Editor’s Note: Whatever you might think about Candace Owens, who converted to the Catholic Faith last year, she is giving a wonderful example of what it means to fight for the truth and to tell the truth. This is what the Church Militant should be doing in every sector of life.

+ + +

Please note you can download these prayers in PDF in English or Italian, from below, or click above to pray online. — The address in this book is no longer valid, so do not write to me using it!

Editor’s Note: I never appreciated the ideological pygmies that Marxism made of clergy who adopted “liberation theology”. But just to chronicle that Prevost is Francis 2.0, if you have not forgotten, I republish his socialist slop-propaganda.

After the socialists convinced the citizens of Australia some years ago to “give up their guns” to promote law and order, their Government locked them down during the Plandemic, and went so far as to even strangle young mothers on the street who did not comply.

So remember, when leftists tell you to disarm, it is because they or their handlers are planning to exterminate you. And by disarming, they do not mean disarming their allies, as you can see from what they perpetrated in Catalonia during the Red Terror.

If you take a step back, now, and think about what Prevost is doing, he is attempting to convince those who have the right to self defense, to abandon that right and become indefensible, while preaching a socialist fantasy of unending peace and prosperity, if mankind only would accept Socialism and believe in it.

This is why any Catholic who calls this man Leo XIV or who prefers to attack those who say, “look into his election, it violated the rules”, is actually the ally of your enemy.

Meanwhile, having usurped the Papacy, he lives in a city with military grade walls and which employs about 250+ armed guards and police, trained to shoot on sight, while grifting the Catholic world for monies that do not belong to him. That’s a nice cherry on top of a cake of pure hypocrisy.

Doctrinal Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

While no “Catholic” news agencies or writers on social media, other than current or past readers of FromRome.Info have had the integrity to call out the Conclave in May of 2025 as invalid, still fewer are denouncing Cardinal Prevost for heresy. — In the above address, which he gave at Castel Gondolfo, to a joint pilgrimage of Catholics and Orthodox from the United States, Prevost denied the Catholic Dogma of the primacy of Saint Peter and His See.

“Rome, Constantinople and all the other Sees, are not called to vie for primacy, lest we risk finding ourselves like the disciples who along the way, even as Jesus was announcing his coming passion, argued about which of them was the greatest (cf. Mk 9:33-37).”

In the context of his address, he is speaking of a Divine Vocation, and thus has explicitly denied the vocation of Saint Peter and his Successors to be the Vicar of Christ on Earth. And he did this by adding the word, “Rome” to his denial.  The patent denial of a Catholic Doctrine is formal, manifest heresy.

And he did not only deny the dogma, he denied the dogma’s relation to the Divine Will for Saint Peter and the Apostolic See, which is also a blasphemy against the one true and living God.

The primacy of Saint Peter is not based on human custom, or some competition won among mere mortals and mere institutions of this world. If it were, then one could quote the Gospel of Saint Mark, chapter 9, to rebuke such behavior, as Prevost did. Rather, the primacy of Saint Peter is derived from the Divine Will of the Church’s Founder, Jesus Christ, Who is the Eternal Son of God. Thus, the Apostolic See is called by God to prosecute her own primacy and supremacy in the Church, for otherwise she would be ignoring the decision of Jesus Christ, that the See of Rome receive and fulfill the munus as His Vicar on Earth, in as much as the Bishop of Rome is the Successor of Saint Peter.

Earlier today, I wrote an article explaining how it’s a Freemasonic game to pretend to have rights that you do not have. In the above statement, Prevost is attempting to destroy the Apostolic See by pretending the other sees have rights they do not have, and that the Roman See does not have the right She undoubtedly has.

If a pope makes such a statement as Prevost has made, is he automatically excommunciated? And does he lose his claim to the office?

Uneducated Catholics will try to lead others into error about this, because it is not the profession of heresy which deprives a Roman Pontiff canonically ipso facto of office, but it does result in immediately excommunication, as per canon 1364. so that spiritually and in the sight of God he no longer be a member of the Church.  Therefore, as a consequence, in virtue of canon 1331, §1, the excommunicate is forbidden to celebrate the sacraments and exercise any munus or ministerium in the Church. However, he must be publicly put on trial, before his claim to office be canonically reckoned null and void, by reason of his heresy. Or to speak more precisely: he must be examined and found to be a pertinacious heretic who has separated himself from the Church, and therefore no longer having a valid claim to the office.  And for a pope, that can only be done in a provincial council, as the readers of FromRome.Info already well know.

Nota Bene: “To lose an office” is a popular term; but if we are to speak precisely, in canonical terms, it’s the loss of the right to claim an office.  Deprivation of office requires a judgement of the proper authority, even when the individual by heresy or schism has lost his right to claim the office. — Thus it is equally wrong to say a heretic “holds” an office as it is to say that there is no need of the intervention of an ecclesiastical office to deprive a man of his de facto tenure of office. — But clearly, because canon 1331 forbids an excommunicate from exercising his office, it is also true that those who were the subjects of the man before he was excommunicated have no obligation to obey him once he is excommunicated. —  Since Vatican II, however, nearly no subject of a heretic has denounced his heretical superior and filed a criminal complaint. Rather, as can be seen from countless news stories, the subject denounces the heretic in public, and his himself punished by the heretic for the crime of schism or heresy, on account of his published statements.*

The problems with Prevost, however, did not begin with his July 17th denial of the primacy of the Roman See, because having professed the heretical denial of many doctrines before his election, Pope Paul IV’s Bull, “Cum ex apostolatus officio”, declares his election null, void, invalid, and incapable of ever being validated even by universal consent.

However, it does remain a moral problem for those who insist he is the pope: because now such Catholics are caught in a conundrum: they claim that fidelity to Pope Leo XIV is required because he is the Successor of Saint Peter, who has primacy over the whole Church, but Cardinal Prevot just denied that dogma.

If common sense and Catholic Faith and sincerity reigned among the Clergy, they would as of July 17th, when he said this — and it is published on the Vatican website, so there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT THAT HE SAID THIS — now stop naming him in the Canon of the Mass, because if he can deny the dogma, which when denied leads to eternal damnation, they no longer have any obligation or rational basis to name him in the Canon as holding the authority which he denies holding.

Ironically, it was Pope Saint Leo I who said, that there was no possibility that Constantinople could ever claim a primacy in the Church. So “Leo XIV” just denied also being a successor of Pope St. Leo I.

And for all this, we need to thank the Holy Spirit, for allowing Prevost to fall into such a spectacular heresy, to make it clear to the whole world, that it is theologically and morally impossible that this man has the grace of the Petrine Office.

It cannot get any clearer than this, folks! — Let those Catholics with eyes to see, say they see: and those who say they cannot see, let them meditate on the fires of Hell, which they will see for all eternity, in demerit for their denials.

** In the Sutri Initiative, where I advocated that Catholics canonically denounce Pope Francis to the Bishops of the ecclesiastical province of Rome, the proper procedure was followed. That is why neither I nor anyone who sent in such petitions was excommunicated, even as numerous priests were because they did not follow the proper canonical procedures.

Editor’s Note: Over at Substack there are numerous individuals who refuse to read my articles about the problems in the Conclave, here at FromRome.Info but who have no qualms at all in publishing unending libel and calumnies against me, with innuendoes and false claims to support them. There are few Catholics who actually defend me on the web, but I wish to thank John Rochester for doing that in the comments on the above article. — There is more information about Br. Bugnolo’s personal life and history on the web than nearly any other “Catholic” publisher, but they won’t stop inventing lies and insisting that their lies are true, even after copious refutations or publications. They seem to read the About Page here to merely dig up old lies and republish them. — I really cannot think of a lower moral class of internet commentator than that.

As an aside, I have to laugh at John Lewis, who thinks that WM Review is a publication which contains articles of any sort of interest like the one John quoted in his Substack.

Substack is run out of Taiwan, and it does not appear to respect the GDPR regulations of Europe nor the privacy of its members. So I inform you, that if you want to comment on the article above, first create an entirely new email to conceal your identity and then subscribe to substack, because Substack divulges your email to every publisher at Substack, and sends your email to their emails, which is a violation of GDPR regulations.

For transparency sake, I inform you that at FromRome,info I never receive the email you use to subscribe: it is saved in the database of FromRome.Info and only used to send out notifications to you. I do not save, copy, or store any of this information on any device I use to publish FromRome.Info, to be fully compliant with GDPR regulations.

In the above attacks against me, one writer alleges another falsehood against me, namely that I hold that a validly elected Catholic pope can be deposed, which is false: the reference to my article is faulty, the correct one is thus: https://www.fromrome.info/2018/09/07/yes-a-pope-can-be-canonically-deposed/ where the context regards those not validly elected, usurpers or public heretics.

In general, however, I see that Substack is attracting a lot of writers who claim to be Catholic, but who are anti-clerical. Since Substack does not require writers to identify themselves, when you read an article on that platform, how do you know you are not reading or interacting with one of the many enemies of the Church who is pretending to be Catholic to lead you to damnation? — Thus, in my opinion it is completely untrustworthy platform for information: like a public garbage can compared to a supermarket, so is Substack compared to a website where all the authors are publicly identified and professed cradle-catholics, who admire the Saints, quote the Doctors, accept the perennial Magisterium, quote the official documents of the Church, and don’t presume to tell others what to believe, or pretend to any right.

Back in the 19th century the journalists of Chicago founded a Macabre club called, “The White Chapel club”, that  history, and a short introduction to America’s first Jack the Ripper, Mr. Holmes of Chicago.  Chicago is the center and heartland of corruption and murder in the USA, and its elites in the Church are also know for making their enemies disappear.

Editor’s Note: To prevent the lawyer from being in court, the government rounded up a group of “sovereign citizens” and included the lawyer in the group, without evidence of any association. This news is already 3 weeks old, and so I ask my readers from the Low Countries to post updates in the Comments below.

Editor’s Note: Recently in the United Kingdom a Catholic priest refused communion in public to a MP who voted in favor of the Euthanasia Law. The priest was denounced by a member of Parliament, but backed by his own Bishop. Archbishop Lenga in the above video praises this priest and reminds everyone how the Church should act in these cases.

Archbishop Lenga’ production team produced this English language dubbed version of an interview with him about the UK Euthanasia Law. This video was produced with a high quality English translation rather than a dubbed translation.  The past attempt was so poor, I told the production team, via a comment on YT, to first get a good translation and then dub that in. — The readers of FromRome.Info will appreciate that finally they can hear what the Archbishop is saying in English.

Editor’s Note: Here at FromRome.Info, I often will share videos about Italy. And one thing about Italy, that most of my readers in North America, Australia, and South Africa have never seen is a castle used as a palace. Here is one example, in Lazio, about 2 hours north of Rome, with narration from an expert in art appreciation.

You can read more about this castle, the Torre Alfina, here. — This article is in Italian, but with Chrome or Firefox’s native translation ability, you can read it in your native tongue. — And HERE is the official website for the Castle.

This castle was the property of Edward Cahen d’Anvers, the Jewish Banker who financed the Masonic takeover of Italy, during the Risorgimento, on account of which service he was ennobled with the title of Count by the treacherous House of Savoy member, Victor Emmanuel II, whose name shall live in everlasting ignominy.

In the above video by Lionard real estate group, they say that the Cahen family is from Germany and originates in the 8th century B. C.. — Which, when I heard the narrator say this, sparked my curiosity for the patent absurdity of such a claim. — Cahen is from Cohen, which is the name of the priestly class in ancient Israel, not Germany.