Tag Archives: In Nomine Domini

Pope Nicholas II’s Bull, “In Nomine Domini” (Papal Version)

Latin Original,
with an English Translation by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

More than 5 years ago I published an English translation of Pope Nicholas II’s bull, In nomine Domini, which he wrote with the counsel of Saints Hildebrand, the future Pope Gregory VII, and Peter Damnian, the future Doctor of the Church against the homo-heresy. — Indeed, in the final paragraph which contains the censures against those who would dare violate this papal law, we can see the influence of the fiery zeal of Saint Hildebrand, where it combines a variety of curses found in the Psalms, against both clerics and laymen.

Recently with the help of a medieval scholar who has spent his life studying this Bull, I have come in the possession of a copy of this bull in its original version (see below). My previous translation was based on a copy of the Bull, in Latin, from a version which had been interpolated — that is, compiled by several existing versions, by a Scholar who attempted to interpret which precise wording was the original. While such a practice is widely accepted in the world of academics, it is always a very good thing to go back to the actual existing manuscripts and read them. The Latin text from the version published by the Church at Rome is that which I now publish, here below. — This papal version differs in nearly nothing from the interpolated version which I previously published and translated, but in the choice of words in a few passages, and in a few extra sentences at the end. — However, the paragraphs in the papal version are not numbered, so I have inserted numbers and joined some paragraphs together so that paragraph n. 3 in both versions regards what is to be done if a legitimate, honest and upright election cannot be held in the City of Rome.

This Bull of Pope Nicholas II is no obscure document, since it is the first Papal Bull which restricted the election of the Roman Pontiff to the Cardinals, two centuries before the first Conclave was ever held. It is even mentioned by name in the Apostolic Constitution of Pope Paul VI, Romano Pontifici eligendo, promulgated October 1, 1975, in its third paragraph, where it is called a “celebrated” constitution, that is, frequently used. It’s importance for today is that it explains, what other Papal Laws currently in force today do not, namely, “What is to be done if all the Cardinals forfeit their right and competence to elect the Roman Pontiff by reason of grave malfeasance, in conducting an illegal election or one which is declared invalid by papal prescriptions?”  It is implicitly referred to also in the current Papal Law of Pope John Paul II, Universi Dominici Gregis, promulgated Feb. 22, 1996, where it says in its preface, that “the institution of the Conclave is not necessary for the valid election of the Roman Pontiff”, and again, wherein in n. 76 it declares any election violating its norms null and void, without however expressing what is to be done if the Cardinals fail to return into conclave because they maliciously will to hold as pope a man who is illegally elected.

Now follows my English translation of that.

Pope Nicholas II’s Bull “In nomine Domini”

April 13, 1059 A. D. — In the Constantinian Patriarchal Basilica of the Lateran, at Rome

Translated from the Papal Version of the text, published by Das Papstwahldekret von 1059. Echte Fassung, in: Jasper, Detlef. Das Pastwahldekret von 1059: Überlieferung unf Textgestalt. Sigmaringen: Thorbecke, 1986, pp. 98-109.

IN THE NAME OF THE LORD God, our Savior Jesus Christ.  From the year of His Incarnation, 1058, in the month of April, in the Twelfth Indiction, with the Sacrosanct Gospels laid open, also with the Most Reverend and Blessed Nicholas, presiding as the Apostolic Pope, in the Lateran Basilica of the Patriarch, which is named the Constantinian, also with the most reverend Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots or venerable Priests and Deacons accompanying, seated, the Same venerable Pontiff, decreeing with Apostolic Authority, concerning the Election of the Highest Pontiff, said:

Most beloved Brothers and co-Bishops, and also inferior members (of the clergy), your Beatitude knows and it does not lie hidden, that with the passing of Our predecessor, the lord Stephen, of pious memory, how many adverse (troubles) this Apostolic See, which I zealously serve with God’s urging, has suffered through, and then how many repeated hammers and frequent blows She has been subjected to through the brokers of simonaical heresy, so much that the Column of the Living God almost seemed to totter and the net of the Highest Fisherman, with the storms swelling, would be driven into the depths of shipwreck to be submerged.

§ 1. Wherefore, if it please thy Brotherhood, We ought, with God assisting, take care prudently for future cases and this by Ecclesiastical statute, provide in the hereafter that (these) evils, revived, not prevail.  On which account, having been instructed by Our predecessor and by the authority of the other Holy Fathers, We decree, and establish, that with the passing of the Pontiff of this universal Roman Church, first of all, the Cardinal Bishops, treating (the election) together with the most diligent consideration, summon immediately the Cardinal Clerics to themselves; and in this manner let the rest of the Clergy, and the People, approach to consent to the new election, so that, lest the deadly disease of venality insinuate itself by occasion, the most religious men be the chief leaders in the election of the Pontiff to be promoted, but the rest be their followers.

§ 2. And certainly the right and legitimate order of the election is here considered carefully, if it be gathered from having examined the diverse rules of the Fathers or their deeds, (and) even that sentence of Blessed Leo, (Our) predecessor, (who) said: “No reason permits, that there be had among Bishops, those who have neither been elected from the Clerics, nor requested by the common people, nor consecrated by the co-provincial Bishops with the judgement of the Metropolitans” (Pope Leo I, Letter to Rusticus of Narbonne, Migne PL 54, p. 1203 A/B). But because the Apostolic See takes precedence to all other Churches throughout the earth, and for that reason, too, She can have over Her no Metropolitan, the Cardinal Bishops with out doubt serve instead as Metropolitans, who namely promote the one elected as High Priest (antistitem) to the apex of the Apostolic Summit.  Moreover, let them elect (him) from the very womb of the Church, if one is found suitable, and/or if he not be found in Her, let him be taken from another; with due honor being served, and reverence for Our beloved son, Henry, who is held as King at the present and with God conceding hoped (to be) the future Emperor, as We have already conceded to him and to his successors, who personally begged this right from this Apostolic See.

§ 3. Wherefore, if the perversity of depraved and iniquitous men, so prevail, that a pure, sincere and free election cannot be held in the City, let the Cardinal Bishops with the religious Clerics, and the Catholic laity, though few, obtain the right of power (ius potestatis) to elect the Pontiff of the Apostolic See, where they might judge it to be more fitting. Plainly, after the election has been completed, if there be a bellicose conflict, and/or if the struggle of any kind of men resists by the earnestness of wickedness, such that he, who has been elected, cannot prevail to be enthroned in the Apostolic See according to the custom, nevertheless, let the elect obtain as Pope the authority to rule the Roman Church and to dispose of all Her faculties, which Blessed Gregory, We know, did, before his own consecration.

§4. On which account, if anyone has been elected, or even ordained, or enthroned, against this Decree of Ours promulgated by Synodal sentence, whether through sedition, and/or presumption, or any guile, let him be cast down by the Divine Authority and that of the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, by a perpetual anathema with his promoters and supporters and followers as one separated from the thresholds of the Holy Church, just as the Anti-Christ, both invader and destroyer of the whole of Christendom, and let no audience be given him over this, but let him be deposed from every ecclesiastical grade unto whatever was before his, without any objection made, to whom if anyone whatsoever adheres, and/or exhibits any kind of reverence as to the Pontiff, or presumes to defend him in anything, let him be abandoned by equal sentence, which if anyone shows himself to be a violator of this sentence of Our Holy Decree, and has tried to confound the Roman Church by his presumption, and to raise disturbance against this Statute, let him be damned by perpetual anathema and excommunication, and let him be reputed among “the impious“, who “shall not rise again in judgement” (Psalm 1:5), let him know the wrath of the Omnipotent One against him, and that of the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, whose Church he has presumed to fool, let him know a ravaging madness in this life and in the future; “Let his dwelling become deserted, and let there be no one who dwells in his tents” (cf. Psalm 69:26): “Let his sons be orphans, and his wife a widow” (Psalm 108:9), “Let him be shaken completely” (cf. Psalm 108:10) to madness, and “may his sons go about begging, and be cast out of their dwellings” (Psalm 108:10). “May the money-lender ravage all his substance, and may the foreigner lay waste all his labors” (Psalm 108:11); “Let the whole world fight against” (cf. Wisdom 5:21) him, and let all the other elements be against him, and may the merits of all the Saints, at rest, confound him and in this life may they show open vengeance upon him.

§5. Moreover, may the grace of the Omnipotent God protect the observers of this Our decree, and by the authority of the Blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul may it absolve them from all bonds of sins.

I, Nicholas, Bishop of the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Roman Church,
have signed this Decree promulgated by Us, here above, as it reads.


Transcription

Source

Dr. Mazza’s lie concerning the Election of Innocent II, 1130 A. D.

Editor’s Note: I do not subscribe to or read 1 Peter 5 nowadays, so the above article escaped my attention, until I stumbled upon it today.   Any long time reader of FromRome.Info will know immediately the problem with the article: IT IS A TOTAL LIE.

And Dr. Mazza who has a Ph. D. in history cannot be excused from reckless negligence unless one were to accuse him of malicious deception, in his article published on May, 5, 2025, entitled, “The non-Canonical Conclave which worked.”

POPE NICHOLAS II’S BULL — IN NOMINE DOMINI — GOVERNED THE ELECTION OF 1130

I say this, because he should know, that the election of the pope in 1130 A. D., was governed by the Bull of Pope Nicholas II, In Nomine Domini. — He also knows of FromRome.Info, and if you search for that Bull you will find that the Latin text is published here at FromRome.Info.

That being the case, then, you cannot plead ignorance of what Law governed the Papal Election of Pope Innocent II.

Thus, to say that Pope Innocent II was elected “uncanonically” is a total lie on your part, Dr. Mazza. Because even the facts you cite do not support your thesis, that the Cardinals who elected Innocent II did not follow the law.

As can be seen from the text of the Bull, paragraph 1:

§1. On which account, having been instructed by Our predecessors, and by the authority of the other Holy Fathers, We decree, and establish, that with the passing of the Pontiff of this Catholic Roman Church, first of all, the Cardinal Bishops, treating most diligently together concerning the election, summon immediately the Cardinal Clerics of Christ; and in this manner let the rest of the Clergy, and the People approach to consent to the new election taking the greatest care beforehand, lest the deadly disease of venality insinuate itself by an occasion, and for that reason let the most religious men be the chief leaders in promoting the election of the Pontiff, but the rest be their followers.

As can be seen, the Bull does NOT say, that first the Cardinal Bishops must summon all the other Cardinals. Rather, it says, first the Cardinal Bishops, should treat most diligently together concerning the election.

Thus, since that is what the Cardinal Bishops did, upon the death of Pope Honorious, they did not violate the law. To claim that what they did was “machinations”, is outrageous. —  Dr. Mazza fails to mention that just a few days before, the supporters of the future antipope had stormed the Benedictine Monastery of San Gregorio al Caelio with military forces, only to find Pope Honorius still alive.

The Cardinals who elected Innocent II had a real, sound and proven reason, therefore, to not publicly announce the death of the pope, but to proceed immediately to the election. They were Cardinal Bishops. The presence of military forces of one side, rather than another, would have made the election invalid, by reason of violent extortion, a principle recognized in Church law for centuries. Thus the only way to have a free election was to proceed to the election before announcing the death of the Pope.

Such decisions and actions are not at all forbidden by the Bull of Nicholas II.

Therefore, to say the election of Innocent II was uncanonical, but later accepted by the whole Church, is simply false. It also implies a blasphemy against Saint Bernard of Clairvaux who convinced the Catholic Monarchs of western Europe to accept Pope Innocent, making it appear that the Saint approved of some illegality.

The Heroic Faith of Innocent II

Innocent II, being a man of God, trusted in the Lord Jesus, that God would come to his aid because his election was 100% juridically valid. And that faith was put to great test, as an example for all subsequent generations.  For, shortly after his election the supporters of the Anti-Pope, Anacletus II, who was Jewish by descent, drove him from the City, and those who had elected him, abandoned him! — So he fled to France and the greatest Saint of that age, Saint Bernard took up his cause and rallied the Kings of Europe to his cause. He returned to Rome, three years later, supported by Lothair III, the Germany Emperor and his armies. You can read this in any history of that age.

So, I must conclude by saying, “Shame on you, Dr. Mazza. Shame!”

This article of Dr. Mazza shows, that even those with Doctorates can pen articles which contain lies and falsehoods, or which misrepresent the historical facts. That is why I always urge the readers of FromRome.Info to go back to the actual documents and to read what they say. And when a translation of a Church document, which was written in Latin, is good enough, I do not hesitate to quote it. That is the honest approach to Church issues, regarding documents, and especially regarding laws.

Finally, the article of Dr. Mazza implies that the rules for electing a Pope were, prior to 1130 A. D., governed by Canons.. That is incorrect. The governing rule for the election in that year was a Papal Law, not a canon. Also, the election was not a Conclave, since the institution of the conclave does not originate until the end of the 13th century.

The Infallible Rule by which a true Pope is to be determined

As I have often said, the only criterion by which we can determine if a man is a true Pope of Rome or not, is whether he was the first man to be elected in a juridically valid manner.  This rule is based on a revealed divine principle of right: from the very lips of the Living God, and Supreme Lawgiver: Whatsoever you bind upon earth, shall be bound in Heaven; whatsoever you loose upon earth, shall be loosed in Heaven. And its second principle of right is part of the Deposit of the Faith, because it is a decision of Saint Peter the Apostle to leave the election of his successors to the free decision of the Church at Rome, that is, to the Catholic Clergy, Religious and Laity of the Church at Rome. — There are other subsequent principles of right, which emanate from decisions of Popes and of Synods at Rome during the course of the centuries, such as 1) what constitutes the territorial dimensions of the Church at Rome, 2) suburbican Sees, 3) rules about incardination, 4) pastoral mandates, 5) what constitutes ecclesiastical residence, 6) who can vote, 7) how the election is to proceed in normal circumstances, 8) the Bull of Pope Paul IV, Cum ex apostolatus officio, which declares invalid the election of heretics. — Thus only an election which abides by all these rules is accepted by Christ in Heaven. And consequently any election which does not, is NOT accepted by Jesus Christ, and thus should be rejected and NOT tolerated by all Catholics. Indeed, with the zeal of St. Hildebrand we should reprove and correct anyone who says otherwise.

That is why in this year of Our Lord, Two Thousand and Twenty Five, the Conclave of May had no juridically valid result, because Prevost was elected by 133 Cardinal Electors, when the Papal Law of Pope John Paul II, Universi Dominici Gregis, in n. 33, forbids more than 120, and in n. 76 declares invalid, the election of anyone otherwise. I have demonstrated that here. I have refuted contrary opinions here. I have shown, further, that if the Cardinals insist on their invalid act, that they have forfeited their right and competence, HERE, and that thus, we are in a situation juridically equivalent to the same in which all Cardinals had died — an extraordinary legal circumstance not envisioned in any Papal Law or canon currently in force — and that thus, in accord with the infallible teaching contained in the Bull of Nicholas II, n. 3, the right of election returns to the Clergy, Religious and Laity of the Church of Rome, in extraordinary circumstances. And the first man they elect, will be the true Pope in the sight of God Almighty and receive God’s Help and the intercession of Angels and Saints, in Heaven, and on earth, just as God and the Angels and Saints did on behalf of Pope Innocent II.

OTHER ERRORS AT 1 PETER 5

1 Peter 5 has had many articles containing gross errors, as I have documented in the last 12 years, but in addition to the above article by Dr. Mazza, there is this article by T. S. Flanders, which contains many false hoods, not the least of which is implying that Pope Vigilius’ election was irregular, even though Pope Boniface II, in accord with the decision of the Roman Synod of 531 A. D., had designated Vigilius as his successor. Thus, to imply that his election was coerced by the presence of the Byzantine Army is simply false. Moreover, the entire Clergy and Faithful of the Church at Rome accepted him. If there are no historical sources which say whether he was elected or acclaimed by popular consent, that proves nothing, for you cannot argue ex silentio, when all the certain facts are in favor of validity.

The Election of Bl. Urban II followed the Bull of Nicholas II, “In Nomine Domini”

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

I strongly encourage Catholics to read the History of the Church. And to that end, I share here in PDF format, Drahomír Suchánek’s, “The First Papal Election according to the Decree In Nomine Domini”, which was published  in the European Journal of Science and Technology, from February of this year.

This scholarly paper does not actually contain sources, but does cite them. And its approach is critical, asking the question whether this Papal Bull, In Nomine Domini, the Latin and English translation of which, I published, in 2020, can be found HERE, governed or was actually followed in the election of Bl. Urban II, Odo of Laghery, who was Cardinal Bishop of Velletri in 1088.

As you can see, from the discussion and conclusions of this article, that even contemporary scholarship admits that 1000 years ago, the elections of the Roman Pontiff follow Papal Laws. — Though the author of this article holds the opinions that this is not the case with all elections, his investigation of the election of Pope Urban II, at Terracina, in March of 1088, A. D., did find that the participants followed the terms of Nicholas II’s Bull, as far as can be ascertained from contemporary historical records.

CREDITS: The featured image is Zubarans’s “The Meeting of Bl. Pope Urban II with Saint Bruno”, a copy of which you will often see in the videos I make, since a cheap printed copy of this hangs in the Hermitage of the Holy Cross.

Pope Nicholas II infallibly taught that Faithful can elect a Catholic Pope

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

During the last month, I have made several videos showing, that the election of Cardinal Prevost was both canonically irregular and that on account of his previous statements contrary to the Catholic Faith, his election is nullified by the Bull of Paul IV.

For these videos I have cited Canon Law and the papal law of John Paul II, as well as the bull of Pope Paul IV.

Now I will add another important authority, that of Pope Nicholas II, who is the Pope who first ordered that Cardinals would elect the Roman Pontiff.

His authority is so preeminent, on that account, because he was the first pope to conceive the idea of restricting the election of the Roman Pontiff to the senior clerics, known as Cardinals. Thus, knowing his mind regarding this institution, is the best and surest way to authentically interpret all successive Papal legislation on the election of Popes.

Especially in regard to the thorny question: What is to be done, when the Cardinals conduct an election which violates papal law to such an extent as to result in an invalid election?

And the answer to this question, is found in the teaching of Pope Nicholas II, which can be found in his Bull, In Nomine Domini, published on April 13, 1059, a little more than 966 years ago, in n. 3 of that Bull, where he teaches:

§3. Wherefore, if the perversity of depraved, and iniquitous men, so prevail, that a pure, sincere and free election cannot be held in the City, the Cardinal Bishops with the religious Clerics, and the Catholic laity, even though few, obtain the right of power (ius potestatis) to elect the Pontiff of the Apostolic See, where it might be fitting.

What Nicholas II here says is of the utmost importance, for recognizing that his law might not be observable on account of the intervention of wicked men, he affirmed the apostolic right of the entire Church of Rome, Cardinals, Clergy, Religious and Laity to intervene in such extraordinary circumstances and proceed to a correct election of a Catholic pope. And his teaching is that in extraordinary times, to preserve the purity of the Apostolic See, the ancient right of the entire Church at Rome* revives, so that a correct election can be undertaken. This is what I have argued since 2019, HERE, on the basis of Divine, Apostolic and Natural right.

In fact, by saying they “obtain the right”, he refers not to a right he grants to them by his authority as pope, but to the right they have from a higher font of law: and in this case, the only higher font is Apostolic Right or Tradition, in that Saint Peter gave the Church of Rome the right to elect their own bishop. Thus, this affirmation has perennial power and represents a teaching of the Papal Magisterium.

This is also confirmed from this, that Nicholas II was elected by such a small group at Sienna the year before. This group included Cardinal Saint Peter Damian, Doctor of the Church, Cardinal Humbert and the Archdeacon Saint Hildebrand of Saona (later Pope St. Gregory VII). Thus what Nicholas II teaches in his Bull is merely a principle of natural right — as I demonstrated 6 years ago in my Scholastic Question — already recognized as such by the Cardinals and Saints present at his own election a year before. Thus the truth of this principal  is objective and does not depend upon the fact that Nicholas II approved of it as part of a papal law on elections of Popes, since obviously his Bull has been replaced now a days by the Law of Pope John Paul II.

While it is true that from a point of discipline, his Bull of Nicholas II no longer regulates papal elections, it is not true that the current papal law, that of John Paul II, Universi Dominic Gregis, says what to do, when it declares irregular elections invalid, in its 76th paragraph.

That is why, for those who want to authentically interpret the current papal law, having recourse to the Bull of Nicholas II is the MOST AUTHORITATIVE AND AUTHENTIC means of interpreting the present law, to know what to do when an election in a Conclave, now-a-days, is incorrectly done such as to be invalid or to have no juridical result, as the recent Conclave failed in the way it was done and whom it elected.

Indeed, according to the general principle of jurisprudence, confirmed in both the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and that of 1983, prior laws which are not abolished in their integrity, remain in force regarding those matters not integrated into newer legislation.

Thus, to all those who have dared to claim that the Faithful (clergy, religious laity) of the Church at Rome, in extraordinary circumstances do not have the right to elect the Roman Pontiff, Roma locuta est! That is, those who say otherwise, are the ones opposing the teaching of the Magisterium, even though they had the diabolic gall, in previous years to say that it was I who was the heretic.

So Steve O’Reilley and Estafania Accosta, I will mark down today’s date, and count the days for your apologies to arrive, not because I want them, but because you have led innumerable souls away from the truth by your unfounded, blatant lies in this matter.

Thus the papally approved teaching, that in extraordinary circumstances of evil and malfeasance, the Clergy and Laity of Rome receive the right to conduct a proper second election, clearly supports and declares legitimate the “Save Rome” Project‘s proposal. Indeed, it is not everyday, that any proposal is approved of by three Popes, against a gaggle of corrupt and incompetent Cardinals, but that day has come.

APPENDIX

For those interested in jurisprudence, the principle being applied by Pope Nicholas II is necessitas nullam legem cognoscit (“Necessity knows no law”). This principle enshrines the rationality of every legal institution which is for the common good in the end or purpose for which the law was written. When that end cannot be reached on account of an insurmountable and unprovided for menace (force majeure), then lesser conditional prescriptions must be understood to give way, so that the end be achieved. This is a common sense principle which sane persons resort too in daily life, in all matters from how to clean the bathroom to how to organize a vacation.

This is the exact opposite of the irrational  usurpation of right on the basis of privilege, which the Cardinals attempted in the Conclave of 2025, whereby they claimed that a privilege which did not belong to more than 120 was justification for violation of the precept of John Paul II that 120 be the maximum number of electors. For in their mad folly, they chose a means to be more important than the end, which is the valid election of a Roman Pontiff, and acted selfishly and recklessly, making the Conclave have no valid juridical result.

Thus, if conditions were so bad at Rome, that there were no Bishops or clergy or religious willing to come to a public place to elect a Roman Pontiff who was Catholic, not because there was any external inimical force such as armies in the city patrolling the streets, but because they no longer though it worth while to have a Catholic Pope and were content to submit to a formal manifest and pertinacious heretic, then by the same principle, “necessity knows no law'”, even the remaining electorate who had the faith and courage to come out to such an election, would suffice, since the apostolic right belongs to the whole Church in a uniform manner, and though it is fitting that Bishops and clergy and religious participate and take the lead, if they fail the Church does not lose that right, because, and especially because, there is never a more greater need for a Catholic Pope at Rome that in that day in which the Cardinals adhere to a heretic and among the remaining clergy there is none with the courage to stand against him, but the laity. And this was the argument I advanced two years ago.


** Note Well: In this article, “Church of Rome” is used properly and specifically to refer only to the Roman Rite Dioceses of Rome, Italy, and its suburbican dioceses of  Frascati, Palestrina, Segni-Velletri, Albano, Ostia, Porto Santa Rufina and Sabina-Poggio Mirteto.

I

Project “SAVE ROME” — Updated: Nov 1, 2025

What is Project “Save Rome”?

Project “Save Rome” is the name of the effort to assist the Catholics of the Roman Rite, at Rome, Italy, to use their Apostolic Right, given to them by the Apostle Saint Peter, to elect a Catholic Pope, seeing that the College of Cardinals elected a public manifest and pertinacious heretic, Robert Francis Provost, who by accepting ‘Fiducia supplicans’ and ‘Amoris laetitia’, and opposing the use of capital punishment, rejects (1) the teaching of Saint Paul on capital punishment, (2) the teaching of Jesus Christ on the Priesthood, (3), the Second Commandment as a moral norm for sacramental discipline, (4) the 6th commandment as a moral norm for sacramental discipline, and (5) the teaching of the Apostles that the Sacraments of the living must be refused to public impenitent sinners, and is thus incapable of being the Roman Pontiff, according to Pope Paul IV (continue reading for more information).

What is the legal justification for an Election by Apostolic Right?

When an institution (Cardinals in a conclave) fails completely to fulfill its ministerial duty (Canon 349) of providing for the selection of a Catholic as Roman Pontiff, the ancient right of original electorate (the Faithful of the Church at Rome) revives, by reason of the default, according to the teaching of Pope Nicholas II, to prevent the Church founded by God from being taken over by a Heretically Depraved invalid candidate, leading souls to destruction, by which the Gates of Hell would prevail (See more about this, in the video on “The error of juridical positivism“). Since this apostolic right is part of the Deposit of the Faith, it is ever capable of reviving when the institution, entrusted with the ordinary duty, betrays the very intention of the Roman Pontiffs to provide for a Catholic pope, and thus forfeits their right and competency; for otherwise, the Church Herself would cease to exist as a juridically valid entity without recourse to action by the original electorate. Such a recourse is judged to be juridically possible and reasonable even by a Canonist accredited by the Roman Rota (see HERE).

How is the Election of Prevost invalid?

The election of Robert Cardinal Prevost is invalid for two reasons:

  1. Since Prevost is a public manifest heretic, the election of which as Roman Pontiff, is declared null, void, and irritus by Pope Paul IV, in his bull of February 15, 1559, “Cum ex apostolatus officio“, n. 6, which foreseeing such a tragedy, deals precisely with this situation.
  2. Since the Cardinals Electors directly violated the formal command in n. 33 of the Papal Law on Conclaves, “Universi Dominic Gregis“, of February 22, 1996, which limits to 120 the maximum number of Cardinal Electors who are allowed to vote, which according to canon 335 and n. 5 of the same law, they have no right to violate; on which account, by allowing 133 to vote, they violated n. 68 in the very act of the election, and thus the election was declared null and void and conferred no right upon Prevost, as per the censure in n. 76 of the same law. — The Cardinals attempted to justify their action by claiming that Pope Francis gave them a dispensation, in that he created more than 120 Cardinal electors: a claim which is nullified by UDG n. 4, which forbids all dispensations of any part of the Law on Conclaves, even if it were granted on the basis of a written documented before his death; or if they were granted, again by a written document the power to interpret this rule as optional, so as not to violate canon 335 (which forbids any innovation of rights during a sedevacante), which document they do not even claim to have! Thus their claim is null and voided not only by n. 4, but by the 2nd paragraph of the Promulgation, in the same papal law, not to mention being a claim contrary to canon 16 § 1 and counter to canon 86, which forbids dispensations from  essential legislative dispositions, such as is the rule of 120. — See a detailed explanation of this HERE.

In what does an Election by Apostolic Right consist?

The Faithful of the Church of Rome, that is, the 3.5 Million Catholics resident at Rome, that is Clergy, Religious and Laity of the Dioceses of Rome, and the suburbican dioceses, of Palestrina, Frascati, Segni-Velletri, Albano, Ostia, Porto-Santa Rufina, Sabina-Poggio Mirteto, need to come together in one physical place and chose a baptized Catholic man, who is both celibate and professes the whole and perfect Catholic Faith. The election can be by acclamation or majority vote, verbally expressed. This right, when the Cardinals fail to conduct a valid election and chose a catholic, revives, as Pope Nicholas II magisterially taught in the Bull, “In Nomine Domini”, n. 3.

WHAT HAS BEEN DONE as of July 6, 2025?

Br. Bugnolo, who lives at Rome, has mailed out about 3500 letters of legal notice to the Clergy of the Diocese of Rome and the suburbican Dioceses, and received confirmation of receipt. He has explained in Italian the legal problems with the Conclave, and has informed them of their rights. He has asked them to speak to one another and put the College of Cardinals on notice, as is their right and responsibility.

Br. Bugnolo has also informed the Clergy that if the Cardinals do not redo the Conclave legally, they have forfeited their right to elect the Pope, and that therefore, they, the Clergy, obtain the right in accord with the teaching of Pope Nicholas II to convoke the Faithful and Religious of their dioceses and elect a Catholic Pope. — He has likewise informed them, that if neither the Cardinals nor the Clergy act within 80 days, he will presume that they are willingly forfeiting their right, and in consequence, that he, in virtue of being a Catholic resident in the territory of the Church at Rome, will act and convoke an Assembly, inviting all who have the right to vote and who reject the heresies of Bergoglio and Prevost. He has made the point to emphasize in his letter to the Clergy, in particular, that he prefers that they take the initiative.

Br. Bugnolo has sent out these notices to remove any legal challenge to the Assembly’s validity, convocation or results. His past experience with the Clergy at Rome, during the controversy of the two Popes, however, strongly inclines him to expect that neither the Cardinals nor the Clergy will take any action by September 24, 2025.

If the Clergy do take action and elect a Catholic Pope, Br. Bugnolo has resolved to investigate and verify the validity of the election and the Catholicity of the man, and if finding everything in order, He pledges that he will donate the funds donated to this Project, to the purpose the new Catholic Pope designates; and explain to him the reasons for our action and the wonderful faith of the Catholics who supported the Save Rome Project, and ask his Apostolic Benediction on us all. — If he finds find that the election was irregular, he will convoke an Assembly as planned.

Practical Necessities

On account of the laws of the Italian Republic and the administration regulations of the City of Rome, Italy, the Catholics need to provide at their own expense for the necessary publicity and equipment to allow for a crowd of 25,000 or more meet safely in the same place: such as security, ambulances, chairs, stage, sound system, specialized locations for care of those suffering from exposure or medical conditions, and access to transportation and sufficient crowd-control barriers etc.. The chief expense of which is publicity to make sure all the 3.5 Million Catholics who have the right to attend know of the event. — Br. Bugnolo, the editor of FromRome.info, and President of Ordo Militaris Inc., is volunteering his services at $0.00 cost, for organizing this project.

Goal

Project “Save Rome”, therefore, aims to seek the assistance of true Catholics all over the world, to raise the funds to gather sufficient numbers of Catholics to this Assembly, so that in the sight of all Catholics in the world, they can clearly see this as an action of the whole Church at Rome. For this reason, calculating the costs of TV, Newspaper, Radio, and Social Media advertising, but the event costs, we are seeking to raise the equivalent of $250,000 US Dollars.

As of November 1, 2025, about $25,100 has been raised for this project. Expenses for posters in the City of Rome alone, printing costs & municipal fees for placement, is about $27,500.  And so we are just at the beginning of the fund raising. Since posters should be placed in all the cities around Rome inside the suburbican Dioceses, and together that probably would raise this costs for posters and municipal fees to maybe $40,000 to $50,000.

If we cannot meet the goal, the election will be arranged in a manner requiring less expense, as much as that is possible. Any monies remaining will be donated to the new Roman Pontiff, and a complete list of expenses will be published on this page, afterwards, so that all might know how the money was used.

HOW TO HELP

First of all we ask you pray to Christ the King, to send His Holy Spirit upon the Church at Rome, so that the true Catholics who remain work effectively together to give Him a Vicar after His own Sacred Heart. We therefore ask prayers especially to Our Lady, Saints Peter and Paul, all the Martyrs and Saints of the Church at Rome, and to Saint Michael the Archangel, the protector of the City of Rome, and all the guardian Angels in the province.

Second, if you can we ask you to consider making a donation to this project either through PayPal, from anywhere in the World. Or using Zelle Pay, if you have a bank account in the United States which offers this served. Or using a Bank Wire in US Dollars, British Pounds Sterling, Euroes or Australian Dollars. See below for each method.

How To Help Financially

You can make a donation to this Holy Work to defend the Church, via Paypal, Zelle Pay, or Bank Wire:

Via PayPal, through the USA 501(c)(3) Non Profit “Save Old St. Mary’s Inc.”





Via Zelle, add the message: SAVEROME

NOTE: Ordo Militaris Inc. will put all funds received into an 501(c)(3) dedicated account for the Save Rome Project, no part of which funds will be used for anything else. However, funds “donated” through Ordo Militaris Inc., do not qualify as charitable donations. If you want your gift to qualify as a charitable donation, use the PayPal method for donation. — Note Also, that European and U.K. Banks will block your bank wire IF you add anything to the phrase “SaveRome” or “Save Rome”; also, they will block you transfer if you classify it as a “donation to a Charitable organization”, since Ordo Militaris Inc. is a for profit corporation. The correct classification is “Services” since funds received will provide services to the Catholics at Rome to hold such an Assembly or will be donated to the Roman Pontiff for services rendered to him.

Will the College of Cardinals elect the next Pope? Maybe not!

Or How the Catholic Cardinals can definitely prevent a Bergoglian from being elected as the next Pope, no matter what.

Editorial by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

With the serious decline in health of Pope Francis, there have begun to be published numerous articles regarding his resignation, death, and what kind of man the Church needs to be elected as the next Pope. Noteworthy Catholics, laymen and clerics, are also beginning to express their doubts that the College of Cardinals is going to elect someone to correct the many heresies, apostasies, idolatries, blasphemies, errors and the promotion of perversity pushed and promoted by Pope Francis.

In all of these discussions, the presumption is that the College of Cardinals will elect the next Pope. However, those who are expert in jurisprudence and all who spend the time to read the Papal Law on Conclaves, and how the election must proceed, know that it is quite possible this will not be the case, if there are two voting blocs of intransigent parties in the College of Cardinals.

And this is because of the rules laid down by Pope John Paul II, in the papal law for papal elections: Universi Dominici Gregis, the English translation of which is linked above in the image above. Note however, that the English translation is not the authoritative version. Only the Latin original is.

In that papal law, to be elected, one has to receive the absolute majority of votes from the Cardinal voters who are present for the Conclave (UDG, Chapter V, n. 62). This means, 2/3rds of the votes, and if the number of Cardinals is not divisible by three into a whole integer, 2/3 +1 extra vote.

So in the case that there are two blocs, neither of which will consent to the election of any candidate proposed by the other, and if each of these blocs contain at least 1/3 of all the Cardinal Electors, plus one, then even just one of these blocs can prevent a valid election of the Roman Pontiff by the College of Cardinals, indefinitely.

In such a case, there would remain only one other way for the valid election of a Roman Pontiff: namely an election by Apostolic Right, which would allow the clergy of the Church of Rome (Diocese of Rome and the Suburbican Dioceses) along with the faithful of this Church to elect the next Pope by acclamation, inspiration, compromise or simply majority (50% +1) of those present for such an election.

This might seem a fanciful thought, but since Pope Francis was elected pope in this manner, and since what is at risk for the whole Church is another heresy-promoting man like Pope Francis, it may be the safest course of action for the Catholic bloc if it can muster 46 votes, while not being able to recruit for its candidate at least 92 votes.

I say 46 votes, because presently there are 137 Cardinals who are eligible to vote. IF we presume that all are present for the Election, then 33% of them, plus one is 46 votes.

But for this second modality of election to take place, the Cardinal Electors would have to agree by an absolute majority vote (2/3 +1) to suspend the conclave and concede to the Church of Rome to act by its Apostolic Right.

And if so, they will have to make a public declaration, that on account of the irreconcilable differences among the Cardinal Electors, with no candidate being able to obtain the 92 votes necessary to be elected, that they have resolved to NOT elect the next pope in conclave, but cede their right by the papal law, back to the Church of Rome which has this right by Apostolic Ordinance.

But the advantages of this course of action are many, the chief of which is the salvation of souls and the unity of the Church: because there are vast numbers of Catholics who hold that Jorge Mario Bergoglio was never the true Pope, or is an antipope, or at least was one of these when he appointed a majority of Cardinal Electors. Hence, no matter whom the Cardinal Electors might elect in conclave, all these will hold the election invalid and irregular by reason of the participation of men who were named Cardinal Electors by Pope Francis, while not having the canonical mandate to do so, or at least while a manifest pertinacious heretic in schism from Christ and His Church.

Whereas, the clergy and faithful of the Roman Church, having not professed these heresies, blasphemies, errors, nor participated in Pope Francis’ idolatries and crimes against God and the local Churches and religious institutes, do and will have the moral reputation to elect a Pope acceptable to the whole Church, by reason of the unassailable right to elect the Roman Pontiff, which they exercised for 10 centuries before Nicholas II, in his Bull, In Nomine Domini, created the College of Cardinals, on April 13, 1059 A. D..

That the College of Cardinals can take such action is clear from the Code of Canon Law, canon 332 §1, which requires a legitimate election, not an election by the College, and canon 349, which merely states that the College is competent to elect the pope, not that they alone can, while making it clear that they can only elect the Pope if they do so in accord with the papal laws on these matters. This enshrines the historical fact that the College has a ministerial duty, which when impossible to fulfill can be fulled by the electorate which holds this right, not by custom, papal law, or even canon law, but by Apostolic Tradition: the entire Church at Rome.

As for the rumors that Pope Francis might change the Papal Law to allow in the first balloting or in subsequent ballotings after a dead-lock, an election by a simple majority, I think this is highly unlikely, because Pope Francis is a clever politicking manipulator, and he knows that while it is possible the Catholic faction obtain a 50% +1 majority, it is definitely impossible that they obtain a 66%+1 majority. And his purpose in destroying the Church will be served, but not so well, but a compromise candidate.

Thus, if the Catholic Faction stand united and strong, they can prevent a manifest heretic or Bergoglian from ever being elected, by following the stratagem I have outlined above.

However, if there is any other result, in the next Conclave, than a truly Catholic Pope, it is these Catholic Cardinals who are to blame. And their names should go down in infamy for having ceded to the enemies of Jesus Christ the entire flock of His lambs, for whom He shed His Most Precious Blood and endured so much infamy and shame and suffering.

The Bull of Pope Nicholas II: In Nomine Domini, April 13, 1059

REPRINTED FROM JAN. 18, 2020 A. D.

Preface and Translation by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

After centuries of interference in the Election of the Roman Pontiff by the Emperors of Constantinople and of the Holy Roman Empire, by the military, by the Roman Nobility and by rogue Nobles of diverse parts of Italy, Pope Nicholas II decreed a historic Bull which restricted the right of election — which had from ancient times been vested by Saint Peter the Apostle in the whole Church of Rome, and subsequently to the clergy — to the Cardinal Bishops principally, and then to the other Cardinals, the rest of the Clergy and the Faithful of the Diocese of Rome.  This Bull led to the formation of the institutions which we know of today as the College of Cardinals and the Conclave. Due to its crucial importance in the history of the regulation of the election of the Roman Pontiff, the FromRome.Info here presents its own English translation of the Latin Text (which can be download in PDF — the authenticity of which I have presumed from internal criteria). — Following the translation, I will give a commentary.

In Nomine Domini

In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and Savior, in the One Thousand and Fifty-Ninth year from His Incarnation, in the month of April, in the twelfth indiction, with the sacrosant Gospels laid before Us, with the most Reverend and Blessed Pope Nicholas also presiding in the Patriarcal Lateran Basilica, which is named the Constantinian: with the most Reverent Bishops, Abbots, Priests and Deacons sitting with him: the same Venerable Pontiff decreeing by Apostolic authority concerning the Election of the Supreme Pontiff, said:

Your Beatitude knows, most beloved Brother (Cardinals), and Co-Bishops, and it is also not hidden to inferior members ( of the clergy), that with the passing of Our predecessor, the divine Stephen, of good memory, how many adversities this Apostolic See, which I serve with God as my author, has born, and how many repeated hammers, and frequent blows, She has been subjected to through the brokers of simonaical heresy: so much, indeed, that the Column of the living God almost seemed to totter, and the net of the Fisherman, with the storms having swelled, would be driven into the depths of shipwreck to be submerged, wherefore if it please thy Brotherhood, We ought, with the God assisting, take care prudently that future cases do not occur, and this by Ecclesiastical statute, lest recurring — far be it — the evils prevail.

The Election of the Pope pertains, first of all, to the Cardinal Bishops, who serve also as Metropolitians, the to the Cardinal Clerics, and the rest of the Clergy, and the People, only proffer their consent to the election.

§1. On which account, having been instructed by Our predecessors, and by the authority of the other Holy Fathers, We decree, and establish, that with the passing of the Pontiff of this Catholic Roman Church, first of all, the Cardinal Bishops, treating most diligently together concerning the election, summon immediately the Cardinal Clerics of Christ; and in this manner let the rest of the Clergy, and the People approach to consent to the new election taking the greatest care beforehand, lest the deadly disease of venality insinuate itself by an occasion, and for that reason let the most religious men be the chief leaders in promoting the election of the Pontiff, but the rest be their followers.  Moreover, the certain and even legitimate order here of the election  is carefully considered, if it be gathered from having examined the diverse rules of the Fathers, or their deeds, and even that sentence of Blessed Leo, Our predecessor: “No reason permits, that there be had among Bishops, those who have neither been elected from the Clerics, nor requested by the common people, nor consecrated by the co-provincial Bishops with the judgement of the Metropolitans; but because the Apostolic See takes precedence to all other Churches throughout the earth, for that reason She also  can have over Her no Metropolitan, the Cardinal Bishops with out doubt serve instead as Metropolitans, who namely, proceed to consecrate the apex of the Apostolic brow, once elected as Bishop“.

The Pope ought to be elected from the womb of the Roman Church if one is found to be suitable, otherwise he is to be elected from another Church.

§2. Moreover, let him be elected from the very womb of the Church, if one is found to be suitable, and/or if one not be found in Her, let him be taken from another; with due honor being served, and reverence for Our beloved son, Henry, who is held as King at the present, and with God conceding hoped as the future Emperor, as We have already conceded to him, just as to the successors of him, who personally begged this right from this Apostolic See.

If the Pope cannot be elected in the City, because of obstacles,
he can be elected elsewhere by the Cardinals, and by others, though few, of whom (We spoke) above.

§3. Wherefore, if the perversity of depraved, and iniquitous men, so prevail, that a pure, sincere and free election cannot be held in the City, the Cardinal Bishops with the religious Clerics, and the Catholic laity, though few, obtain the right of power (ius potestatis) to elect the Pontiff of the Apostolic See, where it might be fitting.

If the elected Pope cannot be enthroned, by these men, here, on account of obstacles, nevertheless he is a true Pope, and can rule the Roman Church, and dispose of all Her faculties.

§4. Plainly, after the election has been completed, if there be a bellicose conflict, and/or if the struggle of any kind of men resists by the earnestness of wickedness, such that he, who has been elected, cannot prevail to be enthroned in the Apostolic See according to the custom, nevertheless, the elect obtains as the true Pope the authority to rule the Roman Church, and to dispose of all Her faculties, which Blessed Gregory, We know, did, before his own consecration.

The pope elected against the form of this Decree is to be punished, as this one was, with his supporters.

§5. On which account, if anyone has been elected, or even ordained, or enthroned, against this Decree of Ours promulgated by Synodal sentence, whether through sedition, and/or presumption, or any guile, let him be cast down by the Divine Authority, and that of the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, by a perpetual anathema with his promoters and supporters and followers as one separated from the thresholds of the Holy Church, just as the Anti-Christ, both an invader and destroyer of the whole of Christendom, and let no audience be given him over this, but let him be deposed from every ecclesiastical grade unto whatever was before his, without any objection made, to whom if anyone whatsoever adheres, and/or exhibits any kind of reverence as to the Pontiff, or presumes to defend him in anything, let him be abandoned by equal sentence, which if anyone shows himself to be a violator of this sentence of Our Holy Decree, and has tried to confound the Roman Church by his presumption, and to raise disturbance against this Statute, let him be damned by perpetual anathema and excommunication, and let him be reputed among the impious, who shall not rise again in judgement, let him know the wrath of the Omnipotent One against him, and that of the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, whose  Church he has presumed to fool, let him know a ravaging madness in this life and in the future; let his dwelling become deserted, and let there be no one who dwells in his tents:   let his sons be orphans, and his wife a widow, let him be shaken completely to madness, and may his sons go about begging, and be cast out of their dwellings, may the money-lender ravage all his substance, and may foreigner lay waste to his labors:  Let the whole world fight against him, and let all the other elements be against him, and may the merits of all the Saints resting above confound him.

For the observers of this Decree, the Pope prays for the grace of God and pardon for their sins.

§6. Moreover, let the grace of the Omnipotent One protect the observers of this Our decree, and let the authority of the Blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul absolve them from all the bonds of their sins.

COMMENTARY

NiccoloII
Pope Nicholas II

Oh the faith and zeal of the men of God of ages past! How shining their nobility of mind, how forthright their speech, how determined their mind, how strong their justice against all wickedness, how prudent in particulars, how unbending in ideals and purpose. Many a  Catholic reading of the Church in ages past has commented thus of our forebears in faith, who on account of the distance of the ages, we can assuredly count among some of our relatives of old.

What makes them so different from our own age, is that with the passing of time, and the corruption of men, the mystical body of the Antichrist has grown up inside the Church, pretending to be one of the faithful, but deceiving all, to such an extent, that the mass and number of the wicked in the Church has reached critical stage and the likeness of the monster of iniquity is taking form inside the members of the Church long dead and separated from the vital sap of Our Lord, the True Vine of the Father.

We can see openly how less a corrupt age it was, by the few precepts to be had to govern a papal election. This was not because the age knew nothing of Law. The great legal works of the Emperor Justinian and the Roman Jurist Ulpian had long before been written and studied. No, it was the rarity of the boldness of demonic impiety, which is now common day and an every day manifestation, which made this first Papal Decree on the Election of the Popes so simple and direct.

Yet, in its simplicity it shows forth several important legal institutions and principles which would characterize papal law on the election of the Roman Pontiff for the next nearly thousand years. Let us examine them in their order of appearance in the Decree.

Three Conditions for the man Elected

The Ancient and Apostolic custom of the Church of Rome was ever that three conditions prevail for the election of a Roman Pontiff: his selection by the Clergy of the City, his approval by the faithful of the city, his consecration by the Metropolitian, or what we call the suburbican Bishops, of the ecclesiastical province: the Bishop who oversaw the dioceses immediately adjacent to Rome.

This custom was the orderly application of the Apostolic Right by which the Roman Pontiff was elected from the time of the Apostle Peter’s death, and may have been suggested by the Apostle St. Paul, who ministered in the City for a year or more before his own decapitation and martyrdom.

Pope Nicholas II by this decree modifies the ancient custom and restricts the discernment and selection of the one to be elected to the Cardinal Bishops. They are then to summon the other Cardinal Clergy, the rest of the clergy of the City and all the Faithful and ask for their consent.

No Elections in secret

The wisdom of this institution prevented the usurpation of the Church by foreigners, the election of men who were unknown to the local clergy, and or who did not enjoy an honest reputation among the faithful of the city. It also prevented simony — the offering of money for votes — to some extent, since you cannot bribe everyone, and without any obligation of proceeding in secret, the motivation for voting for this one or that, would certainly come out and quickly become known to all.

Respect for Tradition

Pope Nicholas shows his respect for the Apostolic right by quoted Pope Leo the Great, who explains the manner in which the election was conducted in his age, some five centuries before, when all the clergy has the right to vote, not just the Cardinals.

Preference for a Roman

To prevent foreign influence and control and to guarantee not only the independence of the Church of Rome but that She have a pastor who saw himself as Her shepherd by innate ties and bonds, Pope Nicholas urges the election of a man born at Rome and Roman. This hearkens back to the Old Testament where God required that the people select one of their own kin to rule over them.

Flexibility in non essentials

Pope Nicholas II shows the sanity of the medieval mind, by allowing the election under special circumstances of necessity to be conducted outside the city. There was no fixed or prescribed place for the election, and this prevented it being controlled from beforehand, as well as from being prevented or impeded in its execution.

A Man is made pope by Election, not consecration or enthronement.

Here there is a principle which comes down from at least the time of Pope Gregory the Great, namely, that the man elected Pope, from that moment becomes the pope, even if he has not yet been consecrated a Bishop and even before he is enthroned in the Lateran Basilica (the Cathedral of Rome prior to the 14th century).

Grave Sanctions for those who transgress

Finally, Pope Nicholas II imposes the most grave and extreme sanctions upon those who transgress his Law on Elections: anathema, excommunication, reduction to the state in which he was prior to the election or usurpation. And this punishment is extended to all his promoters, supporters and followers.  A promoter is he who encouraged his candidacy, a supporter is he who voted for him, and a follower is he who joined his faction and vied that it prevail.

Just read n. 5 above, if you want to know how a usurper of the office of Pope should be treated for his crime. It makes you understand the moral gravity of the crime, a thing which a godless cleric has no understanding of.

Equity and Wisdom

In this Decree, one can see that Pope Nicholas II is trying to balance the different and disparate forces which were vying to control the election of the Roman Pontiff in his own age, and to place that election securely in the hands of those who could be more trusted to elect a man of God, without however, restricting the process so much as to prevent a man of God being elected. His emphasis that the holier members of the Church take a principle part in the election is a strong reminder to our own age of the folly of legislation which thinks that in the precise observance of minutiae one can guarantee holiness.  For this reason, Nicholas II promulgated a law which was to have a lasting effect on papal legislation for a thousand years. May God grant the clergy of Rome a similar wisdom and courage to execute their duties before God.

Criticism

Pope Nicholas II has gone to his reward, so I will allow myself to make one criticism of his papal law, and that is this: by restricting the right to vote to Bishops alone he imposed on the Roman Church the practice which prevailed in the provinces and in the Eastern Churches. This ended up helping the papacy, in one sense, to have men who had experience in government and fiscal management, but, on the other hand, tended to restrict candidates to the class of the landed gentry. It would end the habit of popular candidates, who sometimes, not always, in the past had been men who corrected the wrongs and injustice of the landed class and returned the Apostolic See to a more evangelical road.

What if, God forbid, Pope Benedict XVI dies while the Cardinal Electors remain fast with the Antipope?

I get a lot of questions from the Catholic Faithful who hold that Benedict is still the Pope because they simply follow the norm of Canon Law, unlike the precipitous and rash College of Cardinals who did not even implement canons 40 and 41 following the Declaratio of Pope Benedicct XVI on Feb. 11, 2013. For that reason, the Cardinals are in de facto schism from Christ and His Church, because they have violated canon 359 and Universi Dominici Gregis, n. 37, by electing another Pope when there was no legal sede vacante.

For that reason many of the faithful worry that the Petrine Succession might be abolished or lost, if when Benedict dies, the Cardinals do not convene in Conclave to elect his successor. This is because, the current papal law, published in an age in which there has not be an Anti-pope for nearly 500 years, does not address what is to happen if it should be that all the Cardinal Electors who are canonically valid (appointed by Popes John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI) omit convening in Conclave after Benedict’s death.

I explained the theological, legal and historical reasons why this presents no fundamental problem in my Disputed Question: Whether, with all the Cardinal Electors defecting...

In such a case, whatever Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops, Monsignori, Priests and Deacons, who are incardinated in the Diocese of Rome or at the Vatican, remain in communion with Benedict and assemble after his death, whomsoever they elect by a simply majority will be the Pope. In such an election the laity can also participate, since the Apostolic Right pertains to the whole Church. — If Arcibishop Vigano shows at such an assembly, he would probably be surely elected.

The Church desperately needs a popular candidate for the papacy, because, as in times prior to the law of Pope Nicholas II, In Nomine Domini, the Church is need of a dire correction in its pastoral objectives and needs a reformer who will return the Faith to Her rightful queenship of governance in the Church. Pope Benedict XVI by his evangelical prudence or by mistake, has providentially prepared, perhaps, the next papal election to proceed in just such a manner.

+ + +

The Bull of Pope Nicholas II: In Nomine Domini, April 13, 1059

Preface and Translation by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

After centuries of interference in the Election of the Roman Pontiff by the Emperors of Constantinople and of the Holy Roman Empire, by the military, by the Roman Nobility and by rogue Nobles of diverse parts of Italy, Pope Nicholas II decreed a historic Bull which restricted the right of election — which had from ancient times been vested by Saint Peter the Apostle in the whole Church of Rome, and subsequently to the clergy — to the Cardinal Bishops principally, and then to the other Cardinals, the rest of the Clergy and the Faithful of the Diocese of Rome.  This Bull led to the formation of the institutions which we know of today as the College of Cardinals and the Conclave. Due to its crucial importance in the history of the regulation of the election of the Roman Pontiff, the From Rome Blog here presents its own English translation of the Latin Text (which can be download in PDF — the authenticity of which I have presumed from internal criteria). — Following the translation, I will give a commentary.

In Nomine Domini

In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, and Savior, in the One Thousand and Fifty-Ninth year from His Incarnation, in the month of April, in the twelfth indiction, with the sacrosant Gospels laid before Us, with the most Reverend and Blessed Pope Nicholas also presiding in the Patriarchàs Lateran Basilica, which is named the Constantinian: with the most Reverent Bishops, Abbots, Priests and Deacons sitting with him: the same Venerable Pontiff decreeing by Apostolic authority concerning the Election of the Supreme Pontiff, said:

Your Beatitude knows, most beloved Brother (Cardinals), and Co-Bishops, and it is also not hidden to inferior members ( of the clergy), that with the passing of Our predecessor, the divine Stephen, of good memory, how many adversities this Apostolic See, which I serve with God as my author, has born, and how many repeated hammers, and frequent blows, She has been subjected to through the brokers of simonaical heresy: so much, indeed, that the Column of the living God almost seemed to totter, and the net of the Fisherman, with the storms having swelled, would be driven into the depths of shipwreck to be submerged, wherefore if it please thy Brotherhood, We ought, with the God assisting, take care prudently that future cases do not occur, and this by Ecclesiastical statute, lest recurring — far be it — the evils prevail.

The Election of the Pope pertains, first of all, to the Cardinal Bishops, who serve also as Metropolitians, the to the Cardinal Clerics, and the rest of the Clergy, and the People, only proffer their consent to the election.

§1. On which account, having been instructed by Our predecessors, and by the authority of the other Holy Fathers, We decree, and establish, that with the passing of the Pontiff of this Catholic Roman Church, first of all, the Cardinal Bishops, treating most diligently together concerning the election, summon immediately the Cardinal Clerics of Christ; and in this manner let the rest of the Clergy, and the People approach to consent to the new election taking the greatest care beforehand, lest the deadly disease of venality insinuate itself by an occasion, and for that reason let the most religious men be the chief leaders in promoting the election of the Pontiff, but the rest be their followers.  Moreover, the certain and even legitimate order here of the election  is carefully considered, if it be gathered from having examined the diverse rules of the Fathers, or their deeds, and even that sentence of Blessed Leo, Our predecessor: “No reason permits, that there be had among Bishops, those who have neither been elected from the Clerics, nor requested by the common people, nor consecrated by the co-provincial Bishops with the judgement of the Metropolitans; but because the Apostolic See takes precedence to all other Churches throughout the earth, for that reason She also  can have over Her no Metropolitan, the Cardinal Bishops with out doubt serve instead as Metropolitans, who namely, proceed to consecrate the apex of the Apostolic brow, once elected as Bishop“.

The Pope ought to be elected from the womb of the Roman Church if one is found to be suitable, otherwise he is to be elected from another Church.

§2. Moreover, let him be elected from the very womb of the Church, if one is found to be suitable, and/or if one not be found in Her, let him be taken from another; with due honor being served, and reverence for Our beloved son, Henry, who is held as King at the present, and with God conceding hoped as the future Emperor, as We have already conceded to him, just as to the successors of him, who personally begged this right from this Apostolic See.

If the Pope cannot be elected in the City, because of obstacles,
he can be elected elsewhere by the Cardinals, and by others, though few, of whom (We spoke) above.

§3. Wherefore, if the perversity of depraved, and iniquitous men, so prevail, that a pure, sincere and free election cannot be held in the City, the Cardinal Bishops with the religious Clerics, and the Catholic laity, though few, obtain the right of power (ius potestatis) to elect the Pontiff of the Apostolic See, where it might be fitting.

If the elected Pope cannot be enthroned, by these men, here, on account of obstacles, nevertheless he is a true Pope, and can rule the Roman Church, and dispose of all Her faculties.

§4. Plainly, after the election has been completed, if there be a bellicose conflict, and/or if the struggle of any kind of men resists by the earnestness of wickedness, such that he, who has been elected, cannot prevail to be enthroned in the Apostolic See according to the custom, nevertheless, the elect obtains as the true Pope the authority to rule the Roman Church, and to dispose of all Her faculties, which Blessed Gregory, We know, did, before his own consecration.

The pope elected against the form of this Decree is to be punished, as this one was, with his supporters.

§5. On which account, if anyone has been elected, or even ordained, or enthroned, against this Decree of Ours promulgated by Synodal sentence, whether through sedition, and/or presumption, or any guile, let him be cast down by the Divine Authority, and that of the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, by a perpetual anathema with his promoters and supporters and followers as one separated from the thresholds of the Holy Church, just as the Anti-Christ, both an invader and destroyer of the whole of Christendom, and let no audience be given him over this, but let him be deposed from every ecclesiastical grade unto whatever was before his, without any objection made, to whom if anyone whatsoever adheres, and/or exhibits any kind of reverence as to the Pontiff, or presumes to defend him in anything, let him be abandoned by equal sentence, which if anyone shows himself to be a violator of this sentence of Our Holy Decree, and has tried to confound the Roman Church by his presumption, and to raise disturbance against this Statute, let him be damned by perpetual anathema and excommunication, and let him be reputed among the impious, who shall not rise again in judgement, let him know the wrath of the Omnipotent One against him, and that of the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, whose  Church he has presumed to fool, let him know a ravaging madness in this life and in the future; let his dwelling become deserted, and let there be no one who dwells in his tents:   let his sons be orphans, and his wife a widow, let him be shaken completely to madness, and may his sons go about begging, and be cast out of their dwellings, may the money-lender ravage all his substance, and may foreigner lay waste to his labors:  Let the whole world fight against him, and let all the other elements be against him, and may the merits of all the Saints resting above confound him.

For the observers of this Decree, the Pope prays for the grace of God and pardon for their sins.

§6. Moreover, let the grace of the Omnipotent One protect the observers of this Our decree, and let the authority of the Blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul absolve them from all the bonds of their sins.

COMMENTARY

NiccoloII
Pope Nicholas II

Oh the faith and zeal of the men of God of ages past! How shining their nobility of mind, how forthright their speech, how determined their mind, how strong their justice against all wickedness, how prudent in particulars, how unbending in ideals and purpose. Many a  Catholic reading of the Church in ages past has commented thus of our forebears in faith, who on account of the distance of the ages, we can assuredly count among some of our relatives of old.

What makes them so different from our own age, is that with the passing of time, and the corruption of men, the mystical body of the Antichrist has grown up inside the Church, pretending to be one of the faithful, but deceiving all, to such an extent, that the mass and number of the wicked in the Church has reached critical stage and the likeness of the monster of iniquity is taking form inside the members of the Church long dead and separated from the vital sap of Our Lord, the True Vine of the Father.

We can see openly how less a corrupt age it was, by the few precepts to be had to govern a papal election. This was not because the age knew nothing of Law. The great legal works of the Emperor Justinian and the Roman Jurist Ulpian had long before been written and studied. No, it was the rarity of the boldness of demonic impiety, which is now common day and an every day manifestation, which made this first Papal Decree on the Election of the Popes so simple and direct.

Yet, in its simplicity it shows forth several important legal institutions and principles which would characterize papal law on the election of the Roman Pontiff for the next nearly thousand years. Let us examine them in their order of appearance in the Decree.

Three Conditions for the man Elected

The Ancient and Apostolic custom of the Church of Rome was ever that three conditions prevail for the election of a Roman Pontiff: his selection by the Clergy of the City, his approval by the faithful of the city, his consecration by the Metropolitian, or what we call the suburbican Bishops, of the ecclesiastical province: the Bishop who oversaw the dioceses immediately adjacent to Rome.

This custom was the orderly application of the Apostolic Right by which the Roman Pontiff was elected from the time of the Apostle Peter’s death, and may have been suggested by the Apostle St. Paul, who ministered in the City for a year or more before his own decapitation and martyrdom.

Pope Nicholas II by this decree modifies the ancient custom and restricts the discernment and selection of the one to be elected to the Cardinal Bishops. They are then to summon the other Cardinal Clergy, the rest of the clergy of the City and all the Faithful and ask for their consent.

No Elections in secret

The wisdom of this institution prevented the usurpation of the Church by foreigners, the election of men who were unknown to the local clergy, and or who did not enjoy an honest reputation among the faithful of the city. It also prevented simony — the offering of money for votes — to some extent, since you cannot bribe everyone, and without any obligation of proceeding in secret, the motivation for voting for this one or that, would certainly come out and quickly become known to all.

Respect for Tradition

Pope Nicholas shows his respect for the Apostolic right by quoted Pope Leo the Great, who explains the manner in which the election was conducted in his age, some five centuries before, when all the clergy has the right to vote, not just the Cardinals.

Preference for a Roman

To prevent foreign influence and contro and to guarantee not only the independence of the Church of Rome but that She have a pastor who saw himself as Her shepherd by innate ties and bonds, Pope Nicholas urges the election of a man born at Rome and Roman. This hearkens back to the Old Testament where God required that the people select one of their own kin to rule over them.

Flexibility in non essentials

Pope Nicholas II shows the sanity of the medieval mind, by allowing the election under special circumstances of necessity to be conducted outside the city. There was no fixed or prescribed place for the election, and this prevented it being controlled from beforehand, as well as from being prevented or impeded in its execution.

A Man is made pope by Election, not consecration or enthronement.

Here there is a principle which comes down from at least the time of Pope Gregory the Great, namely, that the man elected Pope, from that moment becomes the pope, even if he has not yet been consecrated a Bishop and even before he is enthroned in the Lateran Basilica (the Cathedral of Rome prior to the 14th century).

Grave Sanctions for those who transgress

Finally, Pope Nicholas II imposes the most grave and extreme sanctions upon those who transgress his Law on Elections: anathema, excommunication, reduction to the state in which he was prior to the election or usurpation. And this punishment is extended to all his promoters, supporters and followers.  A promoter is he who encouraged his candidacy, a supporter is he who voted for him, and a follower is he who joined his faction and vied that it prevail.

Just read n. 5 above, if you want to know how a usurper of the office of Pope should be treated for his crime. It makes you understand the moral gravity of the crime, a thing which a godless cleric has no understanding of.

Equity and Wisdom

In this Decree, one can see that Pope Nicholas II is trying to balance the different and disparate forces which were vying to control the election of the Roman Pontiff in his own age, and to place that election securely in the hands of those who could be more trusted to elect a man of God, without however, restricting the process so much as to prevent a man of God being elected. His emphasis that the holier members of the Church take a principle part in the election is a strong reminder to our own age of the folly of legislation which thinks that in the precise observance of minutiae one can guarantee holiness.  For this reason, Nicholas II promulgated a law which was to have a lasting effect on papal legislation for a thousand years. May God grant the clergy of Rome a similar wisdom and courage to execute their duties before God.

Criticism

Pope Nicholas II has gone to his reward, so I will allow myself to make one criticism of his papal law, and that is this: by restricting the right to vote to Bishops alone he imposed on the Roman Church the practice which prevailed in the provinces and in the Eastern Churches. This ended up helping the papacy, in one sense, to have men who had experience in government and fiscal management, but, on the other hand, tended to restrict candidates to the class of the landed gentry. It would end the habit of popular candidates, who sometimes, not always, in the past had been men who corrected the wrongs and injustice of the landed class and returned the Apostolic See to a more evangelical road.

What if, God forbid, Pope Benedict XVI dies while the Cardinal Electors remain fast with the Antipope?

I get a lot of questions from the Catholic Faithful who hold that Benedict is still the Pope because they simply follow the norm of Canon Law, unlike the precipitous and rash College of Cardinals who did not even implement canons 40 and 41 following the Declaratio of Pope Benedicct XVI on Feb. 11, 2013. For that reason, the Cardinals are in de facto schism from Christ and His Church, because they have violated canon 359 and Universi Dominici Gregis, n. 37, by electing another Pope when there was no legal sede vacante.

For that reason many of the faithful worry that the Petrine Succession might be abolished or lost, if when Benedict dies, the Cardinals do not convene in Conclave to elect his successor. This is because, the current papal law, published in an age in which there has not be an Anti-pope for nearly 500 years, does not address what is to happen if it should be that all the Cardinal Electors who are canonically valid (appointed by Popes John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI) omit convening in Conclave after Benedict’s death.

I explained the theological, legal and historical reasons why this presents no fundamental problem in my Disputed Question: Whether, with all the Cardinal Electors defecting...

In such a case, whatever Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops, Monsignori, Priests and Deacons, who are incardinated in the Diocese of Rome or at the Vatican, remain in communion with Benedict and assemble after his death, whomsoever they elect by a simply majority will be the Pope. In such an election the laity can also participate, since the Apostolic Right pertains to the whole Church. — If Arcibishop Vigano shows at such an assembly, he would probably be surely elected.

The Church desperately needs a popular candidate for the papacy, because, as in times prior to the law of Pope Nicholas II, In Nomine Domini, the Church is need of a dire correction in its pastoral objectives and needs a reformer who will return the Faith to Her rightful queenship of governance in the Church. Pope Benedict XVI by his evangelical prudence or by mistake, has providentially prepared, perhaps, the next papal election to proceed in just such a manner.

+ + +

[simple-payment id=”5295″]