Editor’s Note: The anti-Church and its “anti-promises”. What does that mean for victims of abuse? Read the details in the report above and watch the press release by SNAP, which unmasks Prevost as a serial sexual abuse cover-up artist, just as I said he was, during the invalid Conclave of May 2025.
+ + +
+ + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
Très Saint Père, Baissant l’anneau du pêcheur, je m’en remets entièrement à vous,
Si bien sur vous pouvez lire cette lettre, qui est la lettre d’une personne de 75 ans, qui a vécu avec un traumatisme il y a 53 ans.
J’ai eu la joie et le bonheur de rencontré SS Benoit XVI , qui a été un vrai Père pour moi tant avant qu’il soit Pape qu’après.
J’espère que vous lirez cette lettre pour comprendre le traumatise de beaucoup de gens de mon cas.
Je suis né à Nice en 1951, et vécu dans le Var ensuite, servant de Messe entouré par de très Saints Prêtres assomptionnistes, en 1971 j’ai fait mon service militaire et j’ai connu un Frère de Bethleem, que j’ai rejoint en 1972 à la fin de mon service à l’Abbaye de Lérins…
J’étais le plus heureux des hommes entre l’Ora et Labora un Père Abbé Dom Marie Bernard, que je vénérais comme un Père, un Père Maitre à l’écoute, mais en décembre 1973, un frère a abusé de moi, lorsque je l’ai dit personne n’a voulu me croire le frère P ; lui un « Saint » toujours au office et au service des autres, j’étais un menteur, cela ne pouvait avoir eu lieu, seul un Frère, le Frère Yves m’a cru et Sœur Marie (fondatrice des sœurs de Bethleem, m’a beaucoup aidé à remonter de cette épreuve, elle m’a conseillé d’aller à Paris voir le Père J.M. D.. (Fondateur de la communauté de de Jérusalem pour voir autre chose, car je n’avais qu’une volonté, tuer le f P.
Me voilà à Paris avec une lettre de recommandation afin de rencontre un Père Dominicain Albert Marie de M….. Cet homme a été pour moi un porc…avec les gestes. Disant si Dieu nous a fait un sexe et bien on doit s’en servir,
J’ai fui et retour à Nice, un de mes oncles, Prêtre Orthodoxe et Mgr Romain m’a ouvert leur porte, mais Latin, je suis, Latin et je le reste. Un de mes cousins Mgr Joel Girard évêque de m’a ordonné Prêtre et j’ai rejoint une communauté à Rome Saint André Di Caffa avec Mgr Tana.
En 1982 de Mgr Pierre Martin Ngo Dinh Thuc , j’ai reçu le sacre épiscopal et une sanction canonique, Mgr Gille Barthe a fait beaucoup pour moi nous avons eu rendez-vous avec Monseigneur Alberto Bovone, qui m’a assuré de voir ma situation canonique et de trouver une solution, le soir il m’invitait à Manger dans un restaurant de Rome la Citerne, et même proposition que Mgr .A.M.de.M. je lui ai mis mon point dans le visage et j’ai fini à la questure di Roma. J’avais des témoins et l’affaire a été stoppée.
Depuis 1982 Brave âme de Mgr Barthe et Mgr Abele ont tous fait pour mon retour dans le sein de l’Eglise ; en 1984 j’ai été relevé de mes sanctions canoniques. En 2004 mon petit groupe a été reçu par son éminence le cardinal Ratzinger, au retour de Rome, j’ai rencontré AMdM ( je lui rappeler mon entrevue de 1974) alors la peur ou la bêtise, je ne sais, il a porté plainte contre moi pour exercice d’un ministère sans l’aval du magistère fort des lettres que nous avions signées à Rome d’abandonné l’exercices de l’épiscopat, plus détournement d’argent, la meilleure défense étant l’attaque. Rien n’a été prouvé, bien au contraire et suis toujours depuis 30 ans au même lieu, Lui avait l’autorité, et une reconnaissance, moi non, le cardinal Ratzinger ma beaucoup soutenu dans cette épreuve ;
Aujourd’hui malade, je ne rêve plus que de vengeance, chose pas très bonne. J’ai besoin de votre bénédiction, et surtout un retour au le sein de Notre Mère L’Eglise.
J’assure, votre Sainteté de mes prières et de ma profonde affection ;
Link doesn’t work
Fixed; thank you for catching that.
Press Release by Archbishop de Kerimel (Toulouse – France) – Regarding the Chancellor’s Appointment
To avoid provoking division among bishops, and to avoid remaining at a standoff between those for and against, I decided to reverse my decision; this has now been done, with the appointment of a new chancellor.
My decision was interpreted by many as a snub to the victims of sexual abuse; I apologize to the victims. This was obviously not my intention. Others finally saw it as a sign of hope for the perpetrators of abuse who had served their time and are experiencing a very trying social death. Now, I must apologize to the one I appointed and in whom I trust, for not having been able to find the rightful place to which he is entitled.
How can we find the right attitude that does not require us to take one side to the detriment of the other? How can we maintain primary attention to the victims without forever rejecting the perpetrators?
Today, we speak of “restorative justice”: it seeks to establish a meeting, always free, between the perpetrator and the victim, to acknowledge the harm committed and with the desire not to be trapped in it.
The perpetrator must repair the harm committed, or at least, through the punishment inflicted by the justice system, contribute to the repair of the harm committed. When it comes to a crime, the harm always has an irreparable dimension. What should be done in this case? Practice revenge? That would be to lock oneself into a destructive logic and ultimately into the ultimate victory of evil.
France has renounced the death penalty; the justice system believes in the possibility of change for criminals and works towards their reintegration. It cannot give free rein to revenge; that would be to the detriment of the perpetrator, of course, but also of the victim and of society as a whole. In the name of such justice, we would descend into the worst injustices. Justice does not repay the perpetrator for the harm he or she has done to the victim: “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” It places a limit on the exclusion of the guilty party, except in extreme cases involving dangerous individuals.
In the Gospel, Jesus went very far in the rehabilitation of sinful and guilty people. He called to positions of responsibility men like Matthew the tax collector, Peter the renegade, Paul the criminal, Mary Magdalene the prostitute, and so many others. Paul had made victims, perhaps also Saint Matthew in another order. However, Jesus forgave their sins, they changed their lives, and they exercised, in the name of Christ, an authority that endures to this day. This evangelical logic goes even beyond rehabilitation, which only affects one’s place in society: it is called conversion, because it changes the human heart.
We, whose mission is to bear witness to the Gospel, cannot ignore the mercy that Jesus always showed, even on the cross, by forgiving the wrongdoer who turned to Him. We believe that justice is not opposed to mercy, mercy is not opposed to justice.
We believe in forgiveness, in redemption, without ever condoning injustice, even if, sadly, we sometimes practice it, for we are no better than Jesus’ first disciples. The path of conversion is never complete on this earth.
How can we balance justice and mercy? I would like us to continue to reflect on this important subject, so as not to be limited to emotions, which rarely lead to true justice, but so that, as Christians, we may adopt the most just attitude possible, in accordance with the Gospel.
Please be assured of my devotion.
+ Guy de Kerimel
Archbishop of Toulouse
August 16, 2025
Published on August 16, 2025
https://toulouse.catholique.fr/publication/communiques/communique-a-propos-de-la-nomination-du-chancelier/
Notice that the words “do penance” have no role in his concept of forgiveness. In Catholic penitential tradition, what this former chancellor had done would require him to do perpetually penance in a monastic cell, which he could never leave, for the rest of his life. There, after due signs of change he could be allowed to say mass, but never have authority over others.
Also notice a passage of the Gospel that Archbishop de Kerimel seems to have overlooked : “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung round his neck and he were thrown into the sea” (Mark 9:42)… and Pope BXVI’s comment : “A balanced canon law that corresponds to the whole of Jesus’ message must therefore not only provide a guarantee for the accused, the respect for whom is a legal good. It must also protect the Faith, which is also an important legal asset. A properly formed canon law must therefore contain a double guarantee – legal protection of the accused, legal protection of the good at stake. If today one puts forward this inherently clear conception, one generally falls on deaf ears when it comes to the question of the protection of the Faith as a legal good. In the general awareness of the law, the Faith no longer appears to have the rank of a good requiring protection. This is an alarming situation which must be considered and taken seriously by the pastors of the Church.”
Full text of Benedict XVI essay: ‘The Church and the scandal of sexual abuse’
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/41013/full-text-of-benedict-xvi-essay-the-church-and-the-scandal-of-sexual-abuse
Hence the requirement of CIC 483, 2 : “The chancellor and notaries must be of unimpaired reputation and above all suspicion.”
Thank you for this excellent comment and the citation from Pope Benedict XVI.
This is why those who say that Cum ex apostolatus officio has been abolished or obrogated in all of its norms have in fact adopted a theory of jurisprudence which is not derived from the Magisterium of Christ, Who above all wants His flock protected from wolves.
And indeed, everything which happens after Feb. 28, 2013, is a coup d’etat by the Pedophile Mafia in the Church against that principle of jurisprudence.