Surgeon: Charlie Kirk was “Man of Steel” miraculously stopping Bullet

Editor’s Note: After the public has become convinced that Robinson never shot Charlie Kirk with a Mauser ’98 .30-06 , a caliber which pierces all wild animals, even the huge North American Moose, the AP has found a surgeon who claims that “it was a miracle” that Charlie’s body stopped the bullet and prevented it from exiting his body, thus protecting other persons standing nearby.

The Surgeon adds that he has never seen such a powerful caliber bullet remain in the body, after impact. He also says that Charlie’s bones were strong as a superman and stopped the bullet, so effectively, that it was found “just under the skin”.

“Just under the skin” is also were you would find a bullet if you inserted one by hand into a wound.

But when secular authorities have to claim miracles to sustain the Narrative they want the public to believe, we have moved full from a liberal Democracy into a Satanic Theocracy.

Language alert!

+ + +

The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present

bonav-I-banner This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!

+ + +

10 thoughts on “Surgeon: Charlie Kirk was “Man of Steel” miraculously stopping Bullet”

  1. The memorial spectacle produced by the White House reminded me of The Hunger Games.

    It made me mourn that Father Jacques Hamel barely warranted a few headlines and a decent Catholic burial when he was irrefutably martyred before witnesses while celebrating Mass.

    Do we even know for a fact that Kirk is dead? I don’t believe a thing about this supposed event except that someone wants it to be BIG.

    1. It is said that the doctors at the hospital pronounced him dead on arrival. But it has also be said that they attempted emergency surgery. That does not make sense, unless the reporting is inaccurate. But nothing is accurate in the report of his death. There is video of a fountain of blood gushing from his neck. And yet Candace says the video from behind him shows “no blood; no blood”.

      1. I believe all the obvious contradictions and lack of credibility are intentional. This is a psyop by the people who gave us the Plandemic and the French Revolution, the JFK and RFK assassinations, the Las Vegas shooter. 911. We are supposed to lose our minds trying to figure it out and it erodes our ability to trust in anything. This is the spectacle op; this is the inversion.

        But Reality is a person and His name is Jesus; the image of Him on the cross is the one visual reality that can be trusted. He is the Truth, the Light, and the Way. He is the Word incarnate. He is the Son of the Father, with the Holy Spirit, and accompanied in Heaven by the Immaculate Conception, His Mother and ours, Queen of Heaven and earth. Nothing they do can change this Reality, the Truth of creation, revelation, incarnation and redemption.

        Because Truth is a person.

      2. I look at it differently, as the raging of a serpent in a pit of fire. What happened to Kirk is one thing, but no matter how it happened, his death has shocked the entire nation into doubting dominant narratives of the masonic governments. That is a good thing.

  2. He was shot with a bullet that can’t be retrieved,there’s a video on youtube showing the gun it could be fired from , it’s so small it can be held in the palm of a hand.

  3. This all so absurd. I too am having doubts that he is even dead because it seems like the whole crew is in on this. Also something is off with the way the Erica Kirk is behaving. Alex Jones and Kash Patel both say he is in”Valhalla” which might be code for the witness protection program…just a theory.

    1. They way that everyone acted around him before and after engenders a lot of doubt. I am president of a security company, and though my experience is very little, even I can tell that his security team violated many basic principles of not during a perimeter survey, not checking rooftops, not wearing body armor, and not having medical training to stop immediate blood flow. Moving a man in that condition would kill him if he had neck injuries. And let’s not even talk about securing the scene of the crime and NOT tampering with evidence or the position of furniture. It was beyond ignorant. His wife should sue them for gross, reckless malfeasance, negligence and incompetence. And if Charlie had life insurance, you can be sure the Insurance company will sue them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.