Editor’s Note: No one in the English speaking world is reporting this, because of its explosive nature: here is our English translation of the editorial commenting on this news, reported at ChiesaRomana.Info, from the pages of Il Messagero, the leading Newspaper at Rome, Italy, which works closely with the Vatican. The mere fact that they publish this news shows a major earthquake in relations with the Vatican.
Click the image above to go to the article at ChiesaRoman.Info, where the top image links back to the original report at Il Messaggero from last week:
The unsigned editorial at ChiesaRomana.Info, reads:
Our editorial staff commends former magistrate Angelo Giorgianni for calling into question the validity of the May 2025 Conclave in his recent missive to Cardinal Parolin. He did so on the grounds of an evident violation of *Universi Dominici Gregis* No. 33, which—in its official Latin text—prescribes a maximum of 120 Cardinal electors. The validity of his argument, and the threat it poses to the globalist narrative, is evident in the fact that *Il Messaggero* attempts to smear his reputation in the editorial accompanying its article of March 12, 2026, labeling him a “no-vaxxer.” We do not know, however, whether he intends merely to embarrass the criminal conspirators within the Vatican by submitting a legal inquiry regarding the Conclave’s validity, or whether he is seeking the publicity that Italian newspapers have denied to these issues since May 2025. Certainly, however, we cannot expect an ecclesiastical mafia—comprising sexual perverts and Freemasons—to explain why they have erred. Indeed, the author of the aforementioned article (linked above) finds nothing to say other than to reiterate the outrageous fraud perpetrated by them on April 30 of last year. The day prior, Archbishop Viganò himself had asserted that the Conclave would yield no legitimate result—comments evidently based on his intimate knowledge of individuals within the Secretariat of State. It remains, however, that the Faithful—the clergy, religious, and laity of our Apostolic Church—possess the integrity and simplicity to exercise the right granted to them by Pope John Paul II in the aforementioned law (paragraph 76), which declares that any Conclave conducted in a manner other than that prescribed confers no rights upon the person elected, and that no specific authority is required to declare it invalid. In this regard, the initiative undertaken by the courageous Giorgianni is flawed. In the meantime, we invite the faithful to support the true Holy Father Ildebrando in his Lenten Campaign, so that he may have the necessary funds to open a parish for true Catholics here in Rome. You can make a donation via PayPal, Stripe, Apple Pay, and Google Pay through this LINK. Thank you!
My critics hate this news and won’t speak of it, because it proves you know who was right from the start, and that they are are dishonest, lying grifters manipulating Catholics for their eternal damnation.
+ + +
+ + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
Slowly and methodically the edifice of Prevost’s invalidity and antipapacy is made known. The wheels of God grind slowly. I salute you who alone, like one crying aloud in the wilderness, has with resolute Catholic action striven to defend the papacy and Holy Mother the Church.
Our Lady of Prompt Succor hasten to help us(!)
https://nuntiatoria.org/2026/01/02/the-illusion-of-a-rival-pope-why-the-hildebrand-claim-fails-in-law-doctrine-and-reason/
Brother Alex, where are they going wrong here? (if you have a link to a previous post of yours covering this, that would be nice) And what flaw in their argumentation jumps out at you? If you don’t have time for this, i understand — you’re a busy man(!) For my part, i’m trying to keep as informed as i can and am always glad when counterarguments like this come to light. (it’s been slim pickings, and i’ll take whatever i can get — so i appreciate their effort) Lastly, does universal acceptance apply here? And, for that matter, did it apply in St. Hildebrand’s day? (are there any parallels between then and now?) Thanx for your time in advance…
This site appears to be written by AI. But the article is wrong because what it asserts as true is false, and what it asserts as false is true, nearly every time. It would be prolix to correct it, and since I doubt a human wrote it, I am not going to waste my time.
For example, it claims that Canon Law distinguishes between the illicit and invalid (which is true) and then says that UDG n. 76 speaks only of the illicit, which is a total lie, since UDG 76 says:
76. Wherefore, if the election will have been celebrated in another manner, than this Constitution has established, or with the conditions prescribed equally here not observed, the election for this very reason is null and invalid without any declaration, and for that reason grants no right upon the one elected.
So Nuntiatoria is clearly a BOLD FACE LIAR.
And you would be a fool to read further in his article, since the malignity of such a lie is diabolic and satanic.
Thank you, brother, to me (just looking over it), i thought a number of points appeared to be on shakey ground. (the one you’ve highlighted being perhaps the first and worst) It’s always nice to get your take on things regardless.* i do hope that more, better counterarguments do come out. Cogent arguments properly rebutted will simply make your case stronger. Because sooner or later, with the ultimate rise of Pope Hildebrand, your argumentation is going to have to withstand public scrutiny. And that is going to be explosive(!) Can’t imagine that Prevost & Co. are going to give up without a fight.
*i feel properly oriented now as we speak…
AI cannot argue, that is why this article when you think about it, is clearly not written by a human being, because no one is so insane as to write this way, unless they are a propagandist for a radical ideology, like a Marxist CCP. Even the name of the website roughly means in Latin, “Dictations” in the sense of being dictatorial. Those who think such an article is credible in any way, evidently dont have enought intelligence to discern human from fake logic. Logic is not just a set of rules, it is the very way the human mind works, and for an agent to operate logically it requires three act of the mind, intuition, reason, and illation, that is, the ability to recognize essences at first sight, the ability to understand reasons or causality, and the ability to see the coherence of meta signification. LLMs cannot do any of these, since they only jumble words and data together according to the frequency they are found together in verbal or electronic files.
They are going to do what they did since 2013, since there is no argument against the sky or the grass nor against the most evident things of reality.
What we need to recognize is that we are fools if we fail to admit a criminal conspiracy of the most malign nature. The election of Hidebrand is actually God’s answer, and the pace at which the Catholic Faithful grasp that is the pace of their return to God. I honestly think that the propaganda is so deep and the level of prayer so shallow, that the present war will bode horrible punishments on humanity, to wake them up, because when a man refuses to see the evident things God punishments with eve more evident punishments, until he either repents or is destroyed. This is because God gives life not to create a museum or a amusement park, but to give His creatures the opportunity to choose Him who is the Most Evident Truth through the mirrors and looking glasses of the less evident truths. And when a man refuse the latter, he has chosen his own damnation.
That is why all those who knew the facts but said B16 did validly abdicate will be damned and have been damned, just as all those who know the facts and say the conclave of May last year is valid.
Salvation is not mystical, its tangible. And this is the crime of crimes, to be able to see, and say that one does not see.