claim was made.
Otherwise, if anyone came to your door, knocked, and when you opened it, claimed to own your house, his mere fact of having claimed it, would make him its owner. Now just as this principle holds no matter who is at the front door, whether it be a nobody, the town clerk, the assessor’s office superintendent, the mayor, governor, etc., so also in a papal election. — Thus, the truth of the claim is based on the conformity of facts with the prescriptions of the law governing ownership. The truth of the claim is not based on the dignity of those claiming it!
So, the Catholic who can read the Papal Law and who has knowledge of the historical facts, can assess the validity of the claim of the Cardinals. If he can do this it would be the mortal sin of sloth, if he presumed the claim was true, upon hearing a contrary claim, based on the factually demonstrated discrepancy of behavior with the requirements of the law.
So yes, an ignorant Catholic can presume that if the Cardinals say X is the Pope, that X is the pope. But a literate Catholic in the age of social media, who has access to nearly all information, can not presume, after the first moment in which he encounters any report that puts in doubt the validity of the election.
And here is the difficulty most Catholics have: They believe that they must wait for certain evidence that the Cardinals are not worthy of trust. That is, they refuse to read the law or compare the requirements of the law with the facts of what happened, BECAUSE they are waiting rather for the testimony of some Cardinal that disputes the claim of other Cardinals. And they infer from the unanimity of the Cardinals to the validity of the election, REGARDLESS of what the law says.
I can understand this approach, for being half Sicilian, I know how many deal with organized crime: they simple do not admit it exists, so that they can go about their day without any worries. They might pity the victims of the Mafia, but they really don’t care about that, until one of their loved ones becomes a victim.
So the next time anyone, especially a priest, tells you to shut up or be quite or that you are a sinner or bad Catholic for NOT presuming he is a pope and/or for sharing the truth about the election so that others might be liberated from the deception, ask your interlocutor if they are preaching out of their personal presumption, born of sloth or because they have done their own investigation.
Again, no, Secondly, because if you have the responsibility to act on the basis of another’s claim, you are liable if you act on presumption alone
Every Catholic who has ever been in a position of responsibility, understands this. Because, the mere fact that you hold authority, does not exculpate you from responsibility. Nay, it increases it. This is why in all official matters of state, every government official is required to act only if the proper verifiable and verified actions or documents are communicated.
The same is true for every Catholic. For if we are to accept the Magisterium of someone claiming to be the Vicar of Jesus Christ, we would be grossly negligent and responsible for the harm to all around us, if we propagate his teachings having presumed his election was valid, and remained in our presumption, even when other Catholics have shared with us information about the possibly invalidity of his claim to the papacy.
Remember, we are not dealing here with a controversy over whether the local Ice Cream Shop uses cream or milk to make their products. We are dealing with your eternal salvation and those of all around you, who heed your advice and counsel, whether you be a parent, friend, colleague or relative. Moreso, if you be a priest, pastor, confessor or spiritual director, or ecclesiastical superior.
Thus, it is both deeply irresponsible and gravely reckless for anyone in such position to accord to a man claiming to be the Roman Pontiff the presumption that he is, as soon as anyone whomsoever says there is a problem in his election. All Catholics of all ages before our own, understood this, which is why there have been named more than 40 antipopes in history. How did they earn the moniker, “antipope”, except by the fact that some Catholics contested the validity of his claim to power?
Those who refuse to hear any such contestation, and who hold responsibility over others, are thus showing themselves to be incompetent in the execution of their duties.
And this truth is reflected in Canon 41, which holds that anyone who is required to execute an administrative order, who has not verified that the one issuing it has authority and that the act itself is legitimate, acts invalidly, that is, posits an act which he has no authority to make, usurping the rights of the one who legitimately could authorize the act and defrauding all those subjects who have the right to not be deceived in a matter regarding the claim that a superior has asked something of them.
Thus, priests especially have the duty to investigate all reasonable claims that a papal election is irregular or invalid, otherwise they are sinning gravely in the execution of their ministry. Likewise are all those who have been entrusted or who have taken up by their own volition, the dissemination of information about the Catholic Church, if they censor any discussion or reports about the irregularities in a papal election.
And in all these cases, we are not talking about a small sin, but a mortal sin, because to spread information that someone is the Pope when he is not the pope is to spiritually mislead or scandalize the faithful, and thus is a mortal sin multiplied by as many persons who might hear him say such things.
Thus, if anyone tell you not to investigate, or not to listen to such news of problems in a papal election, remind them that they are sinning gravely against justice and are attempting to violate your rights and duties under Canon 41.
And so to such persons, a parent, for example, can reply in private or in public,
“Father, as a parent, who believes and holds to the Catholic Faith, I have the grave duty, according to Canon 41, of verifying Prevost’s claim to be the pope, before I can offer him any obedience, reverence or respect as the Pope; and your attempt to dissuade me of this grave duty, is a grave sin against the charity and justice you own me and my family. Moreover, since there is objective evidence that his election was invalidated by the presence of 133 Cardinal Electors in defiance of the Papal Law on Conclaves, and that he spoke against the Catholic Faith before his election, I must hold that it is more probable that his election is invalid, because of the authority of Popes John Paul II and Paul IV, the text of whose constitutions are clear on these points, and which cannot be overturned by the interpretations of anyone, but a true Pope.”
And if a priest persist, add:
“And if you continue to abuse your position over me as a priest, I will file a charge against you for spiritual abuse.”
+ + +
If you would like to download this video, click the down arrow in the upper right corner of this video:
Editor’s Note: I think this is worth a listen, even though I think the distraction is about keeping public attention off the development and roll out of the self-replicating mRNA shots which will genocide humanity.
However, what is more likely, is that the blasphemies uttered by Prevost in favor of illegal immigration on Pentecost Sunday, June 8, 2025, were directly related to promoting the insurrection of illegals in Los Angeles, California. A fact which is very disturbing, since it means that Prevost is willing to commit the unforgivable sin,to push the Illuminati agenda of the Kalergi plan. See the time line here, and draw your own conclusions:
Editor’s Note: Leo Francis Zagami, who published this video, is a very colorful figure in modern Italian social media. Such a critic of politicians and the powerful in Italy, he had to flee to the U.S.A., to keep his freedom to speak out. He is a former member of the Illuminati, whom he betrayed and whose secrets he exposed, and he often comments even on Church issues. During the pandemic he even once quoted myself.
In the above video from May 11, he explains how deeply Prevost is a pawn of Ecclesiastical Freemasonry, and how Father Martin confirms that Prevost has been given 20 years to change the Church.
Zagami’s affirmations are sometimes pure speculation, but more often based on what he knows of Italian Freemasonry from the inside out.
Father Martin, S. J., has been working for Prevost for years, as his handler. Zagami says that anyone who claims that Prevost is a conservative is a blatant liar. — This video is in English, since Zagami has begun to speak rather good English.
Zagami lists the supporters of Prevost: the U.S. Democratic Party, the Jesuits, the Freemasons, the Lavender Mafia of Chicago, Barrack Obama etc..
Editor’s Note: Chris Jackson has failed to do the least due diligence to see if the Main Stream Media, and the College of Cardinals, both notorious for lying to Catholics during the last 12 years, were telling the truth when they said Prevost was elected the Pope. He only has eyes to see the discrepancies between what this heretic is doing and what a Catholic Pope should be doing. — How many years will it take for him to connect the dots? — Well I appreciate he says something about what he can still see. But I pray that he open his eyes, since God gave him a mind capable of reading A in a law and seeing that Z was done instead. So to clarify what is wrong in the above report, I have used a leader in my repost, with the correct theological qualifications.
Numerous photographs show that Cardinal Bob is left-handed, though trained to write with his right hand. In Latin, the word for the left hand is the adjective for “left”, sinister.
Left-handed persons are not morally evil people, since it is just a variation of nature, though in ancient times there was a common superstition that they were in some way in league with evil. For this reason, it has long been the practice in Europe to teach children with left-hand dominance to write with their right hand.
And indeed, right handed people never even think that the direction right or left has anything to do with anything other than directions. Nor that they are superior for being so. And they are not immune from being adherents of left-wing or right-wing political organizations or ideologies, if we consider the other area of life in which generally these adjectives of direction are used.
However, seeing that Prevost thinks Pope Francis is in Heaven, and taught “magisterially”, a word he first used for Bergoglio, not Jesus Christ, this is just one more cherry on the top of the cake of signs the Divine Providence has given us, to open our eyes to this Globalist shill who is morally, theologically, politically and intellectually disoriented, that is, a sinister person, in the other sense of the Latin word.
Left-wingers and pope-splainers will read this report at FromRome.Info and say, “Look at this: this proves that FromRome.Info is published by an ignorant superstitious bigoted person”, because being Pharasees and having dedicated themselves to the Father of Lies, they have to find some excuse for their own sin, since they have no desire to remove the planks from their own eyes, lest they see the truth and be saved. — I say this in advance, so that when they begin such a dance of moral perversity, I can say, I told you so.
Editor’s Note: Three years ago, I found myself free one morning, so before anyone had woken up, I went out into a central plaza at Kyiv, where I was working on founding a humanitarian organization to help the Christian victims of the war, and I made this documentary on the Eucharist. — Readers of FromRome.info tell me there is more information in this one video, about How Jesus is with us in the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar, than they have ever heard from any priest in any homily ever. — Well that is because, this talk of mine is not a homily, but more like a lecture.
Today is the Feast of Corpus Christi, June 19, 2015, and as such, this video has aged like a fine wine.
Editor’s Note: And let’s be clear, this war did not just happen, it was planned for.
Even this YouTube Channel — see video below — said as much 4 weeks ago in mid May, 2025. — Note, however, that this second video, below, begins with a factual summary, and then suggests a hypothetical and very bad outcome: as obvious propaganda to incite an attack on Iran by making the public fear that Iran is a threat to the USA.
Once the Globalists had fooled Catholics into believing Prevost was validly elected, all the pieces were in play for the next Globalist created Crisis. This is why those Catholic Media outlets which refuse to report on the invalidity of his election, are 100% Globalist shills.
At the end of this article, the journalist author, says really what is going on among the corrupt Masonic Cabal of sodomites in the Church: speaking of Prevost, Susie Pinto writes: “He was elected leader of the Catholic Church on May 8, 2025”.
Catholics who claim that Prevost is the Pope, even though they have never even done the most minimal due diligence to see if that claim is true, that is, if his election was valid, are in fact saying that they hold him to be the man whom God the Holy Spirit protects from error. But since Prevost blasphemed the Holy Spirit many times, these same Catholics are implying that the Holy Spirit is a total wimp, Whose grace has no effect on the soul of the pope whatsoever.
These Catholics are pretending to be Catholics, as is obvious.
Worse are the social media influencers who are erasing hundreds of comments on social media sites the world over, whenever Catholics attempt to post the news about the problems with Prevost’s election or his heresies.
Those Catholics, are even worse, for they have made a pact with the Father of Lies.
Editor’s Note: To suppress the very Mass which the Roman Church has used for more than 1000 years is a sin of schism and implicates that the person acting to do this is a formal pertinacious heretic, denying hundreds of truths of the Catholic Faith. We really do not more information about Cardinal Prevost to know that in the sight of God he could never have received the office of Peter, in a Conclave, since this is directly contrary to the Bull of Paul IV, “Ex cum apostolatus officio”. To even suggest he could would be to blaspheme Jesus Christ, since it implies that Christ did not keep His word, when He promised, “Whatsoever you bind upon earth, shall be bound also in Heaven.”
Many “Catholic” media influencers are trying to avoid that eternal consequence by merely censoring all news that the Conclave had no valid result. They think they are going to win in a game against God Himself.
Editor’s Note: This report covers the ongoing crisis in the MidEast and how the war is really going. And in the video below, some very disturbing developments regarding the U.S. Administration, and extend of destruction in Israel, which is much larger than reported in the West. This former BBC News Editor, Rifat Jawaid, who is a native of India, delivers a very fact based and realistic critique and reporting of the news, which rivals all the MSM in the West.
Finally, a theological note. With the Catholic world duped into following a man who is not the Vicar of Christ, the entire Mystical Body is separated from Christ the Head. The spiritual result will be that the World will be plunged into horrible spiritual turbulence and delusions. The war in the Mid East is thus, no coincidence. And those refusing to recognize that the Conclave had, according to two Papal Laws, no valid result, are contributing to this separation of the Mystical Body from Christ, and doing a great work of darkness.
There are many who write about the Antichrist, the apocalyptic figure spoken of by the Apostle Saint Paul, in his Second Letter to the Thessalonians, that is to the Church in Thessaly, northern Greece. But rarely do you hear anything said about who are the followers of the Antichrist.
Yet, Saint Paul, one of the “co-founders” of the Church at Rome describes them well in 2 Thessalonians 2:10.
eo quod dilectionem veritatis non receperunt ut salvi fierent.
Then, my English translation:
for this, that they had not received the love of the truth, so that they might be saved.
While the Vulgate of Jerome has, “caritatem” for “dilectionem”, that is “love”, I believe this is an error, because as can be seen from the Greek, the word here is “ἀγάπην“, or the love which arises from a free choice, which is the word used in the New Testament, every time Jesus Christ speaks of His love for us (e. g. John 15:9, καθὼςἠγάπησένμεὁπατήρ,κἀγὼὑμᾶςἠγάπησα·μείνατεἐντῇἀγάπῃτῇἐμῇ.), to emphasize that He was not constrained by passion or necessity, but acted in pure liberty when He chose to save us, not on the basis of our foreseen merits, but simply because He chose to love us first before the foundation of the world.
Thus, what Saint Paul refers to here is very profound, for he identifies the followers of the Antichrist with those who refused to receive from God the Holy Spirit that infused grace so that they might freely chose to love the truth, and thus be saved.
From this we see how important from an eternal perspective it is for every Catholic to chose to love the truth. This is what distinguishes us who are working out our salvation from those who are being destroyed by the spirit of the Antichrist, who is the Man of Lawlessness.
The most authoritative ancient manuscripts of the New Testament, the Codices preserved at Mt. Sinai and in the library of the Vatican. In these two manuscripts, the man described here by Saint Paul is not called, as in all other manuscripts, “the man of sin” (ὁ ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἁμαρτίας), but “the man of lawlessness” ( ὁ ἄνθρωπος τῆς ἀνομίας). And it is this latter reading which scholars believe is the original.
Holding to their authority, we can thus say that the principal characteristic of the Antichrist will be to be violate law, to be a law breaker. The Greek term literally means “without laws” or “without morals”.
Now, if we reflect on this, and want to be very precise in what we say, let us ask ourselves the question, “How does one know, when a man is lawless?”
The answer, of course, is that he transgresses law. But to demonstrate that, we have to find a law, and examine his behavior and show that he did (1) something which is forbidden by the law, or (2) something which is not sanctioned by the law.
And to prove that, we obviously must have recourse to the TEXT of the law, if it is a written law, or to the notion of the law, if it is unwritten law, such as Natural Law.
Thus, as a consequence, every lawless man is going to be discovered by this, that his actions do not concord with the words which express a specific law.
And all of this, now, should be clear to the regular readers of FromRome.Info, where for the past 12 years I have continually spoken of the laws of the Church and how they may or are being transgressed.
Because, if we learn what the laws of the Church are, then we can discern who are the law-breakers are, and who are those who are acting as lawless individuals.
Likewise, we also see, from the Apostle Saint Paul’s teaching in 2 Thess 2:10, that those who are led to destruction are precisely those who follow the spirit of lawlessness by submitting to those who are lead by the spirit of the Antichrist, BECAUSE THEY HAVE REFUSED TO LOVE THE TRUTH, which could have saved them: a love which would have recognized the discrepancy between the lawless’ behavior and the rule of law, and caused them to refuse to follow the lawless, simply because by loving the truth, they would have detested the breaking of the law.
So when you find that a loved one or friend refuses to accept the facts or laws of the Church regarding the scandals since 2013, I urge you to pray for them and share this teaching of Saint Paul, because it is a most terrible sign of following the Antichrist and of being headed to destruction, if someone refuses to love the truth.
This is why it is important to know what “munus” means, in Canon 332 §2, and what “ne excedat” means in Universi Dominic Gregis, the Papal Law on Conclaves, in paragraph n. 33, to cite just two examples, of two laws, which were transgressed by the College of Cardinals when they in 2013 “elected” Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and in 2025, when they “elected” Robert Francis Riggitano Prevost Martinez.
For more about how the Conclave had no valid result, see HERE.
News and Commentary on the Catholic Church
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Left-handed persons are not morally evil people, since it is just a variation of nature, though in ancient times there was a common superstition that they were in some way in league with evil. For this reason, it has long been the practice in Europe to teach children with left-hand dominance to write with their right hand.
