Editor’s Note: This letter, in its original Italian version, was sent to more than 6000 Clergy and Religious at Rome, on September 24, 2025 — No other “Catholic” news agency or reporter has bothered to report on it, though they all know about it. Indeed, numerous communications have been sent to the Vatican about it, but nothing has been done, because Prevost and the crooked cabal of Cardinals are paralyzed by fear of the truth. The name of the author of this letter has not been publicly revealed, but I have confirmed who it is through my sources. — What follows is a Google translation. You can find the original Italian, here, where the text was published on October 2nd. — I waited to report on this letter, so that, like Candace Owens, I could give the enemies of Christ plenty of time to prove to the world, that they are enemies of Christ, by their silence.

French Translation — Original Italian

+ + +

The Apostolic Assembly to elect a Catholic Pope has been called

Every Priest, Religious and Faithful Catholic of Rome
You have the right to participate if you want

This Open Letter was sent to almost six thousand priests and religious in Lazio, during the last week of September, 2025

Dear Faithful of the Roman Church,

I am writing to inform you of your canonical rights, granted by St. Peter the Apostle and the Popes Nicholas II and John Paul II. This notice does not concern any charge of fault on your part, nor does it entail any obligation on your part to take any action. I write to you because I believe and believe that you have the right to know the truth, especially with regard to those truths on which you can act in your service to Christ Jesus, Our Lord, God and Savior.

I write to you in accordance with the right granted to me by Canon 212 of the Codex Iuris Canonicis, published by Pope John Paul II on January 25, 1983, regarding an issue that is causing grave concern to all Catholics, especially those of the Church of Rome: the serious irregularities surrounding the election of Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost as Bishop of Rome.

As you may know, on April 30, 2025, the Holy See Press Office published a statement by the Cardinals concerning their request for dispensation from the violation of the formal precept contained in No. 33 of the Pontifical Law on Conclaves, Universi Dominici Gregis, promulgated by Pope John Paul II on February 22, 1996, which reads in Latin:

“Maximus autem Cardinalium electorum numberus centum viginti ne excedat.”

“Moreover, let the maximum number of Cardinal electors not exceed one hundred and twenty.”

This precept is one of the essential legal provisions of this papal law, since it enshrines the thought of the legislature, Pope John Paul II, who established that the number of 120 cardinal electors participating in the Conclave is sufficient (see paragraph 7 of the introduction to the same papal law).

In the aforementioned press release of April 30, however, the cardinals claimed to have the right to interpret the act of Pope Francis relating to the appointment of cardinals as equivalent to granting a dispensation from this precept. In their statement, they do not cite any document or verbal statement of the late Roman Pontiff to justify or document their claim.

For this reason, it is certain that their dispensation is invalid, since, according to Canon 16, the right of interpretation capable of dispensing from a law belongs only to the superiors and those to whom it was granted in a legal act. In addition, Canon 86 prohibits dispensations from the essential legal provisions of papal laws; moreover, Canon 335 prohibits any innovation of the law during a vacant seat. Moreover, the verbal concessions expressed by a superior, which are not promulgated, cannot have force of law after his death; otherwise, the entire legal system of the Church would become doubtful after the death of any superior. In fact, the right to vote of a cardinal in a conclave is not granted by the act of appointment, nor by the Code of Canon Law, but only by the particular law on conclaves, and in any case only by the restriction of Canon 120.

Similarly, the reasoning put forward by the Cardinals in their statement of 30 April does not invoke their authority referred to in paragraph 5 of the Pontifical Law concerning the interpretation of dubious or controversial passages: from this it is clear that they have tacitly admitted that their statement has no basis in the rights granted to them in that paragraph of the Dominici Gregis Universe.

Moreover, their claim concerning the right to vote granted to some cardinals in No. 36, used as an argument against the said restriction in No. 33 of the same Act, is inconsistent, since according to the universal norms of case law, the initial definitions and restrictions of a law take precedence in the interpretation of the true meaning of a law in all subsequent paragraphs. Therefore, it is not authentic to appeal to No. 36 against No. 33, especially since in No. 36 the affirmation of the right is explicitly subordinated to the restriction of no. 33.

Consequently it seems that Pope John Paul II in the penultimate paragraph of the promulgation of this papal law on conclaves – where he declares irritates anything done, knowingly or unknowingly, by any person of any ecclesiastical dignity – has actually abrogated the claim put forward by the Cardinals in their statement of April 30. — Moreover, the dispensation that they claim to have cannot be used, since in UDG no. 4 Pope John Paul prohibits dispensation from any law during a period of vacant seat. Therefore, without a derogation from UDG No 4, the dispensation claimed by them is worthless. And no one claims that Pope Francis granted such a derogation.

For all these reasons, the recent Conclave, held with 133 cardinal electors in each of the counting sessions, objectively violated the obligation set forth in No. 68 of the same papal law, since in each counting session 133 votes were counted instead of 120. Therefore, a non-juridical value contrary to the norm of No. 68 was attributed to each ballot paper in the act of voting itself, an action that is juridically irritating in itself and which caused the nullity of the election of the Cardinal Provost according to the censure provided for in No. 76 of the same law, decreed by Pope John Paul II, since in the act of election the Cardinals do not have the authority to exercise the rights granted to them by No. 5 of the same law, as the same law expressly establishes.

Therefore, since Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, who is the Head of the Church and Divine Legislator, declared to St. Peter and his successors: “Everything you will bind on earth will be bound in heaven, etc.”, it remains theologically and legally impossible that the Conclave had a valid legal outcome and that Cardinal Prevost should have a valid claim to the office of Roman Pontiff, not to mention the fact that he could not

Moreover, since Cardinal Prevost, before the opening of the Conclave, was known for having publicly expressed opinions contrary to at least five truths whose obligation of faith has always been supported by the Church, it follows that, although otherwise regular, his election is rendered null, inane and irritates through the censorship contained in No. 6 of the Bull of Paul IV, Cum ex apostolatus officio, of 15 February 1559, and confirmed by Pope For more information about these 5 truths of the faith, see ChiesaRomana.Info.

Therefore, I appeal to you, faithful of the Roman Church, that is, of the dioceses of Rome and its suburbicarian sees, and of those that are part of the Episcopal Conference of Lazio, to urge your ecclesiastical superiors to recognize the danger of this reckless action by the Cardinals, which has placed the Church in a serious juridical crisis, by virtue of their claim to give to the Church itself, as Pope, a man who, due to the irregularities of his election and his dissent from the Catholic Faith, has no right to the Papal Office.

As a remedy, there seems to be no other line of honest conduct other than the abdication of Cardinal Prevost and his renunciation of the claim to the pontificate, as well as the return of the cardinals to the Conclave followed, in accordance with the papal law, by the election of another subject, bearing in mind the censorship of Pope Paul IV. Otherwise, given the mere ministerial competence of the cardinals, in the absence of a privilege, within the meaning of canon 349, the right to elect the Roman Pontiff would return to the original institutional electorate, or to the entire body of the faithful of the Church of Rome and its suburban dioceses, according to the norm of apostolic law and natural law (cf. Niccolò II, In Nomine Domini, No. 3, April 13, 1059). In fact, if the Cardinals refuse to recognize the invalidity of their actions of 7 and 8 May 2025, this obstinacy in error makes their competence to elect the Roman Pontiff totally decay, in the present case.

With regard to the rule of the 120 cardinal electors, the latter can easily respect it if 13 of them voluntarily abstain from voting in any ballot, renouncing their right or agreeing to be chosen by lot before each ballot, leaving the Sistine Chapel. Such a solution would not violate pontifical right and would also be in conformity with the ancient legal principle, cited by Graziano, according to which privileges must give way to general norms (cf. General praescriptum benefit special anteferendum est (Theodosian code: DEM AAA. VICTORIO P(RO)C(ONSULI) ASIAE). Therefore, the fact that they refused to do so for many months cannot be configured simply as a misdeed resulting from ignorance: it has become a known crime of ill will.

This is particularly true, since I and the dozens of Catholics who collaborate with me have written personal letters to almost all the cardinals asking for the correction of this irregularity, which made Cardinal Prevost an antipope, which was strongly denounced by Pope Nicholas II as the work of the antichrist.

As you may know, in the last 12 years the Catholic Church has been the subject of attacks from within, as Cardinal Mueller states, and has undergone an attempt to take ideological power by a group of men who do not believe in the veracity of the statements attributed to Jesus Christ in the Gospels, nor in the authority of His Apostles to establish immutable rules of morality and sacramental discipline.

For this reason, each of us who serves the living God, Jesus Christ, both through priestly ordination and through the consecration of religious vows or vows of baptism, has a solemn duty to use all legitimate means to tear the Church out of the hands of this heretical sect. This is the clear teaching of Pope Paul IV in his Apostolic Constitution “Cum ex apostolatus officio”, which clearly and authentically summarizes the perennial magisterium on how we Catholics should consider heretics.

More than 90 days ago I wrote to 750 members of the Roman clergy who have pastoral mandates in the diocese of Rome, and now, with the help of many volunteers, I write to you, having acquired a wider database of e-mail addresses available to the public (see at the bottom of this letter, if you wish to delete yourself). I have written to each of you to your public e-mail address with the intention of informing you of your rights.

If we want to be faithful to Jesus Christ and if we truly believe that He is God and the Head of the Church, we cannot be like the selfish of antiquity, which the prophet Haggean reproached because they cared about their own personal interests, letting the House of the Lord fall into disrepair. We must do everything possible, within the limits of legality, to defend and save the Holy Mother Church from this heretical conspiracy.

And in this year of the Lord 2025, the true merciful God, Jesus Christ gave us a legitimate and effective means, striking His enemies with blindness, so that in the eyes of the whole Church they might perpetrate the most illegitimate and irregular Conclave of the last 1000 years. Now, in accordance with the infallible teaching of Pope Nicholas II, in his Bull In Nomine Domini, No. 3, the Bishops, the Clergy, the Religious and the Faithful regain the right to elect the Roman Pontiff, as it was before Pope Nicholas II limited him to the Cardinal Bishops alone. As Pope Nicholas II explains, this acquisition of law has to do with the forfeiture of law by voters who have acted contrary to the law, persisting in their dishonest obstinacy over the past four months despite the grievances of many members of the clergy and laity.

For this reason, more than 100 days ago I wrote to the clergy of the diocese of Rome, asking them to act and explaining the above, informing them that, if they had not acted or were not successful, after September 24, 2025 I would have acted. And now I have written to almost 6000 priests, religious and religious in the Roman ecclesiastical province.

Therefore, I inform you that, given the tacit consent of the clergy of Rome to my proposal, I am convening an assembly in which we can all participate to elect a Catholic pope according to the teaching of Pope Nicholas II. If you wish to participate in person, I ask you to subscribe to ChiesaRomana.Info for more information.

Please note that when we exercise our rights we do not harm anyone. And when we exercise our extraordinary rights to save the Apostolic See from an antichrist and a heretical and depraved party, we will deserve incalculable graces for ourselves and for our communities, as well as freeing the entire Catholic world from the most horrible deception, propagated by the USAID-funded media that do not serve the interests of Christ or His Church.

As a footnote, I write this letter only for the love of Jesus Christ and of the Roman Church, His Immaculate Bride, whom He has never recognized as valid an irregular election of the Roman Pontiff, believing as you that, with regard to the selection of the candidate to the post of Successor of St. Peter, the rules and laws established by the Vicar of Christ are observed by Christ Jesus Himself in Heaven; therefore, they must be observed with the utmost scrupulousness by His Spouse, the Church, on Earth.

+ + +

+ + + + + + +

The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present

This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!

+ + +