Prevost subliminally suggests that a Pope could marry a nun

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

“Use a picture. It’s worth thousand words”, as Arthur Brisbane quipped in 1911 during a meeting of advertising specialists, which called itself the Syracuse Advertisers Men’s Club.

So from the point of view of optics, just what is Cardinal Prevost playing at with this photograph?

This photograph was included by Vatican News in their report entitled, “Exploring the Cosmos”, here. And thus from a subliminal point of view — that is, in the imaginary deceptions used by advertisers who play on human psychology, what is not said, but suggested, becomes the message to be conveyed.

Indeed, many authors have already noticed that Pope Francis’ diabolic pastoral style was by ambiguous suggestions. And Cardinal Prevost has loudly protested his fidelity to Pope Francis’ “masterfulness”.

As a Cultural Anthropologist, I chose the leader to this article, because I see a dominant male who has placed a non-dominant woman at his right hand, on a chair which has no other chairs next to it, so as to set her aside for himself. This is the traditional optics of a Regent and his wife. — And as a consecrated person myself, I know that it is absolutely illicit for a monk to sit next to a nun, at any time, anywhere.

And if you look at Prevost’s left, then you see a bishop sitting with a layman, in a similar but reversed relationship. — And since the woman appears to be a consecrated virgin, her veil just adds to the subliminal of a married wife, since married women wear black veils.

That this image was intentionally staged, can be easily inferred, since Prevost is sitting on a chair which is distinctive, not to mention that Vatican News cannot publish anything he the de facto monarch of the Vatican City State would not approve of.

Thus, I do not think it would be reasonable to ignore what one’s eyes see in this picture and the message being sent by including this image in an article on recent discoveries in Astronomy.

We know from the Fathers of the Church, that the Antichrist will be born of an apostate nun who fornicates with an apostate Bishop. And she and more likely also he will be Jewish. I cannot saw who this woman is, sitting next to Prevost, but I already showed that it is nearly certain that Prevost is a Jew. So, regardless, Prevost seems to be mainstreaming a lot of Antichristic doctrines lately.

Comment below about what you think Prevost is saying …

BTW, if a bishop, even the pope, would attempt civil or ecclesiastical marriage, he would ipso facto be degraded to a layman and lose all office. But in the Church of Bergoglio, you will soon see that they have no problem with that.

+ + +

+ + + + + + +

The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present

bonav-I-banner This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!

+ + +

Subscribe to FromRome.Info!

Loading

27 thoughts on “Prevost subliminally suggests that a Pope could marry a nun”

  1. Definitely concur with your assessment. The Freemasons, Demon Worshipers, Luciferians always leave cues about their believe systems and associations in subliminal ways. Do believe it’s because God demands they warn those they are attacking with evil; their Psy-Ops and criminal behavior if not outright apostacy and war.
    Is not surprising in the least. You’ve had Prevost’s number from the beginning and most faithful Catholics do agree with you. Few of us are supportive of the Vatican any longer. Many no longer economically support the Vatican or Catholic Church. Much prefer supporting other charities, the cancelled of ‘Holy Orders’…The faithful doing God’s work as you.

    1. Even more spooky, since she is an Italian American woman, just the kind of woman an Italian American man might take a liking to.

      1. Exactly. This is a picture created with a perverse heretical intent, and which exploits a woman to do it.

      2. She holds one of the highest positions in the Roman curia. She doesn’t look like his type!

      3. Actually not. She is the president of the secretariat of the governorship of Vatican City, which is merely a civil position, not part of the Roman Curia. She is like the mayor of Vatican City.

    1. Here the author mistranslated the term, viscera, from the Italian. It means the bowels, as in the bowles of God’s mercy. The game she is playing is that she only say bowels, which is ever worse than saying womb.

      1. There is an update section near the end of the article where the author says: ‘Some critics have claimed that I mistranslated the Italian word viscere as “womb.”…’ He then goes on to say why he sticks with that translation. He says later ‘No one would suggest that Christ grew in Mary’s intestines, only in her womb.’

        I’m not saying he is correct but people do seem to see what they want to see with this ‘pope’.

      2. Therefore when he says this:
        ‘Linguistically, viscere can mean “entrails” or “inward parts,” but in Marian contexts, especially when describing the Incarnation, it has long been used synonymously with “womb.”’ then he is intentionally misleading and spreading disinformation to set someone up to be discredited.

      3. Linguistic habits in English do not translate. Thus, just because a word is used in one way in English or Latin does not mean that it is used that way in Italian. I do think that viscera in Latin is used for womb, but in English we do not use “bowels” except in metaphors such as “bowels of God’s mercy”. Like a visceral reaction means one thing in literature another thing in medicine and physiology.

  2. Oh well, at least antipope Riggitano-Prevost is “keeping his hands to himself” [whilst the picture was being taken…] despite the feminine charms closely adjacent to him……haha!?!

    Do please listen to Fr Isaac Mary’s latest superb podcast published on Trinity Sunday within which, in the midst of having a justified ‘rant’ about Cdl Prevost’s diabolical support of pervert Cdl Fernandez, Fr Isaac very nearly says “Cardinal Pervert” @ 16.33/34 when referring to Prevost……lol !!
    http://www.soti.blog/2025/06/16/soldiers-of-the-immaculate-with-fr-isaac-040-perfect-love-casts-out-all-fear/

    St Gregory Barbarigo, pray for us.
    And [in some English dioceses] St Botolph, pray for us.

    1. If one is not willing to say that Prevost was not validly elected and that the Church needs a Catholic Pope, we are participating in the destruction of the Church. We cannot ignore the juridical reality of the Church, for that would be like complaining that the prime minister is leading a nation to destruction but refuse the evidence that he was invalidly elected to that position.

      So by calling them the pope, one concedes power to Prevost just as one did to Bergoglio, when both were not the Pope. We’ve seen this tactic for 12 years from those who do not want to open their eyes and move from complaining to actually fighting against the revolution.

      Alas, we live in an age, where, if we are only intellectually lazy or lack intellectual courage, or lack friends who are willing to tell us the truth, we shall perish. And all it takes is one person.

      Like here at FromRome.Info. One reader told me to doubt the Pandemic, and that led me to become a crusader against the Globalist Narrative.

      One reader. One true friend.

      That’s all it takes.

      1. Fair comment. I agree that Fr Isaac does not appear to consider, either in this or previous podcasts, that Cdl Prevost’s “election” was invalid and that he is an antipope.

        But Fr Isaac is a Franciscan confrere to you so I am wondering whether you have had any communication with him either before or after the recent conclave? If not, then I will alert him by e-mail to your various editorials & articles.

        Lex orandi; lex credendi; lex vivendi.

      2. Father Isaac is a priest, I am a brother. In the Order, brothers don’t tell priests anything. IT would easier for a Layman to do that.

  3. The photo suggests the woman as a high ranking and influential authority figure. The “right hand man” so to speak.

  4. The subliminal message is also the role inversion, paired withe robes’ colours: the bride/wife (lower in rank) gives her right to the groom/husband (higher in rank).
    The rank is respected up to msgr. Riggitano, inverted afterwards.

    1. Sunday 29th June 2025, the Solemnity of Saints Peter & Paul, will be the 72nd anniversary of the implementation of the CIA’s Doctrinal Warfare Program against the Catholic Church……

      This proverbial “wrecking-ball” has had its desired effect in almost all areas of the Church, with the exceptions of priestly celibacy & women’s ordination……

      So I think it is reasonable to assume that antipope Prevost will, until he is deservedly excommunicated & anathematized, push forward on those two fronts in the most deceptive & distracting manner possible……

      Not so much a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”, Cdl Prevost is more akin to a snake or serpent, slyly & treachorously working to kill his prey whilst retaining an external appearance of calm smartness & smoothness with no ugly ‘wrinkles’……

      Saints Ephrem the Syrian, Mark & Marcellianus, pray for us and for Holy Mother Church.

  5. These “synodal” agendas standout like a sore thumb. But what about Jesus? Disassembling hierarchy thinking is giving me a headache. I already know we are all sinners in need of grace… what good is dismantled order in favor of the most trendy, cool and popular public opinions? Jesus, Save Us!

    https://catholicconnect.in/news/goan-jesuit-priest-appointed-to-key-synodal-role-at-jesuit-curia-in-rome

    “In an interaction with Catholic Connect, Fr. Joseph shared that his appointment follows the late Pope Francis’ request to the Society of Jesus to aid the global Church in actualising synodality after the conclusion of the Synod in Rome. “Fr. Arturo Sosa, Superior General of the Society of Jesus, identified the area of ‘Discernment in Common’ as a key contribution that the Society can make to the synodal process,” Fr. Joseph said.

    Explaining the concept, Fr. Joseph noted that ‘Discernment in Common’ is a process where a group of individuals work together to determine the best course of action in a given situation. “In religious contexts, it is viewed as a way to collectively discover God’s will for the group,” he said.

    In his new role, Fr. Joseph will work closely with Fr. John Dardis SJ, General Counsellor for Discernment and Apostolic Planning (DPA), and will be part of a core team that includes Mr Germán Muñoz, Assistant for Special Projects, and an intern from the Università Sacro Cuore, Milan.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.