In Italy, Men are still dropping dead suddenly (from the Vaxx?)

Editor’s Note: Not the first, nor the last, Erasmo Larato, 29 years of age, while jogging collapsed and died without explanation. It would appear to be a myocardial infraction, that is, heart attack, caused by being DeathVaxxed, but who knows?

Not the second, nor the last, is Daniele Venturi, 55 years of age, an ardent publicist for the last 3 popes, who died suddenly in hospital after being admitted for a “malore”, the Italian term meaning roughly, “feeling bad”, which is used by the Main Stream Media to cover for Covid-19 Jab caused deaths, which are notorious for being the cause of the weakening of the heart. As FromRome.Info has often reported, those who have been DeathVaxxed are apt to die of sudden heart attack within 5 years. Alas, it is happening.

VATICAN: Cardinal Parolin is acting as if Pope Francis has already decided to resign

Editor’s Note: In this morning’s Press Release by Vatican News, concerning Pope Francis’ health and his progress to recovery, there is a very curious note about Cardinal Parolin, who is to celebrate a Mass for Pope Francis, tomorrow morning, March 14th, in the presence of the Diplomatic Corps (all the Ambassadors to the Vatican). — It appears that the Cardinal is attempting to lobby foreign powers for their support of his candidacy in the upcoming Conclave. And that means that he knows Pope Francis is either going to die this year, or abdicate. And it seems more likely that it will be an abdication, or more properly speaking, a papal renunciation.

This implication seems all the stronger, since the Mass to be celebrated, will be offered in the Capella Paolina, the chapel from where the Cardinals process into the Conclave in the Sistine Chapel; a chapel which is for the private use of the Pope himself. The hints here are so loud you can hear them overseas! For more about this Chapel, click the image below:

Pope Francis’ Changing views about Papal Renunciations

Editor’s Note: The scam the AP has been pushing since Feb. 11, 2013 continues, for in this article, they quote part but not all of Canon 332 §2.  And if you are a long time reader of FromRome.Info you can guess which part they left out, before even clicking on the image above to read the article. — Nevertheless, that they published this article just 4 days ago, shows that they heard the rumor of Pope Francis pending abdication sooner than anyone else.

Breaking News: Pope Francis to abdicate, move into Santa Maria Maggiore Apartment?

Commentary by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

According to the report of InfoVaticana, above, in Spanish:

The rumor that has spread in recent hours finds new confirmation. The apartment where Pope Francis will be hospitalized in Santa Maria Maggiore is ready and equipped to welcome the pontiff upon his release from the Gemelli Hospital, with the necessary equipment to care for an elderly patient, 88 years old, in the extremely delicate clinical condition that everyone now knows is. Why set up the hospital apartment in Santa Maria Maggiore and not in Santa Marta, where the Pope resides? The Roman basilica is the designated location in case of his resignation. Unlike Benedict XVI, Pope Francis has already publicly stated that he does not intend to remain in the Vatican, as Ratzinger did, but to move permanently to Santa Maria Maggiore. Added to this is the fact that he has already identified, within the Roman Basilica, the place where he wants to be buried. He also gave precise instructions on how his funeral should be carried out.

While at the present, this is only a rumor, it is perfectly consistent with all the news reported so far, that Pope Francis’ lungs are permanently damaged and he will have to be on oxygen and breathing machines for the rest of his life (as Dr. Bassetti believes is highly likely). This implies the very precise conditions of debilitated health, for which he has several times in the past said would lead him to decide to abdicate, as the AP reported last month.

FromRome.Info will follow this story closely. If true, we can expect in a few days, when Pope Francis is released from Gemelli that the announcement of his renunciation of the Papacy be made.

For more information, this is what Pope Francis needs to do to renounce the Papacy validly.

UPDATES March 12: The denials in recent weeks that Pope Francis was having a room prepared for him at Santa Marta, on the south gate of Vatican City, seems to confirm that he will transfer from Gemelli to another location. It is certain that he will have to be on oxygen during the day and during the night, so these facts seem to corroborate the report above.

The Consistory of Cardinals, which Pope Francis convoked on Feb. 25, for an unspecified future date, also seems to give credibility to the above report, since the most proper way for a Pope to renounce is in the presence of the College of Cardinals fully assembled. So I expect that the announcement of a precise date for the Consistory, and its location at Santa Maria Maggiore, will be the imminent confirmations of the above report.

UPDATES: March 13: The Vatican News Bulletin on Pope Francis’ health, last evening, denied that it is certain that Pope Francis would go to Nicea, Turkey for the 1700th Anniversary of the Council of Nicea, an event so important a Pope could not not attend. This seems to be further confirmation of his imminent resignation, not to mention that since a new pope will need weeks to prepare for this trip, Pope Francis’ resignation would have to be in March or early April to accommodate for that. — Meanwhile Bookies in the United Kingdom have put 75% odds on Pope Francis resigning in 2025.

One of our sources among the staff of Santa Maria Maggiore says that he also has heard the rumor that Pope Francis will transfer there after leaving Gemelli Hospital, but not from any authoritative source.

Former Vatican employee in Secretariate of State can’t figure out just war

Editor’s Note: If you want to know how messed up the Vatican is in its internal organizations, just read this essay by a former employee of the Vatican Secretariate of State, who does not understand how the right of self-defense makes a war just for the defender as a first principle of moral action, derived from the Natural Law, which cannot be dispensed with by any human authority or earthly agreement, not even by the Roman Pontiff.

He writes,

According to Catholic social teaching, however, there are at least two principles even more fundamental than the principles for determining a just war. The first is the dignity of the human person and “the natural inclination of persons and peoples to establish relationships among themselves” (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 433).

And by saying such, he shows that he does not understand the first important distinction, that which exists between ontology and morals, and the next which regards persons and societies. Questions of morality regarding individuals are distinct from those which regard entire nations. And truths of natural beings are not the principles for determining whether a war is just or not, since they are as first principles of all morals. So, if anyone appeals to the principles of just war to justify an unjust war, it is not necessary to refer back to the principles of natural being to refute him on their basis, it is sufficient to discern the error in the application of the principles of just war. In fact, the right and authentic principles of just war can never be contrary to the truths of ontology, which are first principles of morals. Gallagher seems not to understand this.

Thus, to the argument that Ukraine’s defense is not just because she cannot win, the proper response is that since self-defense is always just, regardless of one’s ability to successfully defend oneself or not, it is a perversion of right reason to say with R. R. Reno that Ukraine’s military efforts to defend her territory are not just because of her inability to do this. It is also contrary to fact to say or claim that Ukraine cannot defend herself, as she has withstood (with the help of Allies which she has recruited) the second superpower in the world for 3 years with minimal loss of territory. Reno’s position is the morality of tyranny, where every nation state which is less powerful must succumb to every nation state which is more powerful. His opinion is revoltingly immoral and contrary to all Catholic Teaching.

Moreover, Gallagher’s statement that the Church somehow should never propose a detailed solution to an military conflict is also one of the most lame responses I have ever heard of. This is a diplomat for a supine foreign policy, which is interested in shaking hands but not ending conflicts.

The average Catholic in the pew, with a Rosary in his hand, knows how to make peace in Russia: the Consecration of that nation to the Immaculate Heart. That diplomatic solution was given 108 years ago, and those in the Secretariate of State still do not understand that Heavenly Proposal. Yet, the Secretariat of State eats up most of the annual budget of the Vatican City State.

What a waste of souls, lives and money! Q.E.D..

Ukraine and USA work out armistice proposal, USA to resupply Ukraine with armaments

Editor’s Note: This deal was cut after the U.S.A. deliberately denied Ukrainian Military forces with intel, so that the Russian Federation could take back most of the territory of the Kursk salient. Indeed, Russian Forces seem to have known precisely when the intel sharing deal would end and planned accordingly weeks in advance.

The Guardian newspaper spins the news by saying Ukraine agreed to a cease-fire, even though they know that no cease-fire can be agreed upon unless the Russian Federation which began the war decide to agree with it. And no cease fire has been agreed upon, because the USA has only proposed a possible agreement and the Ukraine has only agreed tentatively to this proposal.

So there is no ceasefire at present. And Russia has not even promised to agree to one.

Russia needs a ceasefire since they have begun to lose on multiple tactical areas, not to mention that their capital, Moscow, was hit by 350+ Ukrainian drones the other day, spreading panic throughout the heartland of the Federation.

Ukraine is probably counting on continuing their drone production and receiving aid from the EU member states.

Russia is not likely to keep any deal on an armistice, nor is the U.S.A. likely to re-supply Ukraine. It appears that Trump wants to divide Ukraine between Russian and the U.S.A., after the example of Adolf Hitler who divided Poland with Stalin.

Frankly, I do not think this war is over, and when it renews it will spread to the rest of Europe, as EU member states lose all confidence in any Russia-USA sponsored agreements.

And from a point of international law, Ukraine has the right to restart hostilities in the future to regain her territory.

McCusker the Historian gets “public” wrong every time

Editor’s Note: Matthew McCusker, who is identified as a historian HERE, but who has no profile on any professional site that I know of, has once again launched into the debate over whether Pope Francis is the pope, using his own erroneous notions, which lead him to attempt to decide by himself or without the authority of the Church, who is in the Church and who is not in the Church.

Once again he confuses “manifest” with “public”,* because he fails to recognize that (1) what any number of Catholics think is the truth is distinct from what the Authority of the Church declares to be the truth — this is the error of protestantism which is at the core of sedevacantism, and (2) that in the Catholic Church there is the rule of law and justice, so that even manifest formal heretics have the right to be tried in court before they are deprived of their rights (though the new Code allows for an administrative procedure, which is not a trial).

Only when a person who is formally accused in a ecclesiastical denunciation to the proper tribunal is reproved 3x and fails to renounce his heretical view(s), does it become juridically certain that he is “pertinacious”. When this occurs, the authority has the right to declare him a “public” heretic. Then the same authority, if it has the jurisdiction, can deprive him of all office and ministry in the Church.

McCusker is trying to convince Catholics, however, that Pope Francis is not the pope simply and solely because McCusker or any number of persons claim he is a heretic. McCusker is against having a trial and thus implicitly must be presumed to be against the Sutri Initiative.

McCusker also in the above article says that no doubt as to the validity of a papal election can be moved long after the election, it must be in the immediate days following. This is simply false, as can be seen from the events of the Great Schism.

So in sum, McCusker stands against any questioning of the Conclave of 2013, but at the same time against any move to remove Pope Francis from office. He hides this his true position under the virtue signaling of his above faulty argumentation.

Many may be fooled by his game. I for one am not.

If you are sincere in wanting Pope Francis declared a public heretic, there is only one way to do it, and that is the Sutri Initiative, because there is only one way the Church has ever done it, and Bellarmine, Noort, Suarez and the like don’t speak of it, so don’t waste your time digging into their writings to find the answer, when the Code of Canon Law already gives one.

_____________________________

Note: In Church Law “public” is used just as it it used in wanted posters for “Public Enemy number 1”, that is, as a qualifier which regards a determination made by legitimate authority. Thus, there are public heretics and public masses, just as there are private heretics and private masses. — McCusker wants you to take it on yourself to usurp the authority in the Church which has the duty to make such declarations. His position is exactly that of Sedevacantists. But Sedevacantists have never wanted to save the Church from Her enemies: they just want to virtue signal and run-away and found their own churches of the pure and enlightened.

Westen launches Fraudulent Petition to gather personal information

Editor’s Notes: In U.S. law there is a statute to protect corporations from unfair business practices such as harassment, criminal mischief, vandalism, calumny, destruction of property etc.. It is called the RICO statute. However, criminal investigations in U. S. law are begun either on the initiative of a state or federal prosecutor who has jurisdiction to investigate, or several working together, or on the basis of the filing of a criminal complaint by a private person or legal representative of such or of a corporation. Thus, in my judgement, there is no question that collecting signatures requesting a RICO investigation of the U. S. Bishops for merely contracting with the U.S. government to care for indigents in the U.S.A. will have any effect other than disclosing to the one organizing the petition, the names and personal information of the ones signing it. — In my opinion, therefore, this petition seems to be the worst kind of grifting imaginable, inciting hatred of the Catholic Hierarchy while seeking to expand one’s base of support.

Outrage in Italy’s Parliament over $1.6 Billion Deal for Starlink services

Editor’s Note: Recent investigations into Elon Musk’s days in South Africa show that he and his family were strong supporters of the Fascist regime in that country. Meloni, herself, and her party has ties to the former Fascist regime in Italy. This deal, which is not only scandalous for its high price tag, is also a threat to the internal security of the Italian Republic, since Elon Musk is known to manipulate Starlink Services to the benefit of the Russian Federation, even after prime strategists of that Federation have called for the Russian conquest of all of Europe, including Italy.

News and Commentary on the Catholic Church