A summary of Articles by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
Over the years the Freemason, John Salza, (source here) who claims to have converted to the Catholic Faith, has published numerous articles full of lies about the Catholic Faith and the Apostolic See. Recently he has gathered his articles on one page, which is being shared with FSSP priests in North American to defend the Bergoglian revolution and keep the Faithful bound to that psyop.
So in reply I will list here on this one page, the articles full of lies, and my refutations, since Salza and Siscoe pretend that I have not refuted their slop propaganda, long ago. Please share this page with all priests of the FSSP:
As always, since I am truly a transparent and independent Catholic journalist, I will follow my example of first posting a link to the article I rebut, a courtesy rarely returned:
First, I will mention that the term, “Benevacantism”, which Steve Skojec popularized, but denies coining, is used extensively by Steve O’Reilley, the self-named former CIA intelligence officer, who live s in Texas and often trolls those who oppose his lies, but who is followed by nearly all Trad Inc. for some reason — I think it is because Trad Inc. itself is a USAID operation. The term, “Benevacantism” is contra-indicatory, since it is used as a slur against those who believed Pope Benedict XVI remained the pope after Feb. 11, 2013, on account of an act of renunciation which was invalid. Those who use this term are the true Benevacantists, because those who slur others with it are those who hold that Benedict vacated his see on that date or on Feb. 28, 2013, though they cannot agree.
Here are the articles, in red, by Salza and Siscoe, and, following each in Blue, are my devastating rebuttals.
The Validity of Benedict’s Resignation of the Papal Ministerium and Munus (reply to an email)
This first is a previously unpublished comment, so I have written no rebuttal. However, I did read his article about Dogmatic Facts (Part I, and Part II) and destroyed it with my own article: on March 20, 2019: Siscoes’ Triple shell Game, which triggered his next response.
Ann Barnhardt is a Liar and a Fool
Here I began my debate with Siscoe, in the comments to that article, but continued here, with my article, Feb. 25, 2020: Siscoe rejects the Magisterium and invents his own
More Flagrant Dishonesty from Br. Alexis Bugnolo
This I refuted here, on February 26, 2020: Salza & Siscoe’s Theory of Universal Acceptance is Masonic
Br. Bugnolo’s Attempt to Redefine Dogmatic Facts Backfires:He Ends by Proving Francis is the Pope
This I refuted here, on March 9, 2020: Siscoe & Salza attack Bugnolo on Dogmatic Facts & He replies
+ + +
Siscoe and Salza have also published other errors, which I have refuted in these articles:
Salza & Siscoe step in it again & attack Paul IV’s, Cum ex apostolatus officio
You can find all my articles mentioning Salza and Siscoe using the search engine here at FromRome and inputting one or the other of their surnames.
+ + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
What I find shocking in my email exchanges with a fssp priest is that he has swallowed hook line and sinker that we should dispense with canon and papal law per se and accept universal acceptance as the determinate of a pope. My horror, and naivety, is that as you have pointed out before Brother, the priestly societies are walking in line to serve the Man of Sin, the Antichrist at the altar of expediency: that their little club will always prosper and truth be damned. An eye opener for me to be sure. Horrifying that USAID is playing pied piper, and leading souls to hell. Thank you.
The so called TLM communities are involved in a narrative which is very mind-controlling, so when confronted with facts its very hard for them to break free since all their social relations and the reasons for doing what they are doing are founded on accepting that niche in the Church. To have a truly Catholic pope means restoring the Church and not working for private benefit or living by virtue signalling. And for those in these communities who have not the grace of honesty, it will be very difficult for them to accept the truth that salvation comes from following the true laws of the Church and submitting to the true Roman Pontiff.
Thank you for this. It will be invaluable to any honest person who might need help accepting the new Pope.
Even Fr. Mawdsley, FSSP, who lost his appointment when he refused to mask up still holds to the mind control narrative about the Papacy.
They all seemingly do Claudia. The last email I had from the fssp priest when I asked him whether his belief that Universal Acceptance by the Church supercedes all papal laws and canon laws was a personal opinion or shared by other society priests, he said it was shared by his confrères.
I found the level of ignorance, or shall we say mind control, to be profoundly saddening and troubling. There was no argument just the promotion of a theological thesis not found in the Church hierarchy, but promoted by two seemingly ex freemasons ( one of them of high rank). It is almost as if the society’s continued existence to say the TLM within the Ecclesia Dei structure is of paramount importance to them and the price they must pay is to be subservient to their illegitimate globalist masters. I am praying for this priest, chosen by the Supreme High Priest, that this blind fog be lifted from his mind. Cause we need them.
Merry Christmas to all! Your comments, Paul, are always brimming with truth and I give thanks to God.
In March of this year, I had the blessing of hosting the fssp provincial of north America and several other priests at my home following a Requiem mass of one of their own priests. A few months ago I wrote a letter to one of these priests who was outspoken about the deathvaxx. I wrote to him about the novena for the election. I received no response and I feel he may have alerted the provincial. They are circling the wagons. Their livelihood depends on it. Think of it. Not all of the priests have supportive families who support tradition. Fr. Salgado did not, except for his sister. He was gaslit to the bitter end. He spoke out against Pope Francis from his pulpit and some of his parishioners recorded it and took it to the chancery. The fssp was going to send him to St. Luke’s to be with the pedophiles, until his 94 year old sister stepped in and said, “not over my dead body.” Also, I learned that ten fssp priests in the U.S. refused to shut their parishes in 2020 and were removed and sent to St. Luke’s. Fr. Salgado told me.
We have a long road ahead where we can expect to be shunned. We were all asleep at the wheel for too many years. I had a picture of ‘pope’ Francis on the wall in my dining room back in 2013, for crying out loud.
We can ask Our Lady, as Brother has said, for extraordinary graces. This is her role to crush the head of the enemy. We give her our hand each morning to lead us.
God bless you.
I wonder if you might mean Fr. James Maudsley. He says he was ‘voluntarily’ suspended. He’s very good on revisionist history on WWII.
https://rumble.com/c/ScriptureandTraditionFrJM/about?e9s=src_v1_cmd
Yes, he has also published several books which I hope to read.
“Where the Church is, there is Peter; where Peter is, there is the Church”: this foundational premise with its corollary is simple. Christmas blessings, graces, and protection for Pope Elect Hildebrand.
Fr. Maudsley was only ordained in 2016 so I think the fact that he’s already outspoken about WWII and the ‘virus’ mandates goes a long way to justify hope that he has good will. His x account is suspended.
The sermon I heard at Christmas Mass yesterday quoted Pope Benedict XVI several times. I took it as a sign of good will on the part of the priest, and perhaps a kind of dog whistle or hostage message. He belongs to a community of priests some of whom in the past have (privately) tried to besmirch the good names of Fr. Gruner and Fr. Feeney.
Brother Alexis, what you say about the mind control under which Trad Inc. and its followers labour, strongly supports my own experience. The most stunning example is a lady who told me ‘If this was legitimate I’d already know about it.’ I understand that very well. She’s wholly invested in the SSPX.
It must have taken courage for you to leave the FI so that you could live the Rule of St. Francis as it was written. You’ve had early experience with leaving the world behind, even such an apparently attractive and holy part of it.
Deo gratias.
I actually did not ask to leave the FFI. I only found that in the Bulls of 3 Popes, the Rule of Saint Francis was to be lived in a certain manner, and that in my community we were told during formation, that that manner was not approved by the Popes, but was a crazy interpretation of zealots. When I found my formators and superiors were lying to me about Papal teaching, I asked to take solemn vows with the proviso that they would grant me permission to live the rule according to the teaching of the Popes. That is when my Major superior, Father Manelli denied me solemn vows and had a friar drive me to the home of my relatives and leave me at the door, with nothing but a borrowed pair of shoes, pants and a shirt. They stripped me of my habit and took the breviary I used away, so I could not live as a religious. From that day to this, I have studied canon law to know my rights and kept the Rule of Saint Francis no matter what. And if the local bishop objected, I simply moved to another diocese. So loyalty to Papal Teaching for me is the first rule of my life. With that, everything comes easily, since the Popes gives us clear teaching about all the important things in life.
This is also why I am very aware that hatred for the papacy and papal teaching is not the monopoly of liberals or progressives in the Church. It is a diabolic spirit which has taken possession of even religious superiors and bishops, whom feign to be conservatives or traditionalists.
I’m so sorry to read this about how you, and by extension the papal authority, were treated. I don’t recall you explaining this so fully before now. I hope you take some consolation though in knowing that you’ll be rewarded for your loyalty.
I also wish to express my sorrow for how you were treated, Brother, due to your desire to remain faithful to the Rule of St. Francis.
Yes, Astrid, I think good will should be presumed in regard to Fr. Maudsley. Perhaps one or both of us should write to him at the Fatima Center, as they would know how to reach him.
May this new year 2026 bring the body of Christ to be in union the vicar of Christ. Hildebrandi P.P. Electi.