+ + +
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
‘No Atomic Bombs Were Dropped on Japan’
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/no-atomic-bombs-were-dropped-on-japan
I suspect atomic bombs only really work reliably underground where the components are contained sufficiently for the chain reaction to proceed long enough for enough energy to be released. However the threat from atomic bombs enables the psychological manipulation of the global population.
John S,
Look up the images of tens of thousands of Japanese burnt by radiation, and then try to calculate how a city could be destroyed by such a small bomb, and you will see that the article is sheer lunacy. I know Franciscans friars who know the friars who lived near Nagasaki and cared for the victims and saw the explosion. For example, the Friary founded by Saint Maximilian, outside of the city, had its front lawn covered by furniture and debris from the explosion several miles away, something impossible with such a small bomb.
As for your claim that no atomic bombs were used, well the second bomb was an nuclear bomb, since it was a hydrogen bomb, but the first was a atomic bomb, and not an nuclear bomb, since it used fission, not fusion reactions.
I would urge you to hear out the evidence presented although the link at the end covers it, which also links to a 350 page book with a chapter on burns.
Hiroshima was uranium and Nagasaki was plutonium both were therefore atomic bombs.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/atomic-bomb/Development-and-proliferation-of-atomic-bombs
‘The first atomic bomb to be used in warfare used uranium. It was dropped by the United States on Hiroshima, Japan, on August 6, 1945’
‘The next atomic bomb to be exploded was of the plutonium type; it was dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945’
The term nuclear bomb can be used for either atomic or thermonuclear.
The thermonuclear bomb was not available until the 1950s.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/thermonuclear-bomb
‘Edward Teller, Stanislaw M. Ulam, and other American scientists developed the first hydrogen bomb, which was tested at Enewetak atoll on November 1, 1952.’
Part of my honours degree included a term on nuclear chemistry (a long time ago). The video gives evidence that does not fit with atomic bombs. Why do you presume only one conventional bomb? The phenomena you describe could occur with the explanation given in the video. When I use inverted commas to introduce the video that means it is not my claim and I have not made a judgement. It may well be false and one can think of a motive but I have heard the alternative view before in the past but also concerns about the viability of nuclear bombs at a higher level of academic understanding.
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/the-truth-about-the-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/
John S, Well the bomb which fell on Nagasaki produced 21 kilo tuns of TNT equivalent. How could such a charge be placed in such a small bomb, which only weighed 4.5 thousand kgs? I won the Renselear Award in Science and Mathematics at my highschool, and though admitted I did not study nuclear physics at College, I do know enough geopolitics to know that if they US had such a powerful non nuclear bomb, they would have used it again after World War II. But the physics don’t match, because that destructive power can not be explained by a chemical reaction. — But thank you for correcting me about both being atomic bombs. — As for my personal knowledge, I said, I know Franciscans who have lived with the Friars who were at Nagasaki and who cared for radiation victims for decades afterwards, that is why I do not have to consider the claims you mention, because they are contrary to fact. — I also know that the CIA sponsors a lot of groups such as flat earthers, never-moon landers, UFO organizations, because such outlandish concepts entrap minds into their narratives. There are many Americans who want to deny Nagasaki and Hiroshima, because the truth of those events totally unmasks Masonic America for what she rally is, and many prefer her to be what the propaganda claims her to be, instead.
I wrote nuclear chemistry; it is of more relevance to the evidence given.
This book addresses objections you raise e.g. suggests possible use of thermobaric weapons.
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/download/hiroshima-revisited.pdf
I have been looking at photographs of the destruction and of injuries. I think there are inconsistencies . For example the destruction shows a lot of vertical standing burnt trees. In the natural Tunguska event all the tree trunks are aligned radiating away from the epicentre except at the epicentre.
If one has never seen an orange and one is given a satsuma and told it is an orange one might for the same reason identify radiation injuries and radiation sickness when another cause can produce almost exactly the same results.
I could write a lot more referring to the photographs but it is a distraction from where effort should be put in these times.
The really to this in the statement made by Edward Teller (Hungarian Jew)..”We have now become destroyer of Worlds” Which means “if we cannot own it all.. We will Destroy It”. The US and British Government allowed the secrets to be stolen and given to the Jew Controlled Soviet Union. On top of it, the USA is only country to use it in anger killing the Catholic cities of Hirosahama and Nagasaki Japan during the Jew Controlled Roosevelt-Truman Democratic Presidents of the USA.
https://www.history.com/articles/atomic-bomb-soviet-spies