Monthly Archives: June 2025

Action Items, Asking for Help

Project “SAVE ROME” — Completed: Nov 23, 2025

40 Comments

What is Project “Save Rome”?

COMPLETED ON NOV. 23, 2025 — SEE HERE

Project “Save Rome” is the name of the effort to assist the Catholics of the Roman Rite, at Rome, Italy, to use their Apostolic Right, given to them by the Apostle Saint Peter, to elect a Catholic Pope, seeing that the College of Cardinals elected a public manifest and pertinacious heretic, Robert Francis Provost, who by accepting ‘Fiducia supplicans’ and ‘Amoris laetitia’, and opposing the use of capital punishment, rejects (1) the teaching of Saint Paul on capital punishment, (2) the teaching of Jesus Christ on the Priesthood, (3), the Second Commandment as a moral norm for sacramental discipline, (4) the 6th commandment as a moral norm for sacramental discipline, and (5) the teaching of the Apostles that the Sacraments of the living must be refused to public impenitent sinners, and is thus incapable of being the Roman Pontiff, according to Pope Paul IV (continue reading for more information).

What is the legal justification for an Election by Apostolic Right?

When an institution (Cardinals in a conclave) fails completely to fulfill its ministerial duty (Canon 349) of providing for the selection of a Catholic as Roman Pontiff, the ancient right of original electorate (the Faithful of the Church at Rome) revives, by reason of the default, according to the teaching of Pope Nicholas II, to prevent the Church founded by God from being taken over by a Heretically Depraved invalid candidate, leading souls to destruction, by which the Gates of Hell would prevail (See more about this, in the video on “The error of juridical positivism“). Since this apostolic right is part of the Deposit of the Faith, it is ever capable of reviving when the institution, entrusted with the ordinary duty, betrays the very intention of the Roman Pontiffs to provide for a Catholic pope, and thus forfeits their right and competency; for otherwise, the Church Herself would cease to exist as a juridically valid entity without recourse to action by the original electorate. Such a recourse is judged to be juridically possible and reasonable even by a Canonist accredited by the Roman Rota (see HERE).

How is the Election of Prevost invalid?

The election of Robert Cardinal Prevost is invalid for two reasons:

  1. Since Prevost is a public manifest heretic, the election of which as Roman Pontiff, is declared null, void, and irritus by Pope Paul IV, in his bull of February 15, 1559, “Cum ex apostolatus officio“, n. 6, which foreseeing such a tragedy, deals precisely with this situation.
  2. Since the Cardinals Electors directly violated the formal command in n. 33 of the Papal Law on Conclaves, “Universi Dominic Gregis“, of February 22, 1996, which limits to 120 the maximum number of Cardinal Electors who are allowed to vote, which according to canon 335 and n. 5 of the same law, they have no right to violate; on which account, by allowing 133 to vote, they violated n. 68 in the very act of the election, and thus the election was declared null and void and conferred no right upon Prevost, as per the censure in n. 76 of the same law. — The Cardinals attempted to justify their action by claiming that Pope Francis gave them a dispensation, in that he created more than 120 Cardinal electors: a claim which is nullified by UDG n. 4, which forbids all dispensations of any part of the Law on Conclaves, even if it were granted on the basis of a written documented before his death; or if they were granted, again by a written document the power to interpret this rule as optional, so as not to violate canon 335 (which forbids any innovation of rights during a sedevacante), which document they do not even claim to have! Thus their claim is null and voided not only by n. 4, but by the 2nd paragraph of the Promulgation, in the same papal law, not to mention being a claim contrary to canon 16 § 1 and counter to canon 86, which forbids dispensations from  essential legislative dispositions, such as is the rule of 120. — See a detailed explanation of this HERE.

In what does an Election by Apostolic Right consist?

The Faithful of the Church of Rome, that is, the 3.5 Million Catholics resident at Rome, that is Clergy, Religious and Laity of the Dioceses of Rome, and the suburbican dioceses, of Palestrina, Frascati, Segni-Velletri, Albano, Ostia, Porto-Santa Rufina, Sabina-Poggio Mirteto, need to come together in one physical place and chose a baptized Catholic man, who is both celibate and professes the whole and perfect Catholic Faith. The election can be by acclamation or majority vote, verbally expressed. This right, when the Cardinals fail to conduct a valid election and chose a catholic, revives, as Pope Nicholas II magisterially taught in the Bull, “In Nomine Domini”, n. 3.

WHAT HAS BEEN DONE as of July 6, 2025?

Br. Bugnolo, who lives at Rome, has mailed out about 3500 letters of legal notice to the Clergy of the Diocese of Rome and the suburbican Dioceses, and received confirmation of receipt. He has explained in Italian the legal problems with the Conclave, and has informed them of their rights. He has asked them to speak to one another and put the College of Cardinals on notice, as is their right and responsibility.

Br. Bugnolo has also informed the Clergy that if the Cardinals do not redo the Conclave legally, they have forfeited their right to elect the Pope, and that therefore, they, the Clergy, obtain the right in accord with the teaching of Pope Nicholas II to convoke the Faithful and Religious of their dioceses and elect a Catholic Pope. — He has likewise informed them, that if neither the Cardinals nor the Clergy act within 80 days, he will presume that they are willingly forfeiting their right, and in consequence, that he, in virtue of being a Catholic resident in the territory of the Church at Rome, will act and convoke an Assembly, inviting all who have the right to vote and who reject the heresies of Bergoglio and Prevost. He has made the point to emphasize in his letter to the Clergy, in particular, that he prefers that they take the initiative.

Br. Bugnolo has sent out these notices to remove any legal challenge to the Assembly’s validity, convocation or results. His past experience with the Clergy at Rome, during the controversy of the two Popes, however, strongly inclines him to expect that neither the Cardinals nor the Clergy will take any action by September 24, 2025.

If the Clergy do take action and elect a Catholic Pope, Br. Bugnolo has resolved to investigate and verify the validity of the election and the Catholicity of the man, and if finding everything in order, He pledges that he will donate the funds donated to this Project, to the purpose the new Catholic Pope designates; and explain to him the reasons for our action and the wonderful faith of the Catholics who supported the Save Rome Project, and ask his Apostolic Benediction on us all. — If he finds find that the election was irregular, he will convoke an Assembly as planned.

Practical Necessities

On account of the laws of the Italian Republic and the administration regulations of the City of Rome, Italy, the Catholics need to provide at their own expense for the necessary publicity and equipment to allow for a crowd of 25,000 or more meet safely in the same place: such as security, ambulances, chairs, stage, sound system, specialized locations for care of those suffering from exposure or medical conditions, and access to transportation and sufficient crowd-control barriers etc.. The chief expense of which is publicity to make sure all the 3.5 Million Catholics who have the right to attend know of the event. — Br. Bugnolo, the editor of FromRome.info, and President of Ordo Militaris Inc., is volunteering his services at $0.00 cost, for organizing this project.

Goal

Project “Save Rome”, therefore, aims to seek the assistance of true Catholics all over the world, to raise the funds to gather sufficient numbers of Catholics to this Assembly, so that in the sight of all Catholics in the world, they can clearly see this as an action of the whole Church at Rome. For this reason, calculating the costs of TV, Newspaper, Radio, and Social Media advertising, but the event costs, we are seeking to raise the equivalent of $250,000 US Dollars.

As of November 1, 2025, about $25,100 has been raised for this project. Expenses for posters in the City of Rome alone, printing costs & municipal fees for placement, is about $27,500.  And so we are just at the beginning of the fund raising. Since posters should be placed in all the cities around Rome inside the suburbican Dioceses, and together that probably would raise this costs for posters and municipal fees to maybe $40,000 to $50,000.

If we cannot meet the goal, the election will be arranged in a manner requiring less expense, as much as that is possible. Any monies remaining will be donated to the new Roman Pontiff, and a complete list of expenses will be published on this page, afterwards, so that all might know how the money was used.

HOW TO HELP

First of all we ask you pray to Christ the King, to send His Holy Spirit upon the Church at Rome, so that the true Catholics who remain work effectively together to give Him a Vicar after His own Sacred Heart. We therefore ask prayers especially to Our Lady, Saints Peter and Paul, all the Martyrs and Saints of the Church at Rome, and to Saint Michael the Archangel, the protector of the City of Rome, and all the guardian Angels in the province.

Second, if you can we ask you to consider making a donation to this project either through PayPal, from anywhere in the World. Or using Zelle Pay, if you have a bank account in the United States which offers this served. Or using a Bank Wire in US Dollars, British Pounds Sterling, Euroes or Australian Dollars. See below for each method.

How To Help Financially

You can make a donation to this Holy Work to defend the Church, via Paypal, Zelle Pay, or Bank Wire:

Via PayPal, through the USA 501(c)(3) Non Profit “Save Old St. Mary’s Inc.”





Via Zelle, add the message: SAVEROME

NOTE: Ordo Militaris Inc. will put all funds received into an 501(c)(3) dedicated account for the Save Rome Project, no part of which funds will be used for anything else. However, funds “donated” through Ordo Militaris Inc., do not qualify as charitable donations. If you want your gift to qualify as a charitable donation, use the PayPal method for donation. — Note Also, that European and U.K. Banks will block your bank wire IF you add anything to the phrase “SaveRome” or “Save Rome”; also, they will block you transfer if you classify it as a “donation to a Charitable organization”, since Ordo Militaris Inc. is a for profit corporation. The correct classification is “Services” since funds received will provide services to the Catholics at Rome to hold such an Assembly or will be donated to the Roman Pontiff for services rendered to him.

News

How Globalists will use AI to exterminate most of the human race

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: Human thought cannot be replicated. But this video, though it contains the BigLie that it can be, serves to forewarn humanity how the Globalists will use AI to cover their plan to genocide humanity. This is a Narrative cover story.

However, it shows why you should NEVER  interact with AI and always avoid as much as possible all apps and devices with AI access. For if you use AI you are giving someone or something knowledge on how to control and replace you.

News

Cardinal Riggitanto-Prevost-Martinez wants Priests consecrated to the people

8 Comments

Editor’s Note: Prevost continues to preach the heresy of “God with us” and dump traditional Catholic Dogma, of “Vertical theology”, as he pushes new definitions of Catholic terms.  We saw two weeks ago that he redefined the human family as “a stable union of one man and one woman”, omitting any mention of marriage. Now, he wants Catholic priests to be redefined.

For, in the above “speech” he told priests to consecrate themselves to the people!

In Catholic Doctrine, however, a priest is consecrated to God alone. That means that he is set aside from the people to serve God alone. This requires him to live differently, in a manner which reflects that he is not of this world any longer, nor for this world, but serves the Living God who is a pure spirit.

And this theology of priesthood is a revealed truth which the Church has always taught is to be believed, so that it is de Fide divina et catholica, the denial of which is a formal heresy, as per canon 751 and 1364, resulting in excommunication.

If priests are now to be “consecrated to the people”, then will they not begin to bless and sacrifice, no longer in the name of the Triune God of the Catholic Religion, but in the name of some kind of socialist collective? or worse?

This is an entirely novel and heretical view of the priesthood. And it means that Prevost wants an entirely New Religion.

His concept is at once totally Marxist and totally Masonic.

If priests are going to be consecrated to the people, then it will be easy to see how Prevost might abandon celibacy and allow bi-sexual polygamy for priests. Because, if a priest consecrated to God means he is celibate and straight, what else could a priest consecrated to the people be?

In any event, this new kind of priesthood seems designed to promote the errors contained in the heretical document, ‘Fiducia supplicans’, which attempts to authorize priests to bless public sinners, but not in the Name of the True God.

I will speculate, that in not such a distant future, Prevost authorizes this new priesthood to bless in the name of Pachamama and offer that demon goddess sacrifices. For that is one of the pagan religions of the Andes where he was Bishop.

In fact, this already seems to be the agenda of the Pachamama Alliance:

As can be seen from page 8 of the PDF below, where the Columban Missionaries in the Philippine Islands are pushing “ecological conversion” in conjunction with the Pachamama Aliance:

Conversion means taking up a new religion, after all, doesn’t it?

It is impossible not to notice that the Globalists are increasingly taking on the use of terminology from the Catholic Church but using it to direct people to worship everything else but the True God. And that is Antichristic.

However, Prevost is not just speaking aimlessly. He is in fact laying the ground for for a theological change in the nature of the Sacraments, as Cardinal Fernandez was preparing 15 month ago, as reported here at FromRome.info:

And it seems that in Peru, they already understand everything about what the “selection” of Francis II means for them, back in the Diocese of Chicolayo, where Cardinal Riggitanto-Prevost-Martinez was bishop, as can be discerned from this advertisement on FaceBook, by the Pacha Mama Tour company, for a trip called, “The Route of Pope Leo XIV”.

APPEAL TO READERS TO ASSIST IN INVESTIGATION:

Back in 2019 there were photographs of Catholic Bishops in Peru attending cerimonies worshipping Pachamama. I distinctly recall that some were Bishops of Peru. I can no longer find these photographs, but if one can be found with Prevost worshipping Pachamama, then we have even more proof of his apostasy. Leave links to what you find in the comments below.

Here is the video of the Pachamama cerimony on Oct. 4, 2019, at the Vatican. I do not see Prevost among the Bishops there, however, but perhaps others with good eyes can double check.

News

Is Cardinal Riggitano-Prevost a bastard or wanted Criminal?

1 Comment

Editor’s Note: When someone fakes being the Pope, it is highly likely that he has been faking to be other things too, throughout his life. This is even more likely if his grandfather faked being several different persons during his own life.

Well in regard to the man who claims to be “Pope Leo XIV”, we have already seen many reports where he claimed to be Robert Francis Prevost. His friends from school, however, knew him as Bob Prevost.

Then, we saw reports about his paternal Grandfather, who was “Salvatore Giovanni Gaetano Riggitano”, when presented after birth by his parents in 1876 at Milazzo, in the Kingdom of Italy; but when he emigrated to the United States of America, claimed then, in 1903, to be “Salvatore Giovanni Riggitano Alito”.  and “John Alito”, and “John Riggitano” at different times before 1920. But after marrying and dumping his wife, Daisy Huges, at Chicago, Illinois, took the name Jean or John Provost: a name which he kept for the rest of his life as he lived with his Mistress and sired two sons, one of which, Louis Martinus Prevost,  we were told was the Father of Robert Francis Prevost.

But now, in the above article, we see that on his Peruvian Citizenship Identity Card, he is claimed to be ” Robert Prevost Martínez“! The “Francis” has disappeared.

“Martínez” was the surname of his mother, Mildred Agnes Martinez, at least when the future Cardinal was born, on his birth certificate.

Does he really have to change his surname, when he becomes a Peruvian Citizen? And when he became one, did he not lose his U. S. Citizenship, since back in the 1980’s that would have been the result of swearing allegiance to another country?

Or is he changing his name for some other reason, like to hide from the Law?

It is true, that among the peoples of Latin America, they often have a double surname, that of the Father and of the Mother. But Prevost’s U.S. documents and passport would not have his Mother’s surname, so why the pretense now? His mother was born in the USA. Her family did not follow such a tradition.

Indeed, in the United States of America, if you change your surname, it usually means other things. Maybe by the time he went to Peru, he was knew that Prevost was not his real paternal surname?

But we can say that Robert, whatever you call him, Riggitano, Prevost or Martinez, is following in his Grandfather’s tradition, of changing his names on documents.

Finally, if Cardinal Prevost knew he was a legitimate pope, he would not be getting or renewing his Peruvian Citizenship, as he would have a Vatican Passport. In this he is following the other South American pretender, of recent memory, who never gave up his Argentinian Passport; he had a canonical irregularity in his priestly ordination, since the Code of Canon Law of 1917 required that you be ordained a Deacon first, before being Ordained a Priest, and there seems to be no historical record he was every ordained a Deacon, or dispensed from that irregularity.