Category Archives: Action Items

An Appeal to support and join, Br. Bugnolo’s Humanitarian Mission to Ukraine

Here AJ and Br. Bugnolo discuss what they and their volunteers did for the Christian Ukrainian people in 2022, through the non-profit Br. Bugnolo founded in Ukraine: And learn what YOU can do by supporting or VOLUNTEERING with Cross Azure, this Spring, as Br. Bugnolo aims to return to Ukraine to help the Christians victims of this horrible war. — Click the image above to watch on Bitchute, Odysee, Rumble, or at OMC Radio TV, or watch here the Rumble Version:

It’s now Open Civil War in the Catholic Church



The movement is called the Sutri Movement. You can read more about it here.

It consists in a letter writing campaign to the Catholic Bishops in Lazio, Italy, who have the canonical right to depose a claimant to the papacy if he be found to be a heretic, schismatic, apostate or invalidly elected.

Other efforts will include lobbying them to heed the letters received. Catholics have begun this letter writing campaign back on Oct. 20, 2023. If we can get thousands of letters via email or surface mail sent to each bishop, they will see how important it is for them to act.

If you would like to contribute to the Sutri Fund, to lobby the Bishops of the Catholic Church to depose Bergoglio, donate below. For more about the Sutri Initiative, see here.

This fund will be administered by Br. Alexis Bugnolo, author of the initiative. See his other writings about this here. These funds are being collected by the Massachusetts non-profit, Save Old St. Mary’s inc., which sponsors brother’s apostolic works for the Church.


The above video can also be seen and shared from Youtube:

UPDATE: Canon Peters says Pope Francis has no canonical authority to remove Bishop Strickland without cause:

UPDATE: Cardinal Mueller: the sacking of Strickland is an abuse of divine right:

Redeeming a Monastery? & Update on Br. Bugnolo

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

As a brief update regarding my search for a new home, I have found many interesting properties on the market, but none which I can afford.

I am very thankful for the support all of you have sent. But after spending a month searching on all the major national real estate sites in Italy, in every part of the country, a place suitable as a hermitage (a single house on at least one acre) cannot be found for anything I can afford, in a zone outside 5G. Thankfully the Italians have learned to flee to the countryside. Unfortunately I have arrived long after the rush. — In the USA, too, since I have no job, salary, paycheck or bank account, I cannot rent. I am currently staying with a poor family in Italy, who has taken me in to their own home as you read the first Catholics did with Saint Paul in the Acts of the Apostles, with pure christian charity.

I see this as God’s will, that I should move on. With the comming digital economy, being supported by benefactors who read my criticism of the WEF and Agenda 2030 is going soon to become impossible. I have to switch over to some other work, to survive what is to come. And I cannot keep asking my readers here at in desperate posts for financial help. I also think that the Globalists have abandoned their Plandemic 2.0, because they tried the 5G triggers and they did not work to produce the pandemics they wanted. As I warned on August 19, they were most likely already sending out such signals. But since no pandemic occurred as of mid September, it was clear the technology failed to work. This is why we have had 2 new wars in a month, Sept 19 in Artsakh, and October 7 in the Holy Land. And I expect new wars each month, as the Globalists desperately try to dominate the narrative.

For this reason, I think that readership at FromRome.Info will slowly go elsewhere, since it was the fear of the Scamdemic which brought us all together and helped us work to get out the truth. That apostolate therefore is at a end, if the WEF has changed course.

Personally, the only ambition I have is to return to my religious life in a monastery. Maybe start a Medieval Institute to teach the true and authentic Scholastic Theology. Promote the Ancient Roman Rite and Gregorian Chant. Those are my priorities. The funds donated for my move will pay for my food and lodging and travel until I find such a place. — I will look in Europe, because the true popes of the Future will need such places of refuge, which will certainly be far and few, because of the nearly total apostasy of ecclesiastical institutions. Only such monasteries in private hands will survive.

Thus, in the course of my property searches, I have keep my eye on those properties which some Catholic needs to redeem. Ancient places where Jesus was worshiped, which now have fallen into the hands of greedy godless folk.

Here are some of them:

A Monastery from the 5th Century, turned into a hotel.



A great deal of the silly vain furniture would have to go, the pool would have to be turned into a catfish pond, and the chapels would have to be restored. But its basically in good order. If any Catholic wanted to redeem this property, all I can do other than help in the transaction, is offer to be manager for free thereafter. I think this would be a great place to restore traditional Franciscan life, establish a Center for Scholastic Theology, Seminary or host the pope in the time of the antichrist. Lots of possibilities.

This second monastery, from the 16th century, offers the same opportunities, at about half the price. Plus it comes with about 13 acres of agricultural land.




Click to learn more.

This third monastery, from the 14th century, is even cheaper, at about a third of the price of the previous one, and comes with 140 acres, mostly arable land which could produce large amounts of food in the age of Globalist madness which is about to fall upon us all. Its a fixer-upper and is truly more Franciscan. Another listing for it is found here. It is currently an organic farm, which is a big plus. One can easily avoid the Agenda 2030 by returning to the medieval practices of life without electricity and chemicals.



Click for more information.

The fourth monastery was a Franciscan Convent. The Church was already stolen at the time of the Risorgimento and belongs to the city. But the convent is evidently in the hands of some private owner who wants to sell it because he does not have the money to repair it.

Perhaps there is someone who reads who wants to redeem from purgatory all his ancestors by such a holy work. Or even better, renounce the world and become a monk, and use his wealth to redeem a monastery?

A Message to Young Zealous Catholics: What is true devotion to the Martyrs of the Vendée?

For a complete list of Br. Bugnolo’s videos in the Series, TRUE DEVOTION, click here.

IF YOU LIKE THIS VIDEO, YOU WILL WANT TO WATCH, “True Devotion to Christ the King”.

A Brief presentation by Ordo Militaris Radio / TV about the War of the Vendée, here.

Br. Bugnolo is a co-founder of Ordo Militaris Catholicus, an international catholic security initiative to help Catholics  who are being persecuted. You can read more about them, here.

Br. Bugnolo: I call on all to urge Pope Francis to consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart!

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

As I have written before, the sign that the man elected to succeed Benedict XVI is the true pope, will be that he consecrates Russia to the Immaculate Heart and it converts. That God gave this sign to end confusion in the Church is intimated in the fact that this promise is attached to the revelation that the pope would have much to suffer and be opposed by the whole world.

So I urge that all Catholics who doubt that Francis is not the true pope to do one act of sincere faith, and join with me in asking him to Consecrate Russia to Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart.

Because if you are sincere in your desire to know if he is the true Pope, and doubt anything about his recent election, now is the time to ask God for a sign, which He has always promised to the true Pope in communion with the bishops of the world.

The College of Cardinals has failed; now’s its the Faithful’s turn to act

The College of Cardinals is now in grave violation of the Papal Law on Conclaves, having failed to convene by the 20th day,
they have lost their exclusive right to validly elect the Successor of Pope Benedict XVI in a conclave.

(Universi Dominici Gregis, n. 37 and nn. 76, 77)

That right now returns by Apostolic Ordinance to the Faithful of the Roman Church.





For how to donate see here.

Brother misspoke twice: “Peter gave to the whole (Roman) Church”, and “Benedict XVI” not “Benedict II”

How to Support the Election of Benedict XVI’s Successor

The B16 Election Fund

Under the Spiritual Care of St. Lawrence, Deacon Martyr of the Roman Church

Those wishing to assist the Roman Catholics at Rome in their efforts to organize a juridically valid election, according to Apostolic Right, of the Roman Pontiff, the Successor of St. Peter, and of Pope Benedict XVI, are invited to make a generous donation for the salvation of the Church by the following means, listed below.

For more information about this fund, see here.

These funds will be used to rent spaces, purchase advertising, and create publicity, as well as to organize events and provide for those who attend, so that this Holy Work can be achieved.

The Roman Church includes nearly 6000 clergy and 4 Million Faithful, and so providing for their assembly is a massive task.

Any funds which remain after the election of Pope Benedict XVI’s Successor will be donated entirely to the Apostolic Treasury of the one Elected, as the first act of homage and gratitude to God and the new Roman Pontiff for taking up the challenge of being His Vicar on Earth for a flock now more endanger than ever in its history.

There are 3 ways to donate, via Zelle, PayPal or by Bank Wire. You are encouraged to donate via Zelle or PayPal, because of the urgent need to transfer these funds to  Rome. The donation method via bankwire will cause your funds to arrive as much as 5 days after you make the wire, due to the delay in the banking system.

    • Requests for refunds of your donation can be made via leaving a comment on any page of FromRome.Info, indicating the full civil name of the account holder, payment receipt information, transaction number, and your email used during the transaction. This information will not be published but will be used to authenticate your request. Please allow 1-2 weeks to reverse your payment. In some cases, the fees collected by the payment processor might not be able to be refunded to you.


Zelle is a payment app which enables instant transfer of funds between Bank Accounts in the USA. You can load this app on your cellphone and integrate it with your bank account, or for many Banks, you can send via Zelle from your online account. The advantage of Zelle is practically fee-less and instant. Zelle is not available for many banks in the USA or outside of the USA. Zelle sends funds via an email identifier. See graphic here below for the email address. Replace “HYPHEN” with – symbol and “AT” with @ symbol, and “DOT” with a period.

Funds received via ZELLE are collected by Ordo Militaris Inc., a Montana Corporation (USA) dedicated to the assistance of persecuted Catholics the world over. It’s B16 Election Fund is a dedicated reserved fund to be used only for the purposes described above and not to accrue to the services, assets or profits of the Corporation. Funds collected but not spent will be donated to the Apostolic Treasury as indicated above.


Anyone with a credit card or debit card can donate via PayPal. PayPal takes about 2.3% of the donation as a fee for its services. You can make a donation via PayPal as a guest, without creating an account with them.

Donations via PayPal are collected by Save Old St. Mary’s Inc., a Massachusetts, USA, 501(c)(3) registered Charity. For US residents, who itemize their donations on their tax returns, donations to this fund may qualify for a tax deduction.


Send bank wires in Euros ONLYWHAT IS a SEPA Country? — WARNING: Many countries do not qualify to send bank wires to these accounts listed below.

INDICATE B16FUND in the reason for your bankwire

For Bank wires in Euros from countries in the EU and SEPA (1-2 days):

Account Name: Ordo Militaris Inc
IBAN: BE77967318468342
Account Number:3184683
Bank: Wise, Avenue Louise 54, Room S52, Brussels, 1050, Belgium

For Bank wires in Euros from OUTSIDE OF the EU and SEPA (4-5 days):

Account Name: Ordo Militaris Inc.. 

      • Recipient SWIFT code/BIC: TRWIBEB1XXX
      • Correspondent SWIFT code/BIC: BARCGB22

IBAN: BE77 9673 1846 8342
Bank: WISE, Avenue Louise 54, Room S52 Brussels 1050 Belgium

Funds received via Bank Wire are collected by Ordo Militaris Inc., a Montana Corporation (USA) dedicated to the assistance of persecuted Catholics the world over. It’s B16 Election Fund is a dedicated reserved fund to be used only for the purposes described above and not to accrue to the services, assets or profits of the Corporation. Funds collected but not spent will be donated to the Apostolic Treasury as indicated above.

The above information about BANK WIRES in PDF:


CREDITS: The Featured Image is that of the Marble Statue of St. Lawrence, in the Basilica of St. Lawrence, here at Rome, taken by Br. Alexis Bugnolo (all rights reserved).

In burying Benedict, they think they have buried the Church …

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Now, that they have buried Benedict, they think that with him they have buried the Church.

The Church which believes that a man is a man from conception until death, and that a woman is a woman from conception until death.
The Church which believes that human sexuality is for reproduction not entertainment.
The Church which believes that it is morally unacceptable that man be enslaved by ideologies.
The Church which believes that words have meanings which men cannot change at will.
The Church which believes in property rights, for man and for God.
The Church which believes that usury and fraud and sodomy and pedophilia are crimes which shout out to God for vengeance.
The Church which believes that Catholics have the right to rule the world, and not the godless.
The Church which believes, above all that there is a God and that He is Man’s creator, redeemer, savior, and king.
The Church which believes, that Jesus was crucified, died, buried, AND who rose from the dead!
The Church which believes with Peter in all which Jesus Christ taught and did, as the Son of the Living God.

This is the Church which they believe they have buried with Benedict. And that message was clear, as the Anti-Pope sat enthroned in front of Benedict’s coffin, gloating over his apparent victory.

And now we all experience that which Our Lady and the Apostles experienced at the death of Our Lord. For when the shepherd is struck, the flock scatters. And darkness has fallen over the whole Church of Rome. Persons who were staunch and firm in the faith days before, cheering in large assemblies for Pope Benedict XVI are now silent and full of doubts and fear. And my dismay and disappointment has grown large as a sea, and as stormy as a sea in a hurricane. For the number of those who want to end this dark night has grown so few. And in just a few days, I am told to my horror, notable persons will declare that no election be undertaken.

But just as Pope Benedict XVI taught us, it is in the darkest hours that we who believe in the One who rose from the Death, must testify to the truth and stand against all the howling gales which pour forth from the Gates of the Netherworld.

Therefore, to one and all, who recognize that Pope Benedict XVI was the pope until death, never renouncing the petrine munus: to all of you, wherever you are in the world and whatever language you speak, I make a solemn promise before God, the Most Holy Trinity: that I will not go silently into the night; I will not tolerate that the Church of Rome be without a divinely approved shepherd; I will not, because I will not cease to believe in the One who has risen from the Dead, who can make water gush from rocks and the dead rise from the grave, because it is at His word that the Heavens and Earth were made.

Thus I promise that I will militate until by last breath and to every sacrifice, if necessary, that the Church of Rome elect a successor to Pope Benedict XVI, no matter what other decision any other shall make. For I have it on good authority, that all the leaders in Italy will shortly announce that no election should take place. That instead, we should wait for the death of Bergoglio, the antipope.


For now, still, however, I will await that the Cardinal Deacon of the College of Cardinals, who has personally received the Solemn Admonition, make a decision. I understand that that College is compromised with invalid electors. But I recognize that if there is good will in any, to call for a Conclave, that God will offer the grace to do it right. I will therefore wait until the 20th day, when it will become obvious that the Cardinals cannot enter into Conclave by the 21st. That day will come on January 20th (calculating in the most liberal way as to give them more time). And if they do not, then I will announce a “crusade” to convoke the Faithful of the Dioceses of Rome, Albano, Ostia, Velletri-Segni, Palestrina, Sabina Poggio Mireto, Porto Santa Rufina, and Frascati, to exercise their apostolic right to elect a successor to Pope Benedict XVI.

I tell you all these things now, because, if when that hour comes, and I am left standing alone to remedy this solemn need, I will call upon all Catholics in communion with Pope Benedict XVI world wide, to form an international coalition to assist in this endeavor: that each group out there, send its representative to Rome, to do as I have done these 3 years, to militate for this and keep those at home informed, while joining in the work and in the fundraising necessary to promote a juridically valid election of the Successor of St. Peter. This will be a massive task that will require legally notifying every member of the clergy of these 8 dioceses, AND attempting through media of all kinds, to notify the millions of faithful in these dioceses to exercise their apostolic right and convene in an assembly for an election.

Therefore, I ask you now to join with me in prayer, that the Cardinals do their duty, and that if they do not, that God might raise up a mighty army, howsoever small, of determined zealous faithful from round the world, to see this holy work done, for the salvation of souls and the glorification of Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, Who has already promised us and purchased for us, the victory in this battle. And who has given us an Immaculate Queen who is terrible as an army in battle array!

Amen. Amen. Let it be! Fiat.



CREDITS: The Featured Image is the tomb of Christ, exposed for the first time in 2016 since 1550, when it was covered with a slab of marble. You can read all about this fascinating history, at the Irish Times, here.

The Sutri Initiative: Why I support it

This Appeal is directed to every Catholic Influencer on Social Media who realizes that Bergoglio is destroying the Church

Everyone in favor of this appeal is invited to make their own video-appeal in their own language, and it will be posted here:

Here is Br. Bugnolo’s Contribution, from Dec. 9. 2022:

The contributions of other influencers, will be published on this page, with the most recent, at the top.


A Manifesto for the free Peoples of the Earth — Text and Video

These videos and text have been released to the public domain and can be distributed in any medium by anyone anywhere. Please share them to everyone. The Time is Short!


Why I am redoing my famous video from YouTube entitled, “A Manifesto for the Free Peoples of the Earth”, on my FromRome Info Video Channel, which aired on April 19, 2020, but removed on Sept. 28, 2022.


When in the course of Human existence, it becomes necessary for humanity to break free from injustice and corruption, it has ever been recognized, lauded, and praised, that humans, yearning to be free, have risen up and overthrown their evil overlords.

This is innately recognized as right and necessary, because the honest and innocent man by his very nature has the right to not be oppressed and punished, exploited or swindled.  This is even more true among the societies of men, than in our personal relationships or contracts.

For as Aristotle says, there is no society of men, unless there is a coalition of the many to defend the honest against the wicked. And it cannot be simply to conduct business, or else it is not a state, but a mere social compact.

Since the declaration of the Pandemic in January of 2020, the free peoples of the Earth have been subjected to an intentional plan of extermination, medical experimentation, psychological manipulation, social deprivation, starvation, and a coordinated plan of civil repression and enslavement, all focused on inducing each and every one of us, under the illicit use of governmental force and power, to take injections of substances, called ‘vaccines’, to permanently destroy or alter our natural biological functions at the cellular or genetic levels.

Millions have already been killed during this international Scam. Hundreds of Millions are going to die as a result of these injections. This is without doubt the greatest crime against humanity, in the history of humanity itself!

At Nuremberg, following the Second World War, the Nations of the Earth assembled to put on trial the men who were deemed most responsible for the unspeakable crimes against humanity committed during it. Many were hung, too many light sentences were handed out, and many were not even brought to trial.

Since the outbreak of the Scamdemic in 2020, a grass-roots internationally diverse, spontaneous host of private investigators, experts, doctors, journalists and private citizens began an investigation into this international conspiracy, and the conclusions of that investigation have been corroborated by hundreds of thousands of citizens, doing research on the internet, in archives, in laboratories, and through the testimony of tens of thousands gathered and published on alternative media sites.

The conclusion is clear: that the Globalists have decided to enslave humanity by 2030. Their slogan, “You will own nothing and be happy” is the cover for the establishment of a new, demonic Feudalism, in which no more than 500 Million of us will be allowed to live, and these will serve as genetically re-engineered slaves of the elite of the elite, perhaps some 5000 families, who will own everything, and be able to do whatever they want without regard to any norm of morality or ethics.

This elite has been working towards this goal for more than 100 years and has crafted an intricate, interlocking network of financial, economic, political, religious and social organizations and groups to push an entirely false narrative as a cover for advancing step-by-step to that moment in history in which they could launch their Armageddon against Humanity with impunity, and with the least possible resistance from the unwashed masses of useless-eaters.

This is the War which was launched against Humanity in January 2020. Every other narrative about current events is merely a cover or distraction to keep us from recognizing this.

These Globalists have been convicted in the court of public opinion on the basis of their own deeds and words, without any recourse to theories of collaboration or conspiracy.

For these reasons, the Free Peoples of the Earth must now take decisive coordinated action. We must act and not react, because the time is short, and our genocide has already been put into motion.

Wherefore, WE the Free Peoples of the Earth, to liberate ourselves from the cruel, evil, satanic, malign, misanthropic designs of the Globalists, do declare:

THAT WE ARE FREE FROM THE MOMENT OF OUR EXISTENCE and that no group of men or women, however powerful, rich, influential or cruel, has the right to govern us and expect from us obedience and service.

That injustice by its very intention, make all governments lose their authority.

That all peoples have the right to remove corrupt leaders, classes, elites, groups, and secret societies which militate against the honesty, freedom, independence, good and rights of human persons anywhere at any time.

Therefore, empowered by the Natural Rights due every Human Person, we declare the Globalist Elite to be OUTLAWS, guilty of capital crimes and by every rational and reasonable measure deserving of immediate arrest, detention, trial and condemnation.

We hereby call upon all our fellow brothers and sisters of the Human Race, to rise up against this Global Conspiracy and take whatever actions are necessary to remove from power, ownership and control, anyone who is cooperating with it.

This is our call to rebellion, revolution, and liberty. As a Race we cannot survive, as we have always lived on Earth, without it!


Dopo Ganswein ammette errori nella Declaratio, un Appello per un Concilio Provinciale Romano

di Fra Alexis Bugnolo

La prego di condividere ciò con tutti i vescovi sottomenzionati.


Fra le sorprendenti dichiarazioni fatte dall’Arcivescovo Ganswein al fratello di Padre Gebhard l’altro giorno, durante una lunga, forbita telefonata che è stata registrata, vi è questa: che ci sono ERRORI nel testo latino della Declaratio di Papa  Benedetto XVI, fatta l’11 Febbraio 2013, A.D., quando come il Monsignore vorrebbe farci credere, egli rinunciò al Papato. Diversi esperti per nove anni hanno studiato quel testo da un punto di vista teologico, canonistico, latinista, grammaticale, contestuale e meta-significativo e tutti sono giunti alla conclusione che la Rinuncia fatta in esso non è conforme alle obbligazioni del Canone 332, par. 2, in modo tale da non lasciare nessun ragionevole dubbio che fosse valida. E questo perché, nel rinunciare al ministero ricevuto dalle mani dei Cardinali nel giorno della sua elezione canonica, Papa Benedetto XVI non ha rinunciato debitamente al munus petrino che ha ricevuto da Cristo quando ha risposto “ si “, alla domanda del sostituto del Cardinale Decano se accettasse l’elezione (visto che il Cardinale Ratzinger stesso era il Decano).

Adesso c’è un solo modo nella Chiesa Cattolica per risolvere questo dubbio, che non è più un dubbio accademico, ovvero sollevato da studiosi ed esperti, ma un dubbio diventato CANONICO, basato sulla testimonianza registrata di un arcivescovo della Chiesa Romana, nientemeno con l’autorità del segretario personale di Papa Benedetto XVI, al tempo in cui la Declaratio fu scritta e proclamata.

E’ diventato un dubbio canonico perché:

  1. L’esistenza di errori nel documento è stata riconosciuta da colui che sarebbe normalmente considerato un testimone di altissima probità, il segretario personale del Papa;
  2. Che, inoltre, è anche un arcivescovo della Santa Romana Chiesa.

Poiché gli errori nel testo possono, in virtù dei canoni 40 e 41, dare motivo ad ogni FEDELE, CHIERICO o LAICO, di continuare a riconoscere Benedetto XVI come il Papa, sulla base del principio canonico, “ Papa renuntiatus dubie, Papa ahuc est “, ovvero “ un Papa che ha rinunciato in modo dubbio, è ancora il Papa “, vi è una controversia REALE, LEGALE, che è OGGETTIVA, EFFETTIVA, DOCUMENTATA e CERTIFICATA pubblicamente da studiosi e ora dall’arcivescovo.*

Faccio appello a tutti i fedeli di DOMANDARE, INSISTERE, SPRONARE e RICHIEDERE un Concilio Provinciale della Provincia Romana per esaminare questo caso e risolvere questo dubbio!

Faccio presente che le presenti condizioni previamente menzionate rendono opportuna la convocazione di un Concilio Provinciale nella Provincia di Roma secondo il Canone 440, par. 1 e che tale Concilio è autorizzato dal Canone 445 a fare una dichiarazione vincolante riguardo alla disciplina ecclesiastica in questa materia.

Tale Concilio può essere convocato quando il Metropolita della Provincia ( in questo caso, il Vescovo di Roma ) è impedito come si legge nel Canone 442, par. 2, che stabilisce che in tal caso uno dei Vescovi della Provincia, eletto dalla maggioranza degli altri, fa le veci del Metropolita per convocare il Concilio, come si evince dal Canone 442, par. 1.

Questo status di impedito è ottenuto dalla vera natura della controversia, perché se Papa Benedetto XVI è ancora il Papa, ma non esercita più il ministero della Sede Apostolica, allora la Sede è impedita.

Vi è anche impedimento perché se i Fedeli non sanno con certezza canonica chi è il vero Papa, si genererà confusione nella Chiesa e i Fedeli saranno scomunicati solo per far valere i loro diritti, loro riconosciuti nei Canoni 40 e 41, il che è ridicolo.

Tutti coloro che converranno a tale Concilio sono tenuti ad attenersi al Canone 444,  par. 1. Coloro che hanno diritto ad un voto deliberativo, possono nominare un procuratore se non possono essere presenti.

Per indire un tale Concilio tale da risolvere questa Crisi Canonica, è necessario:

  • Convocare Papa Benedetto XVI e Jorge Mario Bergoglio come rivendicatori del Munus Petrino ed invitare entrambi ad acconsentire l’approvazione di una convocazione, sebbene canonicamente questo non sia necessario, a causa della natura della controversia, che rende moralmente impossibile per ogni Cattolico riconoscere entrambi come legittimi allo stesso tempo.
  • Convocare ed interrogare l’Arcivescovo Ganswein ed altri studiosi, al riguardo degli errori nella Declaratio di Papa Benedetto XVI, resa il 13 Febbraio, 2013.
  • Chiedere a Papa Benedetto se fosse mai sua intenzione rinunciare al Munus Petrino e, nello specifico, se nel rinunciare al Ministero ricevuto dalle manidei Cardinali, avesse mai inteso di rinunciare al Munus ricevuto da Gesù Cristo nella Successione Apostolica.

E perciò ci sia un pronunciamento sulle seguenti questioni controverse:

  • Se una volta che La Declaratio sia stata scritta in conformità alle norme del Canone 17, ciò sia sufficiente ad escludere totalmente il diritto di ogni Fedele a fare ricorso ai Canoni 40 e 41 per ritenere che l’atto sia un atto nullo, invalido, o irrito, e non-esistente.
  • Se per tale motivo sia da presumere che Papa Benedetto detenga ancora il Munus.
  • E se è ancora il Papa, che dichiari il Conclave del 2013, nullo e non canonico.

Poi, conviene in conseguenza:

  • Chiedere a Papa Benedetto XVI, se desidera rinunciare al Munus Petrino, di fare questo nel Concilio, pronunciando questa semplice frase: “ Rinuncio al Munus Petrino, che ho ricevuto il giorno che ho accettato la mia elezione canonica come Romano Pontefice “.

Un tale Concilio non sarà di minore importanza nella Storia della Chiesa  rispetto al Concilio di Sutri tenutosi nel 1046 A.D., durante la settimana che precedeva il Natale. Là, alla presenza di San Ildebrando ( futuro Papa Gregorio VII ) , tre pretendenti al Papato furono deposti e la strada fu aperta per l’elezione di un legittimo successore di Papa Benedetto IX.

I seguenti sono tutti i vescovi delle Diocesi della Provincia Ecclesiastica di Roma, che sollecito a portare avanti questa iniziativa:

Roma:  Impedita,  da convocare: — Papa Benedetto XVI e Papa Francesco, come pure dignitari tipo l’Arcivescovo  Ganswein, l’Arcivescovo Viganò e tutti i Cardinali presenti al Concistoro dell’11 Febbraio, 2013.

Albano: ( Sede Suburbicaria ):  — Mons. Vincenzo Viva

  • Indirizzo postaleCuria Vescovile, Piazza Vescovile 11, 00041 Albano Laziale ( Roma ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 06.932.68.401
  • Fax: 06.932.38.44

Anagni-Alatri: — Mons. Lorenzo Loppa.

  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Vescovile, Via dei Villini 82, 03014, Fiuggi ( Frosinone ), Italia
  • Indirizzo postale: Piazzale Acropoli, 03011, Alatri ( Frosinone ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0775.51.42.14; 0775.43.45.86
  • Fax: 0775.54.71.05

Civita Castellana: — Msr. Romano Rossi

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Diocesana, Piazza Matteotti 27, 01033, Civita Castellana (VT), It.
  • Numero Telefonico: 0761.51.51.52
  • Fax: 0761.59.92.13

Civitavecchia-Tarquinia: — Msr. Gianricco Ruzza

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Piazza Calamatta, 1, 00053 Civitavecchia ( RM ), Italia
  • Via Roma, 11, 01016, Tarquinia ( VT ), Italia 
  • Numero Telefonico: 0766.23.320; 0766.84.08.43
  • Fax: 0766.50.17.96; 0766.85.60.43

Frascati ( Sede Suburbicaria ): — Msr. Raffaello Martinelli ( consacrato e nominato da Papa BXVI )

  • Sito Web Ufficiale: :
  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Paolo III 10, 00044 Frascati ( RM ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 06.942.04.67
  • Fax: 06.940.10.201

Frosinone-Veroli-Ferentino: — Msr. Ambrogio Spreafico

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Via Volsci 105, 03100 Frosinone, Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0775.29.09.73
  • Fax: 0775.20.23.16

Gaeta ( Arcidiocesi ): — Msr. Luigi Vari

  • Sito Web Ufficiale: :
  • Indirizzo postale: Piazza Arcivescovado 2, 04024, Gaeta ( LT ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0771.74.03.41

Latina-Terracina-Sezze-Priverno: — Msr. Mariano Crociata

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Vescovado, Via Sezze 16, 04100 Latina, Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0773.40.68.200
  • Fax: 0773.40.68.202

Montecassino ( Abbazia Territoriale ): — in sede vacante, amministrata da Don Donato Ogliari, OSB

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Abbazia, Via Montecassino, 03043 Cassino ( Frosinone ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0776.31.15.29

Ostia: ( Sede Suburbicaria ) — in sede vacante, amministrata dal Cardinale Angelo de Donatis

  • Indirizzo postale: Vicariato di Roma, Piazza S. Giovanni in Laterano 6/a, 00184, Roma, Italia
  • Numero Telefonico:
  • Fax:

Palestrina ( Sede Suburbicaria ): — Msr. Mauro Parmeggiani

  • Sito Web Ufficiale: :
  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Gregorio Pantanelli 8, 00036, Palestrina ( RM ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 06.953.44.28; 06.953.12.045
  • Fax: 06.953.81.16

Porto-Santa Rufina ( Sede Suburbicaria ): — Gianricco Ruzza ( già di Civitavecchia )

  • Sito Web Ufficiale: :
  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Vescovile, Via del Cenacolo 53, 00123 Roma, Italia
  • Numero Telefonico:
  • Fax:

Rieti ( – S. Salvatore Maggiore ): — in sede vacante

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Vescovado, Via Cintia 83, 02100 Rieti, Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0746.25.361
  • Fax: 0746.20.02.28

Sabina-Poggio Mirteto: ( Sede Suburbicaria ):– Msr. Ernesto Mandara

  • Sito Web Ufficiale: :
  • Indirizzo postale: Vescovado, Piazza Mario Dottori 14, 02047 Poggio Mirteto ( Rieti ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0765.24.755; 0765.24.019
  • Fax: 0765.44.10.19

Subiaco ( Abbazia Territoriale ):– Abate Mauro Meacci

Tivoli:– Msr. Mauro Parmeggiani ( già di Palestrina )

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Sant’Anna 2, 00019 Tivoli ( RM ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0774.33.52.27; 0774.33.09.42/3
  • Fax: 0774.31.32.98

Velletri-Segni: ( Sede Suburbicaria )— Msr. Stefano Russo,

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Curia Vescovile, Corso della Repubblica 343, 00049 Velletri ( RM ), Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 06.963.00.51
  • Fax: 06.961.00.596

Viterbo: — Msr. Lino Fumagalli

  • Sito Web Ufficiale:
  • Indirizzo postale: Palazzo Vescovile, Piazza S. Lorenzo 9/a, 01100 Viterbo, Italia
  • Numero Telefonico: 0761.34.17.16
  • Fax: 0761.30.60.06


** Questo principio è contrario a “ Papa dubius, Papa nullus est “, ovvero un Papa dubbio non è Papa. La logica conversione di questo principio, ribalta il caso canonico di un papa eletto a un papa che rinuncia, poiché il principio originale per farla breve è “ Papa electus dubie, Papa electus non est “, “ un papa eletto in modo dubbio, non è un papa eletto. “






Archbishop Ganswein’s admissions require Redress before a Provincial Council of Rome

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo



Among the stunning statements made by Archbishop Ganswein to the brother of Father Gehard, the other day, during a long polite phone call, which was recorded, is this: that there ARE errors in the Latin text of the Declaratio of Pope Benedict XVI, made on Feb. 11, 2013 A. D., when as the MSM would have us believe it, he renounced the papacy.

Numerous scholars for 9 years have studied that text from the points of view of theology, canon law, Latin, grammar, contextual and meta-signification and all conclude that the Renunciation made in it does not conform with the obligations of Canon 332 §2, in such a way as to leave no reasonable doubt that it was valid. And this, because in renouncing the ministerium received from the hands of the Cardinals on the day of his canonical election, Pope Benedict XVI did not renounce duly the petrine munus he received from Christ Jesus when he responded, “Yes”, to the question of the vice-Dean of the College of Cardinals, as to whether he accepted his election.+

There is, in the Catholic Church, now only one way to resolve this doubt, which is no longer an ACADEMIC doubt, that is, one raised by scholars and experts, but which has now become A CANONICAL DOUBT, based on the recorded testimony of an Archbishop of the Roman Church, no less in authority that the personal secretary of Pope Benedict XVI, at the time the Declaratio was written and pronounced!

It has become canonical because,

  1. The existence of errors in the document has been affirmed by what would normally be considered a witness of the highest probity, the Pope’s personal secretary,
  2. Who is, also an Archbishop of the Holy Roman Church

Since errors in the text can in virtue of Canons 40 and 41 give grounds FOR ANY FAITHFUL, CLERGY OR LAY, to continue to regard Pope Benedict XVI as the pope, on account of the canonical principle, Papa renuntiatus dubie, Papa ahuc est, that is, “A Pope who has renounced in a dubious manner, is still the pope”, there is a REAL, LEGAL controversy which is OBJECTIVE, FACTUAL, DOCUMENTED, AND ATTESTED TO in the public forum by scholars and now the Archbishop.*

I call on all the Faithful TO DEMAND, TO INSIST, TO URGE AND TO REQUEST a provincial council of the Roman Province to hear this case and resolve this doubt!

I submit that the present aforesaid conditions make the convocation of the Provincial Council in the Province of Rome opportune as per canon 440 §1, and that such a council is empowered by canon 445 to make a binding declaration regarding ecclesiastical discipline on this mater.

Such a Council can be convoked when the Metropolitan of the Province (in this case, the Bishop of Rome) is impeded as per canon 442, §2, which established in such  case, that one of the Bishops of the Province, elected by the majority of the others, serves in place of the Metropolitan to convoke the Council, as per canon 442 §1.

This impeded status is obtained by the very nature of the controversy, because if Pope Benedict XVI is still the pope, but no longer exercises the ministry of the Apostolic See, then the See is impeded. It is also impeded because if the Faithful do not know wither canonical certitude whom is the true Pope, there will arise confusion in the Church and Catholics will suffer excommunication for adhering to their rights granted in canons 40 and 41, which is ridiculous.

All those convoked to such a Council are bound to attend, canon 444 §1. Those with a deliberative vote, can name a procurator if they cannot attend.

To call such a Council to resolve this Canonical crisis, it is necessary to:

1) Summon Pope Benedict XVI and Jorge Mario Bergoglio as claimants to the Petrine Munus, and invite both to consent to an approve the convocation, though canonically this is not necessary, due to the nature of the controversy, which makes it morally impossible for any Catholic to regard both as legitimate at the same time.

2) Summon and question Archbishop Ganswein and other scholars, as to what are the errors in the Declaratio of Pope Benedict XVI, made on Feb. 13, 2013.

3) As Pope Benedict XVI if it was ever his intention to renounce the Petrine munus, and specifically, whether in renouncing the ministerium he received through the hands of the Cardinals, he ever intended to renounce the munus which he receive from Christ Jesus in the Apostolic Succession.

And thus pronounce on the following controverted questions:

1) Whether that which the Declaratio as written signified in accord with the norms of Canon 17, is sufficient to totally exclude the right of any faithful to have recourse to canons 40 and 41 to hold that the act as an actus nullus, invalid, or irritus, and non existent.

2) Whether Pope Benedict XVI thus must be presumed to hold the Petrine munus, still.

3) And if he does, to pronounce the Conclave of 2013 null, void and un-canonical.

And finally, to put the entire controversy to an end by

Asking Pope Benedict XVI, if he wishes to renounce the petrine munus, to do so in the Council, by the simple phrase: I renounce the petrine munus, which I received on the day I accepted my canonical election as Roman Pontiff.

Such a Council will be of no less importance in the history of the Church as the Council of Sutri held in 1046 A. D., during the week before Christmas. There, in the presence of Saint Hildebrand, 3 claimants to the Papacy were deposed and the way was opened for the election of a legitimate successor to Pope Benedict IX.

The following are all the bishops of Dioceses of the Ecclesiastical Province of Rome, whom I am urging to take this action:

Roma: Impeded — To be summoned: Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis, as well as such dignitaries as Archbishop Ganswein, Archbishop Viganò, and all the Cardinals present on Feb. 11, 2013, for the Consistory.

Albano (Suburbicarian See) — Msgr. Vincenco Viva:

  • Mailing Address: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Vescovile 11, 00041 Albano Laziale [Roma], Italia
  • Telephone: 06.932.68.401
  • Fax: 06.932.38.44

Anagni-Alatri — Msgr. Lorenza Loppa

  • Mailing Address: Curia Vescovile, Via dei Villini 82, 03014 Fiuggi [Frosinone], Italia; Piazzale Acropoli, 03011 Alatri [Frosinone], Italia
  • Telephone: 0775.51.42.14; 0775.43.45.86
  • Fax: 0775.54.71.05

Civita Castellana — Msgr. Romano Rossi

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Curia Diocesana, Piazza Matteotti 27, 01033 Civita Castellana [Viterbo], Italia
  • Telephone: 0761.51.51.52
  • Fax: 0761.59.92.13

Civitavecchia-Tarquinia — Msgr. Gianricco Ruzza

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Piazza Calamatta 1, 00053 Civitavecchia [Roma], Italia; Via Roma 11, 01016 Tarquinia [Viterbo], Italia
  • Telephone: 0766.23.320; 0766.84.08.43
  • Fax: 0766.50.17.96; 0766.85.60.43

Frascati (Suburbicarian See) — Msgr. Raffaello Martinelli (Consecrated and appointed by Pope Benedict XVI)

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Paolo III 10, 00044 Frascati [Roma], Italia
  • Telephone: 06.942.04.67
  • Fax: 06.940.10.201

Frosinone-Veroli-Ferentino — Msgr. Ambrogio Spreafico

Gaeta (Archdiocese) — Msgr. Luigi Vari

Latina-Terracina-Sezze-Priverno — Msgr. Mariano Crociata

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Vescovado, Via Sezze 16, 04100 Latina, Italia
  • Telephone: 0773.40.68.200
  • Fax: 0773.40.68.202

Montecassino (Territorial Abbey) — in sede vacante, administered by Don Donato Ogliari, OSB

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Abbazia, Via Montecassino, 03043 Cassino [Frosinone], Italia
  • Telephone: 0776.31.15.29

Ostia (Suburbicarian See) — in sede vacante, administered by Cardinal Angelo de Donatis

  • Mailing Address: Vicariato di Roma, Piazza S. Giovanni in Laterano 6/a, 00184 Roma, Italia
  • Telephone:
  • Fax:

Palestrina (Suburbicarian See) — Msgr. Mauro Parmeggiani

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Gregorio Pantanelli 8, 00036 Palestrina [Roma], Italia
  • Telephone: 06.953.44.28; 06.953.12.045
  • Fax: 06.953.81.16

Porto-Santa Rufina (Suburbicarian See) — Gianricco Ruzza (also of Civitavecchia)

Rieti (-S. Salvatore Maggiore) — in sede vacante

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Vescovado, Via Cintia 83, 02100 Rieti, Italia
  • Telephone: 0746.25.361
  • Fax: 0746.20.02.28

Sabina-Poggio Mirteto (Suburbicarian See) — Msgr. Ernesto Mandara

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Vescovado, Piazza Mario Dottori 14, 02047 Poggio Mirteto [Rieti], Italia
  • Telephone: 0765.24.755; 0765.24.019
  • Fax: 0765.44.10.19

Subiaco (Territorial Abbey) — Abbot Mauro Meacci

Tivoli — Msgr. Mauro Parmeggiani (also of Palestrina)

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Curia Vescovile, Piazza Sant’Anna 2, 00019 Tivoli [Roma], Italia
  • Telephone: 0774.33.52.27; 0774.33.09.42/3
  • Fax: 0774.31.32.98

Velletri-Segni (Suburbicarian See) — Msgr. Stefano Russo,

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Curia Vescovile, Corso della Repubblica 343, 00049 Velletri [Roma], Italia
  • Telephone: 06.963.00.51
  • Fax: 06.961.00.596

Viterbo — Msgr. Lino Fumagalli

  • Official Web Site:
  • Mailing Address: Palazzo Vescovile, Piazza S. Lorenzo 9/a, 01100 Viterbo, Italia
  • Telephone: 0761.34.17.16
  • Fax: 0761.30.60.06


+ At the time of his election, Cardinal Ratzinger was the Dean of the College of Cardinals, so since the holder of that office normally would ask the elected if he accepted his election, I am presuming that the question was asked by the vice-Dean of the College.

** This principal is the contrary of, Papa dubius, Papa nullus est, that is, a doubtful pope is no pope. The logical conversion of this principle, reverses the canonical case from an elected pope to a renounced pope, since the original principal is shorthand for, papa electus dubie, papa electus non est, “a doubtfully elected pope, is not a pope elect.”

A Nightmare unfolds at Compostela: I ask you to write my Ambassadors at Madrid

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

This is Part II of my recounting of the Ordeal which I suffered at Saintiago de Compostela, Spain, (Part I here) the legal consequences of which false accusations, in which I now find myself. I ask you to write my US and Italian Ambassadors at Madrid and express your personal protest at the violation of all norms of Spanish Law as regards this case

One might get the impression that my ordeal came to an end on Aug. 18, 2022, when I was at last released from illegal detention by the National Police, San Clemente Commisariate.

But no. That is only where it began.

Because the real ordeal was not that I was viciously and without cause assaulted in the Basilica by three security guards, but that the National Police conspired with one of them to begin a legal persecution of which I am now and will be the victim for some time to come.

Evidently, the amount of revenue passing through hands at the Basilica of Saintiago de Compostela is so great as to make the protection of the corrupt racket of persecuting Catholics such a requirement, that no questioning of it can be made by anyone. And if any pilgrim dares put that at risk, he must be hounded to the ends of the earth to keep him from speaking out. My insistence on my rights as a Catholic in Spanish Law, to worship God and venerate the Apostle without a mask, consequently, has woken a sleeping dragon, who was quite content on his absolute control of the Basilica.

Contrary to Spanish Law, the police compiled an accusation against me the day after I was released from detention. I was supposed to receive it with my attorney when I was released. That was impossible, because I HAD NOT BEEN ACCUSED BY ANYONE, so the Police could not accuse me of anything, other than grave disobedience to themselves: which was an invented excuse, since there are numerous witnesses, including the Municipal Police, that I complied with ever reasonable request.

So, according to what I was told, the next morning, after my release, someone solicited the female security guard to come to the police station and state that she “had suffered a strong pull in her arm”. Accusing me of being the perpetrator. I never touched her, let alone pulled her arm. No further claim was made about this accusation, so I cannot describe or explain it further.

Then the National Police wrote up the accusation with 2 criminal charges: one, for grave physical assault, another for grave disobedience to a public official, namely, the National Police, in refusing to identify myself.

According to my attorney, grave physical assault can only be charged if there is physical damage, verified by a hospital, which lasts more than 6 weeks (I am not sure on the exact length). The accuser however never went to the hospital. And clearly, after 24 hours, could not make such an allegation.

However, it is not she who made the allegation. It is the National Police who reinterpreted her testimony as such an accusation.

You see how corrupt this system is?

If found guilty for grave physical injury, the maximum sentence, barring no permanent physical damage, is 6 months of incarceration. It is a criminal offense.

The second charge is laughable: because I did show my passport. Twice. Once to the Municipal Police officers, and again to the National Police. Both groups of police are witnesses to the second exhibition of my U. S. Passport.

So on the following Tuesday, the Court of Inquest was held.

The Court had no intention of doing an inquest, however. It presumed I was guilty. It intended to frame me for the charges by intentionally omitting to SUMMON the witnesses against me or even ask THE MUNICIPAL POLICE if the accusations were true.

Moreover, the female guard on the morning of the inquest HAD ALREADY CONTACTED THE COURT OF INQUEST and DENIED the charge of grave assault!

But the Court REFUSED to accept her testimony!

I knew I was already condemned as soon as I entered the court room, because, as soon as the Judge saw me, she formed a most sour expression of disgust on her face, seeing a Franciscan Friar in habit enter her court, and lowered her face to hide her expression.

Then, contrary to practice, the Judge refused me the opportunity to explain what happened. The Judge rather began to interrogate me wanting to know what happened.

Her first question was an outrage, because it showed her total prejudice: “Did you enter the Cathedral without wearing a mask?”

My defense attorney in due course remarked that there is presently no law of Spain requiring the wearing of the mask in the Cathedral or any public place of worship.

Next the Judge asked me if I had touched the guard. I answered no, specifying that only the guard touched me as she brushed past me to withdraw into the Cathedral. As I tried to mention that the Guard also attempted to smash my leg with the interior door, the judge cut me off and omitted it from the record.

The Judge, then, said I could explain what happened, and at about 15-30 seconds into my explanation cut me off and told me she had heard enough. She had not in fact heard anything! — Thus denying me the right to defend myself.

In Spanish Law you also have no right to be accused face-to-face by your accusers. The police did not come to the court, nor were they summonded.

The Judge told me that she did not want to hear what I did and why I did it, only what I did. I responded, “I am a rational creature, everything, I do is for a reason. If you do not want to know the reasons why I did what I did, then I will not answer any more of your questions.”

About this time, the prosecutor entered the court room. She did not enter by the main door, which would have caused her to have to pass near me within a meter’s distance or so. She, rather, lurked in the rear, at the Judge’s private door, until the Judge recognized her as present and granted her permission to enter there. Then the entire prejudice of the court was shown, when instead of going to her place at the left side of the bench by passing infront of the Judge, the Prosecutor (a woman wearing a black silk-like medical mask and long drooping skirt), pushed the chair of the sitting judge away from the back wall to make room for herself to pass! And the Judge endured it.

And with that, all the while knowing that the female guard had withdraw her accusation, the Judge entered into the record that I had assaulted the woman and set a date for my trial as Sept. 21st!

How can an court of inquest set a date for a trial when the accuser removed her charge and when witnesses are not heard for both sides? It was a joke. Not justice.

The Prosecutor then offered me a plea-bargin: 33% reduction on sentence. So that instead of being found guilty by the court (she was super confident) and sentenced to 6 months in prison and fined 3 months salary, the Prosecutor offered me, then and there, 4 months in prison and garnishment of 2 months salary.

I was very shocked at the presumption of the prosecutor since she had not seen any of the evidence and should have known by reading the accusation by the police that a strong-pull on the arm does not constitute grave assault in Spanish Law.

Moreover, I later learned that the Prosecutor was so prejudiced against me, that in her own version of the charges against me, she added another 3rd charge: grave lack of respect for the National Police officers who illegally detained and tortured me for 11 hours.

You see. The fundamental character of the Spanish legal system is cruelty. And if you do not take it like slave, you are committing a crime! …  The look on the Prosecutor’s face as the plea deal was offered me, was memorable: she was absolutely delighted to see me squirm and be in a position where I could not defend myself.

Little did I know that was already in the works.

I most strongly denied agreement with the plea deal.

The Judge in setting the date of the trial then said I did not have to attend the trial, that I could be tried in abstentia. And in saying this she smiled strangely.

It was then I understood that they had no intention of ever hearing my testimony. That I was already guilty in their eyes.

After the hearing, my attorney was given the transcript and I was given the opportunity to correct it. There were several errors, the most egregious of which was, that the transcriptionist — also a woman — had written, “The accused said, that the female guard never made a move to touch him.” or something nearly meaning that, when I in fact had said, “I never made a move to touch the female guard.”

And if you know anything about the Law, you understand now what was going on,

Weeks later, I understood why the Judge smiled strangely at that moment when she said, “tried in absentia”.

Because, weeks later I was informed that the Spainish Legal system is like that of the United Kingdom. Your lawyer cannot appear in court, only your barrister can. But mine was in the court of inquest!

But to have a barrister, you need to appoint a barrister. And to appoint a barrister you need to sign a power of attorney before a Notary of the Spanish State.

So I rushed to the nearest notary, asking for expedited consideration so as to meet the deadline. The secretary of the notary explained that I would be given prompt attention. Then after contacting someone in Court or Government, the Notary refused to allow me to sign a power of attorney, giving this excuse:

That a United States Passport and Driver’s License are insufficient forms of identification!

This is an absolute lie and contrary to all treaty agreements between Spain and the USA regarding the mutual acceptance of passports! My legal team also tells me that they have never heard such an outrageous claim made in law.

Not being able to sign a power of attorney, I cannot appoint a Barrister. But without a barrister, I must either appear in court in person, or be found guilty on all charges out of contempt of court without any opportunity being given to my attorney to defend me.

If I appear in person, I will be apprehended, because it is obvious that I have already been found guilty.

This is the totally corrupt, grossly immoral, barbarous banana-republic system of justice in the formerly Catholic Kingdom of Spain.

Please I beg you to write the US and Italian ambassadors at Madrid, Spain, (here and here, respectively) and make the loudest and most poignent complaint possible, demanding that the Spanish Government at the highest levels intervene in this case, to prevent a citizen of the United States of America, and of the Italian Republic, from being so clearly railroaded and framed by a group of very corrupt public officials at Compostela.

I have written all of the above out of the grave necessity of self-defense, and it is not my intention to touch the reputations of the innocent, only to expose what is actually happening to me. I fully expect, however, considering the level of corruption, to be additionally charged with defamation by the corrupt officials I have mentioned in my testimony. Such is the joke, which is called, “modern Spain”.

A Nightmare unfolds at Compostela: I urge you to write the Spanish Ambassador

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

What I write here, in part I, I write as a citizen journalist, and I claim all the rights of free-speech in journalistic endeavors, to publish the following facts and observations at my own electronic journal,, in the United States of America. I alone hold copyright for all images, video and text contained herein. Part II can be found here.

I will now recount the horrific ordeal which burst upon me on August 18, 2022 A. D., when I went the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostella, in Galicia, Spain, to thank the Apostle Saint James for the vocation he inspired me to undertake, 37 some years ago, when as a young man, I made my first pilgrimage to this Great Apostle of Christ, who brought the Catholic Faith in the Resurrection to Iberia, and when I vowed to God in my heart to become a consecrated religious of Jesus Christ.

I was in this endeavor doing what innumerable Catholics from all over the world have done fore more than a 1000 years, in devotion to this great Witness of Christ’s Power, Divinity and Resurrection.

And I urge each of my readers, to share this story far and wide, and to write letters of complaint to every Ambassador of Spain in the world, castigating them for having such a totally corrupt legal system, where innocents are assaulted in the House of the Apostle, falsely accused, kidnapped, and tortured all day long, only to be hauled into court on false charges afterwards so as to protect the guilty parties who perpetrated these crimes against the Catholic Faith and human rights. Mixed into this criminal mess is one of the most prominent U. S. based security firms, which, on account of the central role of one of the employees of their wholly owned subsidiarity in Europe, is complicit in the conspiracy against a U. S. Citizen to deprive him of his human and civil rights.

This story will read like a nightmare, but it is truly hellish, because it is not fiction, but fact. I will attempt to recount it in chronological order as best I can remember. I will omit names and badge numbers, so that the villains who turned on me like a pack of rabid dogs, might not perpetrate further villainy by claiming I have damaged their reputations.

To the Tomb of Saint James, the Greater

One of the greatest Apostles of Our Lord Jesus Christ, was James the brother of John. Known as the greater, he was one of the Three Our Lord took with him to Mt. Tabor, to see Him in His Transfiguration, and he was so devoted to Our Lady, that the first time She ever appeared, it was to him, as he was preaching in distant Iberia. On his return trip to Jerusalem, he preached Christ Jesus so zealously, that the pharisees in wild rage dragged him to the parapet of the Temple and cast him off, saying, if Jesus was God, He would save him. Hated unto this very day by the crew of Satan’s servant for bringing the Catholic Faith to Iberia and interceding on several occasions to aid Spanish forces in the liberation of their lands from the godless moors, his tomb at Compostella, which is still one of the chief destinations for pilgrimage in all of Europe, is still especially despised by the enemies of God, the Freemasons.

And so I came to the Tomb of the Apostle, Saint James the Greater, on the morning of August 18, 2022, an occasion of such grace, that I decided to make a documentary. Thus, I have in video, the complete legal record of the first assaults made against my person by the 3 employees of Securitas SRL, a wholly owned subsidiarity of Pinkerton, the Masonic Founded, U. S. Security company with a long history of malfeasance, including assassinations, property theft and false accusations of their enemies.

A Documentary of a Nightmare unleashed

These videos would of themselves qualify as top-rated for viewership if they were just the whole of the misadventure which was about to unfold. Yet they are only the first minutes of an 11 hour ordeal, which I will now recount.

Video 1: My arrival at the Cathedral of Santiago

Here, I begin my documentary,  at about 9:38 A. M., on the morning of Aug 18, 2022, unaware of the horror which is about to break out against me. I was thrilled to have come at last to Compostella after a pilgrimage of more than 2000 miles, from Kyiv in the Ukraine, where I had just completed the foundation of CO Cross Azure, a Ukrainian, registered non-profit volunteer organization assisting the victims of Russian Aggression.

So I turned on my cellphone camera and began filming an impromptu Documentary, which begins thus:

Video 2: The Main Doors are ominously closed

After waiting for some minutes, I learned that the Main Doors of the Basilica are never opened, except for a visit by the King of Spain:

Video 3: Concerned, I make a point to film the future crime scene, yet unawares

Here, I providentially film the back entrance of the Church, before entering:

Video 4: The First Assault, when the female guard attempted to crush my left leg

As I did not want to record the female volunteer at the door, as part of my documentary, I placed my cellphone back to back with my cellphone power supply in my left hand. And then I approached the door.

As I was about to enter the main external door, the woman, standing in the only open pedestrian entrance blocked my passage. She was wearing a yellow-orange vest, of the kind worn during a road accident, alongside the road. I thought it strange that anyone would dress like that in the Basilica.

She said to me something which I understood in my poor comprehension of Spanish, which seemed to mean: To enter the Cathedral you must wear a medical mask. I said that I do not wear a medical mask. She insisted. I insisted politely. She shouted at me to wear a mask and said I would not enter the Cathedral without one. I said that as a Catholic pilgrim I have a right to visit the Apostle without a mask, as a sign of my faith in the Resurrection, which he preached in Spain.

She then claimed to be a public official.

This claim surprised me, because clearly she was not dressed as a public official. I took her to mean that she was a police woman. So I explained that in Spanish Law there is no longer a legal obligation to wear a mask inside a Church.

She continued to insist.

Then she did something I would never expect, though I was already flabergasted by her lack of poise, manners, and the excessive emotion with which she spoke. Compostella is a pilgrimage center for pilgrims from all over the world. This woman did not know a word of English or Italian and did not attempt to explain anything about her request. She just shouted louder and louder like someone unhinged. And at the peak of her shouting, she pushed me, and ran away into the Basilica.

I really did not know what to make of her behavior. I was trying to read body language since we could not communicate verbally with clarity.

The Basilica like nearly all ancient churches in Europe has two sets of doors. The exterior, exposed to the elements, and an interior, to block the inrush of cold or hot air, as the seasons change.

She ran inside the second door, which she left open.

I naturally presumed she had conceded that she had no legal right to insist about the mask.

I began to enter the second door, by placing my left leg through it to stand inside. She then grabbed the handle of the door by reaching in front of me to my right, and then began to slam the door on my left leg. I reacted to prevent grave injury to my person, by placing my right hand on the outside handle of the interior door, which handle was now exposed to me, in an attempt to slow the force by which she was slamming the door. I began to reproach her, attempting to convince here that such a violent assault was a crime so great that it was not the proper response to whatever necessity she felt.

At that point, the cellphone in my left hand providentially turned on, though the lens was blocked and only our voices can be heard.

Always wanting to avoid conflict, violence and personal contact, I thought quickly on my feet and bowed my head, so as to pass into the Basilica under her arm. I then put about 10 meters of distance between me and the door and looked about to see if I was in any other grave danger.

I never saw her again. She made no further personal effort to approach me. Though I heard her scream for assistance from other guards.

Video 5: The Second Assault, when 2 Security Guards risked sacrilege against the Basilica by violently assaulting me

Here is my video recording for legal record of how I reacted to the first assault,  at this very point in the drama, and which providentially recorded the second assault by 2 other Security Guards of the same company.

As can be seen, I was trying everything I knew to avoid conflict. I was attempting to speak in Spanish, warning them that I did not agree to being touched and that any contact on their part would be considered a criminal assault, by saying, “Non toccarmi” (Don’t touch me) in Italian.

Then, fearing that they would do me grave violence and cause me to be wounded and lose blood, which in the Catholic Religion would have desecrated the Basilica — requiring a lengthy and costly reconsecration — I shouted, “Sacrilegio!” repeatedly, to warn them against this.

I also shouted, “Diritto a la religion”, a mix of Italian and Spanish, for “I have the right to freedom of religion”. I do not think they understood me. I also tried to say, You are godless in the house of God! (Usted son sin dios en la casa di Dios).

Mind you, morning mass was about to begin. The Church was full of Catholic faithful waiting in the pews. I was standing to the right of the Chancel Grail which surrounds the main Sanctuary, as you look to the main alter from the main doors. There were hundreds of witnesses to this assault.

Being quick on my feet I succeeded avoiding the grasp of this first man, who came at me with wild rage demanding that I leave the Basilica. He never made an attempt to explain himself. He proved to me that he was acting criminally because the first thing he did was to attempt to grab my cellphone to prevent me recording the crime. No professional security guard properly trained to respect human rights or the sacredness of the place would have acted thus. No clergy seemed to be present. No one came to my help. It seemed as if the faithful were used to being thus abused in the house of God and the Apostle.

Then a second taller guard came and they succeeded in grabbing me under the arms. Whereupon they dragged me across the marble floor using my habit as a mop, and pulled me through the gift shop  and ejected me outside near where I had previously entered. In the fray, I lost my glasses and cellphone. In the video you can see a woman find them and give them back to one of the guards.

Here are some photographs of the two male security guards who assaulted me inside the Basilica during Mass!

Video 6: Wherein there is identified the Security Guard who hatched the conspiracy to have my civil and human rights denied me for an entire day

Here is a video of the security guard who assaulted me and who then called the National Police and sicked them on me:

After that my ordeal of 11 hours began, in which I was repeatedly insulted, assaulted, suffered battery on numerous occasions, being kidnapped, held against my will for 10+ hours, repeatedly lied to, and had nearly all the civil rights guarantees detained prisoners in Spanish Law intentionally denied me, with utter contempt.

I was also raped.

Let me strive to recount it all in chronological order.

A False Accusation intentionally launched to deprive me of my rights

Filled with zeal for the house of God and outraged by the violent assaults I had suffered, I immediately raised my voice and called for the police. I took photos of the two guards who assaulted me, and made a video. I also reproached the one shorter guard by using Google Translate App, in the Spanish language, to inform him that I considered what he did to me a crime and that I would most certainly file a criminal complaint.

Being a Franciscan Brother, I am much too naive. I never expected that there is such vileness among men, that upon being so reproached any man would respond by calling the police and accusing me of something so horrendous that I would be kidnapped, tortured and denied nearly all my rights under Spanish Law for the next 11 hours. But that is exactly what happened.

The result of this infamous calumny is grave, as can be seen from what now follows. I am quite angry that a Securitas SRL employee engaged in such a conspiracy against me, and will seek legal means to file a criminal and civil proceeding against them at their owners, the Pinkertons, a Masonic Security company which should not even be allowed to touch the Basilica of the Apostle, let alone determine which kind of Catholic should enter: one which believes in Christ Risen from the Dead, or one which buckles under despotism of the worst kinds.

The Municipal Police Arrive

The city police arrived. There were two of them, a man and a woman. They were very polite, and we tried to talk to one another, but they did not speak English, and I can barely say a word in Spanish. But they an explained to me that the persons whom I identified as my assailants were NOT police men and that I was correct, there was NO law of Spain that requires the medical mask to be worn in the Basilica anymore.  He specifically said, “It is a rule of the Church, not of the State.” (Es regla de la Iglesia, no del estado).

This encouraged me to press charges, and so I began with identifying the assailants to the officers.

The officers in turn asked me to identify myself.

I inquired why: asked what law required that I do so. The policemen could not answer my questions. Neither of them knew by which law a person would be required to identify themselves, when they were not the perpetrators of a crime. As the policeman had been polite with me, I showed and gave him my U. S. Passport.

Then, the security guard said that he would file a criminal charge against me. He never did. But he did call the National Police. For the present, I did not even know that there were two police forces in Spain. I presumed these others were also of the same department. And when they came then never identified themselves to me as the National Police.

Kidnapped, Assaulted and repeatedly lied to by the Spanish National Police, San Clemente Commissariat, Compostella

These national police men, first two, then four, then six, came and asked me what had happened in a very broken English. The first two knew only a word or two of English. Of the next too, the man who was heavy set, knew some simple English. I explained the assault, then he asked me to identify myself.

Since I already had identified myself, I said I had already done so to the two other officers, who were still present. He said that that did not count, as I has to identify myself to him. I asked why; I asked by what law.

He said that it was not his duty to explain the law. I remarked, “Whose duty is it to know the law? I challenged them, saying that if they could not cite a law, it was because it did not exist, because certainly if they asked me under the color of the law, they knew which law it was. We discussed this for some minutes. They honestly could not cite the law. I was most surprised.

As the heavy officer appeared to be getting more enraged, I showed him by U. S. Passport, but I did not give it to him. He insisted that I hand it over. I asked by what law he made his request — there is no such law — and he grew enraged, though he did read my passport and had a cellphone to photograph it if he wanted to.

Little did I know that the National Police had already decided to arrest me on the false accusation. I had made photos and videos of my encounters with both police. At the end of the day, these alone were found to be absent from my cellphone, after it had been in the custody of the National Police for some 10 hours. My lawyers tell me that this is a grave violation of the law.

The guile of the National Police

The National Police first insisted that I not leave. I asked why, “Was I under arrest?” They said no.

Then, they asked if I wanted to file a criminal complaint against my assailants. I said I did. They offered to take me in their own car, leading me to the center of the plaza where it was parked.

I asked if I was under arrest. They said no.

So I explained that since I was not under arrest, I had the right to chose my transport, and that I would walk to the Police Station (Commissariate) to file my complaint. I invited them to accompany me.

The heavy officer asked, why I would not enter the back seat of his car.

I said that if I did so, I feared that I would be assaulted or kidnapped by him and his men, since I was not under arrest, clearly there was no legitimate reason to insist that I get into their car.

Then as I looked at the other officers, the heavy set officer assaulted me, grabbing my cellphone from my hands.

Then, in the space of a second, afterwards, the other 3 national police assaulted me. One attempting to grab my right arm, the other my right, and the third one of my legs. They raised me into the air for a moment, but since I weigh nearly 90 kg (200 lbs), they could not hold me there. I went limp which made it impossible for them to sustain me and they dropped me to the cobblestone ground.

I immediately asked if I was under arrest. They again said no. So I concluded they were involved in some sort of criminal conspiracy against me.

I then informed them I would be practicing passive resistance, because they were acting illegally. I made this clear by saying, “Resistencia passiva!” several times.

This enraged them all the more, but with all of them they did succeed putting me in the back seat of the car, with some difficulty, and in doing so risked me permanent grave spinal injury by tossing me partly on the floor partly on the seat. The car being insufficient in width to accommodation my height, they repeatedly slammed the door on my feet.

I was taken to who-knows-where, because I could not see out of the car with my head being on the floor on the left side of the back seat. We arrived after a few minutes at a door on a downward sloping street, into which the car had descended to arrive there at. More police officers grabbed me and lifted me out of the car, but being unable to raise my weight, they threw me on the threshold to their facility. It appeared to be a prison facility. They left me face down on the floor while they discussed out to move me. They pleaded with me to cooperate. I asked if I was arrested. They said no. So I said I would not cooperate. I would practice passive resistance.

More officers picked me up a short ways and then dropped me on the floor at what seemed the entrance to the interrogation or prison facility. Then a younger officer, who had some training succeeded in dragging me to the interrogation room, with the others helping.

These officers knew who I was, because they had already taken from me my passport and wallet. But after a short while they stripped me of my capuche and Franciscan Cord. — They said this was for my own protection. I feared they would do me further harm, as they repeatedly hit me, pinched me, and assaulted me before, during or after the encounters I ha with them during the next 10 hours, held in this unknown facility.

Nearly none of the officers was wearing a uniform. Their uniforms do not indicate names. I asked for names and the refused to give them. I felt that I was in the hands of KKK members on a priest-hunting escapade, but I learned during the day that these were Republicans, that is the Spanish name for the anti-clerical marxists of Spain, known for their brutal persecution of the Church. They were delighted to have a friar in their hands.

They never addressed me as Padre or Fraile. They never treated me as a consecrated person. They never spontaneously offered me anything such as food or water.

I asked for my Rosary, but when they saw that in praying it, I was consoled and became stronger in spirit, the officer who had some training in moving me, snatched it from my hand. I was outraged at the violation of my religious liberty, and reproached them for this.

There are 8 rights which Spanish Law guarantees each detained prisoner in Spain. Five of the 8 were denied me, intentionally and with malice of aforethought.

The first, is that I have a right to legal representation. When I asked for this at about 10:30 A. M., I was told that there were no public defenders available. I asked repeatedly.

The public defender who came to help me at about 7 P.M., told me days later, that at 10:30 A. M., she was sitting in the main waiting hall immediately above my detention cell, waiting to be appointed a case, and every time she requested if there were any who needed a public defender, was told there was no one. This game was played upon her till about 6:30 P. M., according to my recollection of what she told me.

The second, is that I have access to food and water. When I first asked for water a policeman went to get some, but immediately another took him aside and with a malicious grin on his face made some sort of suggestion. I feared that the water would be laced with something or contaminated or contain spit or urine, so when I was brought to me in an open paper cup, I asked instead for a sealed bottle of water. I was refused. No one again offered me water, for the next 10 hours. I asked for food at about noon, and no one brought me any. Later when I was about to be released in the evening, I was offered food, but since I am pre-diabetic I could not eat it. I offered to pay to have food that I can eat brought, I was refused. Going without food or water for 10+ hours was a torture for me, since my metabolism began eating my own flesh, and I could feel a fire come over my skin from head to toe. To endure it, I had to crunch on my cell bed and remain motionless for hours, between each session of interrogation. I eventually became very cold.

The third right I was denied, was the right to know what I was being held for.  I asked 3 times, and 3 times I got different answers. I even asked at 1 PM or thereabouts, if I was under arrest. One officers said I was. This surprised me, because the others had denied it. A disagreement broke out among the policemen, and I attempted to end it by asking if they could show me a document verifying that I had been arrested, and for what. They said there was no such document. I concluded that I was not under arrest, but illegally detained, and so I told them I would in no manner cooperate with them further. I refused to give my finger prints and to sign any papers.

I asked again at about 4 PM and I was handed about an hour or two later, a list of the rights of an arrested person. I pointed out that this list of rights in now was says that I have been arrested and why.

I was accused by diverse officers of 3 different crimes: assault of public officials, refusing to obey public officials, refusing to obey the police. I was released at about 8 P. M., without being charged. But the next day the Police did charge me, with assault of the female guard (I never touched her, it was she who attempted to break my leg) and refusing to show my passport to the Police (I had done so, and 6 policemen and numerous bystanders saw me do so.

The fourth right denied me was the right not to be tortured or abused. I was repeatedly pushed, grabbed, pinched viciously and grabbed with violence. I had bruises on my skin for about a week, which convinces me that someone is an expert pincher and grabber, because the thickness of the woolen habit which I wear makes it quite difficult to cause a lesion on the skin through it.

The fifth right denied me was the right to have a translator assist me to understand what was going on and to communicate clearly with the police when they questioned me or made any request of me. This was denied me the entire time I was with them, though at the very end, I was given a phone and someone speaking English partially summarized the 8 rights of detained prisoners. This seemed to be but a cruel joke intended to paste a fig leaf of compliance over an entirely bare nude conspiracy to deny me all of my rights.

How I was raped by one officer, while 3 others held me bound

When I was forcibly taken back to my cell — they chose the cell with blood-stain like spots on the ceiling, at the end of the corridor on the right, with a request-button that seemingly did not work — I was dragged on the floor. It was during this transfer that the most horrendous crime was committed against me, for which I bear to this day and will bear for the rest of my life such a deep sense of personal violation that I will never be able to forget.

One of the younger officers, who had looked at me lasciviously during the day, took the opportunity he saw when the other offers were dragging me on by behind to life my habit, exposing my athletic shorts which I wear in lieu of under-ware, as the Rule of St. Francis requires.  It was then he pulled down my pants to expose my private parts, at which he gloatedly stared for some moments. I shouted loudly when I understood what he was about to do, and against him when he was doing it, afterwards remonstrated all the policemen for this rape of a consecrated person.

Never since my private doctor, when I was 12 years old, has any living or now dead human being, seen me utterly naked like that. As a consecrated virgin who has never touched another person or been touched by another person, I cannot get over the sense of shame I feel for what happened to me. I am utterly devastated that I was subjected to such an infamy.

Later, the police would excuse this to my defense attorney, on the grounds that they had to be sure I was not carrying a knife!

Yeah, sure!

In response to my objection to being thus raped, the officers turned me over on my face and dragged me on my left knee causing a gash under the kneecap which, filled with shock, I only noticed afterwards, and the sign of which I still bear.

I have used the word, “rape”, here, as meaning “despoiled or stripped naked with sexual intentions of violation”.

The bizarre sentiments of a National Policeman

This same officer, at another occasion in the day, asked me why I was not being cooperative. I responded that since a very famous American Tech Company inventor was found dead in his cell in Galicia the year before, that I had my reservations about prisons in Galicia, where I was presently being held. As I mentioned an American who was likely murdered in prison by police, this policeman gave me a smile of the most devilish exaltation, as if it turned him on: the idea of killing a prisoner in such wise as to be immune from prosecution. He made no attempt then or thereafter to defend the reputation of the National Police from such a suspicion. His reaction was so strange, that it may be think such occurrences might be usually.

How I escaped imprisonment

At about 4 P.M., I became convinced that I was being held by policemen without any conscience or respect for law, and that if I remained totally passive only worse atrocities and injustices would be perpetrated.

I succeeded in extricating myself by asking a new officer on duty, who came to my cell to ask if I needed the bathroom (who was not involved in my kidnapping) to speak with his superior.

About an hour later, a man, without any uniform, who claimed to be the head of this group of police, began the process for my release. Another policeman, from the Justice Department also came, and seemed somewhat interested to getting me released. The police cannot hold you without charges for more than 72 hours, unless the suspicion was for a grave offense. But as I was charged with nothing of this kind — in fact, I was not yet even charged — they could not hold me for more than 6 hours and by 4 P. M., it was already 30 minutes at least over that limit. And so they were getting anxious about detaining me further.

I was eventually released at about 8 P. M.. At my release I was not charged. The charges were written up by the police the next day. This was because no one came to the station even to accuse me the day I was held and tortured.

But the next day the police accused me of not showing them my passport and refusing to identify myself. And they also claimed that the female security guard came and claimed that I “strongly pulled her arm”. She made no claim to injury. According to Spanish law, such an accusation is not felonious, but the police charged me with grave assault, which has a penalty of a maximum of 6 months, if the accuser can show hospital records proving injury and the need for long term recovery. Both charges were totally false, as I never touched the woman at all, except when she pushed me while running inside the Basilica.

The Second Installment will follow in a few days….

But this horror show did not end there. Next came the court of inquest on the following Tuesday, and all the things which are leading to my imprisonment for 6 months and fine of 3 months salary, if the false accusations made against me are received by a judge. I have also been denied means to defend myself in court, so it looks like I will be found guilty. I am writing my story so that the world may know.

I will pen the second installment in a day or so. (Now available here)

PLEASE SAVE ME by raising your voices!

Since for a charge of 6 months, Spain does not regularly ask for the extradition of persons from other nations, my lawyers say not to fear. But since any nation can comply as a favor, there is a real possibility of my imprisonment, during which I could suffer any more innumerable horrors, even murder.

In the meantime, I ask you to complain to the Spanish Ambassador in the capital of your nation, and bring to his attention the outrageous level of criminality at Compostela. Demand an official investigation by the highest authorities in Madrid. I think that is the only chance I have, because, as my lawyers tell me, the word of these police men against me will be accepted by the court, as I have no witnesses in my favor.

You can also write the Ambassadors of the United States and of the Italian Republic at Madrid and ask them to raise this issue with the Minister of Justice in the Spanish Government.

The case was to be heard today, on Sept. 21, but it has been prorogued to Nov. 21, 2022.

I am not asking any funds to defend myself. I am asking only that voices arise in my defense to the highest authorities in Spain. Please help save me from this nightmare.

Attention Subscribers whose email begins with A to L

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Dear Subscribers,

Many of you have been telling me that your subscriptions do not seem to be working. An investigation this morning determined that some how, all the subscribers to FromRome.Info via email, whose emails begin with a number or letter beginning with A00000 etc. and going as far as LZZZZ etc., have been erased from the database at

I do not know how this happened or when, but it was sometime before May of 2022.

This means that you have to resubscribe to receive notices.

Alas, I have no way of contacting you, but hope you see this notice.

If you have friends whose email address has this format, please let them know that if they had subscribed, this might be the reason they are not receiving email notifications.

Br. Bugnolo: This Pentecost before another 666

Editor’s note: Tomorrow is June 6, 2022 A. D.. That is, 6-6-6 (=2+0+2+2).  What can we expect for tomorrow and how do we prepare for it today? — Br. Bugnolo’s clarion call for all to renew their Confirmation today.

UPDATE: The news of the day confirms Br. Bugnolo’s reading of the events….

 And it turns out that this grain installation is property of none other than a Jewish Oligarch who is a political opponent of Joe Biden. That’s right: Putin just ordered an attack on Joe Biden’s enemy. Now why would he do that if Russia opposed Globalism? — For more on Dmytro  Firtash, see here.

UPDATE: As of 3 PM Kyiv time today, more confirmation that Br. Bugnolo was right again:

DeathVaxx, Russian Cleanup, Chinese Migration — What Globalists want for Europe

by  Br. Bugnolo

As reported by the Pulse, do not imagine for a moment that the recent downgrad of Covid mania means that Covid Tyrants have not planned something more.

They are.

And they are telling us openly.

Having DeathVaxxed Europe, especially able bodied military age men, the next phase is to make sure they go to the grave as fast as possible.

With the death of Europe, the Russian Federation can make mincemeat of what remains.  And then, 100 Million Chinese can colonize the continent.

Resisting the DeathVaxx and helping to defend against Russian Aggression IS THE ONLY AUTHENTIC WAY OF FIGHTING the Globalist plans for Europe.

Those who think otherwise have drunk the koolaid and lost the narrative.

This is why I am in the Ukraine. With the help of many of you, I came to realize and defended humanity against the DeathVaxx in my own small way by publishing the truth here at FromRome.

I still fight globalism, though many of my loyal readers are deeply confused and wandered into Globalist control through Russian Propaganda.

If, however, YOU are grateful because my work here has helped YOU and YOUR LOVED ONES avoid the DeathVaxx and save your lives, I urge you to pass on the gift of life by helping me stop the Russian Invasion of Europe!

Here is how you can help me in that!

Please subscribe to my new Channel from Kyiv, where I will feature all my appeals for Ukraine.

If youtube erases my video, you can always find it here, download it and share it…


Drones Save Lives!

OMC is now in a War Zone, and needs you to have their Backs

Watch out co-founder’s appeal on our official channel

Or on our official Channel from Kyiv:

Editor’s Not: If you admire or support Ordo Militaris Catholicus, please share our tweets and videos, and subscribe to BOTH of our YouTube Channels. Thank you!