Editor’s Note: In the last week, several Catholics on X (formerly Twitter), engaged Archbishop Vigano’s assertions about the crisis in the Church, sharing my recent article on the crisis in the Church, entitled, “Leo XIV is a schismatic?”, which proves from Papal Teaching, that the present crisis is indeed canonical.
Today, the Archbishop has apparently replied, with the above post, in which he explicitly denies that the crisis in the Church is canonical.
“The present crisis in the Church is theological, not canonical, in nature.”
The Archbishop then develops the argument that there is a misuse of authority and says this is based on theological error.
I will let the readers critique the Archbishop’s patent lie and attempt to gaslight the Catholic world. He was unjustly and invalidly excommunicated by Archbishop Fernandez, but for some strange reason, he seems obsessed with defending the illegitimate regime which excommunicated him.
To read the Archbishop’s essay or to watch his video, click the image above.
+ + +
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
“The present crisis in the Church is theological, not canonical, in nature.”
With this introductory statement, His Excellency has discredited his otherwise profound analysis of the “systemic crisis, gaslighting and revelation of the method” in the Church.
It reminds me of his open letter in October of 2020 where he references Donald Trump as the katechon, or one who restrains the forces of evil. What was the result? Catholics lined up to vote for him in great numbers, thereby enslaving themselves to the Deep state.
The Archbishop’s letter is a limited hangout intended to crush the legitimate and only real solution to solve the canonical crisis: an election by Apostolic Right.
Would you agree that the Vatican 2 church professes a different religion? Indeed a different gospel?
The worship of Pachamama in 2019 in the Vatican Gardens and at the altar during the Mass of Christ the King is an act of apostasy . St Paul refers to the pagan gods as demons.
In a homily of an installation of a bishop in Cebu last month Cd Tagle referenced Our Lord as being present in sewer water, in the poor etc. how depressing is the gospel of Francis, Leo xiv , Tagle etc. What a depressing “gospel”!
St Paul is very clear
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. 9 As we said before, so now I say again:
If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.
10 For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? If I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. Gal 1:8
Pope Paul IV teaches :
“the Roman Pontiff,who is the representative upon earth of God and our God and Lord Jesus Christ, who holds the fulness of power over peoples and kingdoms, who may judge all and be judged by none in this world, may nonetheless be contradicted if he be found to have deviated from the Faith. Remembering also that, where danger is greater, it must more fully and more diligently be counteracted, “ Cum Apostalatus Ex Officio, paragraph 1, Pope Paul IV,
Archbishop Viganò is correct when he says :
“The acceptance of fraud
We therefore have a Hierarchy composed of traitorous bishops and popes who demand from their faithful not only an inert silence in the face of the worst scandals of its members, but also the enthusiastic acceptance and sharing of this betrayal, according to that esoteric principle that the Satanist Aleister Crowley summarized at the beginning of the twentieth century: “Evil must hide in plain sight, for the laws of the universe dictate that those who are deceived consent to their own deception.””Mons. Carlo Maria Viganò
HÆC OMNIA TIBI DABO, Cognitive dissonance and the Revelation of the Method
Francis , don’t forget prohibited bishops from creating new religious orders. Francis legitimized the profession of sodomy in contradiction of Divine Law. Francis and Now Prevost have approved / ratified the blasphemy of Cd Fernandez that Christ and even the Blessed Mother engaged in immorality . ( if anyone does not believe let them look it up ) .
These people are not merely schismatics . They are infidels. Apostates. The greater crime is apostasy.
For sure Francis was an apostate , and now Leo has shown himself to be an apostate. They are worse than schismatics. They are worse than infidels . Also, upon the profession of heresy etc Canon Law imposes the loss of ecclesiastical office and excommunication. They do not hide their heresy — they are proud of it. The good Archbishop Viganó makes his point . The bishops and those who support Francis and Prevost worship the same god as Alister Crowley.
Respectfully ,
St John of the Cross
I never said they were merely schismatics, in fact, I showed that their chief heresy is their usurpation of the authority to define which is the true Church of Christ. So the nature of the problem is canonical and theological in nature. To deny that it is canonical in nature is to divorce the order of justice from the order of truth.
However, there is no “Vatican II Church”, since the only Church is the Church founded by Christ, and She is not defined by you or me or bishops in a council which is neither dogmatic nor disciplinary.