+ + +
There are many writers who are not in touch with reality, and this is especially true in the Catholic Church, since admitting the truth is a habit of spirit which rarely survives the human instinct of wanting to receive human respect. But if we are to save our souls in an age in which there is a mass world-wide apostasy, founded in mendacity, the only ones who will survive this test, are those willing to take the realities of Papal Law and Church History as the first principles of prudence and action. Such is the sane proposal in the above article. May God grant that many more writers follow in this path! — Click the above image to read that article on Substack.
Contrariwise, the Church today is beplagued by what Pope Benedict XVI rightly diagnosed as a massive failure in faith of the Sacred Hierarchy, where the four major camps of sinners: the modernists heretics, the conservative freemasons, the traditionalists and the sedevacantists all agree in holding the worst possible heresy: namely, that, he is the true Pope, not him who was first to be validly elected, but him whom “We” say is the pope, since it is not the words of Christ or the laws of Popes which determine the legal right to the papacy, but consensus of private opinion of those on our “team”, “club” or Lodge.
Indeed, pay attention how many Bishops and Priests cannot even admit in public, that a true Roman Pontiff has to be legally elected, or that the laws of Saint Pius X, of Pius XII or of John Paul II, would all agree that Robert Prevost’s election was canonically invalid, for one of 5 reasons, or more:
- That the “Cardinal” who convoked the conclave as Dean, was invalidly appointed by an antipope, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, and not by a validly elected Pope.
- That at least many of the “Cardinals” who voted in the conclave, were never appointed by a validly elected Roman Pontiff.
- That, as the Catholic Faith requires, none of the Cardinals voting rejected the heretical documents of Fiducia Supplicans and Amoris Laetitia, as heretical; thus showing that they themselves no longer hold the Catholic Faith. On which account according to both the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and 1918, they should never have been summoned to participate in a Conclave to elect a pope.*
- That the law of John Paul II allows only for 120 validly appointed, Cardinal electors to vote; and if, this be violated, even by a claim of having a dispensation to do the contrary, the election is null and void, all the same, as per the sanction in n. 76 of that law.
- That, the number of Cardinals who participated in the Conclave of 2025 violated, therefore, every papal law since Pius X, and thus the election was just as invalid as the election of the antipope Benedict X, in 1058, who was elected in an assembly without the presence of the Archdeacon Hildebrand of Sovana, as Pope Stephen IX had precepted and decreed.
This consolidation of each of the factions of Bishops and Clergy in the Catholic Church, in the same one sin, right now shows that they are manifestly no longer spiritually in communion with Christ the King, even if canonically they are not publicly censured: for they have wittingly or unwittingly united themselves to the Church of the Antichrist, by embracing a spirit of lawlessness, which is the spirit of the Apostate to come (cf. Saint Paul the Apostle, Second Letter to the Thessalonians, Chapter 2).
And this is pure insanity, especially since Pope Nicholas II gave the Church the most valid, effective and all purpose fail safe escape route, though enabling the election of a true Pope, validly and legally, in the most easy way possible. A thing which the Catholics of Rome did last year, with the entire active, written and/or tacit consent of all the Clergy and Religious of the Dioceses of Rome and the 7 Suburbican Dioceses.
There are, still, however, Catholic Bishops and Priests and Deacons and even Hermits, who reject these errors and heresies. It remains for them, now to speak out, as well as for us who are laity, to seek them out.
* While it is true that the papal laws for Conclaves since the time of St. Pius X do allow Cardinals who have not been publicly denounced as heretics to participate in the voting, it is not true that they have to be convoked to conclave, since both the Codes of 1917 and 1983 forbid those automatically excommunicated, even in secret, on account of sins such as apostasy or heresy, from exercising any office or duty in the Church, such as voting for a pope. For this reason, the Cardinal convoking the Conclave has to be validly appointed and a Catholic, or no valid Conclave can occur.
+ + +
The Book on the Trinity, every faithful Catholic priest would love as his next present
This is Br. Bugnolo's English Translation, of Saint Bonaventure's encylopedic book of theology on the Trinity: With this book, your priest will always have something intelligent and awesomely inspiring to preach to you about
God the Father, God the Son & God the Holy Spirit!
+ + +
