Candace: How Zionists manipulate Influencers

Editor’s Note: Candace Owens, as part of her investigation into the assassination of her best friend, Charlie Kirk, discusses in this episode how she came to understand the tricks of the Zionist network in the West. — Language alert, at the end.

This is a valuable lesson which all who use social media need to learn, since it is not only Zionists, who seek to control the opinions of the masses through controlling influencers.

My colleague, AJ Baalman and myself, over at Ordo Militaris Radio & TV, have often discussed the strange anomalies in the “Catholic” world of influencers, which act in parallel ways.

To be noticed in this episode, are the comments about “prisons of the mind”, which is used to describe how the entire public debate and thought is compartmentalized by those who control the narratives of our age: a thing seen most clearly and obscenely in the recent TradFest at the Vatican, as presented by “Traditional” “Catholic” influencers, such as Michael Matt (Jewish surname), who likened it to a historic day that will be remembered in ages future, even while Prevost proclaimed that the Catholic Church will be, under his pontificate, freed from all triumphalist, upright conceptions of knowing everything.

I am tempted to say, that the “Traditional Catholic Movement” which was co-opted by the son of a MI6 agent, Archbishop Lefebvre, has now come to the full fruition of its interior principles and should be renamed “Modernist Pharasaism”, since in support of the total redefinition of Catholic notions and realities, they content themselves only with external observances.

However, we Catholics need to take into consideration Owen’s “Mockingbird Pastor” analsysis, on how Christian pastors are instructed in how to psychologically manipulate their congregations to stick to narratives willed by the deep state. This is, in other words, exactly what the Aggiornamento was about from a point of view of formation, a reality, which my readers might not be aware, since they have never been in formation programs at seminaries or in monasteries. But I can definitely testify that in every program of “formation” I was in, there was a lot more psychological control mechanisms imposed and taught to us, than Gospel truths or principles. I have been always sensitive to this, because I chose to follow Christ for Christ’s sake, not to join a club or mad house or mafia.

Regarding Candace Owens, to me, having watched many of her videos, I get the impression that she has not had a completely thorough catechesis at the time of her conversion, and still is in the dark on several issues, such as regards capital punishment, mystical and sacramental theology. As cradle Catholics, that should not surprise us, and we should pray for her that God sends her the Angels needed instruct her better.

Finally, before she takes comments, Candace speaks of one of her sponsors, Perplexity’s AI browser assistance. I strongly recommend you NOT to use anything of the kind. Never let a program written and controlled by unknown persons to decide what you do to search, solve problems, purchase items or make travel arrangements. To do otherwise would be reckless in the extreme, since your devices are not private and controlled only by you, but have backdoors from hundreds of entities and to all the data and programs on them, not to mention for every intel agency in the world.

POSTSCRIPT: Here at FromRome.Info, the comment boxes are continual targets of Zionists, most of whom pretend to be Catholics or Christians. They attempt the same tricks, such as rage posting, using AI chat bots, and psychological attacks, especially when and after FromRome.Info reports or comments on issues which run against their goals. These operative post from various IPs throughout the world, from Manila, to New South Wales, to the U.S.A., and some can visit FromRome.Info from one IP and post a comment simultaneously from another. When frustrated they go for personal attacks. — Readers of FromRome.Info know nothing of this, since comments here at FromRome.Info are each personally approved by myself, and it just makes my day to press SPAM or DELETE when I see scum like these. — I say all this, so that my readers might know that FromRome.Info is a unique Catholic forum which protects you from anti-Catholic propaganda.

UPDATE: Trent, the head of the U.S. Counter Intelligence Task Force asked a lower level FBI agent for access to the Kirk Assassination investigation, to look for leads as to possible terrorist or international entities’ participation in the Assassination. That Trent did not ask permission of Patel, the head of the FBI, even though he does not have to, shows that Trent is actively considering as viable the overwhelming information discovered and published by Owens and Coleman of possible Zionist involvement. See this report here, from the U.K.:

+ + +

+ + + + + + +

The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present

bonav-I-banner This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!

+ + +

Subscribe to FromRome.Info!

Loading

5 thoughts on “Candace: How Zionists manipulate Influencers”

  1. Regarding Prevost’s election, if the requisite percentage of the 120 legitimate electors voted for him, would his election be valid in the eyes of God? In other words, if we could ignore the votes of the eleven illegitimate electors, would the election be valid in the eyes of God? These eleven votes are superfluous aren’t they?

    1. Thank you for your question. You can find the authoritative answer in n. 68 of the Papal Law, Universi Dominici Gregis, which is at the Vatican Website, and whether you look at the Latin or English, for that paragraph, the English is sufficiently accurate to say just what the Latin says. And then having read it, ask yourself what the 133 Cardinals did, and if they counted 120 as you say, and is allowed, or whether they counted more than that.

      You can have your question answered even more directly, by reading n. 76 of the same law, and ask if by allowing 133 when the maximum allowed is 120, they did that n. 76 says invalidates the election or not.

      Your question has an obvious answer. No, the Cardinals did not do what the law says, and the law says, that when they don’t do what it says, they cannot count the vote in favor of anyone, and therefore, the Conclave had no valid result, and Prevost accepted nothing and is not the pope. N. 76 also gives us the right to say it, even if all the clergy in the Church say the opposite.

      But you question also has another answer, namely, when 12000 letters were sent to the Clergy and religious of Rome, about this legal error in the Conclave, not a single one, not even any of the Cardinals, wrote back and said the argument I just presented you is false or has some error.

  2. Excellent commentary on a number of important matters. Thank you!

    AI is very dangerous. At the same time, it is now controlling search results within all the major search engines with extreme malice. The goal is to control the shape and validity of all knowledge and the perception of reality. I tell friends to buy books as quickly as they can because one day they could be declared illugal. In any case, books, by virtue of being offline and not manipulable by AI cannot be changed (or disappeared, unless they burn down your home — and we’ve seen them do that).

    I see writers of religious articles beginning to use AI to render the artwork for their articles, rather than use a piece of sacred art from tradition. In one otherwise good essay defending the Rosary on Substack, in one generated image, Mary had six fingers (three thumbs and three digits),and the Rosary had no corpus or mysteries and was broken, snapped by a small boy being urged on by the child Jesus, among other irregularities. It astonishes me that educated Catholics do not perceive the sinister aura emanating from art rendered by AI. I cannot escape the feeling it evokes — an aura of the non-human, netherworldly, and anti-Trinity. I can’t believe anyone would be foolish enough to use AI to create a sacred image and I don’t link to this example because I don’t want to give the readers of FromRome the willies, nor do I wish to embarrass the writer of that essay any further.

    Listen to Brother Alexis — stay away from AI.

    Trad., Inc = Phara., Inc. Brilliant. .

    1. Well noted, Brother and G in regards to AI.

      My favorite saint has a canonical Archconfraternity established in thr 19th century. Recently I corresponded with the Director and was sent Holy cards generated by AI. I come to find out that this local chapter is associated with Tradition in Action which, I believe, is associated with private chapels. Into the dumpster.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.