Those who insist Prevost is the Pope must own his regime of Pedophiles

+ + +

Editor’s Note: Another French Diocese, another promoted pedophile who is an ex-convict. Another case in which Cardinal Prevost does nothing. — I often wonder by so many laymen insisted Pope Francis was the pope, when Benedict XVI was alive, and why the same are insisting Prevost is the Pope. Maybe they are members of online pedophile networks? — But if they are not, they still have to own that under Prevost Bishops are promoting men who would never ever in any any previous pontificate be promoted. — In American English, “to own” in this sense means “take responsibility for”. They have to own his regime which promotes sexual perverts, because it is they who insist he is the Pope, even though there is no canonical evidence that his election conformed to the law.

When I was a Franciscan Friar of the Immaculate, my major superior asked me to put our whole order on the Internet, that was back in 1994.  So I have seen a lot and began an apostolate on the web long before even some of the YouTubers of today were born.

But if I have learned anything from watching the human behavior of those who claim to be Catholic and who publish on the web or on social media, the most solid and constant rule is never presume they are competent to speak about the matter of the Catholic Faith (regardless of whether they are laymen, religious, have Doctorates, or are Bishops, Cardinals and even claim to be Popes);  and indeed, for your own safety, it is best to presume that they are ignorant, incompetent blowhards, who just want likes and favs, follows and subscriptions, and above all fame and money, but have no moral integrity whatsoever. Because in such a grave matter as what does the Catholic Church teach, what are Her laws, and what is the exact nature of the events in the Church, less than 1% of 1% of “Catholics” on social media, who publish ever do any research and if they do, even less of them know what they are talking about.

Thus, the simple reason that so many believe Prevost is the pope is simply this: they saw it on the T.V..

If you ask them to explain it canonically or show them that facts are discrepant with the requirements of law, you have already made a fundamental mistake, because this kind of “Catholic” cares less about these things that Lucifer himself. So if the T.V. announces that a pedophile, sexual pervert promoter or the like has been elected, these people will accept him, because they are not of the Elect, but are marked with the mark of the Beast, in that they care nothing about the truth, whether revealed or not, and give 100% credence to the pulpits of mendacity.

So the studious and steel silence of every “Catholic” news media outlet and social influencer about the illegalities in the recent conclave is 100% a reliable litmus test of which of these are in league with the Father of Lies. And we need to not only say it, but say it to them, because we should not allow them to get away with defrauding the Catholic world of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

+ + +

+ + +

The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present

bonav-I-banner This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!

+ + +

2 thoughts on “Those who insist Prevost is the Pope must own his regime of Pedophiles”

  1. Rev. Joseph Renaud has been appointed delegate for the social security of the clergy, and not (any longer?), as reported by Riposte Catholique, “Notary at the Chancery of the Diocese of Angers; Member of the Presbyteral Council; Delegate to the Marriage Office”.

    https://www.rcf.fr/articles/actualite/nouvelles-nominations-au-diocese-dangers-du-changement-dans-la-gouvernance

    I also draw your attention to the Press release from the Presidency of the Conference of Bishops of France (10 August 2025) :
    “… we have engaged in constructive dialogue with Archbishop Guy de Kerimel of Toulouse, inviting him to reconsider his decision regarding the appointment of the Chancellor of his diocese. Indeed, such an appointment to such an important position, both canonically and symbolically, can only revive wounds, arouse suspicions and disconcert the people of God.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.