Editor’s Note: This video presents a detailed juridical analysis of the illegal fraud committed during the recent Conclave. The auto-dubbed version in Italian or English is very well done. — The importance of this testimony, herein, is that this video was published by someone on his own initiative, who is not in communication with Br. Bugnolo, nor who cites any argument previously published at FromRome.Info or ChiesaRomana.info. Moreover, the argument appears to have been written by someone with a Doctorate in Canon Law and Ecclesiastical Jurisprudence and is written in such terms, that it appears to have been composed by some professor of Canon Law at a Pontifical University, if not by some expert at the Vatican itself. This supposition of origin appears to be strengthened by the fact that, though the analysis exposes the fraud of claiming a dispensation to exceed the number of 120, it avoids any mention of the juridical result of such an illegal manner of voting: namely, that the election itself was invalid, irritus and conferred no right upon the one elected.
+ + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
On my phone I cannot see the english subtitles and everytime I click autotranslate and select another language it switches subtitles to off.
You need to set your YouTube Account to English, and then the autodubbing of YouTube should work.
Thanks! I didn’t realise I had to login first.
This is wonderful news. On another note, it looks like the Enemy is stuffing around with the Sedes Apostolica.info site – the only link for information, that we have to Pope Hildebrand and the true Church. When I try to go to the site “https://www.sedesapostolica.info” on both my laptop computer and my mobile phone, I get this error message (and it’s not happening for any other site and I’ve never seen this message before, that I can remember):
“Your clock is ahead
A private connection to http://www.sedesapostolica.info can’t be established because your computer’s date and time (Tuesday, January 6, 2026 at 2:05:28 PM) are incorrect.
net::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID”
Has anyone else experienced/reported this, I wonder?
St Isadore, Patron of the Internet, Pray for Us!
No, I have never heard of this before. I do know that Cisco Cloud Service is blocking SedesApostolica.Info for no reason, refusing a socket connection. You need to ask your internet provider.
It seems to be a problem caused by some browsers which in 2026 are attempting to force their users to use a time zone conformable to the actual geographical region they are in. This will annoy a lot of people who commute or who are on holidays.
Thank you Brother, and St Isidore! Thankfully, my problem seems to be resolved and I can access the site once again.
Thank you also for these ideas of how to spread the word and the post about Reintegration at SedesApostolica.info which we can print and hand out. Your instructions/recommendations are crystal clear. I need to do a lot more, and I resolve to. Unfortunately, I don’t know how to post blogs, or share on social media and the like, but I am trying to talk to people. But, could you include a share button for “Signal” as many traditional Catholics in Australia use that messaging platform.
It is said “you can’t comply your way out of tyranny”. Similarly, we cannot work out our salvation by complying with an Anti-church!
I have a couple of questions:
Q. 1. Of all your many articles on FromRome.info which discuss the invalid election, which would you say is best / most succinct to print and hand out? For example, if we were to print off 1 or 2 of the best explanatory articles as well as the following docs from SedesApostolica.info, as an information pack to hand to people, would you say include:
1. 1st Article from http://www.fromrome.info [ARTICLE NAME?]
2. 2nd Article from http://www.fromrome.info [ARTICLE NAME?]
3. FAQ
4. Urbi et Orbi address Hildebrandi PP Electi.
5. Document: On the Reintegration of Catholic Clergy and Religious
Q2. Should I, or should I not, send the info. to my current “Anti-Archbishop” who was recently appointed to my Archdiocese by Prevost and who promotes the ordination of Female Deacons, and who last year placed a Satanic idol in his Cathedral? I would think, not? Should we only inform those priests and bishops who might hear and heed the message?
There is really no fixed rule for what articles to share. Perhaps the first one is
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/25/a-canonical-analysis-of-why-the-conclave-of-may-2025-had-no-valid-result/
And the second is the solution
https://www.fromrome.info/2025/06/11/pope-nicholas-iii-infallibly-taught-that-faithful-can-elect-a-catholic-pope/
And the third is the fact
https://sedesapostolica.info/notitiae/rogitus-de-electione-romani-pontificis/
As for a button for Signal, that’s beyond my technical capability to add. Just use the share button and on your cellphone that should give you an option then to chose your signal app.
Regarding sharing to Signal, with an Android phone or tablet, you can tap and hold any of the links above and choose “Copy link address” from the drop down menu, then paste that link into a new or existing draft message in Signal.
Sorry, I don’t use an iPhone or iPad, so I can’t tell you how to do it on those, though I imagine it’s very similar.
In case readers didn’t listen to the video or understand the argument, Grand’Mos makes two very powerful arguments suggesting that Prevost’s election was invalid:
1) That by using point 36 (Cardinals have a right to elect a pope) to derrogate point 33 (number of Cardinal electors is 120 max) it opens the door to the bending of plenty of other conclave rules by the cardinals, namely: secrecy, voting method, quorum, impediments to active vs passive electorate.
2) Since the Cardinals interpreted that Pope Francis intended on derrogating the maximum of 120 cardinals simply through his appointment of more cardinals, it opens the door for canon 331 (the Bishop of Rome possesses supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church, which he is always able to exercise freely) to be used to bend any point of law without the Pope going through the specific act of modification or promulgation of the law.
Talk about planning chaos in the Church!!!
To be more precise,
1) by arrogating to themselves the right to interpret away any point of law during a sedevacante, by claiming to interpret the will of a late pope, in regard to a papal election, they open the door to any other change, in the procedure and thus guarantee that every election would be doubtful.
2) by arrogating to themselves the right to interpret any previous papal act, so as to change any law during a sede vacante, they college of cardinals has perpetrated a revolution and seized for themselves the power of the pope to rule the Church, as soon as he dies, which is contrary to every canonical norm.
But what this video omits is:
1) That this illegal procedure results in a clear violation of n. 68 of UDG and thus renders the election invalid as per UDG n. 76
2) That this invalidity, sustained so long by all the Cardinals results in the right of the Faithful to have recourse to the teaching of Nicholas II, and elect a true Pope, which was done on Noc. 23, 2025.
3) That the Cardinals perpetrated an even greater sacrilege when they eleted a formal manifest Bergoglian heretic to be the pope, since by divine law itself a heretic is not a member of the Church.
Thanks Brother!