Editor’s Note: Many materialists think they will be able through science to someday explain what no God exists. However, recent studies in biology have found that it is statistically impossible for life to come into existence by chance, as it would require 10 to the power of 267 universes for it to happen even once! — That is a 10, with an addition 267 zeros after it! This video is intriguingly informing.
+ + +
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
A late professor of physics friend, who argued against evolutionary theory explaining our existence and for Creation, told a group of us that the mathematicians he knew and read generally took one in 10 to the power 50 as the “threshold” below which one could state something was “statistically impossible”.
Of course, there is debate and disagreement on that “threshold”, but one in 10 the power 267 is comfortably below that, by a factor of 10 to the power 217!
Perhaps it is explained by quantum mechanics for example photosynthesis is impossibly efficient but explained by quantum superposition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RSKI5A_lsg
Therefore the presumption in Levinthal’s paradox is one protein molecule can only exist in one state of folding at a given moment and fold in a sequential way when in quantum mechanics a particle can behave like it is in multiple places at the same time and therefore presumably a single protein molecule could seem to be folding in multiple ways at the same time.
The quantum theory description of reality is not a real description but a statistical description. Taking it for being a real description is simply wrong way of understanding the theory, and why it does not jive with the theory of relativity. So no, a molecule cannot fold in multiple ways at the same time in the real order of being, though statistically we can imagine that it does in the potential order of being.
That is why I used the words ‘like’ and ‘seem’.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304399112000599
One electron seems to go through two slits causing an interference pattern. In this case there is only one particle travelling, so somehow it behaves like it has gone through two slits – in two different places.
The wave like nature of a travelling particle can interfere with another and cancel out. In chemistry this results in antibonding due to decreased electron density. Therefore I suggest 10 to power 267 is not realistic because many of those potential folding states can not exist due to destructive interference (‘unhelpful’ electron distributions) and other folding states where there is constructive interference will have an increased chance of existence. The dice are loaded.
Antibonding explained.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tB6E6R_XpQ
Note section on ‘Driving forces of protein folding’. There are a lot of factors that influence protein folding and each reduces the possible folding outcomes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_folding?ysclid=mgqfqqu7da658939018
Since does not even know what matter is made of, particles or waves. Particles which are never in one specific place and waves which are not waves on anything material in the modern sense of matter. Don’t waste your time with their looney ontology, they don’t know what they are talking about.
It was first year degree level chemistry when I did it.