Editor’s Note: Click the image to watch on YouTube, since Wemhoff does not allow his videos to be embedded on other sites. — Wemhoff is a Catholic investigator, Legal scholar and former JAG Officer.
+ + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
I think you meant to type or dictate “JAG”
Yes, thank you.
Carl Cameron > Tucker Carlson on 9/11/01
https://archive.org/details/fourpartseriescarlcameronisraelispiesinu.s
Here is my rant.
Roberts indeed may be subverting alliances. Wemhoff’s criticism in this regard may be “fair and balanced” if the facts are indeed as he describes. I have not followed the events.
However, to my un-authoritative ears, his conclusion seems half-baked, biased, lacking self-awareness at best and at worst dishonorable, manipulative and as equally perfidious as the criticisms he launches against the targets of his disdain.
His final claim that ” And none of this is Catholic. And you have to understand that if you are a Catholic, you have to take a look at the things i have talked about, which is the primacy of the person – which requires a recognition of rights – keeping up alliances and working with this idea of a community of nations, the importance of the rule of law, and at the same time working for peace as the object”.
This is very rich talk coming from a man who has documented the ideological warfare perpetuated by the US government upon the Church – and, by implication, the Vatican State (a government) – and which has demonstrated to have no qualms about targeting other nations – and even its own citizens – for a variety of deadly experiments and destruction.
Of my knee-jerk questions, the first is, how honest and forthright is this man, truly? His critique of the individuals mentioned may or may not be accurate. It is above my competency to say.
I simply ask the following:
Is this man aware of the freemasonic nature of the US’s founding?
What precise version of “America” and its principles is he promoting?
Does he favor the non-Catholic weaponizing of the Constitution to subvert the Articles of Confederation?
Does an ally engage in blackmail, brainwashing, and bribery and assassination against their ally’s politicians?
Should ally’s operatives have diplomatic immunity and be free to perpetrate crimes, shape domestic social policies, and extract tax-payer monies and national treasure to promote anti-Catholic narratives, indiscriminate genocides and moral corruption abroad?
How does he define “ally? Did not the founding fathers – at least some – believe in “trade with all and entangling alliances with none?”
Do allies infiltrate allies’ political institutions and engage in blackmail, immigration deception, the promotion of double-standard justice system in favor of non-native born American citizens appointed by biased and often unqualified and even uncredentialled judges?
Is this man being firm, fair, and consistent as a Catholic, or does he have an agenda and is he hiding something for which he is as equally guilty as those whom he accuses, either rightfully or wrongfully? The manner of his litany of -isms in regard to his opponents seems rhetorically cheap and ineffective – and perhaps potentially even to the benefit of his targets’ positions – if he indeed hopes to remedy the situations.
And what solutions does Mr. Wemhoff provide?
Is it not the mark of a “grifter supreme” to criticize without ever engaging in proposing solutions?
Is he so cynical, inflexible, and detached as to not at least concede some sort of potential for reflection, growth, and maturing of other’s positions?
I find his commentary disturbing for the questions it begs. I find it equally discouraging that he -, having benefitted from living in a time when the general Catholic environment and American cultural identities were less fractured and corroded – dare to stand in judgment of a much younger generation whose fate it seems to be to live in a country that not only now barely resembles that of its forbearers, but seems hell-bent on eradicating even the faintest image of the goodness and sanity which existed in the past.
Is Mr. Wemhoff willing to acknowledge that just possibly, he too, has been influenced by the very forces which he claims are controlling others?
On whose side is Mr. Wemhoff? Is he, too, a Russian asset? After all, he seems not to be on the side of Catholics who have the right – and a legal peaceful way – to a Catholic pope.
It is hard to stomach such political self-righteousness and intellectual preening given his educational and professional pedigree. Should not we expect more from such a man at a time of crisis such as now when the stench of the hierarchy fumes makes one wretch and the fumes of moral Western Civilization’s goodness have all but evaporated?
Because he seems to be defending principles, values, learning, and understandings which unfortunately no longer have currency in the minds of Catholics ( who are now thoroughly deformed -even if they still attend Church) due to the very infiltration which he himself documented, what is his intention in selectively calling out the operatives on the right, while failing to focus the same intensity of scrutiny onto the Church? If the targets of his criticism fail in their Catholic litmus test, why does Mr. Wemhoff not show charity to these men by revealing the source of their – and their generation’s – ignorance and wayward ways – by addressing their lack of authentic Catholic formation and the corrupt, debauched, and hate-filled hierarchy – which no longer has any convictions which extend above their bellies and pockets – for such deformation?
And in addition to these outrages, he has the unmitigated audacity to arrogate to himself absolute claims about “the Church” while being unwilling to address the-beyond-a-shadow-of-a doubt fact that the Church (understood here as the hierarchy) whom he claims to speak for and to promote so confidently has become not only ineffective in forming the clergy and faithful, but, by its many omissions, has become an active promoter and cooperator in the very injustices and evils which he decries.
Is Mr. Wemhoff not aware that by his silence regarding the proven betrayal of the hierarchy, he is in all likelihood as guilty of – and perhaps more so due to his age and erudition – of the same sort of barbarity of which he ascribes to those whom he attacks?
And does he defend the separation of Church and State? Is not that very division a freemasonic artifice?
It seems to me, as one who has greatly benefitted from the content of OMC and FromRome, Mr. David Wemhoff , Esquire, might very well benefit from some the diagnoses he himself liberally provides and take a dose of the very medicine he so eagerly prescribes – along with perhaps even a Sacramental Confession which one of the targets of his criticism at least has an awareness of, which based on Juridical Doctor Wemhoff’s observations, leaves one wondering how sincere and convicted he himself is about the proper use of the Sacrament.
“Physician, heal thyself”?
Bravo. Yes, Wemhoff as a former JAG is obviously regurgitating the principles he used in his legal service for the U.S. Military. And he does seem to be a neo-con. — However, that does not mean that he is not 100% on target about the push towards National Socialism. Skull and Bones attempted a Nazi takeover of the USA before WW2, it’s certainly not beyond them to try it again. — In fact, since it is ex-GOPers who are now pushing towards National Socialism, we have pretty much presume that this plan is already in the works.
Thank you, Giovanni, for your insightful inquiry. I had all the same thoughts, but you took the time to articulate them.
Wemhoff is a state-licensed bar attorney who, while he may have some valid points, is principally engaged here in defense of his income stream. Indeed, he has the duty, if he is an honest Catholic, to apply his intellectual gifts in service of the Election by Apostolic Right. If he turns aside from it, I won’t bother to listen to another word from him.
In related news, the Princeton philosophy professor, Robert George, resigned today from the Heritage Foundation.
https://www.wjbc.com/2025/11/17/robert-p-george-resigns-from-heritage-crisis-over-antisemitism-deepens/
The Heritage Foundation is a Skull and Bones institution.