+ + +
Editor’s Note: At 8:20 A.M., today, a huge explosion rocked the city of Rome. It’s source was a GPL (liquified national gas) refueling station for vehicles which use methane, located at Via dei Gordiani, n. 32, on the eastern side of the Villa de Sanctis Park, which covers a large part of the Catecombs of Saint Helen, the mother of the Emperor Constantine, who was first buried in a Mausoleum, on the southern side of what is today the Villa dei Sanctis Park. Forty-five persons were injured, two of them gravely, because the park was filled with Romans recreating. Of these, 12 were policemen, 6 were firemen, and 3 where station attendants
The explosions began as the GPL tanks were being refilled. The station was cordoned off by the police, but then the gas caught fire and exploded, and afterwards a huge black cloud of smoke arose from the site.
The explosion was so large, it seems as a war zone. Fortunately, through the quick action of teachers, a group of 120 little children were led to flee the park from another entrance.
Those with injuries are suffering from burns, the two most serious are on life-support with 55% or more of their skin burned, a truly infernal and horrific injury.
If, I remember correctly, Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich said that under this park, near the first resting place of Saint Helena, rested the incorrupt body of Saint Peter, the Apostle, which has yet to be discovered. Maria Valtorta said something similar. But 3 modern Scholars for their own reasons have come to the same conclusion (see link below).
Thus, I think we have just seen, in the Octave of the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul, a sign from God, that the Apostle is very upset that the Catholics of Rome have not yet elected a Catholic Pope. And by the destruction of this “green” energy refueling station, the Apostle is also saying something in response to Cardinal Prevost’s outrageous remarks in recent days attempting to move the Catholic Religion from salvation of souls, to saving Mother Earth.
Now I understand that those who want to find fault in anything I say, might say, but the explosion is real, the mausoleum is real, and Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich did not consult me before making her prophecy. I am only connecting the dots.
After her burial, Constantine exhumed his mother’s remains and brought them to Constantinople — though some think that her tomb in this Mausoleum was never used for her remains. Today 5 different cities in Europe claim to have some or all of her relics.
I featured the Mausoleum of Saint Helena in a previous report here at FromRome.Info, HERE, little more than 4 years ago. The force of the explosion surely also damaged the catacombs beneath the ground, which are under Vatican supervision and only open in dry years when the water table is low enough.
Here is a TV report with many images:
+ + +
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
Could it also be a sign specifically against American Cardinal Prevost being Pope, as today is July 4th an American holiday of independence?
Good point! And if you are right, then this disaster is an ill omen, for Prevost, that the Divine Vengeance is going to deflate his grift.
Also, July 4th is celebrated with fireworks/explosions….
If it’s GPL, then it’s liquefied petroleum gas (not methane), a combination of propane, n-butane and isobutane which can also contain some propylene, butylene, and isobutylene/isobutene. All highly combustible and explosive under the wrong circumstances.
Neither methane nor GPL are classified as “green energy”, which is a term reserved for energy sources that are not fossil fuels. Although methane can be abiotically derived, it’s considered a fossil fuel. GPL is considered a mix of fossil fuels.
Methane is considered a transition fuel to pure “green energy”. God help us if that transition occurs because “green energy” is fraught with all sorts of problems and limitations, such as the enormous, costly and ecologically damaging infrastructure needed to collect such diffuse energy sources as wind and sunlight with expensively mined specialty minerals. One point of extreme illogic is that it takes so much energy to mine these specialty minerals that “green energy” itself cannot provide. So, we’re asked to accept “green energy” that cannot produce enough energy to sustain itself, and yet call it sustainable.
The explosion was probably what’s called a BLEVE: boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion. A cloud of explosive vapor forms, then ignites all at once when an ignition source is encountered, such as a running car.
That said, I don’t contest your exegesis. I agree with your comment that Cardinal Prevost shouldn’t pay any attention to the non-existent entity called “mother earth” and get back to the Church’s mission of saving souls.
Here in Italy, GPL is considered an environmentally beneficial source of energy for vehicles. For example, when the City of Rome places a ban on card entering the downtown, GPL vehicles and Electric Vehicles are often exempted.
The thinking in Italy about GPL resembles worldwide thinking about methane. On the one hand, methane and GPL objectively result in less CO2 per unit of energy produced as compared to refined oil products and coal. That’s at least a major part of why they’re considered environmentally beneficial. On the other hand, CO2 is not a pollutant, and not the cause of runaway manmade global warming — because there is no runaway manmade global warming — so the environmental benefit is objectively mostly a figment of people’s imagination. The small part that’s true is that methane and GPL contain virtually zero sulfur and nitrogen compounds, so they don’t produce SO2 and NOx when combusted. But the level of sulfur and nitrogen in the diesel that Europe (and much of the rest of the world) prefers is very small, and gasoline as well. Much ado about (almost) nothing due to the false reality created by the notion of dangerous manmade climate change that is a hoax enslaving human minds and emotions for 40+ years, and now has the science behind it to prove it’s a hoax, but the false notion remains. In fact, manmade CO2 is responsible for roughly 17% of the increase in farm productivity since the uptick in fossil fuel use in about 1950. And the earth is substantially greener by satellite measurements due to the extra CO2 that plants literally love. They grow faster, larger, and need less water because the extra CO2 allows them to collect it with plant organelles more closed, resulting in less evapotranspiration. The warming observed in the last few decades is natural, a decrease in cloud cover allowing more sunlight to reach the earth. Climate change hoaxers have long been criticized for ignoring cloud effects. Cloud effects are difficult to reduce to differential equations, true enough, but the hoaxers committed the science mortal sin. They went ahead without physical experimental confirmation and attributed warming to the bugaboo of manmade CO2 that was allegedly going to cook us to rationalize shutting off fossil fuels, and jimmied their pointless computer models to produce that pre-determined result. Surprise, human corruption in yet another part of society naively once thought to be pure and free of bias. These days, the white lab coat is a warning sign, not an assurance of integrity.