Editor’s Note: The suspicions of the public have been proven right by this geometrical and physical analysis. If Tyler Robinson was on the roof, he could NOT have shot the gun which hit Charlie Kirk, producing the sound and angle of the wound seen and claimed by Kovet to be the kill shot.
According to this study, the bullet is seen to hit Kirk about 125 milliseconds after the sound of the shot: see minute 20 and thereafter for this, which would be impossible for a shot from the Losee Roof with a supersonic bullet, which is what the shot sounds like. This is because, a supersonic bullet should arrive BEFORE the sound of the shot, whereas Kirk is hit by a projectile which arrives AFTER the sound of the shot!
This analysis was done using video and audio of a cellphone camera directly in front of Kirk, along the alleged line of fire. The 3D model was created from the lidar scan available in Open Street Maps. — The time difference between the sound of the shot and the impact of the shot is about 125 milliseconds. The video used was studied/corrected first to see if its audio was in sync with the lips of Kirk, rather than being the audio of the speakers which would suffer a delay.
This analysis confirms my supposition that a drone shot Kirk, when its audio sensor heard the crack-bang of a gun being fired. This would explain why a projectile would arrive after the sound of a supersonic shot. This would also explain why the impact was not in appearances of a .03-06 fired from a ’98 Mauser. — This also explains why the FBI would not show the entire video of the man on the roof.
In related news — Patel’s Girlfriend tied to TPUSA for 10 years, Egyptians headed to UVU campus in August
Baron Coleman finds that Google Trend searches from Egypt in August indicate that Egyptians were headed to the UVU campus, specifically to the Fulton Library where “a man in tactical gear” was seen immediately after the shooting of Charlie Kirk.
Finally, Ian Carroll, in live chat with Baron in the above program, is reporting that Google products are refusing to work when the message contains the full name of Charlie Kirk.
Update: Neighbors deny photos look like Tyler, Relatives say he does not know how to shoot, does not hunt; has attached earlobes unlike guy in photos
Language alert, big time. Jesse is an ex-criminal defense attorney.
+ + +
+ + + + + + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
I am not convinced that the guy on the roof is entirely innocent. He may have fired a gun, but its sound was used as the trigger.
I have a degree in design and I studied life drawing for several years, twice a week. Successful life drawing depends on being able to measure angles to plot proportions. Well, I saw the footage of Charlie’s death and knew instantly there was no way on Earth a bullet could fly from that building’s rooftop and strike the edge of his neck. The angle of trajectory was impossible. I could not visualize the official story so as to draw it, at all. I knew then the story was a lie. In fact, from the angle I could visualize after seeing Charlie’s wound, I remain 98% sure it was a tiny drone that caused his death. I figured one day folks will figure that out. The man accused is innocent, in my opinion. I don’t see how a prosecutor could convict him, unless the entire trial is rigged. Seriously.
Checking out this video now. It’s proving my theory based on that impossible angle to be correct! Thx.
—
See Brother? It was one of these, I believe. Likely made of dissolving substance, or the autopsy might be rigged, I don’t know. But even this SOUNDS similar.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKNrlmssN5P/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeFMQuJ7qnk