by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

March 16, 2020:  Bergoglio just published a new law for Vatican City regarding the organization of courts and police forces and offices of investigators.

Notice was given in the official Bulletin of the Vatican Press Office, which also published the text of the law in Italian. While I recognize that Bergoglio has no legislative power in the Vatican without express delegation by Pope Benedict, nevertheless, I took a look at the law to keep abreast of the latest news at the Vatican.

And there is where I found that the goose had laid the golden egg. I speak of Article IV, which reads:

Articolo 4
(Cittadinanza vaticana)

I magistrati ordinari sono durante munere cittadini vaticani.

Which in English is:

Article 4
(Grant of Vatican Citizenship)

The ordinary magistrates (of Vatican courts) are Vatican citizens during their munus.

The Latin phrase, durante munere, refers to canon 1484 §1, which I spoke about at the Academic Conference in October, on the Renunciation of Pope Benedict XVI. I quote, here, from my talk on Munus vs. Ministerium: A Canonical Study:

Third, as regards to the distinction of munus and the fulfillment of a duty of office, there is Canon 1484, §1 in regard to the offices of Procurator and Advocate in a Tribunal of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction:

Can. 1484 – § 1.  Procurator et advocatus antequam munus suscipiant, mandatum authenticum apud tribunal deponere debent.

Which in English is:

Canon 1484 §1.  The procurator and advocate ought to deposit a copy of their authentic mandate with the Tribunal, before they undertake their munus.

Note here, significantly, that the Code associates the mandate to exercise an office with the undertaking of the munus (munus). Negatively, therefore, what is implied by this canon is that when one lays down his mandate, there is a renunciation of the munus.

Significance

The argument about munus meaning ministerium has just received a major blow to its hull and is now taking water at a rapid rate.  What I said in October in my paper at the Conference, has now received approval by Bergoglio in publishing this new law.

And it is not just a one-liner kind of mistake. Again, in Article 10, n. 2, the office of a Magistrate is called in Italian a “carica”, which is the Italian word for “munus”, not ministerium. Again, in Article 17, n. 2,  and in Article 22, n. 2,the same Italian word is used.

Those who believe that Pope Benedict XVI has validly resigned his office, have a major problem on their hands. Bergoglio himself has used munus to mean office. He did not use ministerium. The Latin phrase, durante munere, means so long as he remains in office, or if you like, for the duration of his munus.

But Pope Benedict XVI did not renounce the petrine munus, so He too is pope durante munere.

+ + +

[simple-payment id=”5295″]

These are official government collected stats, published at official UK govt website.  Click image to read the stunning admissions.

On Feb. 11, 2021, we will mark the 8th Anniversary of Benedict’s being forced from power. To understand what Pope Benedict did and did not do, FromRome.Info will publish each day one of the 7 parts of this Documentary, which definitively explains the entire controversy and all the points of canon law involved. — It was first published at Easter of Last year, and no theologian or canonist at Rome has yet refuted it.

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

A Legionary of Christ is hunting for Br. Bugnolo. I do not know why, but he is not the first. An overweight Capuchin from Lebanon has been hunting for me for at least a year.

The Capuchin is incensed that I, as son of St. Francis, am fighting against the New World Order and the Deep Church, led by the Arch-heretic (AB Vigano’s term) and apostate, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

The Legionaries of Christ were founded by Marcial Maciel, certainly the greatest and most depraved sexual monster to ever be ordained a priest and be allowed to rise to heights of ecclesiastical power in any country or even at Rome.  So much so, that when he died and a funeral was celebrated for him here at Rome, at St. Paul outside the Walls, everyone in the Vatican Curia attended, except Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.  And there is a reason for this, as I pointed out here.  This is where the battle lines are really drawn.

Many writers, not myself, have said since Maciel was exposed that those who remain in his Order are completely compromised or morally dissolute individuals. From what I know, I am certain that the Legionaires of Christ are not of God, but rather of the Devil, and that no man of integrity would remain with them. Many men of God have left them, and I encourage the rest to do so.

It was when Pope Benedict XVI moved against them, that the plot to remove him from power was put in motion. That was 2012.

No wonder then that they hate me for faithfully serving Pope Benedict XVI.

So I am honored that I am being hunted by a legionnaire of the Antichrist. The one who is particularly on my scent is incensed that I am exposing the Scamdemic and the Vaxx as total frauds. He is followed on Twitter by a coterie of vicious atheists and sodomites, who when he trolls anyone, they join in the attack.

He recently trolled the Twitter account of Ordo Militaris Catholicus, and for this reason, and that account had to block nearly 300 Marxists, Sodomites and Atheists, and not few rabid Bergoglians, who piled on at Father’s word.

What kind of priest has such a following? A priest in the service of Hell, of course.

But recently this legionnaire made a blunder and sent a Direct Message to the wrong Twitter account, and unbeknownst to him, before he blocked that account, his message was recorded by Twitter and sent via email, leaving a permanent record.

This email reveals the tactics of the group which is hunting me, and how vicious and malign they are. They are digging for incriminating evidence where none is found. The questions also make it appear that they are engaged in a plot to calumniate me to my associates and to the general public, believing like all servants of Satan, that the truth can be undermined by attacking those who deliver it.

So I will foil their plot by answering their questions in the light of day.

First, the DM that was never meant to be seen by the general public.

Can I ask you a few questions? (If you cannot answer, what is the best way to get a had of Alexis Flavian Bugnolo?) 1. Is Alexis Flavian Bugnolo the president of Ordo Milltaris (I found different versions on different pages)? 2. Why did you choose XXX as your registrant & legal address? 3. Why was Ordo Millitaris set up as a for-profit company rather than a non-profit?  4. Can I please see the “written permission of the Congregation for Religious in 2006” Alexis Flavian Bugnolo has according to his bio of FromRome? Does this work forward in time to 2021? In 2010, he had a three-year permission from the diocese of Nota (Sic) but I cannot find any permissions that would apply beyond 2013. Could you please help me? 5. You say, “In response, as of this date, approximately $7000 USD of these funds have been redirected to other charitable works sponsored by Ordo Militaris Inc.” Could you please inform me what charities these were? 6. Do you have contact info for Dr. Rosa Marulo?

Here are my public answers:

A. 1.  I am not the president of Ordo Militaris, because there is no such entity, as far as I know. But I am the President of Ordo Militaris Inc., a Montana Stock Corporation.

A. 2. We chose XXX as our registered Agent because in Montana it is a requirement to have a Registered Agent, and they offer professional services. Please note that it is a federal crime of racketeering to attempt to dissuade a Registered Agent from servicing a corporation as a way to prevent it from operating.

A. 3. Ordo Militaris Inc. was set up as a for profit corporation, because U. S. tax laws to not allow religious non profits to engage in offering services other than strictly religious, and since the Corporation is organized to offer security and defense services, it was a necessity in U. S. law to so organize. But this manner of incorporation allows our NGO to engage in commerce and to sell stock so as to consider any possible way of responding to the needs of Christians who are persecuted. We presently and so far have paid no salaries. I work as a volunteer. We were founded in August of 2016, and are the only corporation I know if which runs as a non profit, but is organized as a for profit. In this we imitate the Orders of Knights of Old, such as the Knights of St. John or the Order of the Knights Templars.

A. 4. No you cannot, as I would not trust you with a dried fig. — If you know anything about Canon law, then you would know that the phrase “work forward in time” is meaningless to such an extent that your question has no answer. — As you do not ask help to do good but rather to do evil, you merit no help.  — But to give you a stomach ache, Pope Benedict XVI knows I live as a hermit in the Diocese of Rome, and has known since 2012.  I am currently one of the few Faithful who remain in communion with him, not like yourself who adore a heretic and schismatic, as your high pontiff, which makes all the masses you offer sacrilegious and meriting only of damnation, because you close your eyes to canon 332.  As regards the Diocese of Noto — not Nota — I was accepted into the Diocese as a hermit after a canonical investigation of my entire life by the then Bishop of Noto. I was the first hermit to be so welcomed into the diocese in nearly 200 years. Even another hermit priest, who is popularly held to be a miracle worker, had not been so accepted at the time.

A. 5.  Those who participated in our Relief Effort for Beirut asked that their funds be used according to specific instructions, the knowledge of which pertains to their private wishes, and which according to U. S. law you have no right to know. Sorry.

A. 6. Yes, I do have the contact info for my colleague at The Scholasticum, but I would no more give you the address of an Academic who is a woman than I would give you the address of a young boy.

Finally, I think you can see where this “priest” is coming from and where he is headed. Let us pray for him. I do not mention his name, so that I can speak the truth about the moral depravity of his actions without damaging his personal reputation. This priest needs lots of prayers, because he has long ago gone down the wrong path, and already has an infamous reputation.

I for my part count this affair as a crown of victory, because as Our Lord said, “Beware if all men speak well of you, because it is thus that they treated the false prophets”.

For more information about the founder of the Legionnaires of Christ, see here.

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In response to FromRome.Info’s call that the US States affirm their right to nullification (see here), two U.S. State legislatures have introduced bills to establish a mechanism for habitual and continual surveillance of Federal Laws and Acts, both from the executive and legislative branches, and make them subject to the State’s right of nullification.

Nullification is a constitutional principle derived from the 10th Amendment whereby each sovereign state can declare inoperative, null or void any act of the Federal Government which transgresses inherent terms, articles, or concepts of the U.S. Constitution or its Amendments.

Both North Dakota and South Dakota voted overwhelmingly for President Donald Trump and joined the lawsuit with Texas, in the Supreme Court, against Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona.

The actions of North Dakota and South Dakota are expected to ripple across America providing a legal shield against the Marxist Usurpation by the Communist Party of China, through Biden, both of whom are beholden to the Rothschild’s branch of international Freemasonry.

If passed into law in the States, I expect a strong reaction from the Supreme Court in an attempt to strike them down — a thing which constitutionally the Court has no authority to do, and which if they attempt will precipitate an even more extreme constitutional crisis in the United States of America.

Click the images to read the news about both states’ actions.

https://twitter.com/SamSullivan/status/1356356339484794880

On Feb. 11, 2021, we will mark the 8th Anniversary of Benedict’s being forced from power. To understand what Pope Benedict did and did not do, FromRome.Info will publish each day one of the 7 parts of this Documentary, which definitively explains the entire controversy and all the points of canon law involved. — It was first published at Easter of Last year, and no theologian or canonist at Rome has yet refuted it.