Editor’s Note: In the above article, there is a passage which links to me, under the words, “Boomer Catholic”, with no social media following, who supports the heresies of Cardinal Prevost:

Here is the screenshot — Click to enlarge:

+ + +

I have seen a lot of dishonesty in my 30 years on the Internet, but this is obscene. If you are on substack, you can compliment Stephen Kokx — whose surname is Jewish — for having grossly and unethically lied to his “vast” following on Social Media.

I have no following on Social Media because I am NOT on social media. But let’s not allow facts to get in the way of propaganda. As for the accusation that I am “attention seeking”, I think that speaks of itself of the low moral character of an accuser who can muster no argument in his own defense.

I will also omit the obvious, that of all the sources Kokx cites in his article, I am the only one who has demonstrated forensically and canonically that Prevost is not Leo XIV, a thing “true opposition” Kokx won’t even touch, precisely because he is a classical sedevacantist, whose ideology cannot permit or tolerate any popes after whatever date they say the Church’s hierarchy all fell into heresy simultaneously.

Kokx linked “Boomer Catholics” to my article on the New Trad Inc.: an article which unmasked him and his fellow sedevacantists for running a fake opposition operation against Trad Inc. to keep Catholics in the “Leo XIV is certainly the Pope” narrative, and who are backed by “Catholics for Trump”, the organization founded by the apparently British foreigner, who seems to be of Jewish descent, Chris Jackson (an anonymous writer who has concealed his identity for more than a decade, while writing for numerous Catholic publications).

In related news, Candace Owens mentions at the end of this video that it has been a goal of Frankist Jews to fake conversion to the Catholic Faith, frequently change their names, and start publication apostolates to destroy the Church from within:

UPDATE: I apparently received a communication from Stephen Kokx — the authenticity of which I cannot confirm — in which he seems to want to claim that “Our critics” in the above cited screen shot, does not refer to the persons mentioned by name or linked to in the previous paragraph, even though the link under the word, “Boomer” goes to an article where I do criticize him. — I really do not know how to respond to someone who wants the English language’s rules of denotation and context to change so as to exculpate himself. That would not even pass evidentiary rules in a civil court. — Note, I have added a link to the origin of the surname, “Kokx”. —  For the record, in his communication to me, the author of the comment seems to want to accuse me of lying about him, and seems to make the claim that he has said nothing untrue about myself. — I say “seems”, because I do not want to impose standard rules of English grammar and syntax on the words of another person who already claims to follow other rules of signification. — However, if the comment I received is authentic, then Mr. Kokx needs to not only correct his article to conform to standard rules of English signification, wherein it is not possible to classify me as a supporter of Cardinal Prevost, AND explain to his readers how he knows about FromRome.info, but is hiding from them the fact that for more than 100 days, I have being demonstrating that the election of Prevost is canonically invalid, despite the fact that he, Mr. Kokx continues to call him “Leo XIV” and the “pope”, which, I will admit, is a far greater deception and unethical treatment of his readership, than saying or implying that I support Prevost.