Tag Archives: Don Alessandro Minutella

Viganò, Magister, Tosatti: all attack Pope Benedict XVI in mourning

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I am continually amazed how some people can wade through hundreds of pages of text to attack a person, but refuse to read 1 word to his defense, all the while claiming to be honest and devout Catholics.

The latest egregious case of this is the position take by Archbishop Viganò and the Italian Vaticanista Magister, condoned after the fact by Marco Tosatti with his publication of his anonymous editorial signed by Msgr. X.

And, yes lately, it does seem that Tosatti’s website has become a newspaper devoted to promoting the Archbishop, as many have noticed. In fact, Viganò and Tosatti are in direct communication and Tosatti publishes everything Viganò wants to publish as part of his own personal publicity campaign which appears more and more, each week, to be a campaign to be the next pope, since it pronounces itself on a variety of key issues in the life of the Church, through the publication of sometimes even personal letters with others. All this, even though Archbishop Viganò holds no munus in the Church to do anything of the kind.

But on to the matter at hand.

Viganò in recent days had Tosatti publish a long letter of criticism of Vatican II (see here). But why criticize Vatican II now? It is not like the current man in control of the Vatican is a shining exemplar and paragon of every virtue who does not know what Vatican II is about. We have 7 years of scandal that could be talked about — and Viganò has talked about that in part — but Viganò no longer names Bergoglio, and his demand that Bergoglio resign has been left in the air, with no action.

But here in Italy, the question of Pope Benedict XVI’s renunciation has become the hot issue. And one of the chief hermeneutical arguments for the invalidity of the Renunciation is the magisterial teaching of Pope Benedict XVI, on February 14, 2013, during his meeting with the clergy of Rome. In that meeting he did not speak to the clergy as a man who was resigning the Papacy, he spoke instead about how the Council was misinterpreted by the press and misrepresented to the world, and that the clergy of Rome need to return to the texts and read the Council for itself, without the presuppositions of what the press wanted you to think it meant.

I wrote about this speech by Pope Benedict XVI, showing how it conclusively affirms the way he wants his Declaratio interpreted. The Holy Father is, in substance, saying nothing strange or novel, he is merely saying in his own way, that Canon 17 should be observed, namely, that the Declaratio should be read in accord with the norm of Canon Law which requires that words in the Code be understood in their proper meaning, and when there is a doubt, read according to their sense in parallel passages of the Code of Canon Law.

This speech by Pope Benedict XVI was discussed by Don Alessandro Minutella and myself in a hour long program recently (here  specifically, and if you want to know about the Mafia of St. Gallen, see part II here). In that program, we laid down a challenge to the Sacred Hierarchy and clergy of Italy to respond to the evidence.  Viganò’s letter on Vatican II is clearly that response. Those who deny that Pope Benedict XVI is the pope, and all now insist that the Declaratio does not mean what the rules of Latin grammar says it must mean, have to attack the truth of that. And if not a direct attack on that truth, an indirect attack on the rules by which you are lead back to it.

So the speech of Pope Benedict XVI had to be attacked.

At the same time, Sandro Magister, who makes efforts to defend Bergoglio whenever he can, rose to the challenge of Viganò, who had attacked the god of Vatican II, using as he did the clever trick of blaming Viganò openly for being unfaithful to Pope Benedict XVI in his discourse on Vatican II. Magister’s article can be read here. Massimo Borghesi commented on it here. Magister accuses Viganò of being on the rim of schism. A good narrative trick to trigger all Viganò fans and those deluded by putting hope in a man who affirms Bergoglio, an archheretic and schismatic, is the pope. And Magister is clever enough to cite a speech from 2005, lest he draw attention to the speech of 2013.

Finally, Marco Tosatti publishes an anonymous essay which attacks Pope Benedict XVI while arguing against Magister’s charge of schism, with the outrageous accusation that Pope Benedict XVI resigned validly to prepare the way intentionally for Bergoglio. The title of the article leaves no room for doubt about that against which it was launched: BXVI’s never clarified Renunciation gives Viganò reason.

The title alone is a subterfuge. Only those who refuse to read the Declaration in the Latin cannot find the clarity in it they seek.

But the villainy of such an accusation is not exceeded by the villainy that would publish it. It is clearly a direct attack on the person of the Holy Father to discredit him in the eyes of Catholics who uphold the laws of the Church. And this during the time he is mourning the sickness and death of his brother, having been deprived of the opportunity to remain with him until the end and celebrate his funeral personally.

But it appears rather that what we are seeing is a very cleverly designed narrative control, to both anoint an Archbishop who holds no munus in the Church, while attacking the one who holds still the Petrine Munus. It allows the forces which hate Pope Benedict XVI to have Viganò play the good cop, and Magister and Msgr. X play the bad cop. But the result is the same as what Bergoglio has always sustained: Benedict resigned so that I can be the Pope, accept that and shut up!

As regards the speech of Our Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, and to discuss it on its merits: it is clear that the Holy Father explained a very sound forensic and catholic principle of textual interpretation, which Vatican II merits to have applied to it, regardless of all other considerations. Having read some of the conciliar texts in the Latin, I know that they are much more Catholic than the vernacular translations make them appear, and did enact a reform which was never put into action. What we got instead was the Aggiornamento of Paul VI. But, neither was free of errors, and the Council clearly never intended to give us texts which were infallible.

But forensic techniques are the nemeses of all Mafia. And that is why they are being ignored by the Sacred Hierarchy today, and many a layman who hangs on their tail coats.

+ + +

If you would like to support FromRome.Info, click the banner below.


[simple-payment id=”5295″]


Don Minutella: The Benedict-bot is a Bergoglian invention!

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

In this video, from yesterday evening, Don Minutella waxes eloquent in a way I have never heard him. He denounces the manipulation of the reputation of Pope Benedict XVI, whom the Bergoglians seem to trot out to support Bergoglio whenever they have a need. In English, we call this fake-Benedict the Benedict-bot, after the expression coined by Frank Walker of Canon212.com.  Benedict-bot is not the human being, but the media personality invented to make Pope Benedict seem an ally of Bergoglio.

He proceeds then to show that in one of the latest reports, it is clear that what is said is not from Pope Benedict XVI. First, he says, that we should step back and consider how it is that Pope Benedict the older he gets, the more he speaks. Old men are not that way. He could not possibly have overseen a 1000 page book.

Don Minutella says then that what is behind this false representation is the Masonic Lodge who sees its project tottering. He then denounces Trad Inc for supporting Bergoglio inasmuch as everything they do is to support Bergoglio’s legitimacy.

The first expression, “All must know …” is totally unlike Pope Benedict XVI. — Because Pope Benedict XVI was never about imposing thought upon others.

Second, that he is claimed to say that greatest revelation of God’s Mercy will be at the end of times. Don Minutella says that this is the heresy of the apocastasis, where all will be saved, a theological position which Ratzinger has never sustained, because he has always placed the height of God’s Mercy in the Redemption wrought by Jesus Christ in the Paschal Mystery.

Third, the claims that Benedict would share the error of Bergoglio that John Paul II had the same doctrine as Bergoglio on the question of the Divine Mercy. Don Minutella then refers to the Polish popes Encyclical, Dives in misericordia. Don Minutella said the Encyclical was hard to read, since Italians write and think linearly, but Poles think and write in spirals. Don Minutella then observes that John Paul II ties mercy to the Redemption and to the Divine Justice. But Bergoglio separates mercy and justice.

So Don Minutella asks, is it reasonable to believe that Pope Benedict XVI, a precise theologian when evaluating the writings of others, would ever misrepresent the thought of Pope John Paul II? He says that would be incredible and impossible.

Fourth, Don Minutella shows that the affirmation that Benedict would ever say that John Paul II was not a rigorist in morals — an expression which is entirely Bergoglian — and impossible. Then in a mocking tone, Don Minutella says expect next that they claim that Benedict will say that Jesus Himself was not a rigorist and in truth a Freemason! This is the level of absurdity to which they resort to use Benedict’s reputation for their ends.

Fifth, Don Minutella is of the opinion that Bergoglio has asked Trad Inc. to attack him in recent weeks, as a sign of loyalty to himself and as a desperate plan to prevent Don Minutella from having more followers in social media.

Sixth, Don Minutella says a sign of Bergoglio’s lack of faith is shown in his decision to hide the Eucharistic Miracle of Buenas Aires where the Host visibly was revealed as a piece of the flesh of the Heart of Jesus Christ, a thing demonstrated by science.

+ + +



Don Minutella: On the timely Comments of Pope Benedict XVI in Seewald’s Book

Here is a summary of the principal points, in English:

  • Trad Inc., Burke, Schneider, De Mattei etc. are the Prussians of the Bergoglian army.
  • The comments of Pope Benedict XVI upset them more than Bergoglians, because they prove that Benedict XVI is still pope and still has the charism of truth.
  • Only those who remain with Pope Benedict XVI are the true conservatives of the Catholic Church.
  • Bergoglio is clearly an anti-Evangelical figure, this is undeniable.
  • Pope Benedict XVI’s comments regarding the Antichrist is a clear reference to the agenda of Bergoglio.
  • Those who are excluded, excommunicated, by globalist society for speaking the Catholic truth, are in Pope Benedict’s mind the true Church.
  • In the Question & Answer period,
    • he reminds everyone that an authentic Miraculous Medal has 6 pointed stars
    • he affirms that the Pope, before the institution of the Conclave and Cardinal electors, was elected by the Catholics of the Church of Rome.
    • Says that Bl. Emmerich has prophesied that the man elected will be in his 50s of noble blood, from the south of Rome, and will not wear white.
  • In conclusion, he says that after the death of Pope Benedict XVI, let us pray that a man of the level of Pope Saint Pius X to be elected. We do not need a man who is not clear or is wishy-washy. A papal pope is needed.

Don Minutella’s Visit to Rome: Feb. 21, 2020

For more videos, see https://www.youtube.com/FromRomeInfoVideo

FromRome.Info spent 620 euros today to hire a video crew to do a live transmission of Fr. Minutella’s Mass and Question and Answers. The recorded video will also appear on Youtube in the coming week. If you want Br. Bugnolo to grow this Video apostolate into a Catholic TV Station here at Rome, help support FromRome.Info.

+ + +

[simple-payment id=”5295″]


Today on FromRome.Info Video — Don Minutella et alia




  • To subscribe click the subscription button on the From Rome Info Video homepage

By Subscribing you guarantee that you will not miss any video published at FromRome.Info Video, since you will thereby receive a notification immediately upon publication of each video.

There will be a host of News today. Here is the Schedule of Events. All times are Rome Time, which is 6 hours ahead of New York City, 9 hours ahead of San Francisco, and 10 hours behind Syndey Australia.

All broadcasts or live feeds will be from the Hotel Palace Pineta, Rome, Italy, where Don Alessandro Minutella, will be leading the Rosary and offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in union with Pope Benedict XVI, as part of a three day conference for those Catholics who have remained faithful to the Church, here at Rome.

1 PM —  Br. Bugnolo interviews Catholics who were present at the Grex Vocum Event to hear their complaints about the events in the Church in the last 7 years. — Video will be uploaded after each interview. Language: Italian.

2:30 PM — Br. Bugnolo will upload short Videos on a variety of topics and speak with Catholics who want their voices heard. Language: English and Italian.

4 PM — LIVE — Don Minutella leading the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary.  Language: Italian, or perhaps Latin.

4:30 PM — LIVE — Don Minutella offers the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the true Roman Rite. Language: Latin — It is expected that Don Minutella will preach.

5:30 PM — As opportunity presents, LIVE transmissions on a variety of topics until 8 P.M. Br. Bugnolo will seek to do a live interview with Don Minutella in Italian, and live interviews with other Catholics who are present who would like to speak about the Crisis in the Church to the whole world.

11:54 PM — 40 Days of Prayer against the Church of Darkness, from Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome.  Language: Latin, Italian, English. — It is hoped that Don Minutella will be present. But unless From Rome Info Video has 1000 subscribers beforehand, the transmission will be recorded, not live.

+ + +

[simple-payment id=”5295″]