All posts by Editor

Google Strikes major blow against Independent Media

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Feedburner announced this morning, that Independent Media will no longer be able to implement the Subscribe by Email widget which had served independent publishers for years, to grow readership and help readers keep track of daily posts.  The announcement was made surreptitiously by Feedburner in an email to blog-administrators.

Feedburner’s official statement, said:

FeedBurner has been a part of Google for almost 14 years, and we’re making several upcoming changes to support the product’s next chapter. Here’s what you can expect to change and what you can do now to ensure you’re prepared.

Starting in July, we are transitioning FeedBurner onto a more stable, modern infrastructure. This will keep the product up and running for all users, but it also means that we will be turning down most non-core feed management features, including email subscriptions, at that time.

Feedburner will no longer allow installations of widgets will implement their service. The dead line to install them was set to be prior to their announcement to catch publishers off guard.

For transparency, FromRome.Info does not use the Feedburner service for its subscriptions.

As an electronic publisher for more than 20 years, it is my professional opinion that this move was made so that Google can take information control of the independent media-verse. Globalists are losing the information war and they have come to understand that they have to be more clever and repressive than ever to stop the leakage of narrative control.

Most publishers probably did not know that FeedBurner was Google owned. I encourage all to take action immediately to secure your email list and go independent.  For bloggers on Globalist media platforms like Blogger or WordPress, this change may make it impossible to build a readership.

By the grace of God and the good will of about 30 readers of FromRome.info, this change will not affect FromRome.Info, since the move of this journal to an independent platform two weeks ago, gave it completely independent control of its subscriber mechanisms and lists.

Google, in preparation for this Feedburner announcement, had begun several weeks ago, to label as “spam” all emails from the rival widget, Subscriber2.  This is why many subscribers to FromRome.Info who use Gmail, Hotmail, Outlook, or Live are having difficulty in subscribing to FromRome.Info.

FromRome.Info will continue to seek technologies to keep the readers connected. I ask the readers prayers for this effort.

Feedburner was highlighted by James Corbett last most as one of the principle ways to work around Globalist control. His YouTube channel of 14 years, with 500,000 followers was erased into oblivion a few days ago. Now the Feedburner “transition notice”,  If you are watching carefully, you can see the agenda.

As James Corbett of The Corbet Report announced in his recent Pwew! Video — reckoning with the erasure of his YouTube channel — we have definitively entered a Post Globalist Social Media World. YouTube, Google, WordPress, Blogger are old fashioned and 100% unreliable politically. The way forward is to go completely independent. The challenges are financial and technical. Few are they who have the talent to write, fewer still the courage to speak against Globalism, fewer the knowledge of just who is behind it, and even fewer those who have the technical skills to run an independent journal. But rarest of all are those will the readers and or funds to make it happen.

I thank the readers of FromRome.Info for making it happen here.

_________________

CREDITS: The featured image is a collage from the DuckDuckGo Search Engine image results for “Google is hated by everyone”. Whether by design or serendipity, the images align to reflect what many independent publishers think today.

NOTICE TO READERS: Thank you! — Patience, Server upgrade in process

Dear Readers of FromRome.Info,

Let me thank you for your generous support which is enabling FromRome.Info upgrade to a VPS server.  This upgrade will take place in the next 3-4 days. During this time  any comments you post here may be lost, and I will not be able to publish articles, since they will be lost in the transfer to the new server.

I ask your patience, and thank you for your charity.   This move will improve speed about 16 fold, and provide FromRome.Info will a hosting service for the next 2 years.

To all who made it possible thank you.  I ask my other readers who are 98% of the traffic here to remember these benefactors in your prayers, who have made it possible for FromRome.info to be available for all the world.

Sincerely,

Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Dr. Jean-Bernard Fourtillan: The Goal is Mass Euthanasia & it was planned in 1981

REPUBLISHED WITH PERMISSION

Message que le Prof. Jean-Bernard Fourtillan*
a envoyé à des personnalités connues

ENGLISH TRANSLATION FOLLOWS BELOW

Chers amis, j’ai le plaisir de vous adresser notre dernière vidéo Jasper Mader et AgoraTV. Je la considère comme une pièce décisive pour notre avenir, dans la mesure où nous apportons toutes les preuves irréfutables qui dénoncent l’Institut Pasteur, leurs commanditaires et leurs complices du Nouvel Ordre Mondial, auteurs de la fausse pandémie du Covid-19. Les peuples de France et du monde entier, qui connaissent désormais la vérité, doivent faire front et se libérer rapidement de cette dictature covidiste qui cherche à les exterminer et les asservir. Je vous communique ce texte révisionniste de Jacques Attali, extrait de l’Avenir de la vie, Michel Salomon, 1981, qui confirme, dans le moindre détail, leur projet satanique et eugéniste préparé depuis longtemps :

« À l’avenir il s’agira de trouver un moyen de réduire la population. Nous commencerons par les vieux, car dès qu’il dépasse 60-65 ans l’homme vit plus longtemps qu’il ne produit et il coûte cher à la société. Ensuite les faibles puis les inutiles qui n’apportent rien à la société car il y en aura de plus en plus, et surtout enfin les plus stupides.

« Une euthanasie ciblant ces groupes ; l’euthanasie devra être un instrument essentiel de nos sociétés futures, dans tous les cas de figure. On ne pourra bien sûr par exécuter les gens ou faire des camps. Nous nous en débarrasserons en leur faisant croire que c’est pour leur bien. La population trop nombreuse, et pour la plupart inutile, c’est quelque chose d’économiquement trop coûteux. Sociétalement, il est également bien préférable que la machine humaine s’arrête brutalement plutôt qu’elle ne se détériore progressivement. On ne pourra pas non plus faire passer des tests d’intelligence à des millions et des millions de gens, vous pensez bien ! Nous trouverons quelque chose ou le provoquerons, une pandémie qui cible certaines personnes, une crise économique réelle ou pas, un virus qui touchera les vieux ou les gros, peu importe, les faibles y succomberont, les peureux et les stupides y croiront et demanderont à être traités.

« Nous aurons pris soin d’avoir prévu le traitement, un traitement qui sera la solution. La sélection des idiots se fera ainsi toute seule : ils iront d’eux-mêmes à l’abattoir. »

(Extrait de l’Avenir de la vie, Michel Salomon, 1981)

Pour visionner la vidéo :

Maintenant que vous connaissez la vérité, vous devez suivre les recommandations d’Artémisia Collège :

« N’obéissez pas/plus aux ordres des criminels, refusez le masque, la distanciation, le confinement, les faux vaccins… Par contre, prenez en charge votre santé ! Vous croyez qu’en obéissant ça va s’arrêter… alors que c’est parce que vous obéissez que ça continue… Tout peut cesser en quelques jours si vous le décidez. »

Il faut en finir rapidement. Nous le pouvons en les dénonçant avec les preuves de notre vidéo.

Courage et confiance, Amitiés à tous

Jean-Bernard Fourtillan

*Expert en pharmacologie et ancien professeur des universités.

ENGLISH TRANSLATION

Message sent by Prof. Jean-Bernard Fourtillan*

to well-known personalities

Dear friends, I am pleased to send you our latest video Jasper Mader and AgoraTV. I consider it as a decisive piece for our future, insofar as we bring all the irrefutable proofs which denounce the Pasteur Institute, their sponsors and their accomplices of the New World Order, authors of the false pandemic of Covid-19. The people of France and of the whole world, who now know the truth, must stand up and quickly free themselves from this Covidist dictatorship which seeks to exterminate and enslave them. I communicate to you this revisionist text of Jacques Attali, extracted from the Future of Life, Michel Salomon, 1981, which confirms, in the slightest detail, their satanic and eugenic project prepared since a long time:

“In the future it will be a matter of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as he exceeds 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and he costs society a lot. Then the weak, then the useless who bring nothing to the society because there will be more and more of them, and finally the stupid ones.

“Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. Of course, we will not be able to execute people or make camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good. The population is too large, and for the most part useless, and this is something that is economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to stop abruptly than for it to deteriorate gradually. We won’t be able to test millions and millions of people for intelligence either, you bet! We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.

“We will have taken care to have foreseen the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots will thus take care of itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse by themselves. “

(Excerpt from The Future of Life, Michel Salomon, 1981)

To view the video in French:

https://odysee.com/@AgoraTVNEWS:5/Fin_de_Partie:1

Now that you know the truth, you must follow the recommendations of Artemisia College:

“Do not/no longer obey the orders of the criminals, refuse the mask, the distancing, the confinement, the false vaccines… On the other hand, take charge of your health! You think that by obeying it will stop… when it is because you obey that it continues… Everything can stop in a few days if you decide to. “

We must end it quickly. We can do it by denouncing them with the evidence of our video.

Courage and confidence, Friendships to all

Jean-Bernard Fourtillan

*Expert in pharmacology and former university professor.

** Or here: https://tvs24.ru/pub/watch/2952/fin-de-partie-pour-institut-pasteur/ (12 mn 30)
And here: https://odysee.com/@ArtemisiaCollege:7/end_of_party_for_pasteur_institute:0 (12 mn 30)

¡Viva Guadalajara!

REPUBLISHED FROM DEC. 11, 2019

Written in Socratic jest for Mons. Juan Ignacio Arrieta,
Secretary of the Pontifical Commission for Legal Texts,

and presented viva voce by Br. Bugnolo to him in person on that morning.

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In the conclave of 2243, the Cardinals of the Roman Church, in their final votation, elected a Spaniard.

So, according to the rules established by Pope John Paul II, on February 22, 1996, in the document Universi Dominici Gregis, n. 87, the Cardinal Deacon, the Secretary of the College of Cardinals and the Master of Ceremonies for Pontifical Liturgies approach the Spanish Cardinal and ask him in these solemn words if he will accept his election:  Do you accept your canonical election as the Supreme Pontiff?

Silence.

Then the Cardinal Deacon signals with his eyes to the Elected Cardinal, asking for an answer.

The Cardinal Elect, smiles, then extends both hands to each side and forms the V sign. With that he says in a clear voice: ¡Viva Guadalajara!

The Spanish Cardinals in the Sistine Chapel, familiar with the jocularity of the Elected Cardinal, giggle. The Cardinal from Barcelona says to himself, “What a joker! But this is not a time for laughs!”

The Secretary of the College gives a stern look at the Cardinal Elect. He is not amused at this kind of levity. So he turns to the Cardinal Deacon, who is perplexed, and whispers: “Let’s ask him again”.

So the aged Cardinal Deacon, turns to the Cardinal Elect, and asks again, this time in Spanish: ¿Acepta su elección canónica como Sumo Pontífice?

Silence.

Then, the Cardinal Elect, answers: raising both his right and left hand as before, and making the V sign with each, he says: ¡Viva Guadalajara! — This time with an even bigger smile on his face.

At this point, the Cardinals break their silence, and mixed mutterings of insouciance and consternation.

The Cardinal Deacon, now impatient, says to the Cardinal Elect: “This is no time to make jokes. Please answer the question with a Yes or a No”. Then recomposing himself, he repeats the canonical question, this time in Italian: Accetti la tua elezione canonica a Sommo Pontefice?

And again, the Cardinal Elect responds in the same manner.

At this point, the Cardinals in the Sistine Chapel break out in small groups of conversation. Everyone is trying to figure out what the Cardinal Elect means to say. The Spanish Cardinals approach the Elect and attempt to reason with him. But he says nothing futher. All he does is keep smiling and raising his right and left hand now and then with the V sign, for victory.

So in accord with the Papal Law on Conclaves, UDG, n. 5, the Cardinal from Paris asks that the College discuss and decide what is to be done, since the Papal Law says nothing about the manner in which the Cardinal Elect is to accept the office, whether it be by a Yes or No or by some other sign.

Two factions arise among the Cardinals. On the one side, a minority hold that the Cardinal Elect, by the words used has not accepted his election and must be considered either in error or mad. On the other side, the position taken is that of the Cardinal of Mexico City, who reasons this way: There is no more certain a manner of indicating that one has accepted the dignity of a prince than to respond in a manner which requires his listeners to acquiesce to his authority. Now by responding in this manner, does not the Cardinal Elect clearly show his intent to act like a prince? And therefore, his intention to accept the election? Is he not just putting our loyalty to the test? I for one will not fail in my loyalty to the Supreme Pontiff in this his first act of office!

This line of reasoning wins over the majority and they vote to regard the manner of speech chosen by the Cardinal Elect as meaning, “Yes, I accept”.

The Cardinal Deacon, then approaches the Cardinal Elect and asks him by which name he wants to be known. He replies, “Ignazio I”.

And years pass. And there is nothing controversial in the pontificate of Ignatius the First. Not in the least.

Except for this one thing.

Every time journalists manage to get an interview with him, and they ask him about the moment of his election as Pope, they ask him what he said, and he says: ¡Viva Guadalajara!

About 6 years into his reign as pope, one journalist, by the name of Marco Tosatti III, wanting to understand this better, asks a very specific question of Pope Ignatius I, during a plan trip.

Tosatti III: I know, your Holiness, has been asked this same question many times. And we are all impressed by your talent for humor and your jocundity, which is so unique among the Popes. But the day of your election, if I may ask again, can you tell just what you said, when the Cardinal Deacon asked you if you would accept your canonical election?

Ignatius I: I said, ¡Viva Guadalajara!

Tosatti III: Is that all you said?

Ignatius I: Yes.

Tosatti III: Did you not say, Yes?

Ignatius I: No, I never said Yes or No. I simply said, ¡Viva Guadalajara!

Marco Tosatti III publishes his interview and it goes round the world. The Pope never said yes.

A few days later, another Italian Vaticanista, by the name of Sandro Magister V, obtains an interview with the aged Cardinal Deacon, who confirms the story: Yes, he never said, yes. In fact there was a controversy in the Conclave, and now that Pope Ignatius I has abolished the pontifical secret on his election, I can reveal that we held a vote in accord with Universi Dominici Gregis, n. 5, and we determined that canonically speaking, this phrase, ¡Viva Guadalajara! would be taken to mean, “yes, I accept”.

Magister V also publishes his interview, which causes even more of an uproar and travels round the world.

About two weeks later, an old lady from the suburb of Madrid, Spain, where Pope Ignatius I grew up, flys to Rome and enters the Piazza of St Peter with a sign, saying, “He is not the Pope!” The Gendarmerie, the Vatican Police, attempt to take the sign from her, there is a scuffle and they end up punching her and she punching them back. Eventually they take both her and the sign away.

But the pilgrims in the piazza photograph and video record the entire travesty and these images go world wide on all social media platforms.

The next day in all the majors newspapers and MSM sites the one topic is why they beat up this poor old women. And the journalists who are allowed to interview her in the Vatican jail all receive the same statement, prepared by her attorney: In my suburb of Madrid, where I grew up with Pope Ignatius I, the phrase, ¡Viva Guadalajara! has always meant, “You got to be kidding. I would no more agree to that than support the team from Guadalajara, by shouting ¡Viva Guadalajara! at a soccer match with our own team!”

At this news, journalists flock to Madrid, Spain and interview all those they can find who knew the Pope as a child or youngster. And they all agree that what this old lady said is the absolute truth.

And these journalists report what they find. And, the next day, Ignatius I gives an interview and says: You see, there is nothing I hate more that arrogance and sycophantry. So when I saw that there were no worthy candidates for the Papacy, I determined to do what I could to delay as much as possible the Conclave, so the most unworthy ones would be taken by the Lord or not be able to vote, having reached the age of 80. So I contrived the deception I used to fool everyone. And it worked. But now that my purpose has achieved its goal, I willing admit that I was never pope, because I never accepted my election as the Supreme Pontiff. Therefore, I will now stop pretending to be pope and go back to Madrid and enjoy my final years of life by drinking cerveza and watching the Madrid Soccer team. Good-bye and Adios!

_____________

The Limits of Discretion

So ends the fictional canonical case I have created. As you can see, strange things can happen if the discretion which we Catholics traditionally accord to the Cardinals goes beyond all limits. There are just some things they cannot do even if they want to.

One thing they cannot do, even if they want to, regards the interpretation of verbal texts. As a translator of medieval texts, I understand well that there are 3 ways of determining the meaning of any obscure phrase. The first is intrinsic, the second extrinsic and the third is referential.

Intrinsic methods look to the meaning of the words used and their grammatical structure. Extrinsic methods look to the context in which the phrase is used and impose a theory about what the intent was in the author’s mind in using the obscure phrase. Referential methods look for other occurrences of the same obscure phrase in the writings of the same author, his contemporaries or those authors he read or cited.

And as a translator, I have learned the hard way, that the worse method of interpretation is the extrinsic method. The intrinsic method can be used but it requires great discretion and a good knowledge of the author one is reading. The referential method is the most certain but one has to take into account that every author might use standard phrases slightly differently.

¡Viva Guadalajara!

As can be seen from the fictional case I have constructed, grave error can arise when the ones who should be interpreting the meaning of things said by the Pope use the extrinsic method, by adopting the context of the phrase and some theory of what the intention was of the one saying it, and from these two data points extrapolate the meaning of the phrase.

This has been no idle study. And though you may find this story humorous, that is not my intention. Because though it regards what could happen regarding the very first moment an man becomes the Pope, the same interpretational problem can arise in the very last moment a man is the Pope, that is in an Act of Renunciation.

Because, when a man renounces the papacy, Canon 332 §2 requires that he say something that signifies, In my capacity as Roman Pontiff, I renounce the munus which I received in the Apostolic Succession from Saint Peter, the day I accepted my election as Supreme Pontiff by the College of Cardinals.

The words do not have to be the ones I just wrote, but they have to signify essentially the same thing.

If you say, however, I declare that I renounce the ministry which was entrusted to me through the hands of the Cardinals, the day I was elected, then you have a problem. Because no where in the Code of Canon Law, nor in Canonical Tradition, nor in the mind of Pope John Paul II do we find any clear equation or predication of munus by ministerium. To hold that Pope Benedict’s renunciation of ministry means a renunciation of munus is an interpretation, unfounded in the law. Moreover, the Cardinals and Bishops and Clergy who hold this interpretation have no authority in the law to interpret the Papal Act in this manner.

We need to be adults and admit this problem of interpretation.

And the ones who committed this error have to grow up and stop insisting that we follow them in it. After all, religious extremism does not consist in refusing an error of interpretation. Religious extremism consists in insisting, like ISIS, that we accept their errors of interpretation or else.

CREDITS: the image of the Cathedral of Madrid is taken from the Wikipedia article on the Facade of the Cathedral of Madrid and is used under the wiki commons license described there.

 

Benedict XVI’s Masterstroke — PDF Booklets

FromRome.Info presents here Br. Bugnolo’s authorized English translation of Andrea Cionci’s Article

La possibile ricostruzione del “piano B” di papa Benedetto XVI

which was published by the Libero, on April 6, 2021, in Italian.

Due to the length of the original, FromRome.Info publishes the translation in 4 parts.

READ ON LINE >> PART IPART IIPART III PART IV

A Reconstruction of Ratzinger’s possible Plan B

to cancel the church of Bergoglio with a complete purification of the Church

A Purposefully invalid Resignation? — We investigate the thesis of Attorney Acosta and various theologians

by Andrea Cionci

Here is the entire English translation, with links, in a PDF File, WHICH IS FREE TO DOWNLOAD. Please spam the world with this document. Especially send to Cardinals, Bishops, Priests, Deacons, Seminarian, Religious, Journalists, political leaders. Let’s get the world to open their eyes about what is really going on in the Vatican!

PDF in English

PDF en español

PDF em português

____

REVISIONS:  Added on April 17, at 10:15 P.M., the official Spanish and Portuguese translations of the same.

Revised on April 12, 2021, at 8:16 P. M. Rome Time, to remove a typographical error.

Revised on April 12, 2021, at 7:48 P. M. Rome Time, to remove some typographical errors.