Category Archives: Faith

The Catechism of the Catholic Faith — Cardinal Peter Gasparri: Chapter 3.4

The Creation and Origin of Mankind

In this series, Br. Bugnolo reads aloud and comments on the Catholic Catechism, written by Cardinal Peter Gasparri, and published in English translation in 1932 A. D.. (in PDF, Here)

This Catechetical series is directed to Adults and especially to Parents, each and every one of whom have the primary responsibility in teaching the Catholic Faith to their children. — It may also be very useful to non-Catholics who are studying the Catholic Faith prior to being received into the Catholic Church as members.

Finally, this series is being published by Br. Bugnolo to encourage Catholics with the best “Good News” possible: our Catholic Faith and what it includes, since here at FromRome.info for 12 years, there has been a lot of bad news reported, and human frailty can only take so much, without renewing one’s faith in the wonders God has given in the Catholic religion, which is the only true, consistent and complete form of Christianity since 33 A. D..

Those not speaking of the Sutri Initiative are tacitly endorsing an Abomination

An Editorial for Holy Week

IN MEMORIAM OF FATHER COUGHLIN, RADIO CRUSADER

It must be said clearly and without equivocation, that no man who identifies himself as a “homosexual” or who has a sexual preference for men, as well as no man who has had sexual relations with children, men, or animals, or who is having them with women or themselves by self abuse, shows the certain infallible and supernatural sign of being able to have a priestly vocation or a vocation to religious life: the spirit of chastity. For, the following of Christ and the ministry Christ handed down through the Apostles requires absolute abstinence from the use of the human powers of generation as well as the intention never to use them.

The above article, however, shows that Pope Francis is involved in mainstreaming impurity into the priesthood, so that these filthy impure men desecrate and crucify again the Child Jesus in the Eucharist, every time they say mass. For there is no such thing, in the Catholic Faith, such as “integrating your sexuality” into the priesthood! A holy priest is a totally mortified man, and mortification is the opposite of “integration”.

Indeed, it is a mortal sin of sacrilege to say the words of consecration, when one is in the state of mortal sin, and every sexual desire consented to, as well as every vice of impurity tolerated, place a man in the state of mortal sin.

All this is a nightmare of horrors on the spiritual level which fully merits the name of an Abomination: something which should be detested and hated with all the strength of our souls, just as God so hates it. Jesus never intended that any pervert or filthy man be a priest or exercise the priestly ministry or take the habit of a religious upon himself.

And that is why, all those “Catholic” voices who know of the Sutri Initiative, but refuse to call on the Bishops of the Roman Province to exercise their canonical rights to know whether Pope Francis is a catholic and has a rightful claim to the Apostolic See are involved in consenting to, nay, positively willing the consequence of this refusal of theirs: the spread of this Abomination.

And as such, they would do well this Holy Week by pausing their customary lamentations of problems in the Church, or in the state, such as their frequent demands that this or that politician not receive the Sacraments, because of not being pro this or that, and instead examine their own consciences which are stained with 12 years of cowardice and refusal to urge their readers to remove this arch-heretic from his claim to the Papacy.

They would do better than pretending that abstaining from the internet and fasting is going to rise to God as a pleasing sacrifice, when their own souls stink of wretched treachery to the Lord Jesus, in the hands of His enemies, the filthy priests tormenting Him by their horrid hypocrisy.

And if anyone be guilty of such mortal sins, let them take the golden opportunity of Holy Week to repent, make a good confession, and burn out the habits of such sins by fasting and abstinence, as long as needed, so that they might stand with the Risen Lord on Easter Sunday with a soul white and shinning and free of such disgusting stains.

As for all the souls not involved in these sins, I urge you to keep this Holy Week with many acts of love and reparation to the Sacred Heart, in union with Our Lady of Sorrows, praying for the conversion of these sinners. Let us immerse ourselves in the memory of their sufferings, so that we might at least obtain by humble acts of love, the repentance of some of these wayward souls. Let us walk with Christ to Calvary, in the company of Our Lady and St. Mary Magdalene and St. John the Evangelist. Let us stand with Christ asking Him again to let the power of His Most Sacred Passion pour out upon sinners again and renew the Church.  For He is our omnipotent Savior and without Him and His intervention we are lost!

The Catechism of the Catholic Faith — Cardinal Peter Gasparri: Chapter 3.2 – 3.3

The Creation, Divine Providence & the Angels

In this series, Br. Bugnolo reads aloud and comments on the Catholic Catechism, written by Cardinal Peter Gasparri, and published in English translation in 1932 A. D.. (in PDF, Here)

This Catechetical series is directed to Adults and especially to Parents, each and every one of whom have the primary responsibility in teaching the Catholic Faith to their children. — It may also be very useful to non-Catholics who are studying the Catholic Faith prior to being received into the Catholic Church as members.

Finally, this series is being published by Br. Bugnolo to encourage Catholics with the best “Good News” possible: our Catholic Faith and what it includes, since here at FromRome.info for 12 years, there has been a lot of bad news reported, and human frailty can only take so much, without renewing one’s faith in the wonders God has given in the Catholic religion, which is the only true, consistent and complete form of Christianity since 33 A. D..

In this Episode, Br. Bugnolo comments on corrects some of the errors in these chapter subpoints, which are mostly minor, but occasionally very grievous.

Regarding Guardian Angels: Cardinal Gasparri says that a guardian Angel is assigned to each of us “at birth”; but actually, there is an open debate on this, with some theologians holding that one is assigned at conception, others are birth, others at Baptism. This last opinion is the most certain, because since the holy Angels are servants of God’s Household, you have to become a member of His Household by baptism into Jesus Christ to receive the ministrations of His Angels.

The Catechism of the Catholic Faith — Cardinal Peter Gasparri: Chapter 3 – 3.1

The Apostles’ Creed: I believe in God…

In this series, Br. Bugnolo reads aloud and comments on the Catholic Catechism, written by Cardinal Peter Gasparri, and published in English translation in 1932 A. D.. (in PDF, Here)

This Catechetical series is directed to Adults and especially to Parents, each and every one of whom have the primary responsibility in teaching the Catholic Faith to their children. — It may also be very useful to non-Catholics who are studying the Catholic Faith prior to being received into the Catholic Church as members.

Finally, this series is being published by Br. Bugnolo to encourage Catholics with the best “Good News” possible: our Catholic Faith and what it includes, since here at FromRome.info for 12 years, there has been a lot of bad news reported, and human frailty can only take so much, without renewing one’s faith in the wonders God has given in the Catholic religion, which is the only true, consistent and complete form of Christianity since 33 A. D..

In this Episode, Br. Bugnolo comments on the Apostles’ Creed and corrects the many errors in this chapter, which are mostly minor, but occasionally very grievous.

Addendum: In this episode, Br. Bugnolo criticizes the use of the word “unmeasurable” in the English translation. This word is perhaps an erroneous translation of the Latin for “immense”, for God is said to be of infinite immensity, since the infinity of His perfections is beyond any metric of measure.

The Catechism of the Catholic Faith — Cardinal Peter Gasparri: Chapter 2

What is Divine Revelation?

In this series, Br. Bugnolo reads aloud and comments on the Catholic Catechism, written by Cardinal Peter Gasparri, and published in English translation in 1932 A. D.. (in PDF, Here)

This Catechetical series is directed to Adults and especially to Parents, each and every one of whom have the primary responsibility in teaching the Catholic Faith to their children. — It may also be very useful to non-Catholics who are studying the Catholic Faith prior to being received into the Catholic Church as members.

Finally, this series is being published by Br. Bugnolo to encourage Catholics with the best “Good News” possible: our Catholic Faith and what it includes, since here at FromRome.info for 12 years, there has been a lot of bad news reported, and human frailty can only take so much, without renewing one’s faith in the wonders God has given in the Catholic religion, which is the only true, consistent and complete form of Christianity since 33 A. D..

In this Episode, Br. Bugnolo explains how and why God has revealed Himself to mankind, and where we are to find these written and unwritten truths that we must believe to be saved.

The Catechism of the Catholic Faith — Cardinal Peter Gasparri: Chapter I

The Sign of the Cross

In this series, Br. Bugnolo reads aloud and comments on the Catechism of the Catholic Faith, written by Cardinal Peter Gasparri, and published in English translation in 1932 A. D., (in PDF, Here).

This Catechetical series is directed to Adults and especially to Parents, each and every one of whom have the primary responsibility in teaching the Catholic Faith to their children. — It may also be very useful to non-Catholics who are studying the Catholic Faith prior to being received into the Catholic Church as members.

Finally, this series is being published by Br. Bugnolo to encourage Catholics with the best “Good News” possible: our Catholic Faith and what it includes, since here at FromRome.info for 12 years, there has been a lot of bad news reported, and human frailty can only take so much, without renewing one’s faith in the wonders God has given in the Catholic religion, which is the only true, consistent and complete form of Christianity since 33 A. D..

Mis-spoken: In this video, Br. Bugnolo, who does not drink coffee, intends to say, “two natures”, when he says of Christ, “two divinities”.

The Best Friends Catholics have: The Communion of the Saints

This is a show for Catholics of all ages. If you are not plugging into the Communion of the Saints, you will fall victim to the control of the satanic Matrix of the Globalists, to which, as we saw in the Scamdemic, 90% of Catholics belong. — Break free by starting to have devotion to the Saints. This show explains what that is and how to do it. — This show will change your live forever, if you listen to the whole program and start living what it teaches.

Jesus Christ has now checkmated Pope Francis

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Back on October 1, 2013, shortly after I began FromRome, I remarked that the Church had entered a moment when we would have to trust ever more in the High Priestly Prayer of Jesus Christ for His Vicar, on earth, the Pope. I recalled that profound truth after the Assembly by Apostolic Right, on January 30, 2023, when the Faithful to heal the de facto schism in the Church, between the Catholics in communion with Christ’s Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI, and those who were deceived by the mass apostasy from the truth, of the Cardinals in electing Jorge Mario Bergoglio, even when Pope Benedict XVI had not abdicated according to Canon 332, elected the latter, so that the man whom most of the hierarchy regarded as Christ’s Vicar might become Christ’s Vicar, and be entrusted to that very Prayer of the one and only true Priest in the Catholic Church, Jesus Christ.

And the whole Church, both the friends of Pope Francis and his enemies, saw that for the first months of his juridically valid papacy, he was a much better person and avoided heretical statements and destructive policies. But after he put his signature to “Fiducia supplicans”, thus turning his back entirely to Jesus Christ’s Gospel of repentance, Christ responded with lighting bolts, literally, and sent His Holy Spirit not only to stir up world-wide opposition to his blasphemous agenda, through the faithful Bishops, mostly of Africa and other nations not under U.S. Government influence, and to withdraw that same Live-Giving Spirit from him, so that his health began to definitively decline.

Within three months, he was in hospital for bronchitis, and his doctors told him to slow down, but he refused. So he began taking cortisone to keep going, such that by the first anniversary of his perverse apostasy from Christ he was seen gasping for breath in public. He evidently increased the cortisone dosage, abusing the drug, causing him to fall frequently and suffer massive bruises, and nearly died on several occasions by glycemic shock in February, and by choking to death in Gemelli Polyclinic, here at Rome.

Released from the hospital, on March 23, 2025, now, Pope Francis is a beaten defeated man: who cannot breathe without high level oxygen at night: and who thus, consequently, cannot speak because his throat is so dried out. He suffers from an incapacitated right arm — perhaps due to one of his many falls — such that he can no longer write with his right hand. And his immune system is so shot, that he cannot even meet with individuals, but it shielded by a small circle of supporters who are in fact now running the Vatican.

Has any of this brought this incredibly evil, malign, sick, perverted, corrupted, accused by an investigative reporter of national fame of being an informant against his own sheep during the Argentine dictatorship (in the March 2005 book El Silencio still in print in Italy *) — whence they were tortured or thrown from planes from 30,000 feet into the Atlantic to their deaths –, not to mention his betrayal of 30 million Catholics in China, to repentance, at last? I ask.  I do not think so. There are no signs of it.

But Christ has quite effectively checkmated this heretic in every possible physical way, patiently but inexorably, as a warning.

If he refuses this Divine Remonstration, there will come most certainly the two Last Things, which he has fully merited by his constancy in evil: Death and Damnation.

In the meantime, Our Lord has in a way, you could say, impeded his heretical hold on the Apostolic See. Bishops round the world know he is now totally moribund, and this will encourage the good to resist the final acts of perfidy he might attempt to perpetrate.

And these events are all the consequence of the High Priestly Prayer of Jesus Christ, before the Throne of God in the Empyrean Heaven, which mercy was conferred on Pope Francis, by the Faithful of Rome, meeting together on January 30, 2023, when they did the only thing they could do, for his sake and for the sake of us all, elect him the successor of Pope Benedict XVI.

Let us praise and glorify the Living God, Who remains true to His Faithful when even just a few of them continue to trust in His Promises. May His Justice and Mercies be swift!


Footnote: While the main stream media generally believed the accusations for 8 years prior to his “election” in 2013, and flipped and called them false afterwards, the mere fact that the book is still for sale in Italy argues that they were true, because in Italy libel suits are very easy to win, and the mere fact that the Vatican and Bergoglio have never taken action against the author for libel, argues more than 100 newspaper articles to the contrary.

Make this Lent the event that will change your life forever…

REPRINT from Lent 2023

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The season of Lent is something so regular in its advent that it is easy to lose the proper sense of what we should be doing differently, and why this season is so important for our lives as Catholics.

Indeed, so scheduled and habitual are the events of modern life, that it is easy to let the season of Lent go by without ever making those changes necessary in our daily schedule, without which it is impossible to gather and taste the spiritual fruits of the season.

Lent is a Season for Good Works

First, let’s enumerate the many good works that can be done during Lent, which though salutary each in a different manner, do not comprise the essential act that we should be engaged in, frequently, during this season.

Thus, first, there is the Lenten resolution, which, even when I was a child, was still quite commonly practiced among Catholics — a sort of Catholic version of the New Year’s resolution, but us much more Christian.

While, yes, it is a good thing to resolve at the start of Lent, to undertake some work of charity or devotion, to sanctify this holy season.  That is not the essence of Lent.

Thus, it is a good and holy thing to resolve to go to Daily Mass, receive the Sacraments more frequently, give alms to the poor in the third world, purchase a book about spiritual things, and read some of it, or attend devotional exercises such as the Stations of the Cross, while not neglecting to keep Friday’s meatless, these things while they should never be omitted, are not precisely what Lent is about.

Preparation for Holy Week and Easter is only the Secondary purpose of Lent

Now frequently we hear that the purpose of Lent is to prepare us to celebrate worthily the Sacred Feasts of Holy Week and Easter.  This too, while true, is only a secondary purpose behind Lent.

True, Lent is a liturgical season, which originated to prepare converts to the Faith, for Baptism on Easter, in the early centuries of the Church.

But Lent, as a liturgical season, is not directed principally to preparing the individual or the local Catholic Community to celebrate liturgical ceremonies worthily.  Rather, it has a higher purpose, just as the ceremonies do not exists for themselves, but for a higher purpose.

There is a certain sort of error, which has quietly crept into the Catholic world in the last century, which conceives Catholic life to consist essentially in liturgical celebrations.  So widespread is this error, that you find Catholic laity reading out loud the entire rite of the Mass in Latin or in the vernacular, when the priest is absent, going so far as to say the priest’s parts; while thinking that on Sundays when there is no Mass in their area, that it would be a sin or fault or imperfection to omit the similitude of the liturgical celebration, so essential they believe that is to Catholic life.

Without a doubt the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is essential to the life of every Catholic and to the entire church.  But the liturgical ritual’s enactment is not the center of life.  It’s what that ceremony represents, which is the center of our life:  the Passion and Death of Our Lord Jesus Christ, through which, and without which, we cannot be saved and receive grace.

And hence the scope or role of the liturgical functions is not to be an end in themselves, but to be instruments and occasions for us to do those acts which are essential to Christian life:  the practice of the theological virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity; the contemplation of God and of Heavenly things, and the consideration of the present state of our souls in the light of God.

The Primary Purpose of Lent

Lent, essentially, is for this:  to be an occasion in which we consider profoundly and anew, the state of our souls in the light of God, and in considering this, weighing the immense travesty of our sins against the dire and extreme eternal punishment, which we most certainly merited for them.

This most sober of considerations is what Lent is about.  Without that consideration and that done frequently in this holy Season, we miss the whole importance of Lent.

Death, Judgment, Heaven and Hell:  these are the 4 Last Things, and these should be the objects of our frequent consideration, in Church, and out of Church.

The Saints made the consideration of the state of their soul in the light of God their habitual, daily reflection and habit of mind.  It was for this reason that the Saints did so many things which startle the mind and stir the soul of whomsoever hears or reads of them.

Essential Practices for Lent

We will soon enter into the season of Lent.  It will therefore, be very useful for us, now to consider its essential practice, ordering all the other customary practices of Lent towards this one essential thing:  our own repentance.

The mere consideration that we have sinned, is necessary, but this is not the only step we need to take.

We need to examine the causes of our sinfulness:  in which things or places are have we most sinned:  with whom, about what things, during which activities.

A wise Catholic who actually wants to save his soul, does not take lightly the consideration of such things.  This is so, because he is a prudent Christian who realizes that unless he corrects a minor spiritual problem, it can easily grow into a greater one.

A humble Catholic too, realizes that, in the reconsideration of one’s past sins, one can often find that one’s past confessions were much too superficial, and that in failing to remove one’s self from the occasions of those sins, that the vice which bore their deadly fruit has grown deeper still in one’s soul.

Let’s consider, therefore, the motives we should have in examining our conscience during Lent.  I do not mean “examining one’s conscience” in the perfunctory and quick manner in which we are accustomed, rightly, to do prior to receiving the Sacrament of Penance.

I mean this in the sense of the habit of meditation we should have to do this, whenever we do this, but especially throughout every day of the season of Lent.

Just as one’s house will soon be filthy as a pig-sty, if one does not regularly clean every corner of it; so the soul gathers moral filth through very tiny and unnoticed daily sins.

These grow the vices in our soul; and when these vices are strong enough they give birth to the evil fruit of mortal sin.  And since one mortal sin, unrepentant of, is sufficient to lose eternal life, and merit the everlasting and unimaginably excruciating fires of Hell, the prudent Catholic will not take lightly the importance of cleaning the house of his soul.

The first difficulty in this work that we find is that venial sins, each of them, reduce quite unnoticeably the ability of our souls to recognize sin and its effects.

Thus, unless we have a strong habit of examining our soul, when it comes time to think of our sinfulness, we cannot find anything to convict ourselves of!

If this is the case, with yourself; then you have found the first thing to confess and the first thing you must investigate with prayer and meditation:  the fact that you do not recognize yourself to have sinned.

As the Psalms say, even the holiest of men sins seven times a day.  If you are not a Saint, you surely sin more than 7 times a day; if you are a Saint you will already be convinced that you sin much more than this.

However, to counter super-scrupulosity, which is the spiritual disease of those who are convinced that certain things are sins, and that they have committed these quite frequently, even though their real sins are much greater, and by this too anxious of self-accusations they omit the consideration of their vices of pride or despair in the power of God’s grace to forgive them in the Sacrament of Penance; nevertheless for the majority of us, we have not this fault, we just don’t see our sins; we do not suffer from a preoccupation of believing we have sinned when we have not; we suffer from the opposite spiritual fault, of considering we have not sinned, when we have!

One rule of thumb is, that if you do not consider you have committed any sins in the last year, you probably have the habit of committing many mortal sins:  it’s just that since the effect of sin is the darkening of the mind, you have been so blinded by your sins that you can’t see it.

Lent is a prosperous spiritual time to seek the cure of such a blindness.  And one must seek it, to escape from the dire punishment of Hell which would surely engulf such a blinded soul!

Practical Remedies to Cure one’s own Impenitence

There are some practical remedies to obtain this cure, which need to be mentioned, because they are never preached.

The first is that for most of us, a direct attack upon this blindness does not convince of anything.  Even a very moving sermon, has little or no effect beyond recognizing that it was such.

The actual change of heart, which is the goal of repentance evades the sinner.

A direct attack upon this spiritual insensitivity to sin does not work, because one can only recognize sin, inasmuch as one opens one’s mind to the ability to see it and fear it.

Spiritual blindness is accompanied by a lack of fear of sin; a certain habit of easily excusing major sins, as if they were light faults; and venial sins as imperfections.  There is a certain distortion of judgment in the soul, which has resulted by ignoring the immorality of sin for so long.  And it is, admittedly, a very evil consequence of sin, to free one’s self from.

And to be absolutely frank, its is very rare that a single confession will be sufficient.  Just as those with cancer are not cured by taking just one pill, but often have to endure very painful procedures and months and years of treatment; so this kind of insensitivity to sin requires a long and protracted treatment.

The key to progressing against this awful spiritual disability, is to take tiny steps towards weakening and conquering this disability.

Regaining one’s ability to see one’s own sins, is not some mysterious spiritual practice.  It begins with the recognition of one sin which our conscience still can see is a sin.  Perhaps, however, we only think it is an imperfection or venial sin; but if we consider its causes or nature or occasion, it is certain, in a soul which does not consider itself to be a great sinner, that he has overlooked something which conceals the fact that he is in reality a great sinner.

I won’t speak about the fact that it is already a mortal sin of pride to consider that you are not a sinner: because such a declaration for such a soul is usually too much to understand.  Pride is a very spiritual sin, and one who has lost the sense of morality, has lost the sense of what is spiritual.

However, at the start it is always useful to consider and recognize intellectually that this is true; even if affectively and effectively we do not understand how this can be the case, because of our blindness.

How to dispose one’s self to the great Grace of Repentance

So, uprooting spiritual blindness begins with considering the one thing we can still see as a sin or imperfection.  This is the first step, because the very nature of spiritual progress is a re-capacitation of the power of the mind to consider spiritual things.  And like dominoes which when aligned properly, cause the next one to fall, when they themselves are toppled, so sins, when recognized and repented of, are the occasion to open our minds to the recognition of other sins.

In each step of the process, the recognition of one sin is the work of the conscience in its present state.  But this recognition cannot enable us to make the second step, which is repenting of the sin, because this second step is the work of prayer, devout and persistent to obtain the grace to repent of it.  And this can only be obtained by humble supplication.

All kinds of fasts, prayers, liturgies, meditations, pilgrimages, spiritual readings, alms, etc., are not going to assist your soul, if you do not use them as accompaniments to the work of earnestly begging for the grace of repentance, and disposing yourself to it by acts of self humiliation before God, in private, in the recesses of your heart and mind, wherein you declare, decide and resolve, that God is God, and that you are just a poor sinner, who in no manner deserves anything but judgment and damnation!

Humility is the key here:  how often a sinner might struggle to overcome one vice all his life, but fail to do so, simply because he never got down on his knees in private, and admitted to God and to himself that he was incapable of virtue by himself, and that he could only be virtuous and good, by the gift of God, earnestly begging Him for it on such an occasion!

This humble prayer and devout, secret supplication for grace, is the key step and the essential prerequisite for repentance, though, it can in fact be done in the secret of one’s heart, even in public places, while driving, or traveling, or even during other occupations, when the soul is properly disposed and God in His Mercy bestows the actual grace for it to occur.

During this essential step of humble recognition, a sorrow is engendered in the soul, along with a fear and realization of the danger of damnation, that the heart and mind turns vivaciously towards God and stirs it to ardently appeal for grace.

During such times it sometimes happens that this movement is responsive to grace sufficiently to receive the gift of tears, and during such a gracious movement, the dispositions of the soul can be cleansed and purged from years and years of distorted affections; leaving the heart with a new and healthy sense of sin and its gravity, and a new and healthy vivacity for things spiritual and heavenly.

The Proper Place and Role of Self-mortification

Essential to preparing the soul for such a humble recognition is the practice of mortification.

Mortification consists corporeally with fasting from beverages and food, abstaining from meat and rich foods; use of cold showers, and the endurance of sensations which are painful or sacrificial.

Mortification of the body does not work, when such activities are undertaken by a spirit of self-sufficiency, a kind of presumption that without God one can work his own repentance, or that in doing such things, one proves that he is not a sinner or is some sort of spiritual giant or athlete.

Such a spirit makes such corporal mortifications sinful!

Rather such practices should be undertaken only with the motivation to humble oneself, detach oneself from such a spirit of self sufficiency, and open the door of the spiritual world to the virtue of humility.

This desire to seek spiritual enlightenment, to leave aside one’s pride, to change one’s life at its root, to gain a sense of spiritual things and to loose one’s carnal view of things, should be the motivation of spiritual mortifications, which are very helpful to dispose our souls to the grace of repentance:  such as all those customary acts of Lent, which were mentioned at the beginning of this essay, as not being the principal purpose of Lent.

Repentance is the principal purpose of Lent, and all other things must be ordered to that.  But repentance has as its goal the reuniting of the soul with God and the resumption of the path toward perfection in the pursuit of eternal salvation. Lent thus finds it glory, not in preparing us for liturgical celebrations in time, but in being an occasion to return to the quest for eternal salvation in eternity.

_________

CREDITS: When Jesus was condemned to death and had to carry The Cross for the salvation of us all, an honest man, Simon of Cyrene volunteered to help Him. In all our troubles and concerns, Christ is still there carrying the bulk of the burden of our own personal cross, but as you can see in the Featured Image, He awaits each one of us, to join with Him in this work of our salvation, carrying the foot of the cross, which as you can see in the image, has not yet been grasped by Simon of Cyrene.

J. D. Vance’s Christology contains a grave error

Critique by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

If the title of the above linked article seems strange to you, that is probably because you are a Catholic or member of one of the Apostolic Churches of the East.

This is because, in none of these Churches do we say, “Jesus Christ died and raised Himself from the dead.”

Rather, we confess in the Nicene Creed: that “He suffered, died and was buried, and rose from the dead”.

This is not nit picking. There is a deep reason why we say Christ rose from the dead and not that Christ raised Himself from the Dead.

And it has both to do with grammar and theology.

You see, when you say, “Christ died and raised Himself from the dead”, you must use the same subject for both verbs, “died” and “raised”. And then you are signifying that the same one who is dead was able to raise himself dead from the dead. And that means the one who raised Him from the dead was dead when he raised himself.

This is why we Christians do not say this. We do not ascribe the power of the Resurrection to someone who was dead.

We say something entirely different: we say the One who died is also the One who rose from the dead. By confessing that He rose from the dead, we signify that He did this by His own power, but we do not signify that He did this by His human power or through His humanity which died.

Christ is both God and man. In His one Eternal Person He is Divine, but in His two natures He is God and man. Not God and a man. And not a God and man. But God and man. This is because as God, He is the Second Person of the Trinity, He is not another God. Nor is there any other God but the Trinity. And so there is no such thing as a mere god. Also we do not call him a man, because He is not a man, He is God become man. That is, He is the Eternal Son of God, fully God, Who became man, that is took to Himself as His own most intimate possession and alternate nature, the nature of man.

And this is what is wrong with the statement made by J. D. Vance. As God He raised His humanity from the dead, that is, He reunited His human body and human soul together. But neither His body nor His soul was ever separate from His Divine Person and Nature. They were dead, but they were never separated from Life.

Vice President Vance has uttered a grave error in theology and misrepresented the Christian Faith. And someone better tell him, before his grave error spreads among Christians. I sure hope he has spoken out of ignorance. But since the CIA has used converts to spread errors in Christian Churches to destroy them from within, I fear that he has intentionally made this error to seduce Christ’s flock into a very erroneous form of Christology to misrepresent our central tenet of faith, Christ’s Resurrection, which is not a self-suscitation.

However, if you are a transhumanist, and believe that life is merely a mechanical process in motion, then you can accept a self-suscitation, the same way you can accept that a computer turn itself back on.

On the Devils who are now dancing around the bedside of Pope Francis

An Editorial by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction français

There are a lot of Catholics who hate Pope Francis, because of his caustic personality, his horrible morals, his perverse theology, and his Marxist politics, by which he has expressed disdain for God, the Saints and about everything in the Catholic Church or in Western Civilization, that he could fit into a news byte.

But the strange thing about this, is that many who think they are righteous are the ones who actually are involved in a vicious or sinful hate of the man.

And now that it appears that it may be that he is dying, they are gloating even on social media of his death.

But is gloating over the death of such a man an honest thing to do? I do not think so.

As Our Lord says in Ezechiel 33:11, “I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked”

And since we Catholics should conform ourselves to the Sacred Heart in all things, we should not either.

But it is very sad to see that so many who insisted Pope Francis remain in power, or held authority legitimately, for so many years, also refused to seek his repentance. And among these those, who now dance around his death bed, are some of the worst of the worse, because they prefer him dead or in power, but in neither case repentant.

They preferred him in power, than to admitting that munus and ministerium mean different things. They preferred him in power to reading the Code of Canon Law. The preferred him in power than to electing a legitimate successor of Saint Peter. They preferred him in power rather than asking for his rebuke in council.

However, those Catholics who know that the world does not revolve upon prayers alone, but on every good deed done, insisted his election in 2013 was invalid because Pope Benedict XVI did not abdicate; and insisted that Pope Benedict XVI have a successor; these also saw the wisdom of the Catholics of Rome in electing him pope, thereafter, so that he might have the benefits of the High Priestly Prayer of Christ the King. These also participated in the Sutri Initiative for nearly 18 months, because they had true supernatural charity for Pope Francis and sought his repentance or deposition. These Catholics are in the Camp of God, and entirely different moral universe from those who now gloat, and refused to see Pope Francis either questioned in his authority, rebuked in council, or removed from power.

Would that the Bishops have listened to this petition, for as it said, therein, if he had the grace of Peter, the Lord would give him repentance, and if he did not, the faithful would be relieved from his evil influence. But these Bishops chose not to act, deliberately, and now they share in the guilt of letting such a man go to his grave without a fraternal correction.

Those faithful too who knew of the Sutri Initiative but valued their own reputations or hatred for the man more will also have to answer to the Divine Justice for failing in charity towards the man.

And those who wanted him in power so that they could grift on the dissent he was causing in the Catholic Church are perhaps the lowest lifeforms on social media.

The first side sought the man’s salvation and grieves that he is headed to destruction impenitent. The other side cared only to insult him and use him as a punching bag, and now gloats that he will be damned.

Let us not join these devils who are dancing around the hospital bed of Pope Francis. Maybe our prayers can no longer do anything, but we should at least refrain from that vile behavior of the dark side of all these recent controversies.

And, thank you, one and all, who read FromRome and who joined me in rebuking the man for his errors, opposing him in his unjust claim to the Apostolic See, seeking the greatest mercies in Heaven for him, in the Prayer of Christ, and the greatest final mercy on earth, a fraternal rebuke. The entire motive for this was Charity, and we did nothing other than what Catholics should do, who are to love all those in Christ, whether they be saints or sinners.

Moral Responsibility in Ecclesiastical vs. Political Elections: Jan. 30, 2023

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

Traduction français

Since the death of Pope Benedict XVI new cults and sects have arisen which focus around novel ideas of juridical and ecclesiastical right. Not all of these are sedevacantist, for an equal number are also globalist and willingly recognize Pope Francis as always having been pope.

But since these errors regard topics which are never quoted by “Traditionalists” or “Conservatives”, though the latter do mention “morality” at election time — their only morals left being the assertion that “it is a mortal sin not to vote for a Masonic politician of the right” — it will be important to review a few basic Catholic truths to distinguish the true Faith from the doctrines of sectarians.

First of all, in ecclesiastical elections, like civil elections, there is a moral responsibility for all who have the right to vote, to make a decision. However, this does not equate to the moral responsibility to vote. Because in a system where there are only a few candidates, whose names are chosen by a Masonic elite, you are never obliged to vote for any of them.

But in an ecclesiastical election, by the norms of Canon Law and ecclesiastical tradition, everyone with a right to vote is free to vote for whomsoever he will, even if, at later stages in the voting the number of possible victorious candidates is reduced to only a few. This freedom shows how the Catholic system is much more sane and liberal than any modern “democracy”, where the masses are never entrusted with such discernment or decisions.

And yes, in an ecclesiastical election just as in a civil election, you are not obliged to even show up for the vote. However, while not exercising your right to vote in a civil election nearly never makes any difference, due to the high numbers of those who have the right to vote, in an ecclesiastical election it always makes a difference, due to the low numbers of electors.

Thus, if you do not come to vote, in an ecclesiastical election, you have the much greater moral responsibility for the outcome than someone who came and voted against the one who ultimately won. Similar situations can also arise in civil elections in parliaments, of course.

Thus, when it comes to voting for a Roman Pontiff, electors have a very grave duty to take their responsibilities seriously. In a Conclave, for example, when the election involves just 120+ electors, not attending the Conclave, by law, means that you cannot vote afterwards: but morally speaking it also means you consent to whatever is the outcome.

Certain immature individuals never accept the outcomes of elections and say things like, “He is not my President”, or “He is not my Pope”. In the former, they never act out on their virtue signalling, though some emigrate for a time from their country. In the Church there have been but rare cases of schisms caused by persons or groups not accepting an uncontested election.

But in the case of an election of the Roman Pontiff by Apostolic Right, the Faithful of the whole Roman Church — the Diocese of Rome and all the suburbican dioceses — are all responsible for the outcome. That is why in ancient times they meet immediately and without delay, if they could, and elected holy men. There are dozens of saints who were popes before 1058, when the College of Cardinals was established. There are but a handful since that time, in the last 1000 years. A fact that should cause all of us to stop and think.

So in the recent and extraordinary juridical case of a pope who appears to renounce but does not, or who is pushed out of power by a College of Cardinals in total rebellion, but who tricks them by an intelligent ruse, after his death the only ones likely to vote for his successor are the Faithful of Rome who paid close attention to his words and did what he himself urged to be done, elect his successor by those who are competent, that is, who have the right to do so, in such extraordinary circumstances, wholly outside the presumed conditions which would exist in the time of a papal election, as are provided for in the current Papal Law, Universi Dominici gregis.

And thus we come to the most sober consideration: that everyone at Rome who refused to attend that Assembly is entirely responsible morally and juridically for the election of the one who was elected there, just as all the clergy and faithful of Rome who held Pope Francis to be the pope from 2013 to this day, and thus who did not attend. Merely claiming that you held Pope Benedict XVI to be the pope until death does not excuse you from responsibility. Nay it magnifies it to an infinite degree.

Even those who had no right to vote, are morally responsible, and gravely so, if they did anything to encourage electors not to attend or took steps not to inform them or encourage them to exercise their right.

If you could have prevented an unworthy candidate from being elected, and did not, then you are gravely responsible, and cannot be saved if you never repent of this.

At the same time, for those who did attend, there’s was a responsibility greater than the cult leaders and grifters who talk about controversies in the Church to gain money or attention. They had to do the utmost to protect the Church, with the men who were willing. They had to balance the salvation of the whole body against the interest of a few. These faithful Catholics, betrayed and abandoned by everyone but the readers of FromRome had also to prevent another Assembly being called by nefarious voices who would elect someone even worse than Bergoglio or someone who had no desire to promote the unity of the Church after his death, putting the Church in a century long internal schism. They had to find a candidate that most Catholics would accept; a candidate whose acceptance would be morally certain, and by whose acceptance the whole body of the Faithful would return again into communion with Christ.

Also, in this matter, it is important to note that the concept of Quorum in elections is also important to consider. The Quorum rule in most modern “democracies” guarantees that no minority will enact a law or decision which binds the majority. In some ecclesiastical elections there are Quorum rules, But in elections of the Roman Pontiff there never has been a Quorum rule, neither in a Conclave, nor in an Assembly of Apostolic Right. Precisely because, in morals, if you do not come you have in fact voted for whoever has won, whether you like the outcome or not. This is why even if all the clergy do not come, they have in fact voted for whoever has won.

That these few electors on January 30, 2023 A. D., are so viscerally hated by all grifters and cult leaders and “Bergoglio is certainly the pope” fake opposition, shows that they did the will of God against all the fanatics of Hell.

While we are not privy to the decisions than many generations of Cardinals had to make in Conclaves, during the last thousand years, to hold the Church together and protect her from persecution, we can be sure that many times many honest and holy men had to make similar decisions. Of them we know nothing on account of the Pontifical Secret to which all Cardinals are bound, in Conclaves, however.

In postcript: a certain uninformed civil attorney in South America, who never studied in an ecclesiastical institution, has been reporting that since a certain Pope denied that the people can elect their own bishops, that therefore the election of a Roman Pontiff by the faithful of Rome is never lawful. Her argument is a sophism of the kind condemned long ago by Aristotle, where you take one statement which denies a thing (by the People) and apply it to a fact which regards another thing (the Faithful) and draws a conclusion of the undistributed middle term, as it is called in logic. It’s the most common way to deceive or lie, and is often used by lawyers. This attorney, if their thesis was correct, would have to become a protestant, since their conclusion leads to the implication that there were no legitimate Popes until 1058 when an illegitimate pope established the College of Cardinals. Idiots might find that line of reasoning sound. But all sane men from every age shall laugh at them on the Day of Judgement!

Candlemass: The Feast that reminds us to walk with the Child Jesus

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

“Behold I send My messenger, and He shall prepare the way before Me. And suddenly there shall come to His temple the Lord, whom you seek, and even the messanger of the testament, whom you desire. Behold he cometh, saith Yahweh Sabaoth.”

Today in all of Christian tradition, we celebrate the presentation of Our Lord Jesus Christ, in the Temple, when Saint Joseph and Our Lady took him to the Temple in Jerusalem, to offer the expiatory sacrifice for their first born.

This ancient past event in the life of Jesus, Our Savior, seems to be very insignificant, for all the celebration which surrounds it: for today, Christians are wont to bless Candles, in East and West and undertake elaborate processions.

Famous people have fans who commemorate their lives, and so it makes sense that Christians have the right to remember everything that Jesus did, and said, and suffered with some celebration. Why who else has ever loved us so much as to die for us to save us from eternal death?

But this feast day reminds us that we too should walk with the Child Jesus just as Mary and Joseph did.

For them there was no feast day, no procession, no celebration, and they expected that no one would take any care, just as many parents today take their children to some government building to register their documents.

But doing that was their duty to do in such a minor thing was the cause of great graces from that day until the end of time. Because Simeon and Anna had waited their entire lives for this day, not knowing it was this day, to see their Savior and Messiah. And though it was the solemn duty of every believing son and daughter of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, to await Him, these two elderly Hebrews alone received the grace of being promised to see him, and persevering in prayer to obtain that promise.

This reminds us that if we but do the ordinary duties of our life, as ones in love with Jesus Christ, carrying the Child Jesus as it were in the embrace of our hearts and minds, then God will prepare the way of grace ahead of us, even for many others of whom we do not even know the names or existence.

A kind word of faith, a little work of Christian charity, a compassionate gift of consolation: some small thing of which if we have the love of God, is not only easy to do, but spontaneous when we see anyone in any need.

This is who we who believe in Jesus Christ should live. This our is how the candle of our lives is to be lit, so as to bring the Light of Christ to the world.

And this is such a wonderful, simple and ordinary way of walking with the Child Jesus, that it deserves to be celebrated and remembered each year.

May His Light be ever with you, in good times and in ill, in the the darkest moments, so that you may find Him to be your greatest and eternal Joy.

Wishing one and all a blessed Candle Mass!

Trumpian “Catholics”: We need a Trump-like man as the next Pope!

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

When a Catholic says that a political leader is the “Light of the World”, you know you are face-to-face with an adept of the spirit of the Antichrist.

I am reminded of the loonies who in 2008 said that Barrack Obama was “the Messiah”, a most blasphemous thing to say.

The U.S.A. is currently under a massive psy-op, where given the appearances of a little back-tracking and patriotic supremacy, many Catholics are falling under the spell of a carefully orchestrated fake salvation.

Let us remember that the titles, “light of the world” or “the Light of the World” are proper only to Christians and Christ respectively; and that Trump is a member of a church of positive thinking, which is not even Christian. So when he says, “God” the meaning is not even certain.

But to confuse some political details with salvation is just as absurd.

Has Christ been proclaimed “King of the United States”, has Trump converted to the Catholic Faith, has the Masonic Lodge been abolished, have their two political parties been banned? Some such things might be cause for rejoicing.

But in any case, one should never ascribe titles which are theologically based on decisions of God to certain persons or to Christ, to a political leader who is doing something entirely different.

Nor is it sane to say that Donald Trump is an example of the kind of pope the Church needs to restore Her from years of Modernist attacks, as Mundabor, who is given to excesses as much as some people are given to drinking more than one cup of coffee, says, here:

And when you click on the side bar of FromRome.Info, then you will understand why I say this. Because the U. S. government policy since 1953 has been to undermine the Catholic Church and make the American example accepted as the true salvation of the world. This being the case, an informed Catholic can rightly wonder if Mundabor and Sheryl Collmer are of a sane mind, or whether they have accepted consciously that objective and error, since what they are proposing, that Trump be a model for a pope, is totally Americanist in the worse sense of that term.

Trump is not a virgin. He is not a Catholic. I am not sure he is even baptized. He is twice divorced. He allowed his second election to be stolen. He pushed the DeathVaxxing of the U.S.A..  He allowed 200+ cities burn under Marxist mob attacks. He is pro-Abortion, though not under ever circumstance. He is pro-LGBTQ+.

If you say that this man is the kind of man we need to restore the Church, then I would say you are a blasphemer.

Now, my critics might lash out and say that I am faulting the comparison of Trump vs. the next Pope on the personal characteristics of the man, when the above authors are talking about his public policies. But, if my critics dare to respond thus, they can save their breath in enunciating that, because, I ask, do you really want a godless, heathen of a man on the Apostolic Throne who does good things? Don’t we need a holy man? Is not holiness the only certifying factor that a pope’s pontificate will do good for the Church?

And in this, is shown the real error of the above authors: they are claiming that politics is a more sure sign of Catholicism than sanctifying grace and communion with the Holy Spirit.

So please, think before you repeat this HYPE. As it is godless and demonic.

Eric Sammons redefines the Deposit of the Faith

Editor’s Note: This article by Eric Sammons, who once worked for the U. S. Government in data collection, is 100% cringe worthy for his audacious presumption to tell Catholics — even though he is a convert — what the Deposit of our Holy Faith contains and does not contain. Here he pontificates and insists that the Hexameron’s teaching that the world was created in 6 days is NOT part of the Deposit of the Faith, and that therefore Catholics cannot claim that belief in alien intelligent corporeal life is contrary to scripture.

For Catholics who know their faith, they will recognize immediately Eric Sammons fallacy, when he insists, that since the Magisterium has not defined either beliefs, they are not part of the Deposit of the Faith. He is quite wrong.

The Deposit of the Faith contains the whole of Sacred Scripture and the whole of Divine and Apostolic Tradition. Sacred Scripture includes all the books of the Bible accepted in the canon at the Council of Trent. The narrative of the creation of the world, in the Book of Genesis, is part of that canon. As Saint Thomas says, to deny that any verse of scripture is true is heresy by definition. To cut out an entire book or part thereof is obviously way worse, being an act of apostasy, because if you change the foundation upon which you build, it’s obvious you are not building the same house.

Also, I seem to remember that the infallible, inerrant prophet Isaiah said in chapter 45:18, that “God made the world … to be lived in.”. A verse which clearly means that a place for life requires the Divine Intervention.

It may not be obvious to Eric Sammons, but the Holy Spirit, the Lord and giver of Life, has to be at work for life to exist. And if Scripture does not say He was at work, then the Deposit of Faith does not say there is life there.

Eric Sammons has shown himself to be a classical modernist and a deceptive publisher, who like many laymen throughout the ages has gone off the cliff of presumption and begun to be his own pope. Like nearly all Catholic social media personalities, who are converts, you waste your time listening to these persons, who are often if not nearly always wrong in something, even when they have academic degrees from Catholic institutions.

Eric Sammons also seems to be utterly uninformed about the recent discoveries in cosmology and biology, both of which by an ever growing consensus of empirical scientists require such a precise and mathematically impossible arrangement of things and causes, that God is the only rational explanation for the existence of the planet Earth and of the abundant life on it. So the truth is, that Sammons by denying parts of the Deposit of the Faith to make room for science, is really making room for scientism and disbelief.

A Christ-Mass Prayer

catholic statue of Our lady and child Jesus

That all may turn to the Child of Bethlehem,
repenting of their sins against God and neighbor,
ending every pursuit of envy, fraternal hatred, jealousy,
covetousness, lust, greed, and rancor,

so that they might know the all-surpassing

PEACE AND LOVE

WHICH COMES FROM GOD ALONE

AND WAS INCARNATE FOR OUR SALVATION

THIS DAY 2024 YEARS AGO!

+ + +

With a special thanks to each and every reader of FromRome.Info,
in particular to all those who by God’s abundance were able to help me in the Year of our Lord 2024,
by their prayers or financial support and moral encouragement!

The Blessings of the Child of Bethlehem upon you all!